Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

We Hunted The Mammoth: How a good feminist site got corrupted

34 replies

NotTerfNorCis · 24/02/2020 23:33

A few years ago, We Hunted the Mammoth was a great resource against MRAs. Its founder, David Futrelle, was fearless in 'exposing the new online misogyny' - the world of men's rights activists, incels, MGTOWs (men going their own way) and PUAs (pick-up artists). Personally I'd go there several times a day for info and support.

Sure, the MRAs claimed Futrelle was a misogynist, and I did wonder if he wallowed too much in the filth he uncovered, but I liked the guy. He took a lot of flack for his beliefs.

Fast forward three and a half years. The site is now rancid. MRAs are yesterday's news - there's nothing much to say about them, beyond 'exposing' incels who sound like unhappy kids. The new target is gender critical feminists. I've just spent all day there before being banned. It's insane. A weird, twisted cult.

Did anyone else ever use We Hunted the Mammoth? What do you think of it now? Am I overreacting? Or was Futrelle always a bit dubious?

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
TheJoyOfWriting · 15/09/2025 01:48

Heggettypeg · 15/09/2025 01:41

Of course they should. And they should be able to do it without people suggesting that their taste in clothes ( or hairstyles, or toys, or hobbies) means that they must "really" be a boy and can only be happy if they mess their body up in pursuit of trying to be one physically.

Sexist: "women can't fly to the moon and womanly women don't want to"
Genderist: "if you want to fly to the moon you must really be a man"
Sex realist feminist: "of course you can fly to the moon (but don't forget to pack some tampons)"

This, great post!

Heggettypeg · 15/09/2025 01:41

TheJoyOfWriting · 15/09/2025 01:04

Don't you think girls shoyld be able to wear practical clothes like trousers tho?

Of course they should. And they should be able to do it without people suggesting that their taste in clothes ( or hairstyles, or toys, or hobbies) means that they must "really" be a boy and can only be happy if they mess their body up in pursuit of trying to be one physically.

Sexist: "women can't fly to the moon and womanly women don't want to"
Genderist: "if you want to fly to the moon you must really be a man"
Sex realist feminist: "of course you can fly to the moon (but don't forget to pack some tampons)"

TheJoyOfWriting · 15/09/2025 01:04

Goosefoot · 25/02/2020 14:12

it's more likely to be a combination of personality disordered people always wreaking havoc on the groups they target, some women finding it hard to resist the programming to kiss men's arses, and the inadvisability of allowing men to lead feminist groups/spaces in the first place.

Personality disorders have certainly been a force. But both that and the push to genderism more generally come out of the intellectual climate IMO.

Personality disorders have been around always I suppose but it's not just in women's issues that suddenly people with these issues have been able to come into groups and demand that everyone validate them. It's happened all throughout the left and to a large extent in mainstream society.

But genderism is coming out of years of other narratives. People being told, for years, that the sexed body is not relevant or important, that men and women are the same, that reproductive role is a wholly private issue of no interest to society at large. Prt of that is a result of people actually being less aware because of small families and starting families later. Increased focus on creating our sense of self as an identity exercise, and that also being more and more about internally defined interests.

Even things like the discussion of non-gendered baby clothes. Many people conceptualise this as being because the sex of the baby is irrelevant, but what the older child likes is an important pointer to "who they really are". God forbid a boy who feels some inner alignment to wearing a skirt not have that option, or a girl not be able to wear trousers. People think this isn't just not that big a deal so why not, they think it is a transgression against identity. So what constitutes that - whatever it is, in people's minds it leads right to essentialism around random cultural norms.

I think if we see this as a conspiracy thing or even just an accident we are likely to be unable to really get past it. We need to unpick why so many people have accepted elements without a second thought.

Don't you think girls shoyld be able to wear practical clothes like trousers tho?

TheProdigalKittensReturn · 25/02/2020 23:11

Also most fads don't leave the people who follow them infertile and with other permanent physical consequences. Hair can be dyed back to its original color, piercings can be taken out, clothes are very easy to change. The side effects of years of puberty blockers and hormones are not so easy to get rid of, and that's only taking into account the damage done to the person directly involved rather than to those around them.

