Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

America's Gun Control

493 replies

wonderingdaily · 28/03/2023 16:07

Gun violence, I really don't understand it, well i do, but the arguments "for" guns are very weak at best.

How is this still going on, why have they not tightened gun control similar to the UK and other countries.

My heart goes out to the people affected by the recent school shooting.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
14
Wallaw · 29/03/2023 17:52

AskingQuestionsAllTheTime · 29/03/2023 17:34

Worthy of a little consideration is the fact that during the ten years between 1994 and 2004, when there was a ban on selling assault weapons in the USA (not a very complete one, at that), the death-toll from mass killings fell really quite dramatically even though Columbine was in 1999 slap in the middle of it, and it rose seriously straight after the ban fell into desuetude. So it is possible to do something about this carnage without having to take all guns from the cold dead hands of all the gun freaks in every state, piecemeal. Not letting some of them get into the hands of anyone at all in the first place would be good. (Bad for Putin and bad for the arms manufacturers, but good for the children and possibly the black people and women.)

Maybe just not selling assault weapons to people before they are old enough to buy a drink legally in every state might be a good start, considering how often it seems to be disgruntled adolescents who buy themselves an AK-15 because, like Kyle Rittenhouse, they think it looks cool, and then go out to kill off some of the people they are not happy with, often starting with their mom because she's tried to bring them up to be decent people and failed.

Maybe the red flag laws to stop domestic abusers and the mentally disturbed from legally possessing a firearm might also be a help; they would probably save the lives of quite a few women, at least.

An instant blanket ban or no action at all being presented as the only two possibilities is silly.

And yes, I agree: licence and tax guns, and have mandatory insurance... The insurance companies would be likely to weed out the "poor risk" gun-owners and decline to offer them insurance except at punitive rates after their first "accident" with a loaded gun, or the first time their child took it from their purse and fired it at a friend for fun.

Yes to all of this. And I would add, continue to open up liability for gun manufacturers to be sued for mass shootings.

https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/can-gun-makers-be-liable-in-mass-shootings

Can Gun Makers Be Liable in Mass Shootings?

Gun manufacturers were granted broad immunity from lawsuits over gun crimes by a 2005 act of Congress. But three recent legal developments may allow plaintiffs in some states to successfully sue gun makers, like plaintiffs in the Sandy Hook case who wo...

https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/can-gun-makers-be-liable-in-mass-shootings

AskingQuestionsAllTheTime · 29/03/2023 17:47

Incidentally, road deaths in the UK have been slowly but steadily falling for years now. You have to leave out the pandemic years because the disease messed with road usage, but taking the most recent that seems reasonable and allowing that last year's figures are not yet in, 1,752 out of a population of about 60,000,000 is not as great a per capita rate as the 12.21 per 100,000 in the USA; 2.92/100,000 as against 12.5/100,000.

DdraigGoch · 29/03/2023 17:47

An instant blanket ban or no action at all being presented as the only two possibilities is silly.

I've just noticed the parallels with the NHS debate. Any time that reform is suggested, it's shut down by "you wouldn't want the American system instead", as if there was no middle ground. Nigel Lawson said the the NHS is the "closest thing the English have to religion"; the obsession with guns in the US seems to be a religion too (I even saw some Republican claiming that it was a "God-given right").

AskingQuestionsAllTheTime · 29/03/2023 17:34

Britinme · 29/03/2023 16:44

Sigh. Nobody claims it's intelligent. Those of us who actually live in the USA and understand the way the constitution and system of government works and why you can't just wave your hands and institute a ban on guns get very very tired of continually explaining to our British friends the ways in which we are not the UK. Given that the Equal Rights Amendment hasn't been ratified yet after sixty years, what do you think the odds are of getting an amendment to change the second amendment? Or do you think Americans are willing to just junk their Constitution? Really, if you want to feel clever be my guest and go ahead, but that feeling is going to do nothing to solve the problems of a country where there are more guns than people. The situation here is not remotely like the pre-Dunblane system in the UK and UK-style solutions will not work here.

