Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To tell you all that David Walliams has been dropped by his publisher Harper Collins?

270 replies

hotmumshit · 18/09/2026 14:19

What else is there to come out about this guy?!

OP posts:
Needmorelego · 18/09/2026 16:09

Fiddlesticks1 · 18/09/2026 15:49

His books appeal much like Ronald Dahl but Ronald Dahl was original and DW is not. Take boy in the girls dress- original was by Anne Fine- Bill’s New Frock.

Bill's New Frock is a completely different plot.
Not similar at all.

PrettyLittleRose · 18/09/2026 16:10

OnlyUsername · 18/09/2026 16:05

Roald!

Ronald. 😆 That did made me laugh. I don't mean that in a nasty, condescending way, it just tickled me!

Aviarythebird · 18/09/2026 16:10

hotmumshit · 18/09/2026 15:03

What's coming must be bad if they can't separate the art from the artist though

I know what you mean but would we term his books art?

PrettyLittleRose · 18/09/2026 16:11

TonyDancer · 18/09/2026 16:09

I don’t think you can beat Rock and Roll Christmas but Gary Glitter is a deeply disturbed man

It does annoy me how much I love that song, and it's Gary Glitter. Ewww. 😖

PrettyLittleRose · 18/09/2026 16:11

I still love Michael Jackson's music. The majority of it.

RUNS >>>>>>>>>>. 🏃

TheSmallAssassin · 18/09/2026 16:12

LeaderBee · 18/09/2026 14:21

Separate the art from the artist.
if kids enjoy his books, so what?

They are shit books though. Once you've read one, you've read them all.

Dontlletmedownbruce · 18/09/2026 16:12

So far neither the poster or the pps have mentioned what they are on about. What did he do? This thread is so vague and cryptic it makes no sense it could be about anyone.

TonyDancer · 18/09/2026 16:13

PrettyLittleRose · 18/09/2026 16:11

It does annoy me how much I love that song, and it's Gary Glitter. Ewww. 😖

Such a weird bloke but the songs are great.

SmallandSpanish · 18/09/2026 16:13

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Because he’s a sleazy twat who deserves his downfall and its way too little too late?

PrettyLittleRose · 18/09/2026 16:14

Dontlletmedownbruce · 18/09/2026 16:12

So far neither the poster or the pps have mentioned what they are on about. What did he do? This thread is so vague and cryptic it makes no sense it could be about anyone.

Yeah, the OP posted her first (cryptic) message, and has posted nothing since.

Confused
PrettyLittleRose · 18/09/2026 16:14

SmallandSpanish · 18/09/2026 16:13

Because he’s a sleazy twat who deserves his downfall and its way too little too late?

BUT WHAT HAS HE DONE?

PrettyLittleRose · 18/09/2026 16:14

SORRY ABOUT THE CAPITALS!

Needmorelego · 18/09/2026 16:16

Well going by the amount of copies of his books I see in charity shops the books aren't going to disappear completely for quite some time.
There will still be gazillions in circulation.
I suppose with no new books and no new print runs of his back catalogue there might not be any new fans and the popularity will gradually fizzle out.
Regardless of what he has done/not done or what his personality is....the books are fairly rubbish anyway and the early ones incredibly dated as he uses a lot of pop culture references.
Oh well.

Gall10 · 18/09/2026 16:17

LeaderBee · 18/09/2026 14:21

Separate the art from the artist.
if kids enjoy his books, so what?

Really?

believeinbelieve · 18/09/2026 16:17

He doesn't seem like a nice person.

Saw him on Michael McIntyre's Wheel thing a while back and he came across very badly, I thought.

I didn't like Little Britain either - a few funny moments (son used to watch it as a teenager) but overall left a nasty taste. Very teenage boy humour in general and a few sketches were really unpleasant.

alphabetboxes · 18/09/2026 16:19

Dontlletmedownbruce · 18/09/2026 16:12

So far neither the poster or the pps have mentioned what they are on about. What did he do? This thread is so vague and cryptic it makes no sense it could be about anyone.

