Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Court cases/Judicial Reviews/ET/ETAs

290 replies

ArabellaScott · 02/10/2023 12:07

A thread of court cases involving people with 'gender critical' beliefs. So they are all in one place. I'll try and add links to court judgements where I can find them.

I'll add cases as I have time but please feel free to add others and/or remind me of any I've missed!

  1. Maria McLachlan, Tara Wolf. Assault by beating/battery.

https://www.feministcurrent.com/2018/04/27/trans-identified-male-tara-wolf-charged-assault-hyde-park-attack/

'Tara Wolf (also known as Tara Flik Wood), a trans-identified male, stood trial for striking 60-year-old Maria MacLachlan three times in Hyde Park on September 13th 2017, where women had gathered to attend a meeting called “We Need to Talk About Gender” at a yet-to-be-disclosed location. Wolf was found guilty of “assault by beating,” more commonly known as “battery.”'

Trans-identified male, Tara Wolf, convicted of assault after Hyde Park attack

Jen Izaakson reports from the courtroom, as Tara Wolf is tried for assaulting Maria MacLachlan.

https://www.feministcurrent.com/2018/04/27/trans-identified-male-tara-wolf-charged-assault-hyde-park-attack

OP posts:
Thread gallery
89
ArabellaScott · 23/02/2025 08:57

https://www.artsprofessional.co.uk/news/breaking-news-ace-loses-second-gender-beliefs-tribunal-case

Arts Council England v Afreena Islam-Wright

ACE lose against employee who claimed constructive dismissal for her support for 'trans rights'.

Judgement:

www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions/mrs-a-islam-wright-v-arts-council-england-and-c-ashcroft-2408555-slash-2022

OP posts:
Hairyesterdaygonetoday · 23/02/2025 08:47

Thanks for setting up this thread, Arabella. A very valuable and necessary resource. And, increasingly, a source of comfort and encouragement as the genderist bullies lose case after case.

Signalbox · 22/02/2025 20:10

Almut Gadow has received a payout after reaching a settlement with the Open University.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/02/22/law-lecturer-sacked-gender-critical-beliefs-payout/

Archive…

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/02/22/law-lecturer-sacked-gender-critical-beliefs-payout/

Ereshkigalangcleg · 12/02/2025 13:39

Oh wow, that's excellent. I have followed that case from the start. She's really been put through the wringer and it could have happened to any of us as it was about her Facebook reposts.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 11/01/2025 20:54

Brilliant! Well done Eleanor Flowers

Signalbox · 11/01/2025 20:38

Eleanor Frances v DCMS and DSIT (departments of the Civil Service)

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1878164412139184162.html

“My lawyers quantified the value of my claim as £116,749. In settlement, DCMS and DSIT have agreed to pay this amount in full, plus the associated taxes.”

[…]

“DCMS and DSIT have jointly agreed to issue the following statement, signed by their respective Permanent Secretaries, Susannah Storey CB and Sarah Munby:

“We are committed to fostering a tolerant and respectful working culture. As such, our departments are working together to introduce a revised Gender Reassignment policy, informed by a new central model policy which we anticipate will be available by the end of the year. In accordance with the Equality Act 2010, the revised policy will balance the rights of staff with different protected characteristics, including but not limited to gender reassignment, religion and belief, and sex. It will also build on the work both our departments have been doing in consultation with our staff in recent years.”

Thread by @Eleanor_Frances on Thread Reader App

@Eleanor_Frances: I am delighted to have reached settlement in my Employment Tribunal case for discrimination and victimisation in connection with Civil Service EDI initiatives. DCMS and DSIT have agreed to pay £116...…

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1878164412139184162.html

Signalbox · 10/01/2025 08:33

An employment tribunal in Edinburgh has rejected a plea by Fife Health Board and a trans-identifying doctor for an employment tribunal case to be heard in private, and for the doctor’s identity to be anonymised.

https://sex-matters.org/posts/updates/edinburgh-employment-tribunal-says-no-to-trans-anonymity-order/

Ereshkigalangcleg · 08/01/2025 20:18

Is there a judgment posted? Didn't see a link in the BBC article. But maybe that will be after costs have been agreed.