To try and give you an analogy (not a great one but I'm thinking with my keyboard here), imagine that somebody points out how many people are killed in the UK by cars every year and proposes that car ownership be tightened up and that people who can't demonstrate that they can't get anywhere by public transport have to hand their cars in (also to reduce our impact on climate change as a bonus byproduct). How do you think the majority of sensible and responsible car owners who have never been involved in an accident in their lives would react to that? And do bear in mind that the actual need for guns is far higher here in the US than in the UK.

Now imagine that you have to get that piece of legislation through every single county council in the country, at least half of which would be rural and completely opposed to it.

The reason it's a poor analogy is that we do, of course, license and tax motor vehicles and require insurance for them. That, honestly, is the only type of progress that I see as remotely likely in tackling the gun issue in the US.

Worthy of a little consideration is the fact that during the ten years between 1994 and 2004, when there was a ban on selling assault weapons in the USA (not a very complete one, at that), the death-toll from mass killings fell really quite dramatically even though Columbine was in 1999 slap in the middle of it, and it rose seriously straight after the ban fell into desuetude. So it is possible to do something about this carnage without having to take all guns from the cold dead hands of all the gun freaks in every state, piecemeal. Not letting some of them get into the hands of anyone at all in the first place would be good. (Bad for Putin and bad for the arms manufacturers, but good for the children and possibly the black people and women.)

Maybe just not selling assault weapons to people before they are old enough to buy a drink legally in every state might be a good start, considering how often it seems to be disgruntled adolescents who buy themselves an AK-15 because, like Kyle Rittenhouse, they think it looks cool, and then go out to kill off some of the people they are not happy with, often starting with their mom because she's tried to bring them up to be decent people and failed.

Maybe the red flag laws to stop domestic abusers and the mentally disturbed from legally possessing a firearm might also be a help; they would probably save the lives of quite a few women, at least.

An instant blanket ban or no action at all being presented as the only two possibilities is silly.

And yes, I agree: licence and tax guns, and have mandatory insurance... The insurance companies would be likely to weed out the "poor risk" gun-owners and decline to offer them insurance except at punitive rates after their first "accident" with a loaded gun, or the first time their child took it from their purse and fired it at a friend for fun.

Naunet · 29/03/2023 16:49

Britinme · 29/03/2023 16:44

Sigh. Nobody claims it's intelligent. Those of us who actually live in the USA and understand the way the constitution and system of government works and why you can't just wave your hands and institute a ban on guns get very very tired of continually explaining to our British friends the ways in which we are not the UK. Given that the Equal Rights Amendment hasn't been ratified yet after sixty years, what do you think the odds are of getting an amendment to change the second amendment? Or do you think Americans are willing to just junk their Constitution? Really, if you want to feel clever be my guest and go ahead, but that feeling is going to do nothing to solve the problems of a country where there are more guns than people. The situation here is not remotely like the pre-Dunblane system in the UK and UK-style solutions will not work here.

To try and give you an analogy (not a great one but I'm thinking with my keyboard here), imagine that somebody points out how many people are killed in the UK by cars every year and proposes that car ownership be tightened up and that people who can't demonstrate that they can't get anywhere by public transport have to hand their cars in (also to reduce our impact on climate change as a bonus byproduct). How do you think the majority of sensible and responsible car owners who have never been involved in an accident in their lives would react to that? And do bear in mind that the actual need for guns is far higher here in the US than in the UK.

Now imagine that you have to get that piece of legislation through every single county council in the country, at least half of which would be rural and completely opposed to it.

The reason it's a poor analogy is that we do, of course, license and tax motor vehicles and require insurance for them. That, honestly, is the only type of progress that I see as remotely likely in tackling the gun issue in the US.

Ahh right, so you just thought you’d call me ignorant even though I didn’t mention history or politics or gun ownership in general, didn’t even share my views on that, but just one very specific situation that IS FUCKING STUPID, and then rather than address that point, and explain why it’s not stupid, you address lots of others ones that are completely irrelevant to what I said.

It is stupid to allow military grade weapons to be sold in supermarkets. You’ve said yourself it’s not intelligent, so stop getting defensive for no reason.

Britinme · 29/03/2023 16:44

Sigh. Nobody claims it's intelligent. Those of us who actually live in the USA and understand the way the constitution and system of government works and why you can't just wave your hands and institute a ban on guns get very very tired of continually explaining to our British friends the ways in which we are not the UK. Given that the Equal Rights Amendment hasn't been ratified yet after sixty years, what do you think the odds are of getting an amendment to change the second amendment? Or do you think Americans are willing to just junk their Constitution? Really, if you want to feel clever be my guest and go ahead, but that feeling is going to do nothing to solve the problems of a country where there are more guns than people. The situation here is not remotely like the pre-Dunblane system in the UK and UK-style solutions will not work here.

To try and give you an analogy (not a great one but I'm thinking with my keyboard here), imagine that somebody points out how many people are killed in the UK by cars every year and proposes that car ownership be tightened up and that people who can't demonstrate that they can't get anywhere by public transport have to hand their cars in (also to reduce our impact on climate change as a bonus byproduct). How do you think the majority of sensible and responsible car owners who have never been involved in an accident in their lives would react to that? And do bear in mind that the actual need for guns is far higher here in the US than in the UK.

Now imagine that you have to get that piece of legislation through every single county council in the country, at least half of which would be rural and completely opposed to it.

The reason it's a poor analogy is that we do, of course, license and tax motor vehicles and require insurance for them. That, honestly, is the only type of progress that I see as remotely likely in tackling the gun issue in the US.

Naunet · 29/03/2023 16:35

Britinme · 29/03/2023 16:26

@Naunet - that's ok. Just enjoy your feeling of moral and intellectual superiority and pass lightly over your ignorance of the actual history and problems of dealing with the issue.

Are you trying to say selling army grade weapons in Walmart is not fucking stupid? Please do explain why this is actually an intelligent thing to do.

Britinme · 29/03/2023 16:26

@Naunet - that's ok. Just enjoy your feeling of moral and intellectual superiority and pass lightly over your ignorance of the actual history and problems of dealing with the issue.

Naunet · 29/03/2023 16:21

Untitledsquatboulder · 29/03/2023 09:59

What I don't understand is why anyone outside if the States cares about this. Americans are well informed, they know what's happening. They are a democracy, they can change things if they want. Truth us, they're happy with the status quo. All the children that die, at school or at home when they get hold of mommy's gun, that's a price they are willing to pay. As long as no fetus is killed in utro, they're not right bothered what happens to them thereafter. Strange but there you go.

Exactly this.

Naunet · 29/03/2023 16:17

HermioneWeasley · 28/03/2023 16:24

No, everyone in America is not stupid and the U.K. is not comparable because we’ve never had the scale of guns they have in the US. It seems impossible now that everyone has multiple guns to persuade responsible people to give theirs up. After all, the school shooters aren’t going to give up theirs so where do you start?

Because we’ve never bloody allowed it! We’ve never allowed people to walk into Tesco’s and buy a semi automatic for god sake. And I’m sorry, but that is very fucking stupid.

Im honestly past caring, Americans have ultimately decided that school shootings are a price worth paying to keep their guns. It’s none of our business.

GOW56 · 29/03/2023 14:03

don't really understand how you could ban guns in the US. Who is going to take them away from the people who refuse to give them up? Who is going to stop people smuggling them in illegally?

Just because a policy is hard it doesn't mean it's impossible and shouldn't be tried. Besides no one is talking about a total ban sadly I don't think that would ever happen but much tighter gun controls should be possible.

Nolongera · 29/03/2023 12:06

MarshaBradyo · 29/03/2023 09:58

I can see you have a big issue in US in terms of criminals keeping guns but changes here have resulted in no school shootings for a long time

This is a huge positive and children not safe from shootings at school is something I’d avoid

There were no school shootings prior to Hamilton, had the law been enforced by the local police Dunblane would never have happened.

DdraigGoch · 29/03/2023 11:50

Still wondering what that point was.

