Kyle Walker

I have zero issue at all saying I read the daily mail - unlike the majority who get their punts all twisted over it 🤣

It's not just working class....plenty of middle class women are equally enamoured by the fame and cash.
Half the girls at the local private schools aspire to marry footballers....and are out clubbing underage in order to achieve that
(The other half are probably footballers daughters)

Invited sex workers to the house that his kids live in. Boak

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyle_Walker

He sounds vile.

She also wanted an au pair along with the nanny.

@Vivi0 she doesn't. She pays her own mother £2k a month to look after them. She wanted a nanny on top of the maintenance (for some reason even AFTER age of 18) yet she doesn't have any job to speak of and made only £300 a year from 'influencing'

If you have a nanny or use a nursery, and have the money for cleaners and help, you can most definitely sit on your arse. Whether or not she does I have no idea.

If you read the judge's statement he says as Annie Kilner doesn't have a nanny he doesn't see why Lauren needs one.

The OW doesn't want to look after her children, she wanted a meal ticket that's why she asked to court to get him to pay for a nanny.

Sure, but let’s not pretend that raising two children on your own is “sitting about on your arse all day”.

Very well written.

They’re all in the wrong to some extent (him the most, then LG, then AK). 2 of them being female doesn’t get them off the hook, or excuse them from clearly shit decision making.

LG has decided the stability and privacy of her children is an acceptable price to pay to land a tacky mansion, a big payout and a bit of drama to keep her entertained.

AK has pretty much decided the same albeit she is the wronged party in the cheating.

And the only person Kyle Walker loves is Kyle Walker.

I think his wife had her head screwed on by marrying him! They'd been together and unmarried for years. He had an affair and the other woman had a child. She didn't marry him until after. It means she'll get a decent settlement and not just maintainence. It looks to me like she was always planning to leave and just playing the long game.

Meh with that money she can easily afford a nanny.

He has paid up. Much as I dislike him.

If he doesn't like it, he should have used protection. He was foolish enough to get her pregnant twice and initially refused to have anything to do with the child although sounds like that has changed. I don't like her but he's left her to be a lone parent and refused to take responsibility so the least he can do is pay up. Maybe if he decided to be a 50/50 father he could pay her less, he's chosen not to do that.

She set out to get pregnant? Really? Using the same logic, it would be accurate then that he set out to get her pregnant (twice, no less) because he clearly wasn’t taking any steps to avoid pregnancy.

No one forced him to have unprotected sex with her multiple times.

Also, she isn’t supporting her to sit about on her arse all day. He is supporting her to raise their two children on her own.

Silly argument. If they separated they’d have half of the wealth, so tens of millions. They’d have a very similar lifestyle to what they have now.

I feel desperately sorry for the children and obviously it’s humiliating for her, sure.

But isn’t the whole point of marrying a PL footballer to take his money? Whether you do the Colleen Rooney Faustian pact or you leave and them to the cleaners: surely that’s the rationale for the relationship?

Nobody marries these intellectually limited, arrogant and sex obsessed Neanderthals for any other reason. It’s a contract.

The wife is set up for life and a bit of tabloid embarrassment is the price she will pay. The OW will get some maintenance settlement (nowhere near what she wants but enough for her children to have a decent life) and the world keeps on turning.

The only moral concern I have is for the children. The two women involved are both gold diggers, one more successful and with a classier veneer than the other. But that’s the bottom line really. No one with any self respect thinks marrying a footballer is a route to a dignified and autonomous financial life. You lie down with dogs, you get fleas. You may get very wealthy but married or not it’s tacky as fuck. They are both as bad as each other.

He earns circa 3 x that a day just on his basic salary. It's nothing to him

She probably will as they were married so she may be entitled to spousal support as he's so wealthy. Any decent man would want all his children to have the same lifestyle and opportunities, however he is not a decent man.

Lauryn shouldn’t get as much as Annie though because Annie has 3 children with him whereas Lauryn has 2 with him. I hope Annie gets way more for her children than Lauryn does.

I'm not sure tbh. They weren't in a relationship that failed - she set out to get pg (twice no less) , knowing g the father she was providing for her kid is a piece of shit. She's done that to them on purpose and I don't believe that behaviour should be rewarded by massive pay outs.
Absolutely he should have to contribute 50% to the costs of his kids, so I'd support him having to pay the nursery fees, and to keep them decently housed and fed. But that shouldn't extend to supporting the mother to sit on her arse with her hand out.
Children cost what they cost, no matter that he earns.

Their kids.

Doesn't matter if it's "enough", it should be in proportion to his salary. All the children that HE created should receive the same lifestyle that he can afford.

However much money he has, it doesn't mean she has a right to rinse him. 2k per month is enough to support her kids!