Signalbox · 22/12/2024 17:16

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvg748nj42lo.amp

December 2024

A mother who is trying to stop her teenager being given cross-sex hormones to change their gender has won her fight to keep the courts involved in the case.

The Court of Appeal has ruled it is "appropriate" for it to "keep an eye" on the case at a time of rapid change in gender services and regulation.

It said the 16-year-old has the capacity and competence to consent to taking hormones which develop male physical characteristics. But it added that in future, the court may need to decide whether or not that is in their best interests.

[…]

Today's judgement said with agreement between the parents in the case unlikely, it would be wiser to keep the proceedings alive as "there is sufficient current doubt as to what is proper and appropriate in this area".

It concluded that the judge in the earlier case "did not place enough weight on the possibility of genuine future disagreement, the rapidly changing regulatory environment and the fact that services provided by private hormone clinics seem already to be in a somewhat different position from the same services provided by the NHS".

The Royal Courts of Justice which include the Court of Appeal in London

Courts to remain involved in young person gender case - BBC News

A mother trying to stop her teen being given cross-sex hormones wins fight to keep courts involved.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvg748nj42lo.amp

OP posts:
BoreOfWhabylon · 13/12/2024 14:11

Placemarking this very excellent thread. Thank you @ArabellaScott and all contributors.

Signalbox · 12/12/2024 08:32

Deeming v Pesutto

December 2024

A defiant John Pesutto says he won’t resign as Victoria’s opposition leader after a damning court judgment found he defamed ousted Liberal MP Moira Deeming and will need to pay her $300,000 in damages.

Federal court justice David O’Callaghan on Thursday found Pesutto defamed Deeming on five separate occasions after the Let Women Speak rally she helped organise on 18 March 2023, which was gatecrashed by neo-Nazis.

https://amp.theguardian.com/australia-news/2024/dec/12/moira-deeming-wins-defamation-case-victorian-liberal-leader-john-pesutto-over-neo-nazi-comments-ntwnfb

Judgment…

https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2024/2024fca1430

John Pesutto defies calls to resign after being ordered to pay $300,000 for defaming Moira Deeming | Victorian politics | The Guardian

Court finds Victorian Liberal leader defamed then party-room colleague when referring to rally gatecrashed by far right

https://amp.theguardian.com/australia-news/2024/dec/12/moira-deeming-wins-defamation-case-victorian-liberal-leader-john-pesutto-over-neo-nazi-comments-ntwnfb

Signalbox · 21/09/2024 16:02

Plaid Cymru Admit Unlawfully Discriminating Against FiLiA

“In February of this year, grassroots feminist charity FiLiA signed a contract with Plaid Cymru to have a stand at their March Spring Conference. However, this was cancelled by the Party with less than a week to go.

“Plaid Cymru representative Elin Jones, chair of Plaid Cymru’s steering committee for its Spring Conference, emailed the organisation on 19th March 2024 – less than 48 hours before the conference was due to start – to cancel the booking, it was stated that this was due to the following: ''some of FiLiA’s positions are potentially contrary to the party’s values – for instance on trans rights'' and indicating that the presence of the stall would prevent the conference from being a ‘safe space’.

“This week, after previously accepting the cancellation amounted to a breach of the contract with FiLiA and offering partial compensation for FiLiA’s costs, Plaid Cymru have accepted that the decision to cancel this booking on the basis of FiLiA’s protected beliefs amounted to an act of discrimination under the Equality Act 2010.”

https://www.filia.org.uk/latest-news/2024/9/20/plaid-cymru-admit-unlawfully-discriminating-against-filianbsp

Plaid Cymru Admit Unlawfully Discriminating Against FiLiA  — FiLiA

Naomi Cunningham, Barrister, Outer Temple Chambers said: ‘Plaid Cymru’s tight-lipped and grudging concession implies that it thinks “the law as it stands” is unsatisfactory, and it is hoping for a change of law that will enable it to discriminate on g...

https://www.filia.org.uk/latest-news/2024/9/20/plaid-cymru-admit-unlawfully-discriminating-against-filianbsp

SinnerBoy · 17/09/2024 06:27

80% is a phenomenal rate of success!