The main thing is a set of allegations that surfaced in December 2025. HarperCollins announced it would not publish any new titles by Walliams "after careful consideration, and under the leadership of its new CEO", following reports of alleged inappropriate behaviour towards young women at the company. Former employees told The Telegraph they had been advised to meet him in pairs and not to visit his home. He denies it — his spokesperson said he was never informed of any allegations, was not part of any investigation, and is taking legal advice.
It has escalated since. The BBC said it has no plans to work with him in future, Waterstones dropped him from its 2026 Children's Book Festival line-up, and as of today HarperCollins is reportedly ceasing printing of his existing books — titles like Mr Stink, Gangsta Granny and Ratburger have disappeared from its website along with his author page.
There's also older baggage feeding the story: the 2022 leaked Britain's Got Talent transcript of obscene remarks he made about contestants (he apologised, and settled a lawsuit against FremantleMedia in 2023), and long-running criticism of Little Britain for racist and transphobic content, including an Ofcom finding in 2023 describing one sketch as explicitly racist and outdated.

nobody is having a go at the bbc for airing it in the first place or the British public for loving it but there you go

LaidOnYourBackWithTheBoyWithTheArabStrap · 18/09/2026 16:21

The fact that he was dropped so quickly from the publisher, agent and others makes me wonder how many people in positions of power over him already knew what he’d done and did nothing until some incidents became public. Basically, I strongly believe that this has been about doing the right thing and everything to do with their bottom line; money and reputation.

That said, I’m glad this odious bastard has been cancelled. It’s no more than he deserves. Also his books are absolute shite to the point that only my eldest has ever read them. We chucked them before the others could discover them. So no great loss to the literary world.

PinkMagpie · 18/09/2026 16:23

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

I would imagine it is because this is a women’s discussion forum and David Walliams has been credibly reported to be predatory to women and girls.

if you’re not interested in the topic you don’t have to click on the thread

BrezhnevsLuxuriantEyebrows · 18/09/2026 16:23

Needmorelego · 18/09/2026 16:16

Well going by the amount of copies of his books I see in charity shops the books aren't going to disappear completely for quite some time.
There will still be gazillions in circulation.
I suppose with no new books and no new print runs of his back catalogue there might not be any new fans and the popularity will gradually fizzle out.
Regardless of what he has done/not done or what his personality is....the books are fairly rubbish anyway and the early ones incredibly dated as he uses a lot of pop culture references.
Oh well.

Well going by the amount of copies of his books I see in charity shops the books aren't going to disappear completely for quite some time.
There will still be gazillions in circulation.

Yes, I was thinking this too! Maybe the publishers have decided not to print any more copies partly because they're so extremely easy to buy for 50p a copy, who would buy the new ones?! Do they still print new copies of 50 Shades of Grey - bearing in mind the same situation?!

Dontlletmedownbruce · 18/09/2026 16:23

Thank you @alphabetboxes

Needmorelego · 18/09/2026 16:25

@BrezhnevsLuxuriantEyebrows I have seen new copies of "50 Shades" with an updated cover picture 🤷

FudgeFudy · 18/09/2026 16:25

Aviarythebird · 18/09/2026 16:10

I know what you mean but would we term his books art?

I'd say shart is nearer the mark. Odious weirdo who somehow managed to steal not one but two careers. All in my opinion of course.

Fiddlesticks1 · 18/09/2026 16:26

AlwaysExtraHot · 18/09/2026 16:04

You mean Roald.
And I think it's generally accepted that DW is a Roald Dahl ripper-offer. Clearly his publishers positioned him as 'the new Roald Dahl' too, by giving him the same illustrator.

Yes, sorry didn’t notice error.

AndyoutooInez · 18/09/2026 16:26

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Fiddlesticks1 · 18/09/2026 16:27

Fiddlesticks1 · 18/09/2026 15:49

His books appeal much like Ronald Dahl but Ronald Dahl was original and DW is not. Take boy in the girls dress- original was by Anne Fine- Bill’s New Frock.

I mean Roald