Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To tell you all that David Walliams has been dropped by his publisher Harper Collins?

270 replies

hotmumshit · 18/09/2026 14:19

What else is there to come out about this guy?!

OP posts:
PinkMagpie · 19/09/2026 09:28

user1476613140 · 19/09/2026 09:04

Just Googled as I had no idea what this was all about...allegations. Until he has committed a crime, it is best not to comment...

And yet here you are on the thread!

user1476613140 · 19/09/2026 09:04

Just Googled as I had no idea what this was all about...allegations. Until he has committed a crime, it is best not to comment...

Dollymylove · 19/09/2026 09:01

TonyDancer · 18/09/2026 16:09

I don’t think you can beat Rock and Roll Christmas but Gary Glitter is a deeply disturbed man

I came along to say this. A Christmas banger but of course no longer played publicly

user1476613140 · 19/09/2026 08:56

I'm currently reading Code Name Bananas to one of the DC each night and it's a really enjoyable read.

Used to watch Little Britain years ago, might actually still have it on DVD box set.

BinturongsSmellOfPopcorn · 19/09/2026 08:54

You'd hope a ghostwriter would turn out something of better quality.

BrezhnevsLuxuriantEyebrows · 19/09/2026 08:44

DeftGoldHedgehog · 19/09/2026 08:21

But I still found his on camera behaviour objectionable at the time. I didn't even like the programme but my DM did and stopped watching because of his unfunny antics.

Oh, indeed, he behaved appallingly in front of the camera too; but I suppose he knew when he could try to gaslight people that it was just his 'wild madcap comedy' and when it was purely nothing other than sleazy nastiness.

BrezhnevsLuxuriantEyebrows · 19/09/2026 08:38

I'd be very, very interested to hear Lara Stone's personal accounts. Why on earth did she marry him? Aside from the widespread beliefs that he may not have been all that into women in the first place, if she was after more fame or fortune, there must be countless wealthy single celebrities out there who aren't mega creeps.

It wouldn't surprise me in the slightest if his legal representatives had 'strongly encouraged' her not to talk about any of her experiences of the marriage.

BinturongsSmellOfPopcorn · 19/09/2026 08:33

everyoldsock · 19/09/2026 07:45

A 60% drop is huge. I knew this was about money.

If the only consideration were financial, they would keep him. Print fewer copies, not delist him entirely.

Less money is still some money; which is better for a business than no money. If you were getting, say, £4,000 for doing virtually nothing, you wouldn't turn it down on the grounds that you used to get £10,000.

BrezhnevsLuxuriantEyebrows · 19/09/2026 08:33

khakipant · 18/09/2026 18:47

I don’t think that applies when his “art” is entirely ghostwritten

I understand (I may be mistaken) that he fought back, going legal against the many suggestions that his books were ghost-written. What the truth is, though, who knows?!

Either way, aside from the many other issues here, there's inevitably going to be an artistic quality issue in many cases when people who are already famous decide to turn their hand to writing (whether all their own work or just using their name on the cover).

Roald Dahl came to public prominence because he was a brilliant writer; if his writing had been mediocre and he'd struggled to find a publisher, none of us would even know who he was today.

DeftGoldHedgehog · 19/09/2026 08:21

BrezhnevsLuxuriantEyebrows · 19/09/2026 08:18

Interestingly, he seemed to know just how far to push it and what he could get away with. He tried very hard indeed to suppress the revelations of his odious comments on BGT that he believed wouldn't be audible to viewers at home - threatening legal action, as he is repeatedly reported to do.

But I still found his on camera behaviour objectionable at the time. I didn't even like the programme but my DM did and stopped watching because of his unfunny antics.

BrezhnevsLuxuriantEyebrows · 19/09/2026 08:18

DeftGoldHedgehog · 18/09/2026 18:07

He was inappropriate in plain sight on BGT. Such a bully.

Interestingly, he seemed to know just how far to push it and what he could get away with. He tried very hard indeed to suppress the revelations of his odious comments on BGT that he believed wouldn't be audible to viewers at home - threatening legal action, as he is repeatedly reported to do.

InfiniteTeas · 19/09/2026 08:01

The whisper network in the writing world has been going strong on Williams for years. General consensus is there’s something big still to come out. The timing of them dropping him just before Christmas last year suggested their hand had been forced. I’m wondering whether things have been snarled up with lawyers since then.