ArabellaScott · 16/09/2024 22:37

Jo Phoenix has published a report on 'gc' tribunals which she says have an 80% success rate

https://jophoenix.substack.com/p/dont-get-caught-out

Don't Get Caught Out:

A summary of Gender Critical Belief Discrimination Employment Tribunal Judgments

https://jophoenix.substack.com/p/dont-get-caught-out

OP posts:
SinnerBoy · 16/09/2024 21:31

Well, I'm really glad to hear that she's won her case and in style.

One thing which intrigues me is that, after these ridiculous cases, where women are harassed and bullied out of their jobs, that the risible idiots who did the bullying and whining never seem to face sanction. Nor, for that matter, do the bosses, who supported them, or at least winked at it.

Surely bringing a spurious complaint, resulting in an expensive, impossible to win suit at law should result in a disciplinary procedure, for wasting public money, if nothing else?

Ereshkigalangcleg · 16/09/2024 21:09

They turned up and said they weren't contesting it, I think. Like the Natalie Bird v Lib Dems hearing.

ArabellaScott · 16/09/2024 19:49

I guess it was a hearing to establish what damages and costs were to be awarded?

OP posts:
Feministwoman · 16/09/2024 19:45

I'm puzzled.

If (as was reported in always excellent The Critic) Cambridgeshire County Council pulled out at the last minute (just before before the ET started) and agreed to damages etc, why has the ET now ruled that Liz Pitt should get damages and costs awarded?

I thought a settlement in advance of a hearing starting halts proceedings, yet The Times article I posted is reporting there was a ruling by the Judge and an ET sanctioned award?

https://thecritic.co.uk/the-curious-incident-of-the-dog-and-the-tribunal/

The curious incident of the dog and the tribunal | Josephine Bartosch | The Critic Magazine

On the morning of Monday, 29th July, lawyers were preparing to question witnesses for Cambridge County Council (CCC) about the harm caused by the misgendering of a dachshund during a workplace meeting.

https://thecritic.co.uk/the-curious-incident-of-the-dog-and-the-tribunal

ArabellaScott · 16/09/2024 17:46

Thank you!

Lizzie Pitt v Cambridgeshire County Council

'Local authority bosses must pay a lesbian social worker more than £63,000 after she was disciplined for having “nasty opinions” about a colleague’s “gender-fluid” dog.

Elizabeth Pitt was reported to managers at Cambridgeshire county council for making allegedly transphobic remarks during a video meeting with the council’s “LGBTQIA+ group” last year.

An employment tribunal heard that Pitt made the comments after a colleague said he identified his dachshund dog as “gender-fluid” and that he had put a dress on the pet to prompt debate. Pitt and another lesbian colleague were reported for commenting on the revelation in a “really aggressive tone”, in which they voiced views that were deemed to be “non-inclusive and transphobic”.

Council bosses banned Pitt from contacting members of the group or attending their meetings. In response, the social worker sued the local authority for discrimination and harassment over her so-called gender critical views.
The tribunal backed Pitt’s claim and awarded the social worker more than £55,000 in damages and £8,000 costs. The judge also recommended that the council change its staff training to include a section on “freedom of belief and speech in the workplace”.

...

In his ruling, the judge, Paul Michell, said the tribunal agreed with Pitt’s lawyer that the evidence “unambiguously” showed that “at least part of the reason” for the council’s conduct towards her was her “gender-critical beliefs”. Pitt was awarded nearly £30,000 in loss of earnings and £22,000 compensation for injury to feelings, with interest added.

Michell recommended that council bosses include a section on freedom of belief and speech in the workplace in its mandatory training for staff within the next six months.'

OP posts:
Dumbledoreslemonsherbets · 16/09/2024 17:14

SinnerBoy · 13/09/2024 21:47

Good for Ali, but it's yet another case where the offender has tried to win, by outspending the plaintiff. I wish it were punishable by making such offenders pay all costs, as well as compensation.

Agree - this is a major injustice within the 'justice' system. We're seeing the cases where the individual has won due to crowdfunding and publicity but I bet most of the time the massive organisation does, the cases that don't get the publicity.

Any analysis of that would be really interesting, actually. % of cases won where an individual goes up against a large institution.

nauticant · 13/09/2024 22:42

Assuming the information in the link is correct, if Shahrar Ali got 60% costs in an ET case that's a fantastically good result.