Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

David Walliams

757 replies

mrpenny · 10/11/2026 12:16

To Think it could not have been DW??

OP posts:
Thread gallery
13
Ved · 10/11/2026 15:31

mrpenny · 10/11/2026 12:16

To Think it could not have been DW??

Worst kept secret ever. Do keep up @mrpenny 😆

nomas · 10/11/2026 15:30

ohyesiseethatnow · 10/11/2026 15:28

I’m not sure about this.

Abusing his position of power…..he wasn’t these girls teacher or doctor or anything. He was a rich, famous man. Does that automatically mean he can only court rich, famous women?

The girl sending images, not only was she 17 and a half, so legal anyway, she told him she was “old
enough to go drinking” (ie 18).

As a man in his 30s and 40s he pursued younger women. Regardless of whether you see that as a bit ick, it’s not illegal. I don’t really see what he’s done particularly wrong here.

The story of the 15 year old is a different matter entirely. I’m just not sure why it’s being diluted with stories about women in their 20s who he pursued but didn’t actually harm.

Well the Queen paid Virginia Giuffre £9 million pound because she had sex with Andrew when she was 17 so I don't think men having sex with 17 year old is an unproblematic as you claim.

Clue is in the words 'Abuse of power'.

Flymyprettiesflies · 10/11/2026 15:29

‘Oh cmon, he has not been accused of rape,’

this kind of denial is why men like this got to get away with rape, sexual assault abuse of power and all the rest of it for so long even while those working with them knew they couldn’t be trusted around young staff or fans.

nomas · 10/11/2026 15:28

Flymyprettiesflies · 10/11/2026 15:27

‘Harper Collins was a sponsor and I was at a table with some of their staff. They told me that they didn't allow any of their young female colleagues to be alone with him.’

same went for Brand, friend said that they wouldn’t let him be alone with any female staff and no woman under 30 around him at all.

All of them are complicit.

ohyesiseethatnow · 10/11/2026 15:28

cowxst · 10/11/2026 13:07

Well, we don’t actually know much but abusing his position of power is illegal and apparently involved a 17 year old, which is definitely illegal.

I’m not sure about this.

Abusing his position of power…..he wasn’t these girls teacher or doctor or anything. He was a rich, famous man. Does that automatically mean he can only court rich, famous women?

The girl sending images, not only was she 17 and a half, so legal anyway, she told him she was “old
enough to go drinking” (ie 18).

As a man in his 30s and 40s he pursued younger women. Regardless of whether you see that as a bit ick, it’s not illegal. I don’t really see what he’s done particularly wrong here.

The story of the 15 year old is a different matter entirely. I’m just not sure why it’s being diluted with stories about women in their 20s who he pursued but didn’t actually harm.

nomas · 10/11/2026 15:28

mrpenny · 10/11/2026 15:10

I think I wrote it???🙄🤨In one word….

But what does that mean?

Are you saying the journo who wrote the article 'Noel Fielding's Reddit AMA was deliciously Noel Fielding' was acting deliciously?

Flymyprettiesflies · 10/11/2026 15:27

‘Harper Collins was a sponsor and I was at a table with some of their staff. They told me that they didn't allow any of their young female colleagues to be alone with him.’

same went for Brand, friend said that they wouldn’t let him be alone with any female staff and no woman under 30 around him at all.

KidsDoBetter · 10/11/2026 15:27

Bundleflower · 10/11/2026 15:23

I think you actually mean ‘speculation by BundleFlower on when someone may follow through what he threatened as part of his sickening attempt to silence the British media about his vile behaviour as a final act of trying to take control’.

I don't agree with his attempt to silence the media with this threat - either morally or legally.

But I don't think its in good taste to speculate excatly when a child's father might take their own life.

I do accept however that by running this argument through the court, he has brought this discussion into the public domain so there we are.

FWIW I feel that if was seriously going to do it, it would be done by now. I don't think he will.

Here I am speculating ... hypocritically.

Flymyprettiesflies · 10/11/2026 15:25

Also know people who had to work with Brand and no-one could stand him, another absolute Bellend who was horrible to anyone ‘beneath’ him. Which in his stupid little head was pretty much everyone.

Flymyprettiesflies · 10/11/2026 15:24

mrpenny · 10/11/2026 12:16

To Think it could not have been DW??

Have met him, work reasons. He was an absolute smarmy prick and I believe every single allegation.

KidsDoBetter · 10/11/2026 15:23

AStonedRose · 10/11/2026 15:19

Confused by the multiple posters defending DW. Clearly there are loads of men who post here. Even if he's not a rapist, he's sexually assaulted kids. He's a nonce.

Unfortunately, I reckon the large majority of men would behave like this, if they thought they could get away with it.

Sadly I think that the number of men, once they find power through fame, wealth or celebrity who do do this - bears witness to this.

Some of them would - they just don't get the opportunity.

I do of course understand that not all men would even if they could. But still ... its so bloody depressing.

Bundleflower · 10/11/2026 15:23

KidsDoBetter · 10/11/2026 15:19

God I think speculation from @Bundleflower about when someone might die by suicide is pretty unnecessary. Jeez.

I think you actually mean ‘speculation by BundleFlower on when someone may follow through what he threatened as part of his sickening attempt to silence the British media about his vile behaviour as a final act of trying to take control’.

AStonedRose · 10/11/2026 15:19

Confused by the multiple posters defending DW. Clearly there are loads of men who post here. Even if he's not a rapist, he's sexually assaulted kids. He's a nonce.

Unfortunately, I reckon the large majority of men would behave like this, if they thought they could get away with it.

Allseeingallknowing · 10/11/2026 15:19

So why is he threatening to kill himself if he’s not done anything wrong?

KidsDoBetter · 10/11/2026 15:19

WitchesBritches · 10/11/2026 15:09

Your certainty that he will do it and that he will do it by the end of the week.

God I think speculation from @Bundleflower about when someone might die by suicide is pretty unnecessary. Jeez.

Firesidechatter · 10/11/2026 15:18

lastapache · 10/11/2026 15:06

Not when they were underage, but in one of the women's cases the contact turned sexual once she turned 17. Even if that's not falling foul of the grooming laws, that's grooming, plain and simple. I don't think anyone would disagree that that is completely unacceptable behaviour for a 32 year old man - famous or not. It's definitely serious enough behaviour to permanently damage your reputation and your likelihood to be employed in the public eye again. He would have known that at the time, and he did it anyway.

But the messages are things like good luck in your exams, stay in touch, he’s been very careful. There is nothing in there sexual,

Librarina · 10/11/2026 15:17

Araminta1004 · 10/11/2026 13:15

DS (who is 12 now) had a primary teacher who purged all his books from the school library a few years back already, she must have known something. I asked her about it and she said he was dodgy.
So what is going to happen to the books now in schools/libraries?

I was at a publishing event in 2015 (I remember the year because I was still BFing and milk leaked through my dress). Harper Collins was a sponsor and I was at a table with some of their staff. They told me that they didn't allow any of their young female colleagues to be alone with him.

Since then I haven't bought any of his books for my Libraries or delivered lessons that have promoted them and I've never bought his books for my own children. However I have accepted them as donations and added those as stock because they were so popular but in the last 2 or 3 years I've not replaced copies that have worn out and donations of his books have often been added to my 'freebies' table.

I've got one or two hardbacks put to one side which will be turns into folded book Christmas Trees. I'm sharing paper-crafts ideas with my Librarian colleagues so that we can make something beautiful out of his shit.

Bundleflower · 10/11/2026 15:15

WitchesBritches · 10/11/2026 15:09

Your certainty that he will do it and that he will do it by the end of the week.

My certainty? On my certain-ometer I put ‘reckon’ at around 60%.

Stowickthevast · 10/11/2026 15:12

Firesidechatter · 10/11/2026 15:00

Oh cmon, he has not been accused of rape, if you prefer that language better. The worst he’s been accused of is kissing a fifteen year olds breast, which is heinous in itself, and is sexual assault, but is not a rape allegation.

The 15 year old says he kissed her breast and tried to put her hands down his trousers. That would constitute sexual assault as far as I'm aware.

mrpenny · 10/11/2026 15:10

nomas · 10/11/2026 15:05

Which bit are you referring to in the article?

You realise MN isn't pay per word? Explain what you're saying!

I think I wrote it???🙄🤨In one word….

OP posts:
WitchesBritches · 10/11/2026 15:09

Bundleflower · 10/11/2026 14:00

How so? He’s already threatened it. I believe he’ll follow it through.

Your certainty that he will do it and that he will do it by the end of the week.

lastapache · 10/11/2026 15:08

HectorPlasm · 10/11/2026 15:03

I've always had bad vibes about JR - add the bake-off man to that vibe too

Edited

I'm so sad about that. Always liked NF. I know that visually he presents as alternative and a bit weird, but I never got the creepy vibe from him. Unlike DW.

lastapache · 10/11/2026 15:06

Firesidechatter · 10/11/2026 15:01

But again if you read the article and look at his messages, there is nothing sexual in them,

Not when they were underage, but in one of the women's cases the contact turned sexual once she turned 17. Even if that's not falling foul of the grooming laws, that's grooming, plain and simple. I don't think anyone would disagree that that is completely unacceptable behaviour for a 32 year old man - famous or not. It's definitely serious enough behaviour to permanently damage your reputation and your likelihood to be employed in the public eye again. He would have known that at the time, and he did it anyway.