Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AI over the next few years

469 replies

Nutmuncher · 03/07/2026 12:46

I’ve recently shifted my reading content from war, doom scrolling and political madness towards being positive for the next few years, mainly scientific breakthroughs and technological advances from AI. There’s so much to be excited about (aside from the inescapable dose of fear and nerves of war doom climate doom and politics) and I think it’s something MN should be talking about more.

AI is coming whether we like it or not, it’s going to bring with it a seismic shift for the world that’s going to be incredible but also bring with it a tricky societal transition that will impact us all in some way, jobs will change, industry will evolve, the human touch will become increasingly important. How easily we transition to that new world is another story, how will those who don’t use devices or aren’t technology native actually navigate a more connected world? The economic implications if entire industries go or certain careers are no longer needed could be catastrophic if not managed properly and that’s just the tip of the iceberg. But I want to focus on the positives so let’s gloss over the bumpy transition period for now 😅

The advances and changes we’re going to see in the coming years will make today look like the 80’s in a relatively short space of time. The pace of progress in companies such as Anthropic, SpaceX, OpenAI right now is breathtaking. People think picture editing or making dodgy FB posters whenever you mention AI but it’s so much more than that, we just think it’s bad for the environment and that it’s taking jobs away when actually alongside technology and robotics it’s going to revolutionise how we live dramatically.

Excited about-

Medical advances and breakthroughs, we’ve seen the impact GLP-1s brought, there’s so much more just like those coming in the next few years. Drugs are being discovered super fast, research is taking months instead of years and analysis of clinical trials is more thorough and accurate. As new technologies come available the medicines keep improving. Gene therapy and having targeted treatments based on our own genetics is an exciting area of research that’s currently happening, the understanding of our own bodies will be a major step forward. I have always been keen in longevity and wellness, areas which I’m watching like a hawk.

Education. AI isn’t going to be a hologram teacher (not yet anyway) instead it could help teachers tailor lessons to each child, minimise many of the laborious administrative tasks, help to identify learning difficulties earlier and much more. I think classrooms are going to look very different in the next 5 years.

Industry. Rather than replacing entire industries, AI will automate repetitive work, improve decision-making and help people work more efficiently. Some sectors will change more than others and productivity will increase along with efficiency in the businesses that adopt and adapt. I think industry and workplaces in general will soon be judged on how quickly they use new technology, those that do will appear relevant and capable and those that don’t will resemble an office if it were still using a typewriter today.

Anyone else excited?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
NamechangeRugby · Yesterday 11:20

The bit about child learning being taken over by AI I find most sinister.

Greater opportunities for vocational learning is great, but a totally separate issue.

bumblingbovine49 · Yesterday 11:20

Backedoffhackedoff · 03/07/2026 13:01

Really interested to understand this more- I am director of a finance department (so the accountants you’re talking out lol!) my organisation provide basic co pilot. What would you start using it for the get ahead? I only use it for presenting ideas and initiatives (ie complex emails or paper wording) and can’t see how else it can help really?

We use copilot at work. For a recent task, I was asked to look at sector information about a particular aspect of work where the company has not done well thia year. Questions like where did we do wrong and how did others in our sector do, who is doing it better and how can we learn from that

I would not trust AI as a starting point for that but I collated data from a variety of sources, some free, some paid for and created spreadsheets that collatesd that into a reasonably easy to read format where you could see patterns. That in itself took a while bu it neded a good understanding of the different data available sector sources and which were most relevant for the questions we had

However pulling out the important patterns from thr collated sheet and summarising that into a coherent story for the relevant teams to use in planning next year would have taken me several days.. Copilot did it in minutes and I only needed half a day to check what ist had done that the numbers were correct and add any specific terms our company uses.

I told it use neutral descriptive language , UK spelling and to avoid too much highlighting and superlatives and adjectives and it came up with a pretty good output in a fraction of the additional time it would usually take me and I am.very experienced in this sport of data synthesis

This was a job where the idea of large data analysis was overkill as outlining the differences in the different data sources would have taken ages when I already know that. Collating it took me 1-2 days, summarising into key learnings for different audiences would have taken me 2-3 days . With AI the whole thing took me 3 days instead of 4- 5. Not quite the miracle everyone says but very useful nonetheless

Nutmuncher · Yesterday 11:21

NamechangeRugby · Yesterday 11:01

Utopia at last! Horrah! You have solved everything, ever @Nutmuncher

All the world's problems solved and we can all live in peace and harmony forever and perfectly functioning UBI.