PinkMagpie · 19/09/2026 07:59

And the backlist sales are free and clear profit to Harper Collins. I’m just saying I agree with others who think there must be a reason for them to cut off this money stream

PinkMagpie · 19/09/2026 07:58

everyoldsock · 19/09/2026 07:56

Was there a need to be snotty and patronising?

Do you agree that HC are not making anywhere near as much money from his books as they used to?

Apologies if the tone was snotty, I genuinely didn’t mean it to be.

yes of course the sales have taken a big hit. The context is that they were massive sales so 40% of a huge figure is still a lot of money to Harper Collins

everyoldsock · 19/09/2026 07:56

PinkMagpie · 19/09/2026 07:48

The backlist are properties that have already been written and marketed. There are no overheads associated with them, the sales are profit. For Harper Collins to give Walliams his rights back to the backlist and cut off a revenue stream, if you know the business at all it looks like they have good reason to do that. We’ll see over the coming days

Was there a need to be snotty and patronising?

Do you agree that HC are not making anywhere near as much money from his books as they used to?

BugJuice · 19/09/2026 07:49

PrettyLittleRose · 18/09/2026 16:14

BUT WHAT HAS HE DONE?

Do you have Google?

PinkMagpie · 19/09/2026 07:48

everyoldsock · 19/09/2026 07:45

A 60% drop is huge. I knew this was about money.

The backlist are properties that have already been written and marketed. There are no overheads associated with them, the sales are profit. For Harper Collins to give Walliams his rights back to the backlist and cut off a revenue stream, if you know the business at all it looks like they have good reason to do that. We’ll see over the coming days

everyoldsock · 19/09/2026 07:45

A 60% drop is huge. I knew this was about money.

LlynTegid · 19/09/2026 07:29

If there is worse to be reported, please spare a thought for any victims, if there are any.

PinkMagpie · 19/09/2026 07:27

SALaw · 19/09/2026 07:10

Is it still very lucrative though? What’s the data on that? I suspect its popularity has declined when he’s not on TV and there’s no active marketing of the books plus there’s a whiff of something that people don’t know the details of but would be put off buying the books by.

Getting rid of the backlist is an extra step they didn’t need to take. There was no clamour for it. The David Walliams story had faded away. His sales are down 60%, but that means they are still getting 40% of those massive sales. Harper Collins are cutting off a revenue stream and I share the opinion of other posters who says that it points to something about it come out

SALaw · 19/09/2026 07:10

PinkMagpie · 18/09/2026 16:35

I think you are right OP @hotmumshit that something must be about to come out. Walliams’ back catalogue is still very lucrative so that is a lot of money Harper Collins are stepping away from

Is it still very lucrative though? What’s the data on that? I suspect its popularity has declined when he’s not on TV and there’s no active marketing of the books plus there’s a whiff of something that people don’t know the details of but would be put off buying the books by.

UnwillingAdvocate · 19/09/2026 07:08

hotmumshit · 18/09/2026 15:02

I reckon there's more to come 😬😬😬

Yeah, apparently he’s a ‘Lay Dee’ who likes to do ‘Lay Dee’ things.

Morecoffeeneedef · 19/09/2026 07:05

I thought they dropped him a while ago.

Minesril · 19/09/2026 07:02

They’ll disappear from bookshops soon enough: if they’re not sold they’ll be returned to the publisher to be pulped.

The only really funny scenes from Little Britain was the one with the dodgy politician giving statements to the press, and that was only funny because of Lucas’ expressions! The ‘weight watchers’ skit was mildly amusing, but blatantly copied from League of Gentlemen, which was much funnier.

iwishtoo · 19/09/2026 05:34

believeinbelieve · 18/09/2026 20:36

I suppose you could argue it was "iconic"
in the sense that it launched catchphrases like "computer says no", "only gay in the village", Vicky Pollard's "yeah but no but..." etc.

It could have been good in a zeitgeisty way but it went way too far and really plumbed the depths at times. It showed a contempt for anyone "not like them" - classist, racist, ageist, ableist - that seems typical of Walliams. I'm not sure about Lucas. But he was involved in it too so I can't give him a pass.

Also Tom Baker should have known better!

This. I couldn't watch it, so many parts were just offensive rather than funny. I didn't understand why it was so popular.