Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Jonathan Ross

289 replies

Undahpressurah · 10/11/2026 13:49

Is he next?

thought this could be a good place to discuss his ‘jokes’ about a 15 year old going home with Walliams. He clearly knew far more about Brand and Walliams than he let on.

Repulsive.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
JuliaBraverman · 10/11/2026 19:52

IdentifyingAsAWoollyMammoth · 10/11/2026 14:41

In the Victorian era it was very very commonplace that there were significant age gaps between men and women. Not saying it's right, just a fact.

I still can’t believe he got away with this after grooming her as a 13-year-old. I remember it well at the time being in the papers but it didn’t seem to have the shock value that it would have today.

YourAmplePlumPoster · 10/11/2026 19:49

Redbags · 10/11/2026 18:52

Infantised or now recognised that all those oh so mature 16yos were acutely vulnerable?

I mean, it used to be OK to send 5yos up chimneys.

It also used to be OK for young people to take on responsibilities like work, providing for families and taking responsibility for their behaviour but now they're apparently too vulnerable.

Puppylucky · 10/11/2026 19:47

newNannie2026 · 10/11/2026 19:30

totally agree. always found Ross creepy (not as much as Brand and Walliams) but he is up there on my radar

Sorry this "on my radar" comment that is becoming compulsory just makes me laugh! Is MN populated by a colony of bats?!

Puppylucky · 10/11/2026 19:45

Redbags · 10/11/2026 19:30

Yes, it was a good natured bantery jibe at Walliams. Just what should happen to sex offenders. It shows "they" knew and did nothing.

If going home with a drunk 15 year old girl was seen as disgusting/ dodgy at the time - as it should have been - why is calling out that behaviour in front of DWs peers "good natured and bantery"

IdentifyingAsAWoollyMammoth · 10/11/2026 19:44

Redbags · 10/11/2026 19:37

Well saw how he was behaving that evening. I don't need to know it as a FACT, to express the opinion that it seems likely they did.

Edited

But you didn't say LIKELY, did you?

"Yes, who would have all been aware of his behaviour around teenage girls"

That's quite a difference. Legally, in particular.

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 10/11/2026 19:42

Redbags · 10/11/2026 18:52

Infantised or now recognised that all those oh so mature 16yos were acutely vulnerable?

I mean, it used to be OK to send 5yos up chimneys.

There's middle ground here. I get the sense that some children and teenagers now are not expected to do anything much independently and unsupervised. They have so little life experience that there has to be a risk that they're just not learning essential life skills that many of us acquired in childhood - social skills, character assessment, spotting the early signs that someone else is trouble and backing away. Yes, there were some huge risks in leaving children so much on their own in the past, but the risks in not giving children some independence are also considerable.

Redbags · 10/11/2026 19:37

IdentifyingAsAWoollyMammoth · 10/11/2026 19:36

And you know for a FACT that his wife and everyone in that photo knew of his behaviour, do you? Seriously?

Well saw how he was behaving that evening. I don't need to know it as a FACT, to express the opinion that it seems likely they did.

IdentifyingAsAWoollyMammoth · 10/11/2026 19:36

Redbags · 10/11/2026 19:31

Yes, who would have all been aware of his behaviour around teenage girls. I have never said Ross was involved, only that too many people knew and did nothing.

And you know for a FACT that his wife and everyone in that photo knew of his behaviour, do you? Seriously?

Redbags · 10/11/2026 19:31

Puppylucky · 10/11/2026 19:27

Along with his wife and 10 other people.

Yes, who would have all been aware of his behaviour around teenage girls. I have never said Ross was involved, only that too many people knew and did nothing.

newNannie2026 · 10/11/2026 19:30

totally agree. always found Ross creepy (not as much as Brand and Walliams) but he is up there on my radar

Redbags · 10/11/2026 19:30

Puppylucky · 10/11/2026 19:26

Re the Comedy Awards comment which is causing so much angst has it not occurred to anyone that it is actually a jibe / reveal against David Walliams? This show was screened in 2005 ( JR makes reference to it being the 15th year) - long before any rumours really leaked out about his behaviour. By calling out David Walliams preferences albeit in a jokey way JR is actually sending up a red flag - or is that too generous a reading for this thread !

Edited

Yes, it was a good natured bantery jibe at Walliams. Just what should happen to sex offenders. It shows "they" knew and did nothing.

Puppylucky · 10/11/2026 19:27

Redbags · 10/11/2026 18:47

There's a picture in the news today with Walliams arm round a teen he's accused of grooming. Surprise surprise, Ross is in the picture too.

Along with his wife and 10 other people.

Puppylucky · 10/11/2026 19:26

Re the Comedy Awards comment which is causing so much angst has it not occurred to anyone that it is actually a jibe / reveal against David Walliams? This show was screened in 2005 ( JR makes reference to it being the 15th year) - long before any rumours really leaked out about his behaviour. By calling out David Walliams preferences albeit in a jokey way JR is actually sending up a red flag - or is that too generous a reading for this thread !

