Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

NHS treatment poor compared to some overseas countries?

117 replies

PSEnny · 30/03/2024 16:49

I’m on holiday with a family member who developed an infection. This is linked to an ongoing issue but no sign or symptoms of infection before we left. We’re in the Canary Islands. At 8.30 this morning we had to go to a local medical centre. Saw a doctor within minutes of arriving. 30 minutes later the issue had been diagnosed and an injection given which was a combination of antibiotics to kill the infection. Doctor also checked urine. Not by using a dipstick but by putting the sample in an analysis machine. This revealed an additional infection. Over the next 2 days relative needs to go back for daily injections of the antibiotics. We were fully expecting to be given some oral antibiotics (family member has been given these before when the same issue arose). NHS have never checked urine for a potential other infection. We asked the doctor why we hadn’t just been given oral antibiotics. Doctor discussed how the UK gets it wrong in a lot of its treatment, that the injections are the best course of treatment and that the go to over the counter antibiotics wouldn’t have got to the root of the problem. Doctor spent 30 minutes completing a full examination. In the UK you’re lucky to get 5 minutes with a GP. I’m guessing there’s a cost issue in that oral antibiotics are cheaper? And the additional time needed to do a thorough consultation is also costly but if it meant that issues were actually treated properly would this actually save money overall?
This isn’t to bash the NHS more a thought about why the best treatment isn’t offered and why thorough consultations aren’t carried out when other countries can do it?

OP posts:
MissyB1 · 31/03/2024 19:35

Runningbird43 · 31/03/2024 18:47

That question is answered here: https://www.ox.ac.uk/research/everything-you-need-know-about-chickenpox-and-why-more-countries-don’t-use-vaccine

modelling shows that introduction of a chicken pox vaccine would lead to increased cases of shingles in adults, as the virus disappears from the population adult will not be exposed enough to develop immunity.

so interestingly, chicken pox vaccine for children will increase shingles cases in adults.

You are more likely to get shingles after having chickenpox itself rather than the vaccine.
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/vis/vis-statements/varicella.html#:~:text=Talk%20with%20your%20health%20care%20provider%20to%20learn%20more.,after%20medical%20procedures%2C%20including%20vaccination.

Chickenpox (Varicella) Vaccine Information Statement | CDC

Chickenpox Vaccine Information Statement

https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/vis/vis-statements/varicella.html#:~:text=Talk%20with%20your%20health%20care%20provider%20to%20learn%20more.,after%20medical%20procedures%2C%20including%20vaccination.

SnakesAndArrows · 31/03/2024 19:35

Sallysappho · 31/03/2024 18:58

The answer is bureaucracy pure and simple. An emphasis on form filling, tick boxes and clinicians having to justify their actions to non clinicians.
The suggestion that it's underfunding or the Tories is bollox. The NHS gets more money year on year yet has worse outcomes year on year. We now have more funding and more staff post pandemic but the patient outcomes are worse than pre pandemic levels.
It simply doesn't work and never will no matter how much money is pumped into it

There are more people (ageing population) and treatments are more expensive than ever. We also spend less per capita than most other comparable countries. It’s under funded.

motherofbantams · 31/03/2024 19:22

Angelsrose · 31/03/2024 16:21

The NHS is a total and utter mess. There are now so many people trying to access very finite resources, all for "free". As it's not properly funded, it can only be reactive rather than proactive. It uses resources such as interpreters which are incredibly expensive, a cost that most other health services don't have. I think the NHS is trying to be too many things to too many people and as a result is not providing any discernible service to most people. Some people also abuse the system, missing appointments and not thinking of the money this wastes and there is no financial consequence to them for this (as it's all "free"). If the system had endless resources it would be great if dual citizens could get timely NHS treatment. However with a system that is totally broken, I don't think it's unreasonable for these individuals to seek their treatment in the other country where they hold citizenship. Many people will not go to their home country / other country for treatment as there is an upfront cost. I think a token fee should be introduced as many British people don't appreciate or respect things that they feel are "free". I do sadly think the NHS is finished and it is such a shame.

In Sweden, where we lived until recently, you have a small charge (~20£)for GP appointments, A&E etc, with a max a year if you have e.g. something chronic. Means people turn up as they will be charged anyway!

Sallysappho · 31/03/2024 18:58

The answer is bureaucracy pure and simple. An emphasis on form filling, tick boxes and clinicians having to justify their actions to non clinicians.
The suggestion that it's underfunding or the Tories is bollox. The NHS gets more money year on year yet has worse outcomes year on year. We now have more funding and more staff post pandemic but the patient outcomes are worse than pre pandemic levels.
It simply doesn't work and never will no matter how much money is pumped into it

AdriftAbroad1 · 31/03/2024 18:51

The CP (HerpesZoster virus) stays in your body for life and can get reactivated when low/old/stressed.

I know many (including me)

Having CP means you are MORE likely to reactivate the virus. Despite what many think.

It lurks in your spine (I think)

Runningbird43 · 31/03/2024 18:47

Octopussingthieves · 31/03/2024 16:15

What would save money would be to offer up the chicken pox vaccination as part of the routine childhood immunisation programme.

That question is answered here: https://www.ox.ac.uk/research/everything-you-need-know-about-chickenpox-and-why-more-countries-don’t-use-vaccine

modelling shows that introduction of a chicken pox vaccine would lead to increased cases of shingles in adults, as the virus disappears from the population adult will not be exposed enough to develop immunity.

so interestingly, chicken pox vaccine for children will increase shingles cases in adults.

Everything you need to know about chickenpox and why more countries don’t use the vaccine | University of Oxford

Publication date: 2016

https://www.ox.ac.uk/research/everything-you-need-know-about-chickenpox-and-why-more-countries-don%E2%80%99t-use-vaccine

kitsuneghost · 31/03/2024 18:45

Because you are paying privately.
You get what you pay for.

Runningbird43 · 31/03/2024 18:40

poetryandwine · 31/03/2024 15:53

I am not questioning the judgment of professionals regarding OPs experience.

However in other ways I think she has a valid point. One example is the Shingles vaccine. Shingles is a terribly painful disease of mostly elderly who have had chicken pox. Occasionally it is quite serious. Until last year NHS England only offered the Zostervax vaccine to those over 70, for whom it is only 38% effective.

Now, many years behind other countries, we are finally offering the more expensive, more effective Shingrix vaccine to 65yos (the American Centers for Disease Control recommends age 50). But those who have had Zostervax are not eligible, where the CDC recommends they should also get Shingrix. Thinking of the needless suffering caused by this policy makes me furious

Do you know why shingle vaccine isn’t offered routinely?

i’d be interested to know if it’s like Hpv, where it’s only offered to teens because of the likelihood that the older population will already have been naturally exposed.

does the same apply? If enough of the older generation have already had chicken pox then would shingles vaccine be pointless? Could that be why it’s not routine?

if chicken pox vaccines were routinely offered to children would that negate the need for shingles vaccines?

does the us offer it because they also vaccinate against chicken pox so it’s unlikely anyone has a natural immunity?

poetryandwine · 31/03/2024 18:26

Octopussingthieves · 31/03/2024 16:15

What would save money would be to offer up the chicken pox vaccination as part of the routine childhood immunisation programme.

Agreed.

FishPie2 · 31/03/2024 18:09

A few years ago I used E111 when they were valid and broke my ankle in Spain - was in and out with it plastered in just over an hour.
My husband had a hernia op in India, very clean hospital but we had to provide his food - cost £800 and he was in there for 4 days.

AlliumFairy · 31/03/2024 17:05

Over use of antibiotics leads to resistance. We already have AB resistance in some very nasty diseases.
You only have to watch a US medical series to see how over treatment = profit.