Because there is no such thing in the world as inflation or monopolies or greed or the very essential human need for purpose in life. And humans will absolutely just sit back and allow robots to take over... Robots will never feel physically threatened and will never try to impose their will or defend themselves in any way. There is no such thing as finite resources to build all these robots with, which could actually be put to other purposes. No such thing as data centres sucking up energy & water & causing air and sound pollution. No such thing as a massive AI stocks & shares bubble. Nope... all just amazing here 😍.

😅 no one said the transition was going to be easy. Small steps.

OP posts:
NamechangeRugby · Yesterday 11:36

Nutmuncher · Yesterday 11:21

😅 no one said the transition was going to be easy. Small steps.

You don't seem to be talking in 'small steps'. Might your reply be just a tad disingenuous and shallow, given the sweeping changes you are predicting?

Nutmuncher · Yesterday 16:04

NamechangeRugby · Yesterday 11:20

The bit about child learning being taken over by AI I find most sinister.

Greater opportunities for vocational learning is great, but a totally separate issue.

I don’t believe we’ll see teachers getting replaced in classrooms any time soon but there’s a lot of scope in education to use AI as a tool to improve the learning experience.

‘AI TA’s’ could pair with each pupil and adapt to their individual needs. A teacher with 30 children in a classroom could effectively assign their AI TA’s with the days learning objectives, each AI then adapts a tailored lesson plan for their pupil aligned with the overall goals for the class.

Teachers could have a dashboard view of what each plan looks like, the TA AI reports back on their pupils progress in real time. Teachers would have the ability to provide equivalent 1-1 learning for every pupil.

Huge potential.

OP posts:
Badbadbunny · Yesterday 16:23

Nutmuncher · Yesterday 16:04

I don’t believe we’ll see teachers getting replaced in classrooms any time soon but there’s a lot of scope in education to use AI as a tool to improve the learning experience.

‘AI TA’s’ could pair with each pupil and adapt to their individual needs. A teacher with 30 children in a classroom could effectively assign their AI TA’s with the days learning objectives, each AI then adapts a tailored lesson plan for their pupil aligned with the overall goals for the class.

Teachers could have a dashboard view of what each plan looks like, the TA AI reports back on their pupils progress in real time. Teachers would have the ability to provide equivalent 1-1 learning for every pupil.

Huge potential.

I fully agree. We need to work "with" AI to improve our services, not fight against it. You can't swim against the tide. Over the years there've been loads of critics of teacher-generated "scrappy work-sheets" where teachers are constantly re-inventing the wheel to suit a new class etc., but that's something AI could be used for very easily, and that's just one minor thing. AI could be used to mark essays etc which are very time consuming.

I'm an accountant. I've been on loads of courses on AI over the past few years, and use AI extensively in my practice. Not to replace me. I do it to enhance "me". I can do more, both in terms of time and ability. There's work I do today that I couldn't have done five years ago. One of the many course lecturers hit the nail on the head when he told us to treat AI as "an enthusiastic trainee" - i.e. feel free to give it work to do, things to research, etc., but properly review what it produces in the same way you'd review the work of a trainee!

I know lots of people criticise it for lack of accuracy, mistakes, etc., but a lot of that is down to not giving it proper instructions/background, etc., i.e. being too vague. Again, just like having a new trainee, you need to give them clear instructions etc. AI is remarkably similar. It will go off on a tangent and give wrong answers if you're not 100% clear with it's instructions and terms of reference.

I think AI in schools and classrooms could be a game changer. But teachers need to be properly taught how to use it and we, finally, need some coherent national strategy, i.e. "banks" of materials so teachers aren't constantly re-inventing the wheel. AI could even be used to create that "bank" of materials.