Fedupmumofadultsons · 10/11/2026 19:18

Additup · 10/11/2026 15:01

Im not sure how JR can be criticised in that scenario. Presumably he was doing Lily Allen a favour by moving her?

This exactly if anything JR was actually protecting lily Allen nothing wrong with that x

Horses7 · 10/11/2026 19:15

Willwetalk · 10/11/2026 15:55

People have suggested he’s guilty by association. They were also posts here yesterday about Noel Fielding. As I said, I can’t stand Ross although I do like Fielding and if either of them are found to be guilty of a crime, put them away - I wouldn’t give a shit about them. I don’t like people casting aspersions at people because they don’t like them, or they’re weird’. There are people who make my skin crawl; it doesn’t make them perverts.

My thoughts exactly.

JustAnotherWhinger · 10/11/2026 19:07

Redbags · 10/11/2026 18:52

Infantised or now recognised that all those oh so mature 16yos were acutely vulnerable?

I mean, it used to be OK to send 5yos up chimneys.

This is actually a point I find very interesting.

My MIL is in her late 70s and she thinks children today are horrendously babies. She left school at 15, married at 22 and thinks the idea of 18 year olds still being kids as bizarre.

DH’s Granny (her MIL) is 103 and she thinks children should be children until 18. She thinks things are starting to go a bit far with people babying their children in their late 20s, but she left school at 12. She met her husband when she was 17 and they married when she was 19 and he 25. They had delayed marrying for a long as possible as she loved her job (they worked together) and she had to quit as soon as she married. She thinks the balance is better now than in her generation.

LaidOnYourBackWithTheBoyWithTheArabStrap · 10/11/2026 18:58

It really wouldn’t surprise me. It’s not even just the “hilarious jokes” that makes me think these people’s hard drives need checking. It’s the apparent casual acceptance that this kind of behaviour (sexual assaults, harassment, grooming of children) is completely normal, to be expected and a “perk”.

Even if it’s a slow burn I really hope that the time is up for all the creeps and sexual predators out there and they all get what’s coming to them- justice for their victims and prison time for them.

SuzeBr · 10/11/2026 18:57

Redbags · 10/11/2026 14:26

Jonathon Ross, one of the most sought after presenters on the planet at the time, could absolutely have refused to say it. Do you think the autocue, on stage, at the event was the first time he saw the script?

absolutely, not sure how this was even thought to be funny at the time

Redbags · 10/11/2026 18:52

YourAmplePlumPoster · 10/11/2026 18:41

Spot on. Even young adults in their twenties are completely infantilised.

Infantised or now recognised that all those oh so mature 16yos were acutely vulnerable?

I mean, it used to be OK to send 5yos up chimneys.

Redbags · 10/11/2026 18:47

There's a picture in the news today with Walliams arm round a teen he's accused of grooming. Surprise surprise, Ross is in the picture too.

IsEveryUserNameBloodyTaken · 10/11/2026 18:43

SerenaCat93 · 10/11/2026 18:13

David Mitchell attractive!?!

Oh certainly not.

LastChristmasI · 10/11/2026 18:42

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 10/11/2026 18:36

I've seen things crawling out from under stones that would meet that description!

That's a fair point! I always just thought he looked like a walking STD. I never understood the appeal.

YourAmplePlumPoster · 10/11/2026 18:41

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 10/11/2026 18:03

Back in the 1970s, people would have been astounded to hear 16yos referred to as children. Minors, yes, but very much on the verge of adulthood and treated as such, with a lot of independence and resilience expected, and not much of a safety net for those who couldn't cope, sadly. Very few kids stayed at school beyond that age. Of those that did stay on, an even smaller number went on to university, polytechnic or some sort of professional training, and those of us who did get that opportunity were treated as fully adult. No adults at university open days, no expectation that parents would be involved in our lives at all beyond (if we were lucky) a financial contribution to top up the maintenance grant. Lots left with no qualifications. I don't know if most had jobs in their early teens, but lots of my schoolmates had Saturday and holiday jobs then, as I did. Nobody bothered much about 16yos going to pubs or 18 films. As we have seen on this thread, it was widely accepted that 16yos could be sexually active and some of them ended up married. I may be wrong, but I think you could join the armed forces at 16.

I honestly think those of you who were 16 far more recently have little concept of how infantilised teenagers are now by comparison with all previous generations. I'm absolutely not saying that it's a great idea for 16yos to get married, but plenty of us have formed extremely successful long-term relationships at not much older than that (I did myself, 6 year age gap, we've been married for 44 years).

Spot on. Even young adults in their twenties are completely infantilised.

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 10/11/2026 18:36

LastChristmasI · 10/11/2026 18:31

Well,.for starters about 10000000x more attractive than RB.

I've seen things crawling out from under stones that would meet that description!

LastChristmasI · 10/11/2026 18:31

SerenaCat93 · 10/11/2026 18:13

David Mitchell attractive!?!

Well,.for starters about 10000000x more attractive than RB.