Active discussions

Please or to access all these features

Talk
Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Feminism: chat

Original poster

Amy Hamm - Canadian Nurse being disciplined for being GC

913 replies

IcakethereforeIam · 05/07/2022 12:57

I've not seen a thread on Amy on MN and the search didn't show up anything. She seems to be being put through the wringer by tras and by her nursing college.

I thought if she saw this thread it might be cheering Flowers, she's on twitter. I found her thanks to Bette.

quillette.com/2022/04/08/im-being-investigated-by-the-british-columbia-college-of-nurses-because-i-believe-biological-sex-is-real/

OP posts:
Thread gallery
37
chilling19 · 18/03/2024 22:04

Do you think that by the time I have fed the cat she will be gone?

ILikeDungs · 18/03/2024 22:02

Ha! Erases transpeople by saying "of course they exist". You numpty

Signalbox · 18/03/2024 22:01

bf: the evidence is that TW are the most oppressed women.

ILikeDungs · 18/03/2024 21:56

Got wine. I'm good.

I'm pretty sure I didn't miss anything

FlabMonsterIsDietingAgain · 18/03/2024 21:55

Everything is a fucking "derogation of trans people"

Breathing - yep that's a derogation
Turning left - whoa now, stop that derogating
Write happy birthday on a card - hey! How dare you, your derogating trans people by suggesting your birthday should be happier than non trans people because it was written to a non trans person.

nauticant · 18/03/2024 21:54

It's interesting to notice how often bf presents criticism of "trans activists" or "trans activism" has to be a criticism of trans people. That's a massive weakness.

But then this isn't a tribunal in the UK, it's in Canada and the question is how much barking madness will the panel feel obliged to support?

fallfallfall · 18/03/2024 21:53

i wonder if any of the panel members regrets the colleges choice of bf due to her tone of voice/manner of speech and presentation?

ILikeDungs · 18/03/2024 21:50

Please stop, BF. She just keeps on going.

Clearly, I need wine. Excuse me

Signalbox · 18/03/2024 21:45

FlabMonsterIsDietingAgain · 18/03/2024 21:43

Am I alone in being pretty much incapable of following what she is saying. It's all just monotone babble at this point, she could be reading the dictionary as far as my brain is concerned, I have completely tuned her out and the words no longer mean anything.

She's very hard to follow. It's like she's making it up as she goes along.
It doesn't help that she speaking in gender ideological language the whole time.

nauticant · 18/03/2024 21:45

bf has shifted more into a hectoring mode rather than seeking to be persuasive.

FlabMonsterIsDietingAgain · 18/03/2024 21:43

Am I alone in being pretty much incapable of following what she is saying. It's all just monotone babble at this point, she could be reading the dictionary as far as my brain is concerned, I have completely tuned her out and the words no longer mean anything.

ILikeDungs · 18/03/2024 21:42

Women are not entitled to feel safe in Canada.

nauticant · 18/03/2024 21:41

Oh, thanks for the correction. Shame it wasn't a panel member!

Ereshkigalangcleg · 18/03/2024 21:41

I've turned the video screen off as I can't bear to see bf's blue haired gormlessness.

Signalbox · 18/03/2024 21:40

nauticant · 18/03/2024 21:39

A panel member rebuking bf:

"At least be accurate when you go through what you say in the tweets."

I think that was Lisa Bildy, Amy's counsel.

Signalbox · 18/03/2024 21:40

The look on Lisa Bildy's face is a real treat.

nauticant · 18/03/2024 21:39

A panel member rebuking bf:

"At least be accurate when you go through what you say in the tweets."

ILikeDungs · 18/03/2024 21:38

I can't tell if BF is enjoying doing this (going through the tweets/retweets, or (as I see her) struggling to make her point and out of her depth

Signalbox · 18/03/2024 21:32

ILikeDungs · 18/03/2024 21:24

Ok I am biased, but could the panel be convinced by BF because of the climate around trans stuff in Canada? To me she is just floundering and full of nothing, and knows it

This is the worry. Canada seem to have completely lost their way on this issue. Even here we had Rachel Meade treated like shit by her regulator and employer. But by the time she took it to tribunal she could rely on Forstater to assist her. But there is no Forstater in Canada so she's really on the back foot I think.

ILikeDungs · 18/03/2024 21:31

FlabMonsterIsDietingAgain · 18/03/2024 21:24

I wish someone would step in and just say, ok then, ta, you've given us enough to understand your position.

It's clear she's a moron, and this is just dull to listen to now

"You have delighted us long enough."

nauticant · 18/03/2024 21:29

AH lost connection. Someone on the panel pleaded for a break but were told "no", they all had to soldier on until everyone lost the will to live.

FlabMonsterIsDietingAgain · 18/03/2024 21:24

I wish someone would step in and just say, ok then, ta, you've given us enough to understand your position.

It's clear she's a moron, and this is just dull to listen to now

ILikeDungs · 18/03/2024 21:24

Ok I am biased, but could the panel be convinced by BF because of the climate around trans stuff in Canada? To me she is just floundering and full of nothing, and knows it

Ereshkigalangcleg · 18/03/2024 21:23

She doesn't understand what Munchasens by Proxy is.

Signalbox · 18/03/2024 21:19

chilling19 · 18/03/2024 21:18

Also, 'a woman from Britain' - how about the most famous writer in the world who wrote Harry Potter and stands up for women's rights.

Exactly. That was completely bizarre!