That's not to say the NHS is superior in any way. I'd vote for a modest charge for most things but it's untouchable in that respect.

sdds15 · 31/03/2024 17:02

we have returned to home eu country for Easter hols and have a whole battery of health checks lined up for a very decent price. As we are resident in UK we obvs no longer qualify for free healthcare in this country but going private here is very reasonable priced (say 1/5th of harley street prices or less) so defo worth it as NHS will not offer any of these checks.
My eu friends in UK do the same.

ps: if you claim on insurance, your premium will go up at next renewal so I wouldn't just leisurely claim on it unless you really need it of course.. even if work pays for it.

kaiadeluded · 31/03/2024 16:59

I'm glad we have the NHS, I was on holiday in the Canaries & had forgotten some of my Zonisamide prescription for my epilepsy.
Luckily I was able to get a private prescription (about 50e) from a local GP there., then found 1 box of a month's supply of Zonisamide for 90e at a chemist!! Here my prescriptions are free anyway as I have epilepsy.
Thank god for the NHS or I would either be unmedicated for epilepsy and for my mental illness or living on the streets.. no insurance companies cover people like me for serious pre existing conditions in countries like the USA for example.
I can't get life insurance or mortgage payment protection insurance here in the uk as the premiums are too high, and have to go to a specialist insurers for Travel Insurance.

Runningbird43 · 31/03/2024 16:52

PSEnny · 30/03/2024 16:56

Yes actually and I’m guessing this is the difference. Will claim it back through insurance. So is it that it simply comes down to cost and that UK NHS services will go for the cheapest option, without a thorough examination even though it may not treat the issue fully?

No. The nhs will offer the most cost effective option to fully treat the issue.

private medicine will tell you antibiotic injections are “better” because 7x consultation fees for daily visits add up to much more money from your insurance than 1x consultation fee and a course of oral AB’s.

also preying on human psychology that the more it costs the better it must be.

Kitkat1523 · 31/03/2024 16:45

They were taking the piss there…,your insurance will be paying out big time for something unnecessay

mintbiscuit · 31/03/2024 16:31

Angelsrose · 31/03/2024 16:21

The NHS is a total and utter mess. There are now so many people trying to access very finite resources, all for "free". As it's not properly funded, it can only be reactive rather than proactive. It uses resources such as interpreters which are incredibly expensive, a cost that most other health services don't have. I think the NHS is trying to be too many things to too many people and as a result is not providing any discernible service to most people. Some people also abuse the system, missing appointments and not thinking of the money this wastes and there is no financial consequence to them for this (as it's all "free"). If the system had endless resources it would be great if dual citizens could get timely NHS treatment. However with a system that is totally broken, I don't think it's unreasonable for these individuals to seek their treatment in the other country where they hold citizenship. Many people will not go to their home country / other country for treatment as there is an upfront cost. I think a token fee should be introduced as many British people don't appreciate or respect things that they feel are "free". I do sadly think the NHS is finished and it is such a shame.

This. It was not designed for today’s society.

really hate people bashing the NHS. And people taking liberties with it.

There’s no silver bullet here to fix it but we need to take a hard look at some of the treatments that are covered, optimising private medical healthcare (more employers should offer this) and better operational and general leadership. Not much then 😂

Angelsrose · 31/03/2024 16:21

The NHS is a total and utter mess. There are now so many people trying to access very finite resources, all for "free". As it's not properly funded, it can only be reactive rather than proactive. It uses resources such as interpreters which are incredibly expensive, a cost that most other health services don't have. I think the NHS is trying to be too many things to too many people and as a result is not providing any discernible service to most people. Some people also abuse the system, missing appointments and not thinking of the money this wastes and there is no financial consequence to them for this (as it's all "free"). If the system had endless resources it would be great if dual citizens could get timely NHS treatment. However with a system that is totally broken, I don't think it's unreasonable for these individuals to seek their treatment in the other country where they hold citizenship. Many people will not go to their home country / other country for treatment as there is an upfront cost. I think a token fee should be introduced as many British people don't appreciate or respect things that they feel are "free". I do sadly think the NHS is finished and it is such a shame.

missmollygreen · 31/03/2024 16:21

PSEnny · 30/03/2024 16:56

Yes actually and I’m guessing this is the difference. Will claim it back through insurance. So is it that it simply comes down to cost and that UK NHS services will go for the cheapest option, without a thorough examination even though it may not treat the issue fully?