StarmanBobby · 29/03/2023 11:50

what I don’t get is how my SIL and her DH who don’t have guns, and aren’t interested in guns or hunting, and have to send their children to school with bullet proof plates in their backpacks - still don’t support gun control.
they live in the south, but completely and unconditionally support the right to bear arms - unrestricted. They’ve moved to a gated community with security at the gates because they feel so unsafe in their city because of guns and drugs.
bizarre that they can’t see that there’s any correlation between unfettered gun ownership and violent crime.

route111 · 29/03/2023 11:48

But fair enough, I've made my point and will leave you to it.

wonderingdaily · 29/03/2023 11:47

route111 · 29/03/2023 11:44

As I've said before you're not the thread police. I'm showing you a mirror when you call other nations stupid without seeing the stupidity of your own.

Im talking about a very specific subject, ive asked if they are stupid when it comes to GUN CONTROL.

Its like me saying who thinks Route111 is a stupid user name and you replying saying i think you will find dolphins are stupid also. You are making no relevance TO THE THREAD

OP posts:
StarmanBobby · 29/03/2023 11:47

‘Except when it's migrant children being killed at sea because of inhumane asylum policies that people vote for - then it's OK’

no, it’s not okay and while I abhor the U.K. new immigration stance - it’s not what we’re discussing on this thread, is it?
So if you can’t stick to the discussion on the thread, I suppose you can’t. And if you feel that strongly - then start a thread on immigration.

route111 · 29/03/2023 11:44

wonderingdaily · 29/03/2023 11:42

@route111 you have literally made zero contribution about the threads subject.

Why dont you start a thread on whats wrong with the UK, im sure you will get lots of responses.

As I've said before you're not the thread police. I'm showing you a mirror when you call other nations stupid without seeing the stupidity of your own.

MarshaBradyo · 29/03/2023 11:44

wonderingdaily · 29/03/2023 11:42

@route111 you have literally made zero contribution about the threads subject.

Why dont you start a thread on whats wrong with the UK, im sure you will get lots of responses.

I agree with this. Some people do want to talk about a topic. If not there’s much more on mn dealing with other stuff

wonderingdaily · 29/03/2023 11:42

@route111 you have literally made zero contribution about the threads subject.

Why dont you start a thread on whats wrong with the UK, im sure you will get lots of responses.

OP posts:
route111 · 29/03/2023 11:37

DdraigGoch · 29/03/2023 11:32

How many have drowned in the English Channel this year so far? I'll wait...

In the same time period, 9,870 people in the US were killed in gun violence. There's no comparison.

A life is a life, it shouldn't be about numbers, and here you actually have a chance to do something about it whereas you don't in the US! But of course it's much easier to pontificate about other countries than face inconvenient truths about your own.

route111 · 29/03/2023 11:35

That's OK. Northern European with British family so leaving not an option. I don't hate it, I'm angry and have been since about 2016 when I suddenly woke up one morning to find a country I'd happily made a life in until then turning rabidly anti foreigner and getting worse and worse since. I see the developments here in the last few years as wilful self harm caused largely by ignorance and manipulative, corrupt politicians and their spin doctors and the right wing media.

DdraigGoch · 29/03/2023 11:32

route111 · 29/03/2023 11:21

Not at all. Pointing out how hardened a lot of the hand wringers here actually are allowing migrants to be murdered by their callous indifference.

"you’d have to be pretty hardened not to care about children being murdered in school, repeatedly, wherever the country."

How many have drowned in the English Channel this year so far? I'll wait...

In the same time period, 9,870 people in the US were killed in gun violence. There's no comparison.

MarshaBradyo · 29/03/2023 11:31

route111 · 29/03/2023 11:21

Not at all. Pointing out how hardened a lot of the hand wringers here actually are allowing migrants to be murdered by their callous indifference.

"you’d have to be pretty hardened not to care about children being murdered in school, repeatedly, wherever the country."

Recent events re children overboard near Italy made me feel the same as that image of the shooter in the school tbh

davegrohll · 29/03/2023 11:30

@route111 can I ask why when you seem to really hate it ? Are you British and stuck here like alot of us ? 😆
Genuinely wondering not looking for an argument btw...

Swipe left for the next trending thread