NamechangeRugby · Yesterday 17:38

Nutmuncher · Yesterday 16:04

I don’t believe we’ll see teachers getting replaced in classrooms any time soon but there’s a lot of scope in education to use AI as a tool to improve the learning experience.

‘AI TA’s’ could pair with each pupil and adapt to their individual needs. A teacher with 30 children in a classroom could effectively assign their AI TA’s with the days learning objectives, each AI then adapts a tailored lesson plan for their pupil aligned with the overall goals for the class.

Teachers could have a dashboard view of what each plan looks like, the TA AI reports back on their pupils progress in real time. Teachers would have the ability to provide equivalent 1-1 learning for every pupil.

Huge potential.

Why stop with children? Why don't we tether an AI TA to every adult worker to train and monitor how they are doing all day too? Be really interesting to see how their psychology and mental health develops as an experiment. To see how their independence and individuality flourishes when every move and every thought is monitored, assessed, guided and assumed to fit with pre-determined metrics so it fits into a well designed dash board.

Although if you extrapolate out the model, really... why bother to educate much at all, when AI can do it all? Expensive and no ROI to educate humans to their full potential when no trainee work to go to / what work there is retires at 40.

Nutmuncher · Yesterday 17:40

NamechangeRugby · Yesterday 11:36

You don't seem to be talking in 'small steps'. Might your reply be just a tad disingenuous and shallow, given the sweeping changes you are predicting?

The future is incredibly exciting for society though. The benefits of better healthcare alone will have profound impacts on everyone, a GP equivalent in your pocket, disease breakthroughs, new medications and so on. Ease as many health worries as possible and you shift the mood of society.

The same will happen as we discover new materials or processes that eliminate wastage, make life more efficient, create abundant energy, actually removing stressors for people not adding to them.

UBI or early pensions in the next 10 years would free up time for those who want more time, there will still be jobs for those who prefer to work, but work won’t be the life sentence it is for so many of us now. The human connection will be appreciated and valued whereas today it’s taken for granted, I trade 5 days per week of my time in order to live a life that is built around the job of 5 days and 2 days of freedom.

OP posts:
Pinkfluffypencilcase · Yesterday 17:41

And they pay for the ai resource. ATM we have some staff using the Fred version and the ones that pay producing amazing things.

Nutmuncher · Yesterday 17:49

NamechangeRugby · Yesterday 17:38

Why stop with children? Why don't we tether an AI TA to every adult worker to train and monitor how they are doing all day too? Be really interesting to see how their psychology and mental health develops as an experiment. To see how their independence and individuality flourishes when every move and every thought is monitored, assessed, guided and assumed to fit with pre-determined metrics so it fits into a well designed dash board.

Although if you extrapolate out the model, really... why bother to educate much at all, when AI can do it all? Expensive and no ROI to educate humans to their full potential when no trainee work to go to / what work there is retires at 40.

Education will always be vital, how many children fall through the system because of the current one size fits all curriculum? Tailored learning is a luxury only afford to those who can afford one to one tuition now, imagine every child having that access. Transformational.

As for adults having an AI tethered to them, we already do it’s called a smartphone. AI or Excel and other dashboards monitor and critique my career performance already so there’s no change there and I’m sure that’s the case for everyone in full time work anyway, my progression and salary is all decided by said dashboards so again not particularly a step into the unknown. Maybe the future AI monitors will be more pragmatic and appreciative compare to the humans in charge of said dashboards now.

OP posts:
Pinkfluffypencilcase · Yesterday 17:51

Pinkfluffypencilcase · Yesterday 17:41

And they pay for the ai resource. ATM we have some staff using the Fred version and the ones that pay producing amazing things.

Free version.

NamechangeRugby · Yesterday 17:59

Nutmuncher · Yesterday 17:40

The future is incredibly exciting for society though. The benefits of better healthcare alone will have profound impacts on everyone, a GP equivalent in your pocket, disease breakthroughs, new medications and so on. Ease as many health worries as possible and you shift the mood of society.

The same will happen as we discover new materials or processes that eliminate wastage, make life more efficient, create abundant energy, actually removing stressors for people not adding to them.

