Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Cancel Culture and The Chilling Effect - a thread to share your experiences

219 replies

ArabeIIaScott · 01/06/2023 10:22

Does the 'chilling effect' or 'cancel culture' affect you?

This is an anonymous forum, so we can speak relatively openly. But how do we speak in real life?

Are you comfortable to talk about gender/sex openly?
Would you raise it at work?
Would you/do you raise it with your child's school?
At home?
On social media?

Are women able to speak about these issues?
Have you done so and experienced consequences?

I think the effects of these issues have far reaching consequences that we really have hardly seen reported or looked at so far. How's it affecting society, women in society, relations between groups?

Thanks.

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
AliasGrace47 · 02/09/2025 17:17

Sorry- zombie thread!

AliasGrace47 · 02/09/2025 17:17

DemiColon · 04/06/2023 00:02

I find the intense focus on the rainbow groups to be so, so weird - while clearly that's been a fairly recent public debate over various civil rights type questions, demographically gays and lesbians- but particularly gay men - are pretty well off materially. Typically with good incomes, university educated, and without much in the way of inherent barriers to living a productive, solvent life in the way someone who gets pregnant, or is deaf, might.

But more and more it seems like it represents the epitomy of all diversity initiatives.

Part of me things it's precisely because there aren't any really difficult problems of integration involved, you don't have to figure out what is fair in terms of employment questions, or give social benefits, or accept that some ethnic groups are more religious in ways that are no longer typical in the west, or maybe have issues with the local language etc.

People can feel virtuous about hiring/befriending people that are a lot like themselves.

Plenty of lesbians DO get pregnant. But I get what you mean...think tho, as you say, overall this description better fits gay men..

There is the so-called lesbian wage premium, where they tend to work longer hours (as less likely to have kids, and may take longer to find a partner due to small dating pool) and are more likely to go into higher paying male-dominated fields like STEM..

But at the same time, this is not the full picture. They earn more than straight women but still less on average than men, and are also according to some studies, more likely to earn less and be high school dropouts (though these studies I think tended more US than UK, where esp in rural areas there could still be issues with family/school)

ArabeIIaScott · 17/06/2023 19:43

I can't give the crossword solution for fear of a heresy deletion, but here's another definition:

'a small religious group that has beliefs regarded by many people as extreme or dangerous'

OP posts:
howdoesatoastermaketoast · 17/06/2023 19:00

@ArabeIIaScott Sometimes, ideas that appear to be hugely popular are secretly opposed by most of the population.'

Things like Bud light would give some credence to the notion that gender ideology support may be wide but actually quite shallow.

dunBle · 14/06/2023 23:57

MissLucyEyelesbarrow · 14/06/2023 21:49

Honestly, you don't have to be clever - it's a learnt skill. Once you can recognise the type of clue, you can do them. I taught myself to do it, but now I've forgotten again!

I'm not great at them - I'm still scratching my head over @ArabeIIaScott's one - but always found the Telegraph one reasonably doable, as it had a fairly consistent syntax. Anagrams were usually signified by synonyms of confused or muddled eg "FWR poster makes a disorganised bundle (6)", initially meant you had to use the first letter of each of a group of words to find the answer, and hidden/within either meant you could find the answer stretched across a couple of adjacent words in the wording of the clue, or if that didn't help it meant you had to put the answer to one bit of the clue inside the answer to the other bit. I find the Private Eye one nigh on impossible though.

Lamelie · 14/06/2023 22:47

ScrollingLeaves · 14/06/2023 22:41

dunBle · Today 20:44

Lamelie · Today 10:01

^OldCrone Maybe not here least this thread goes too, can’t work out this:
“Just before it went I'd used the 'f' word about males who identify as trans”^

To go full cryptic crossword, "The extra-terrestrial hides amongst sea-life (6)?

I can’t do crosswords but given the context Is extra terrestrial “ET” and the sea-life “Fish”?

It is!

ScrollingLeaves · 14/06/2023 22:41

dunBle · Today 20:44

Lamelie · Today 10:01

^OldCrone Maybe not here least this thread goes too, can’t work out this:
“Just before it went I'd used the 'f' word about males who identify as trans”^

To go full cryptic crossword, "The extra-terrestrial hides amongst sea-life (6)?

I can’t do crosswords but given the context Is extra terrestrial “ET” and the sea-life “Fish”?

ArabeIIaScott · 14/06/2023 21:57

To be fair, I'm not clever enough to write them.

OP posts:
MissLucyEyelesbarrow · 14/06/2023 21:49

Waitwhat23 · 14/06/2023 21:44

I'm not clever enough for cryptic crosswords - my brain just doesn't work that way. I don't get either of those clues. At all!

Honestly, you don't have to be clever - it's a learnt skill. Once you can recognise the type of clue, you can do them. I taught myself to do it, but now I've forgotten again!

Waitwhat23 · 14/06/2023 21:44

I'm not clever enough for cryptic crosswords - my brain just doesn't work that way. I don't get either of those clues. At all!

ArabeIIaScott · 14/06/2023 20:54

dunBle · 14/06/2023 20:44

To go full cryptic crossword, "The extra-terrestrial hides amongst sea-life (6)?

😁

We should definitely communicate more in crossword clues.

'You are missing from the arts' (4)

OP posts:
dunBle · 14/06/2023 20:44

Lamelie · 14/06/2023 10:01

@OldCrone Maybe not here least this thread goes too, can’t work out this:
“Just before it went I'd used the 'f' word about males who identify as trans”

To go full cryptic crossword, "The extra-terrestrial hides amongst sea-life (6)?

OldCrone · 14/06/2023 10:15

Lamelie · 14/06/2023 10:01

@OldCrone Maybe not here least this thread goes too, can’t work out this:
“Just before it went I'd used the 'f' word about males who identify as trans”

I've sent you a PM.

I should have said I used this word about some men who identify as trans.

NotHavingIt · 14/06/2023 10:13

OldCrone · 14/06/2023 09:59

Just before it went I'd used the 'f' word about males who identify as trans. I thought my post might go as there are people who don't like us drawing attention to that aspect, but not the whole thread. Some people objected to the title, which seemed like poor phrasing rather than being deliberately offensive.

Yes, it was poorly phrased rather than intentionally offensive.

Lamelie · 14/06/2023 10:01

@OldCrone Maybe not here least this thread goes too, can’t work out this:
“Just before it went I'd used the 'f' word about males who identify as trans”

OldCrone · 14/06/2023 09:59

NotHavingIt · 14/06/2023 09:47

Just noticed a relatively new thread has been removed by mumsnet - " because it infringes the talk guidelines".

There was no abuse, no swearing, just an involved discussion involving elements of .disagreement.

Here, in action.

Just before it went I'd used the 'f' word about males who identify as trans. I thought my post might go as there are people who don't like us drawing attention to that aspect, but not the whole thread. Some people objected to the title, which seemed like poor phrasing rather than being deliberately offensive.

BernardBlacksMolluscs · 14/06/2023 09:58

Yes, I was coming to this thread to post the same

an interesting thread starting from a valid hypothesis (there are increasing numbers of people who identify as trans because until recently they have been closeted in the same way as homosexuals) deleted for no good reason I could see

people just scream ‘homophobic’, ‘transphobic’ at anything they remotely disagree with in an effort to stop the bad words

if you disagree with something, explain why. That’s fair more likely to kill bad ideas than refusing to even engage with them

Lamelie · 14/06/2023 09:56

Are you comfortable to talk about gender/sex openly? Out of work and face to face with friends yes. My oldest friends are 100% on the same page- nhs and education. Other slightly younger friends are either uninterested or useful idiots.
Would you raise it at work? Absolutely 100% not. Conspicuously no pronouns on my emails though and I’ve been eased out of the sex specific service I worked in for ten years so I suspect they know and are avoiding conflict.
Would you/do you raise it with your child's school? I would have I think yes. Had a good profile and status re race and equality so I think I’d have been brave.
At home? DDs think I’m a nasty old bigot but I’ve shut down any slurs. Happy to discuss but 100% intolerant of passing comments. Either discuss properly or stfu. DS and DH know and agree. Parents are useful idiots/ be kind and uninterested. My older relative died- was very supportive about values and prejudice, one of the many reasons I miss him so much.
On social media? Not Facebook which is friends and the aforementioned useful idiots. Although if they looked they’d see Rosie,
Julie and lots of other gc friends. Twitter yes- bravely with my photo.

NotHavingIt · 14/06/2023 09:47

Just noticed a relatively new thread has been removed by mumsnet - " because it infringes the talk guidelines".

There was no abuse, no swearing, just an involved discussion involving elements of .disagreement.

Here, in action.

NotHavingIt · 14/06/2023 09:45

I'm reading an interesting book at the moment by Frank Furedi - " Borders: Why Humanity Needs To Re-Learn The Art of Drawing Boundaries'

In it he discusses the modern cultural embrace of openness and non judgmentalism as inherent virtues, and the denigration of boundaries, discrimination and differentiation.

But as old boundaries are being wilfully eroded, newer boundaries are being erected around what is permissible or not permissable to say, or even to think.
He argues that a culture of surveillance necessarily follows such shifts - as the boundaries of acceptability have to be policed in order to maintain them.

It occurs to me that the more traditional boundaries have evolved to differentiate between one society and another, between male and female, and between children and adults, as just a few examples; whereas the new boundaries are being very tightly erected around individual identity and the identity of the new groupings ( which are now race and gender ( rather than sex).

The new crimes are thought crimes and crimes of speech. Scary territory.

cheshirecatssmile · 14/06/2023 09:14

Are you comfortable to talk about gender/sex openly?
Very much so

Would you raise it at work?
Have done, nhs I'm an their nemesis

Would you/do you raise it with your child's school?
Thankfully kids have left school but I keep an eye on what my grandkids are being taught .

At home? All the time and my partner and wider family and friends agree with me.

On social media? All the time on Twitter.

The nhs has fallen. I'm brave for saying im GC
I will protect my dementia patients.
New guidance off nhs confederation to my last count is at odds with 17 points of the nmc code.
It's against nhs values
It's against the 6cs

I've told my trust that , completely taken over and infiltrated by the rainbow mafia

DrBlackbird · 14/06/2023 08:49

Ask Kathleen Stock.... supposedly cancelled and seems to be on every media outlet.
**
So no, don't see there being any chilling effect.

Apart from how Prof Stock was forced to resign and have people screaming whenever invited to speak, I think you missed the point about how @ArabeIIaScott was using this thread to ask us, you know, regular women leading regular lives working in all kinds of industries, about our experiences of a chilling effect. You seem very determined to ignore our comments.

ArabeIIaScott · 13/06/2023 17:21

This interesting article on 'gender Ketman' seems very relevant:

'The practice of Ketman contributes to the ongoing spiral of silence. Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann, who developed the <a class="break-all" href="https://www.google.com/url?q=www.britannica.com/topic/spiral-of-silence&sa=D&source=editors&ust=1686273454346363&usg=AOvVaw0sEFGQ9tIMD92X1Ako3UWB" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">spiral of silence theory, suggested that people’s willingness to express their true opinions about controversial moral issues is linked to perceptions about the popularity or otherwise of the opinions. If an idea is perceived as unpopular, the person will often keep it silent to protect themselves from the risk of social isolation. Sometimes, ideas that appear to be hugely popular are secretly opposed by most of the population.'

https://thecritic.co.uk/gender-ketman/

Gender ketman | Colette Colfer | The Critic Magazine

Masking doubts to avoid dissent…

https://thecritic.co.uk/gender-ketman

OP posts:
howdoesatoastermaketoast · 12/06/2023 18:10

For me cancel culture is in part the things you don't say, you write out an e-mail or post or tweet and then just cancel without saying it.

Like this - this is the thing I didn't say today

yeah I always want to ask at what age do you think kids are mature enough to:-

get tattoos
get drunk
have sex
get married
decide that they will never be happy in their body and know for sure that sex, orgasms and reproduction aren't important to them now or in the future.

ArabeIIaScott · 12/06/2023 16:39

potniatheron · 12/06/2023 15:52

This is such a classic Cluster B personality disordered type of thing to think.

This is because people with Cluser B personality disorders and/or tenuous grips on social function, tend to assume that all attention is good attention, and that everyone desires attention.

I appreciate it might be difficult for you to understand this @MishyJDI so please take my word for it when I say that non-Cluster B folks don't view all attention as good attention. If Kathleen Stock is getting loads of attention, but 70% of that is men in dresses screaming at her and sending death threats, and her colleagues and bosses force her to leave her job, then that IS cancellation. Even though she's still getting lots of attention.

Also, one woman speaks up on behalf of how many thousands who are unable to?

The 'chilling effect' I'm talking about here is not just about Stock losing her job for speaking up; it's about the thousands of women who can't speak up for fear of the same thing happening to them.

OP posts:
Swipe left for the next trending thread