Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Russel Brands eyes

340 replies

Getsomemeatonyerbones · 08/11/2026 18:16

They are very strange arent they?
I have always thought this.
He either looks manic and crazy or they're like black holes, just dead, wonder if that's telling?

Also, did you ever fancy him? I had a friend who thought he was gorgeous. I never ever did and he couldn't have been further from my type

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Thread gallery
8
EvieBB · Today 17:35

godmum56 · Today 17:23

how can that not stick in your mind?

No idea. I don't think I even finished the book....🤔 It was from the library

godmum56 · Today 17:24

CloveRinse · Today 13:48

I don't think David Walliams is sleeping well at night at the moment!

I thought that today when the news was on

godmum56 · Today 17:23

EvieBB · Today 13:50

As I said, I don't remember reading that part of the book at all. It was over 2 decades ago....

how can that not stick in your mind?

EvieBB · Today 13:50

Jadeprincess · Today 10:43

And you still thought he was attractive ? - wow !

As I said, I don't remember reading that part of the book at all. It was over 2 decades ago....

CloveRinse · Today 13:48

Mama2many73 · 08/11/2026 19:51

Believe its proven that cruelty to animals develop into cruelty to humans.

From my POV I never fancied him, some friends did, his humour wasn't mine but thats personal.preference. I saw him as overly confident and cocky which I really dont like in a man.

I think those who say its a witch hunt by the establishment etc are delusional. He is a predator who hunted women and did it in plain sight and got away with it for too long. Men.especialky need to call inappropriate behaviour / sexual harassment and abuse.

I think there will be a lot of men, both famous and not , who might becoming very worried at what could be heading their.way.

I don't think David Walliams is sleeping well at night at the moment!

TwoShades1 · Today 11:54

I’ll admit I quite liked him. Thought he was attractive liked his comedy, though he did get a bit wordy and political sometimes which isn’t really my thing.

however I’m completely unsurprised when he was accused of rape and sexual assault. He’s done a lot of drugs and alcohol and sex and had a messed up childhood and a very high opinion of himself. I don’t think he set out with a plan to rape women, more that I don’t think he actually occurred to him that some people didn’t want to have sex with him.

OrlandointheWilderness · Today 11:29

I thought he was funny when he first started out and fancied him a bit. But the lore he spoke the less I liked him- he uses a huge amount of word salad to try and convince the world he is intelligent, however if you actually understand the words he uses then some times he makes absolutely no sense at all!!!
can’t stand him and haven’t liked him for years.

godmum56 · Today 11:15

Jadeprincess · Today 10:43

And you still thought he was attractive ? - wow !

Not me. I never thought he was anything but a mouthy sleaze. Also I never read the book.

PeloMom · Today 11:13

always thought he was sleaze. I remember he was constantly on telly/ in the papers 20+ yrs ago and I just couldn’t figure out what women saw in him (from memory he was # something the sexiest man in the world or something at some point).

EvieBB · Today 11:11

Jadeprincess · Today 10:30

It seems he was a nasty piece of goods from the word 'go'...

In his 2007 autobiography My Booky Wook, Russell Brand confessed to being cruel to his childhood family dog, Topsy.
The passage described a recurring cycle of behavior from when he was roughly 11 years old:

  • The Lure: After a rule was introduced banning Topsy from the upper floor of the house, Brand would sit at the top of the stairs and coax the dog to come up to him ("Topsy! Topsy! Topsy!").
  • The Abuse: Once the nervous dog cautiously climbed up to the forbidden area, Brand would scold her and violently kick her back down to the bottom of the stairs.
  • The Pretended Sympathy: He would then run downstairs to cuddle and comfort Topsy, later comparing the dynamic to having an "evil twin" upstairs and a "good twin" downstairs.
The story re-emerged widely across social media and news commentary following his recent legal convictions and trial.

Horrendous. That poor dog 😓
If you can do that to an animal, then that's very telling. The man is sick

MesaVerde · Today 11:09

Tears0fTheMushroom · Today 00:07

Ra Ra Russell Brand. Johnny Depp from Poundland.

Ha ha! I've always referred to him as 'Poundland Jack Sparrow'

Jadeprincess · Today 10:43

godmum56 · Today 09:36

Yes.

And you still thought he was attractive ? - wow !

Jadeprincess · Today 10:30

EvieBB · Today 09:55

I don't remember reading that. Obviously that's appalling

It seems he was a nasty piece of goods from the word 'go'...

In his 2007 autobiography My Booky Wook, Russell Brand confessed to being cruel to his childhood family dog, Topsy.
The passage described a recurring cycle of behavior from when he was roughly 11 years old:

  • The Lure: After a rule was introduced banning Topsy from the upper floor of the house, Brand would sit at the top of the stairs and coax the dog to come up to him ("Topsy! Topsy! Topsy!").
  • The Abuse: Once the nervous dog cautiously climbed up to the forbidden area, Brand would scold her and violently kick her back down to the bottom of the stairs.
  • The Pretended Sympathy: He would then run downstairs to cuddle and comfort Topsy, later comparing the dynamic to having an "evil twin" upstairs and a "good twin" downstairs.
The story re-emerged widely across social media and news commentary following his recent legal convictions and trial.
EvieBB · Today 09:55

EvieBB · Today 09:55

I don't remember reading that. Obviously that's appalling

It's not like you know what's in the book before you buy it! 🙄

EvieBB · Today 09:55

Jadeprincess · Today 09:26

Was this the book where he describes with glee how he tormented his pet dog?

I don't remember reading that. Obviously that's appalling

godmum56 · Today 09:36

Jadeprincess · Today 09:26

Was this the book where he describes with glee how he tormented his pet dog?

Yes.

Jadeprincess · Today 09:26

godmum56 · Yesterday 13:18

you read the book and still thought he was attractive?

Was this the book where he describes with glee how he tormented his pet dog?

Tears0fTheMushroom · Today 00:07

floopyboop · 08/11/2026 19:30

Oh my God, THAT'S who he reminds me of. Rasputin. He's a hipster Rasputin.

Ra Ra Russell Brand. Johnny Depp from Poundland.

EvieBB · Yesterday 23:40

Sartre · Yesterday 17:00

Well, I disagree. I obviously think he’s an abomination but his face isn’t unattractive and it’s ok to say this. Hook nose is a bit extreme, it’s a straight and proportionate nose. Good for you on the humour front, I found him very charming and amusing as a 14/15 year old girl so I can see how he was so appealing.

I agree with you Sartre. He's obviously a disgrace and extremely unattractive in every single way possible now but back in the day I also thought he was attractive and had tons of charisma. He wouldn't have been able to charm so many women back to his place had he not had these qualities. Sadly, as we now know he's a very damaged and dangerous person.

likelysuspect · Yesterday 19:04

SerendipityJane · Yesterday 18:42

The thing is the bar for convincing a panel you are no danger is very high.

Lots of people are in bog standard prison with MH conditions which can be treated in prison instead of in hospital

If you are in prison, you are have been found guilty in a criminal court.

I was specifically referring to defendants who plead "Not guilty due to diminished capacity" and are subsequently acquitted. They can be sent to a secure mental institution indefinitely.

As you say, irrelevant here - but worth noting why so few criminals try that route.

I didnt realise you were talking about aquittal, so yes thats true. But you can also be found guilty, then argue your case if you like, so you'll be sent to hospital to serve some of your sentence because you need 'treatment'

Although having worked in secure psychiatric hospitals (not forensic) and also prisons, I dont know why someone would think its any different hugely, the rooms might be nicer but essentially you're still locked up.

NewMonsteraLeaf · Yesterday 18:56

Lemieux7 · 08/11/2026 18:19

In person I’m sure he’s very charming but I wouldn’t have touched him with a barge pole.

He looks unclean and yes, mad.

SerendipityJane · Yesterday 18:42

likelysuspect · Yesterday 18:29

Its not necessarily life, you'll be there until you are deemed no longer needing psychiatric care.

Lots of people are in bog standard prison with MH conditions which can be treated in prison instead of in hospital

You may also have been ill at the time of your crime but not ill by the time of the trial.

Irrelevant in any case for him

The thing is the bar for convincing a panel you are no danger is very high.

Lots of people are in bog standard prison with MH conditions which can be treated in prison instead of in hospital

If you are in prison, you are have been found guilty in a criminal court.

I was specifically referring to defendants who plead "Not guilty due to diminished capacity" and are subsequently acquitted. They can be sent to a secure mental institution indefinitely.

As you say, irrelevant here - but worth noting why so few criminals try that route.

likelysuspect · Yesterday 18:29

SerendipityJane · Yesterday 14:18

I've read that it's usually considered a very risky strategy to try and get acquitted due to mental health. Quite aside from it being a very high bar and investigated by real doctors, if it works the defendant gets committed for life. It's what Broadmoor is for.

Its not necessarily life, you'll be there until you are deemed no longer needing psychiatric care.

Lots of people are in bog standard prison with MH conditions which can be treated in prison instead of in hospital

You may also have been ill at the time of your crime but not ill by the time of the trial.

Irrelevant in any case for him

likelysuspect · Yesterday 18:26

godmum56 · Yesterday 13:25

interesting that a mental health defence wasn't made.....I mean either you are not responsible by reason of mental state or you are fit to plead...

I thought he pled not guilty?

You wouldnt give any mitigation if you're claiming the crime didnt happen

likelysuspect · Yesterday 18:06

Mysteise · 08/11/2026 23:40

It’s interesting to look back at his formative years, particularly that period before he married Katy Perry and courted Hollywood, so around 2004–09? For me, he really exemplified that era, which had a zany, surreal, anything-goes quality to it. At the time, me and my friends liked him! We thought he was funny, charismatic and outrageous. I certainly didn’t have him pegged as some awful person with evil eyes. He was just part of that cultural landscape and his humour and behaviour seemed to exemplify the attitudes of the time.

It was a peculiar atmosphere in the Uk around that time. There was the whole indie explosion, which had a glam rock and roll aesthetic to it. The Libertines, Arctic Monkeys, The Kooks, The Cribs etc. Skinny jeans, leather jackets, messy hair, vintage clothes. RB wasn’t the only one looking permanently dishevelled and smelly, that was the ‘look’. There was a real romanticisation of the chaotic, drug-taking, hard-partying rock star and along with that a sense of excess around relationships and sex. You had Amy Winehouse and Blake Fielder-Civil, Kate Moss and Pete Doherty, and this whole fascination with wild, volatile men and chaotic relationships.

Tele and comedy had a similar sensibility if you remember. Mighty Boosh, Garth Marenghi’s Darkplace, Nathan Barley etc. Everything was surreal, eccentric, deliberately inappropriate and out there. Russell Brand was part of that scene originally. Don’t forget, he first became widely famous through Big Brother's Big Mouth. At the time BB contestants were plied with alcohol, with producers hoping it would lead to sex and rows that made headlines. Absolutely crazy when you think about it now!

On reflection it was a pretty dark and hedonistic time. I wonder whether that also created an environment where quite a lot of unpleasant male behaviour was simply tolerated. The sleazy frontman, the obnoxious comedian were written off as laddishness, charisma, eccentricity or just being rock and roll. There seemed to be a romanticisation of men behaving badly particularly if they were funny, creative or famous.

To be clear, I believe he is a predator and feel so much sympathy for the poor women and girls he abused. I think as the years went on he became more and more twisted by fame and his celebrity status fuelled his narcissism and sense of entitlement. But I do think there’s a wider conversation to be had about the media’s role in creating and encouraging the persona he became famous for (in the early days at least). I’m glad for young people that things are different now. It was a weird time to grow up as a young woman.

I’ve been watching clips of some of his earlier tv appearances on Alan Carr, Jonathan Ross and Graham Norton. What’s striking is how much all of the presenters seem to cajole him into being this outrageous caricature. They’re prompting him, encouraging him, playing along and the audiences are absolutely in stitches. Funny how quiet they all are now.

Because that is entertainment as well and to be fair, despite what countless threads seem to be saying about him, a lot of women like that rock and roll/unsafe or dirty type of man

I was on a thread recently about Jamie Oliver, of all people, actually I think it was about his wife, someone was saying she has a lovely life and I agreed, I think they're a lovely couple, I like him etc etc. I cant remember how it came round but people were calling him names like they do, saying hes a big lump and how awful that must be for her etc etc and comparisons were made with Gordon Ramsey. I said I found Gordon Ramsey to be repulsive and how awful his face is etc and someone said 'yeah but he would be better in bed, really dirty and filthy'

I dont quite know how the thread got to that, but many women like that, the faux disgust about RB that is all over these threads is making me laugh, women were throwing themselves at him and those like him and still do, there are still filthy, unpleasant actors/addicts/pop stars and women are throwing themselves at them
Nothing has changed since the days of Byron and further back.

Swipe left for the next trending thread