UBI or early pensions in the next 10 years would free up time for those who want more time, there will still be jobs for those who prefer to work, but work won’t be the life sentence it is for so many of us now. The human connection will be appreciated and valued whereas today it’s taken for granted, I trade 5 days per week of my time in order to live a life that is built around the job of 5 days and 2 days of freedom.

I so hope it is as you believe. The advances in healthcare and medicine, those I would absolutely prioritise - yes, can see it and champion it.

Energy... It sucks up so much and I'm just not convinced it is going to produce enough efficiencies, enough new amazing science to compensate, but never say never.

UBI is a lively idea, it is just so expensive and who pays? Early retirement, a lovely idea - who pays? The economic titans of the world don't even pay the amount of tax they truly should. Who or what is going to change this as they amass more and more power?

Dr13Hadley · Yesterday 18:26

cauliflowercheeseplease · 03/07/2026 14:56

I work for the NHS and we’ve been told redundancies will happen and AI will be taking over the job roles of consultants secretaries for example.
So it will become even harder to get to speak to a human being within the NHS.

This is already happening in our Trust. It’s not going well………. They’ve had to start recruiting back all the secretaries they layed off last year.

NotrialNodeal · Yesterday 18:30

OP I've got to page 5 - I can't read anymore. You are incredibly naive to the point I'm not sure you're even real.

cauliflowercheeseplease · Yesterday 18:31

Dr13Hadley · Yesterday 18:26

This is already happening in our Trust. It’s not going well………. They’ve had to start recruiting back all the secretaries they layed off last year.

I’m on maternity leave currently. I saw in the news this week a consultation period has begun in our trust so I checked my work emails. I was emailed two weeks ago and have missed several meetings already. I contacted HR and the union on Friday and was given a massive apology and assured that the contact leading the consultation period would contact me as my circumstances are different!

Nutmuncher · Yesterday 18:59

NamechangeRugby · Yesterday 17:59

I so hope it is as you believe. The advances in healthcare and medicine, those I would absolutely prioritise - yes, can see it and champion it.

Energy... It sucks up so much and I'm just not convinced it is going to produce enough efficiencies, enough new amazing science to compensate, but never say never.

UBI is a lively idea, it is just so expensive and who pays? Early retirement, a lovely idea - who pays? The economic titans of the world don't even pay the amount of tax they truly should. Who or what is going to change this as they amass more and more power?

Energy is key alongside compute, I think it’s reasonable to say whoever wins that race hits the jackpot and there’s plenty racing right now.

UBI is expensive indeed however so is running the NHS and our Benefits and pensions bill, rethinking how the UK allocates funding isn’t a far stretch of the imagination especially in the context of healthier populations and revenue from AI investments. Economics across the globe will have to evolve once AI becomes too big of an elephant in the room to ignore.

OP posts:
Nutmuncher · Yesterday 19:02

NotrialNodeal · Yesterday 18:30

OP I've got to page 5 - I can't read anymore. You are incredibly naive to the point I'm not sure you're even real.

Respectfully please do your own research into how advanced and rapidly evolving the technology is. The naivety is thinking more ChatGPT is all that’s coming.

OP posts:
NotrialNodeal · Yesterday 21:36

Nutmuncher · Yesterday 19:02

Respectfully please do your own research into how advanced and rapidly evolving the technology is. The naivety is thinking more ChatGPT is all that’s coming.

From my one post on this thread you have concluded that I believe ChatGPT is the extent of AI and that I know nothing more on the subject. Okay...
Respectfully, you have no idea who I am or what I may or may not know on the matter of AI.
For clarity I understand it's advancing and is more than just ChatGPT.

Nutmuncher · Yesterday 22:46

NotrialNodeal · Yesterday 21:36

From my one post on this thread you have concluded that I believe ChatGPT is the extent of AI and that I know nothing more on the subject. Okay...
Respectfully, you have no idea who I am or what I may or may not know on the matter of AI.
For clarity I understand it's advancing and is more than just ChatGPT.

Yet you read up to page 5 of a 19 page thread and concluded I was naive and wasn’t real.

You’re correct in that I don’t know you but I still believe you should research the capabilities and potential greatness of AI for society, to be sure we’re on the same page.

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread