80 year old woman banned from pool for standing up for little girls

No, it wasn't reddux. Try again

🙄
Meanwhile other normal people will be looking out for creepy behaviour - but if you’re obsessed with genitals you do you

So we are the only species that after millions of years of evolution can't recognise the opposite sex, the single most important thing to ensuring the propagation of the species?
Anyway, many links to academic studies have been provided to you, so perhaps you could go away read them and try not to come across as such a rude clueless buffoon.

Would you like to provide a source that female people are not likely to be able to correctly identity the sex of a male person with observation and interaction?

Otherwise, shall we repeat your sneering sentence?

"Do you have a source for that? You don't because you've just pulled it out of your arse".

Plus name another mammalian species that cannot accurately discern which members of its own species it needs to mate with to reproduce.

Like Boiledbeetle my eyesight is waning and when I'm down the seafront, walking my dog, I can almost always tell which neutrally dressed stick figure in the distance is male and which is female.

Yep. Woman with short hair, here, who never wears make up, always wear trousers.

Any woman who is unsure of my sex is free to ask if I'm a woman. It wouldn't bother me in the slightest.

As I've said before; it's the male skull and jawbone, the height, limb length, hand and feet size, gait, lack of hips, adams apple, philtrum width, etc etc etc. Males and females are SO incredibly physically different (anyone who isn't blind knows this) and the tells are so numerous, but skeletal structure really tells most of the story.

Presumably, Chris and Bobbby will now post:

Man left, woman right...

.

I really do think these men posting that women after millennia of civilisation don't know men from women have clearly lived in a very sheltered world away from civilisation. Womens lives literally depend on accurately sexing danger. I mean, this is not fucking rocket science! 🙄 It's base level common sense!

ABOUT Q ANGLES

If you believe in fair competition, Emily Bridges should not be racing Laura Kenny

Owen Slot, The Times, 29th March 2022

https://archive.is/u4oSa

^www.thetimes.co.uk/article/3081c8c0-af7c-11ec-8b8c-0207c0fd6104?shareToken=dfc4c5b36b407a8e0ccc2133e718b121^

"Biomechanically, though, she still retains distinct advantages. The athletes she will be competing against have naturally wider hips. For the purposes of powering a bicycle, the crucial element here is that they will have a wider angle between the hips and the knees — this means their quads do not work so efficiently in transferring power."

Crucially, it is these angles that are quite important in understanding who is a male person and who is a female person when looking at gait, stance and other movement. All without judging a person's body based on whether they are 'woman' enough.

You seem very surprised at the basic common knowledge fact that for our safety and survival, women need to detect danger ie the predatorial sex. You clearly don't have logic or critical thinking or common knowledge.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6396056/#:~:text=Adults%20and%20children%20can%20rapidly,et%20al.%2C%202002

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/p220131

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/8460447_Sex_differences_in_face_gender_recognition_in_humans

https://stanmed.stanford.edu/brains-hard-wired-recognize-opposite-sex/

https://www.theknownheretic.com/p/instinct-sos-sex-recognition

For anyone interested, Amy E Sousa has done some videos on the recognition of sex category in humans.

https://www.theknownheretic.com/p/instinct-sos-sex-recognition

Amy Sousa is a Depth Psychology specialist. Meaning she has studied and she teaches about human instinctive behaviour.

I recommend any person who doesn’t believe that humans are likely to correctly identify the sex of other humans particularly female people recognising male people, might like to watch this.

Here is a study done on faces

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004269892200133X

Our results indicate that facial structures with full information on the texture and color of the skin are correctly classified as to their sex by most of the participants (98.4 % for Exp. 1 and 94.6 % for Exp. 2). If we do not consider versions 3 and 5 (close to the androgyne version 4), which contain a certain degree of sex ambiguity and only consider the less ambiguous versions (1 and 2 for male faces, and 6 and 7 for female faces), the accuracy approaches the ceiling (99.9 % for Exp.1, and 99.1 % for Exp.2). This is in line with previous research which observed that natural faces, devoid of any cultural signs of sex, are generally correctly categorized into their sex

I would think that results over 90% indicate a correct assumption that most of the population can accurately identify the sex of humans from faces. However, note the difference between people correctly identifying male versions of faces vs female.

The study mentions other papers as well.

I have a link stashed away that show that babies can recognise male and female faces too.

I am really not sure when people started to believe that their inability to tell the difference between male and female people through observation and hearing voices was the norm. The research says otherwise.

Any source for this other than reddux?

Do you have a source for that? You don't because you've just pulled it out of your arse.

Great news! Well done Julie Jamon, and thank you Helleofabore for posting.

Wh6 are you obsessed with other people's genitals?

Males without a penis are not allowed in female spaces either.

By voice he was a man and it emerges that he has recently come out as trans - since trans doesn't exist that means he is a man (and transwoman = man, it's says it on the T-shirt) . What was he doing watching little girls get changed? I am a woman and I wouldn't do that!
Fwiw - and I hope I am never in such a situation - I'd have asked why he was watching the little girls and reported that a transwoman was doing this - subverting the YMCA's nasty protocols for them.
The US is so captured by this utter nonsense.

Quick service announcement to other women - you're absolutely welcome to question at any time what sex I am, as a lesbian I am fine with that and happy to reassure you in the aim of women's legal protections and equalities, and keeping the men the fuck out. Ask away.

You only had to wait 33 minutes for the facile wittering to appear in favour of men helicoptering their dicks at women and women shutting up and taking it like good girls. Now that's what I call service.

@Boiledbeetle I did similar last week. Sat in the bike park cafe after a spot of mountain biking and watched riders ride away from me on the circuit and then circle back towards me. So from behind, looking at people doing an identical activity and dressed in the usual unisex bikers' clothing I 'guessed' their sex and then checked as they circled back and I could see their faces. I correctly sexed them every time.
Bit of an odd way to pass the time, I admit, but I thought it was worth testing out the 'you can't always tell' theory while I supped my flat white.

Unlikely, more probable that they'd be the ones doing the staring.

If I'm out and about sometimes I'll sit for a while in town just people watching.

My eyesight is crap these days, definitely need to make an opticians appointment, but even so I'll watch people way way off in the distance and think that's a woman, that's a man. And once they are close enough to come into focus I'm always correct.

I watched two people the other week, same height both seemed to be wearing same coloured trousers and a similar coat, both short hair etc. I'd guessed woman in the left, man on the right.

When they got close enough presentation wise there was nothing to tell them apart, they were both wearing completely identical clothes, same trainers, same jeans, same coat. Same haircut, same 5ft 6" height and build. And they were very obviously a woman on the left and a man on the right. (And as an aside I'd bet good money they'd been married 40+ years to each other!)

I don't understand why some people try to claim humans can't correctly sex other humans.

And I'm sure there will be people who will still try the "but you don't know you were correct" .

At which point all I've got in response these days is a heavy sigh, a shake of my head and to look at them in a way that conveys "you really are quite a stupid individual aren't you?" .