Dipping back in after a couple of busy days at home.
This thread continues to be one of the sanest navigations available in this current point at which gender identity belief finds itself.
The backlash on paraphilias being normalised appears to be kicking in. Fingers crossed that this continues in the same way that PIE and paedophile sympathisers were eventually stopped. Unfortunately those sympathisers and enablers are still being weedled out. Most recently it was Peter Whilby. Perhaps another well known Peter will soon be seen for who he is on this subject in the public discourse.
As has been said many times before on several threads, there are many parallels with several scandals in history. To add in to the mix: the lobotomy scandal has been mentioned before. I got curious as to how long it lasted end to end, from when doctors were being hailed as heroes and pioneers until it fizzled out and got consigned to its rightful place for the mistreatment of those with mental health conditions. About 40 years was the answer. Treatment for gender dysphoria is more complex because it is firstly underpinned by a belief that "everyone has a gender identity" and then there is the mental health aspect of those who feel that their "gender" differs from their sex(ed body).
One interesting turning point in the demise of lobotomies as the go-to treatment was the re-examination of the known data that showed the following:
...when doctors investigated long-term outcomes for his patients they found that just one-third could be regarded as experiencing some improvement, while another third were significantly worse off.
Coincidentally, the recent re-examination in the Tavistock data on puberty blockers found exactly the same ratios. In both the case of lobotomies and physical interventions for gender dysphoria, it's very difficult to justify any treatment that has this outcome given the inevitable and irrevocable consequences of doing so (physical and mental impairment - plus sterility in the case of puberty blockers when administered from before puberty until the end of the natural period within which puberty would complete). In both cases, the risk/benefit balance just isn't there.
Here's the article from which the above quote is taken:
https://www.bbc.com/news/stories-55854145
Hopefully, the fact that paraphilias eventually do get recognised for what they are and we're at this stage of understanding may offer some green shoots of hope.. I just really hope that Genspect takes stock.
Also just to add: as a parent who has made use of Safe Schools Alliance information to challenge the PHSE materials in my daughters' school, I'm incredibly impressed with what they are doing. It's a rather lonely journey trying to help my gender-questioning daughter access good care and exercise her own critical thinking (and knowing that I can't trust education or mental healthcare regarding the bias towards gender identity belief) so it's important to have access to different agencies with different and complementary goals.