No, wrong way round. Hospitals run for profit and payed for with insurance will go for the most expensive treatment. Bigger margins.

Octopussingthieves · 31/03/2024 16:15

poetryandwine · 31/03/2024 15:53

I am not questioning the judgment of professionals regarding OPs experience.

However in other ways I think she has a valid point. One example is the Shingles vaccine. Shingles is a terribly painful disease of mostly elderly who have had chicken pox. Occasionally it is quite serious. Until last year NHS England only offered the Zostervax vaccine to those over 70, for whom it is only 38% effective.

Now, many years behind other countries, we are finally offering the more expensive, more effective Shingrix vaccine to 65yos (the American Centers for Disease Control recommends age 50). But those who have had Zostervax are not eligible, where the CDC recommends they should also get Shingrix. Thinking of the needless suffering caused by this policy makes me furious

What would save money would be to offer up the chicken pox vaccination as part of the routine childhood immunisation programme.

Spacecowboys · 31/03/2024 15:58

There isn’t really enough information in your post. Did the dr check urine when there weren’t actually symptoms of uti? Because asymptomatic bacteriuria does not routinely need treated in men. Or were the antibiotics to treat a different infection? It’s a bit confusing. Of course, when all consultations and treatment can be claimed from someone’s travel insurance, I’m sceptical. Antibiotic injections for someone who does not have a significant infection are unnecessary and will only contribute to their countries antibiotic resistance. But yes, the nhs has serious problems right now.

twitternotx · 31/03/2024 15:54

Obviously I don't have the notes but that sounds suspiciously like over treatment to fleece you or your insurance Company.

poetryandwine · 31/03/2024 15:53

I am not questioning the judgment of professionals regarding OPs experience.

However in other ways I think she has a valid point. One example is the Shingles vaccine. Shingles is a terribly painful disease of mostly elderly who have had chicken pox. Occasionally it is quite serious. Until last year NHS England only offered the Zostervax vaccine to those over 70, for whom it is only 38% effective.

Now, many years behind other countries, we are finally offering the more expensive, more effective Shingrix vaccine to 65yos (the American Centers for Disease Control recommends age 50). But those who have had Zostervax are not eligible, where the CDC recommends they should also get Shingrix. Thinking of the needless suffering caused by this policy makes me furious

Toddlerteaplease · 31/03/2024 15:43

Was going to say the same thing as PP about the urinalysis machine. It dies exactly the same job as a conventional dip stick.

Tryingtokeepgoing · 31/03/2024 15:34

CatsWillRuleTheWorld · 30/03/2024 16:59

Healthcare in the UK is very, very poor quality comparatively. I'm sorry but this is just a fact. It was not the case 20 years ago but it has deteriorated sharply during recent Tory rule. All of my friends with dual citizenship are constantly travelling to their home countries for medical and dental care. Others are considering moving back there specifically for healthcare. A relative had an injury while on holiday in a EU country and was seen in A&E and patched up within the hour, paid twenty euros. In the UK I would've been there for 10+ hours or paid hundreds for private care.

Even 20 or 30 years ago the NHS was comparatively poor on a global level, and I say that as my late husband was a heavy user of it from the mid nineties, but we travelled a lot and experienced heath services around Europe, Asia and the Americas. But people didnt notice in the U.K. as it was tolerable, whereas now it’s not just worse but much worse, and of course there’s much more viability of how bad it is

zusje · 31/03/2024 15:21

Every time your relative is going back for an injection of antibiotics the clinic gets to charge the consult time and the higher cost of an iv injection of antibiotics. My cynical brain tells me the iv antibiotics are indeed better...for the clinic's finance books!