Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Over-flowery food language

39 replies

LydiaTheTattooedLardarse · Yesterday 11:17

I’ve noticed it a lot on MN over the years, but it seems to be getting worse lately. No one seems to be able to talk about food without behaving like they’re in those M&S ads with Dervla Kirwan! It’s all so over the top.

On one of the Christmas food threads the other day, someone was waxing lyrical about showing off their “glossy sprouts” and “vivid red cranberry sauce” (as opposed to beige cranberry sauce?), while someone else was talking about something cooked in “lashings of butter”. When did anyone last use the word “lashings” outside of an Enid Blyton novel.

It’s everywhere at the moment. Dare to admit you don’t have 37 different vegetables and there are gasps of “But Christmas dinner should be a feast!”. And it’s not even just about fancy or party food. Even fairly ordinary day to day food gets described like it’s something Michelin star. I remember one woman going into raptures about her “famous” lasagne and all its joys - ending on “And I DON’T skimp on the cheese!”, as if this was somehow terribly indulgent. It’s only a bloody lasagne!!

Why can’t MNers have a normal conversation about food without acting like they’re writing (bad) copy for a catering brochure?

OP posts:
5foot5 · Yesterday 11:21

I was expecting far more vivid (sorry) examples of flowery language in your OP. I don't think any of the examples you give are particularly OTT. What's wrong with "lashings"? I hear that plenty.

Looking forward to some more Nigella-esque examples

NineteenSeventyThree · Yesterday 11:25

I haven't especially noticed it here.

I find it quite amusing on restaurant menus - food always has to be 'nestled' in its accompaniment, for example - I'd be disappointed if the trend passed!

LydiaTheTattooedLardarse · Yesterday 11:25

“Lashings” just sounds like you’re trying terribly hard to make something sound incredibly indulgent and special. Whereas it’s actually just a bit naff.

OP posts:
Saturdaysfairies · Yesterday 11:25

Never noticed it on MN.

PillsBox · Yesterday 11:26

YANBU but it's always been the same lol.

MNetter's kid likes reading = "They devour books".

MNetter has hungry teenagers = "They inhale food".

MNetter wants to talk to someone = "I've reached out"

Not as flowery as you're describing perhaps, but just as odd.

LydiaTheTattooedLardarse · Yesterday 11:29

Oh yes, the “devouring” of books!

OP posts:
NineteenSeventyThree · Yesterday 11:50

'Inhale food' makes me think of food going into the airways and causing choking.

InterestedDad37 · Yesterday 12:04

I went through a phase of (on Facebook) describing perfectly ordinary food in an elaborate way - so beans on toast would be something like "youthful haricots bathing luxuriously in a veritable spa of finest home-crafted tomato jus, reclining on a mattress of finest artisan breads" (etc).
It amused me, anyway.

sprigatito · Yesterday 12:10

I am pretty misanthropic in general, but I rather enjoy this. We have a wondrously rich and nuanced language. I like to see people using it.

TheSoapyFrog · Yesterday 12:18

I admit that I haven't really noticed "flowery" language, but there is plenty of food related language which irrationally irk me.

  1. "Washing down" food with a drink.
  2. "Mopping up" the sauce with bread or something.
  3. When the teeny tinies complain that their monstrous, 8ft tall husband "wolfed down" or "gobbled up" the half eaten lettuce leaf they were saving for dinner next week because they couldn't eat the whole leaf.
  4. Reiterating something was homemade too much. "For dinner yesterday, we had a homemade cottage pie, made with homemade mashed potatoes, and homemade gravy. Followed by a homemade apple crumble with homemade custard. We then finished off with a homemade cup of coffee, served in a homemade cup, stirred with a homemade spoon, which was in my homemade drawer, in the homemade kitchen cabinets, in the homemade kitchen, in my homemade house." Ad nauseum to the point where the word "homemade" sounds weird.

I totally agree about "lashings" though. I prefer "metric fuck tonne".

Worriednanof1 · Yesterday 12:19

LydiaTheTattooedLardarse · Yesterday 11:25

“Lashings” just sounds like you’re trying terribly hard to make something sound incredibly indulgent and special. Whereas it’s actually just a bit naff.

I totally agree!!! Lashings made me think of Enid Blyton but i kept quiet as i'd already annoyed everybody enough on that thread.

Firesidechatter · Yesterday 12:26

I also noticed this and find it utterly bizzare, and if I’m honest in part wonder about the weight of tne posters,

there are continuous threads about food, you’re favourite sandwich, or comfort food, or your takeaway order etc, and people pile in describing eating an avalanche of food, and with descriptors like lashings of, and its always something like butter or cheese , and then talk about its delicious, bliss, how they are drooling, salivating etc.

and anyone who dares say it’s too much, gets told they are a teenie tiny, competitive under eater and the piss taken out them for apparently eating a massive salad.

i saw one takeaway thread and posters were ordering multiple dishes for one person, like multiple meals. Someone else commented how a box of six donuts was a portion. Threads on how many Xmas food they’ve already consumed, how many Easter eggs they can put away, how to eat your children’s eggs.

at rhe same time, multiple jealous bitter threads on weight loss injections. Bizzare assumptions women look younger fat. I’d bet good money there is an overlap.

TwoLeftSocksWithHoles · Yesterday 12:29

@5foot5

"What's wrong with "lashings"? I hear that plenty."

I have read about those sort of house parties but have not attended one myself. It just doesn't appeal to me, and anyway my leather jeans seemed to have developed a rather irritating squeak.

5foot5 · Yesterday 12:30

TwoLeftSocksWithHoles · Yesterday 12:29

@5foot5

"What's wrong with "lashings"? I hear that plenty."

I have read about those sort of house parties but have not attended one myself. It just doesn't appeal to me, and anyway my leather jeans seemed to have developed a rather irritating squeak.

😆😆😆

5foot5 · Yesterday 12:43

Firesidechatter · Yesterday 12:26

I also noticed this and find it utterly bizzare, and if I’m honest in part wonder about the weight of tne posters,

there are continuous threads about food, you’re favourite sandwich, or comfort food, or your takeaway order etc, and people pile in describing eating an avalanche of food, and with descriptors like lashings of, and its always something like butter or cheese , and then talk about its delicious, bliss, how they are drooling, salivating etc.

and anyone who dares say it’s too much, gets told they are a teenie tiny, competitive under eater and the piss taken out them for apparently eating a massive salad.

i saw one takeaway thread and posters were ordering multiple dishes for one person, like multiple meals. Someone else commented how a box of six donuts was a portion. Threads on how many Xmas food they’ve already consumed, how many Easter eggs they can put away, how to eat your children’s eggs.

at rhe same time, multiple jealous bitter threads on weight loss injections. Bizzare assumptions women look younger fat. I’d bet good money there is an overlap.

I think what you are describing is excess, not over-descriptive language, which is what the OP seems to dislike.

I would describe myself as a foodie because I am interested in food. Reading about it, cooking it and eating it. I actually have quite a small appetite and often end up leaving some on my plate when I can't finish it, but I still love it and like to talk about it.

Whilst I acknowledge there is a lot of over-blown descriptions used sometimes on menus or adverts, I see nothing wrong with using some imaginative language when writing or talking about everyday life. Why reach for the same old boring words to describe something if you can paint a better picture by choosing different ones?

LydiaTheTattooedLardarse · Yesterday 22:29

sprigatito · Yesterday 12:10

I am pretty misanthropic in general, but I rather enjoy this. We have a wondrously rich and nuanced language. I like to see people using it.

I knew someone would have to bring in “nuance”.

OP posts:
CatsMagic · Yesterday 22:36

YANBU OP!

It really bloody irritating! And as the PP observed the shoehorning in of homemade completely unnecessary- why do you need to tell us of something has been homemade??

The descriptions of cooking the damn food is also as bad - “whack” being the worst , nothing in the kitchen should be whacked anywhere!!

5foot5 · Yesterday 23:45

LydiaTheTattooedLardarse · Yesterday 22:29

I knew someone would have to bring in “nuance”.

And what's wrong with that?

The poster you quoted @sprigatito said:
I am pretty misanthropic in general, but I rather enjoy this. We have a wondrously rich and nuanced language. I like to see people using it.
I agree wholeheartedly. Why use the same old utilitarian adjectives to describe things if you can bring some life and colour to your account by employing more imaginative language?

A PP seemed to sneer at people saying a child "devours books" rather than just saying "he likes reading" or saying a teenager "inhales food" instead of simply stating they are hungry. But can you not see how the choice of words gives a much richer description?

MrsMoastyToasty · Today 00:03

"Deconstructed" cottage pie "presented" on an "artisan" shovel....is mince and potatoes served by a wanky hipster with a man bun hairstyle in a pretentious café where the prices are a number with no £ sign.

brownbootsandhats · Today 00:10

It only gives a richer description of it isn’t the norm

as it is it’s just a longer way of saying things

mathanxiety · Today 03:49

I blame Nigella Lawson.

LydiaTheTattooedLardarse · Today 04:38

5foot5 · Yesterday 23:45

And what's wrong with that?

The poster you quoted @sprigatito said:
I am pretty misanthropic in general, but I rather enjoy this. We have a wondrously rich and nuanced language. I like to see people using it.
I agree wholeheartedly. Why use the same old utilitarian adjectives to describe things if you can bring some life and colour to your account by employing more imaginative language?

A PP seemed to sneer at people saying a child "devours books" rather than just saying "he likes reading" or saying a teenager "inhales food" instead of simply stating they are hungry. But can you not see how the choice of words gives a much richer description?

It isn’t a “much richer description” though. It’s just pretentious. People who really know how to use language effectively don’t need to go needlessly over the top.

OP posts:
DeeDeeSharpWhatKindOfLadyNSoul · Today 05:02

CatsMagic · Yesterday 22:36

YANBU OP!

It really bloody irritating! And as the PP observed the shoehorning in of homemade completely unnecessary- why do you need to tell us of something has been homemade??

The descriptions of cooking the damn food is also as bad - “whack” being the worst , nothing in the kitchen should be whacked anywhere!!

Perhaps "Jamie Oliver" I don't think I'd tire of whacking him in the kitchen or anywhere else for that matter.🥊🥊

pestowithwalnuts · Today 05:17

mathanxiety · Today 03:49

I blame Nigella Lawson.

Some her quotes are the oddest
Describing black treacle as a ‘somber majesty’

echt · Today 07:19

I'm not getting the "flowery" from your examples, OP.

Swipe left for the next trending thread