These types of threads are on many forums and articles I've read
AIBU when I am clearly stating that that the person/s leaving their assets behind to whoever is entitled to do as they so wish, EG, give the money away to a charity, their dog, the cat next door, their best friend, only give some of their children their money/etc and or not equally divide it
When I hear and or read about cases going to court, often one sibling against the other, it makes me so angry
If a person/s has mental the capacity as defined in law to make a Will, surely it is their choice and should never be challenged.
A nephew of mine recently complained to me about my sister(his mum) and his dad's Will means he'd get a lot less as things stand. My nephew had moaned to his parents and they told him that he was well settled, had a good job/pay and also had rental properties. I politely tried to make him see sense that regardless of what his parents had told him, in my judgment it istheir choice. My nephew was not happy with what I said.
The above comes with a caveat where disabled dependents may be left out of a Will as that is more complex. However, on the whole, it is as above
AIBU to robustly support the freedom of the assets holder/s to leave money to whoever, whatever they choose and no court should have the right to overturn this.