NotTerfNorCis · 25/02/2020 16:56

I think it's a combination of rigidly enforced moral values on the left, the influence of post-modernism (nothing is really real), this generation's way of feeling special, individualism, and the internet, where people can choose a new identity very easily. It's a fad in my view but the damage it's doing to feminism is real.

OP posts:
Goosefoot · 25/02/2020 14:12

it's more likely to be a combination of personality disordered people always wreaking havoc on the groups they target, some women finding it hard to resist the programming to kiss men's arses, and the inadvisability of allowing men to lead feminist groups/spaces in the first place.

Personality disorders have certainly been a force. But both that and the push to genderism more generally come out of the intellectual climate IMO.

Personality disorders have been around always I suppose but it's not just in women's issues that suddenly people with these issues have been able to come into groups and demand that everyone validate them. It's happened all throughout the left and to a large extent in mainstream society.

But genderism is coming out of years of other narratives. People being told, for years, that the sexed body is not relevant or important, that men and women are the same, that reproductive role is a wholly private issue of no interest to society at large. Prt of that is a result of people actually being less aware because of small families and starting families later. Increased focus on creating our sense of self as an identity exercise, and that also being more and more about internally defined interests.

Even things like the discussion of non-gendered baby clothes. Many people conceptualise this as being because the sex of the baby is irrelevant, but what the older child likes is an important pointer to "who they really are". God forbid a boy who feels some inner alignment to wearing a skirt not have that option, or a girl not be able to wear trousers. People think this isn't just not that big a deal so why not, they think it is a transgression against identity. So what constitutes that - whatever it is, in people's minds it leads right to essentialism around random cultural norms.

I think if we see this as a conspiracy thing or even just an accident we are likely to be unable to really get past it. We need to unpick why so many people have accepted elements without a second thought.

LonnyVonnyWilsonFrickett · 25/02/2020 13:37

I think ally-ism (completely made up word but bear with me) completely changed around the time of MeToo. MeToo required woke men to actually change their behaviour and give something up, rather than doing feminism for the sole purpose of doing feminists.

I'll never forget a conversation I had with a really, really lovely guy who I know well, which went along the lines of 'I mean Lonny, I just don't know if it's safe to chat people up at work anymore, what about the banter?'

It was these men that MeToo shone a spotlight on, rather than 'proper rapists'. And they didn't like it. That created a vacuum, which co-incided with the TRAs getting organised. IMHO. And the rest we know.

WeeBisom · 25/02/2020 13:33

It's interesting to compare the language of the commenters on that stie to the language used here. It's either just straight up abusive - "fuck you", "go fuck yourself, TERF", or it's strangely infantile. One commenter said something like "biology is a heckin' lot more complicated than folks learned at school!" Meanwhile, on Mumsnet, people talk like normal human beings - it's so refreshing. And yeah, to chime in - this is exactly what happened to all the feminist sites that were big in the mid 2000s. Jezebel, Shakesville, Feministing, Feministe, Jezebel - they all got taken over by trans rights activists and had all the life sucked out of them.

I remember when a particularly nasty trans rights activist decided to camp out at Feministe. The entire tone of the place completely changed. Women were constantly falling over themselves to apologise for transphobia, and it was never good enough. So everyone left. And then this same person just moved on to Jezebel and did the same thing. This is why Mumsnet is such an important space.

TheProdigalKittensReturn · 25/02/2020 10:32

That's why my motto has gone from live and let live to no parasan. I've seen what happens when vital ground is ceded out of a desire to be "nice".

WrathofFaeKlopp · 25/02/2020 10:26

The Fword was my go-to website too.

But I knew it had changed and I rarely went back.
It changed and I couldn't fathom out why.

I came to Mumsnet for other reasons and now I know why.

TW had muscled themselves in the Fword space.

I was sleeping, now I am awake and aware.

NotTerfNorCis · 25/02/2020 10:06

Personality disordered sounds right. There was something really off about the behaviour I saw. It went beyond passionate political discussion. There was a lot of hate for anyone with different views... hate and a sense of deep personal hurt that anyone might disagree.

OP posts:
TheProdigalKittensReturn · 25/02/2020 08:53

Even the feminist lite sites like Jezebel have been irreparably damaged by genderism. As much of the conspiracy theory part of my brain wants to think that the post 2016 fragmenting of feminism that genderism has achieved is some sort of deliberate Cointelpro thing it's more likely to be a combination of personality disordered people always wreaking havoc on the groups they target, some women finding it hard to resist the programming to kiss men's arses, and the inadvisability of allowing men to lead feminist groups/spaces in the first place.

NotTerfNorCis · 25/02/2020 08:36

No problem Eresh! Smile

OP posts:
NotTerfNorCis · 25/02/2020 08:34

A few years ago, 2013 - 16, fighting MRAs was bringing feminists together. It was something radical and liberal feminists could agree on. Futrelle himself was feted in the mainstream press as a feminist warrior. Then it all went to shit when genderism burst on the scene.

Genderism had been lurking for a while, of course. But I think it only went mainstream in 2016.

OP posts:
Ereshkigalangcleg · 25/02/2020 08:29

Thank you, that would have bugged me all day!

Ereshkigalangcleg · 25/02/2020 08:28

Yes! Remember now

NotTerfNorCis · 25/02/2020 08:23

Eresh, was it Manboobz? A self-deprecating joke by Futrelle?

I remember that even before the TRA takeover, people could be abusive as they wanted but they weren't allowed to call anyone stupid or mad. Because that was ableist. It's always been a 'careful you don't offend certain posters' place.

OP posts:
Ereshkigalangcleg · 25/02/2020 08:18

In the case of those run by "feminist" men, well, radfems have been pointing out that this is one of many reasons why men don't belong in feminism for a long time.

And yes, WHTM is a perfect example of this.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 25/02/2020 08:13

I always found We Hunted The Mammoth smug and nauseating, and full of overbearing men. As a new poster in 2013/2014 some man (and it always was a man) would come and give you a long set of woke diktats after you posted for the first time. They enjoyed talking down to women. It's not what I would really think of as a feminist space, more a "look what crazy thing I found on Reddit" space.

It used to be called something else before it was WHTM, anyone remember what it was?

Summerhillsquare · 25/02/2020 08:09

I used to enjoy the F Word and it had plenty of engagement - not now...

NotTerfNorCis · 25/02/2020 08:09

If MRAs had dreamt up a sneaky way to destroy feminism, they couldn't have done much better than genderism, which is destroying feminism from within.

Everything refers back to genderism and its grievances. I went back to WHTM after someone said 'terfs' are 'enforcing two genders'. I tried to explain the difference between sex and gender. They accused me of reducing women to baby factories. I said that's not how GC feminism works - we acknowledge biology but then say what women do with that biology is their business. Then they wanted me to explain some random on Twitter who said motherhood was the high point of being a woman. I said some feminists celebrate motherhood because it's such a big part of many women's lives.

After I'd been banned, they picked up on that again... and accused me of deliberately trying to erase trans mothers. Meaning transwomen who are parents. Yeah... it's all about their ideology.

OP posts:
Ereshkigalangcleg · 25/02/2020 08:08

I think mumsnet is the reason there is more 'resistance' in this country than others.

So do I.

EmpressLangClegInChair · 25/02/2020 07:54

I think mumsnet is the reason there is more 'resistance' in this country than others.

Well, there has to be a reason the Misogynist Monitors spend so much time patrolling FWR.

Langsdestiny · 25/02/2020 07:44

I think mumsnet is the reason there is more 'resistance' in this country than others.

SadlyMissTaken · 25/02/2020 07:38

The F Word website was one of the first to go and is now steadfastly ignoring the whole debate. I do think that without Mumsnet today's situation would be very different. I know it's not perfect but without it... I wonder where we would be.