Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Cultural manners

307 replies

anareen · 27/10/2023 04:58

Having a discussion/debate

Is it rude for DC to say "what" when you call them?
I think it is. I teach DC to respond with "yes" when called. I grew up in Hispanic culture. Possibly this is a factor?

What are others input? Do you teach DC something along the same lines?

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Thepeopleversuswork · 29/10/2023 16:05

WinterDeWinter · 29/10/2023 15:50

True.

I think at an individual rather than structural level, it cans sometimes be almost subliminal. I was taught to push food onto my fork (rounded side up, left hand) with my knife (right hand) - even peas. While I now often eat with my upturned fork in my right hand with no knife, I literally shiver with distaste if DH holds his fork upturned in his left hand and pushes food on with his knife. It’s clearly insane and awful of me - but I’m not joking about my visceral response. That shows I think how the mind can be manipulated to think of others as ‘less than’.

I agree: I've internalised a lot of this sort of stuff from my mum who was a total snob (based on her own social insecurity). Nowadays I officially reject it all as being hide-bound class insecurity and I would judge someone hard if they actively pulled someone else up on it.

But I still reflexively cringe when people say "pardon" or "serviette", even as I hate myself for it. It's hard-wired.

WinterDeWinter · 29/10/2023 15:50

True.

I think at an individual rather than structural level, it cans sometimes be almost subliminal. I was taught to push food onto my fork (rounded side up, left hand) with my knife (right hand) - even peas. While I now often eat with my upturned fork in my right hand with no knife, I literally shiver with distaste if DH holds his fork upturned in his left hand and pushes food on with his knife. It’s clearly insane and awful of me - but I’m not joking about my visceral response. That shows I think how the mind can be manipulated to think of others as ‘less than’.

WhatWouldJeevesDo · 29/10/2023 14:57

WinterDeWinter · 29/10/2023 00:28

Well yes and no - I’d say fundamentally the class system is based on inherited power, and these signifiers are just one of the defences. They can be breached occasionally - for eg 19th century American heiresses - but only with the consent of the powerful.

I always find these discussions wildly naive in the way they position all this stuff as being from a sort of generic ‘past’. one of the biggest shocks of my life (80s scholarship girl) was realising the extent to which class still really does equate to power in what till then had seemed to me to be a meritocratic society with some limits (was very blind to my own class privilege for eg). It feels to me that this is getting worse, not better. I wonder why we all pretend it’s not?

I don’t think many of us on this thread do see these snobberies about the choice of words as something from the bad old days - not if we’ve read the thread, anyhow. At least one person has admitted to correcting their children for saying ‘pardon’ and quite a few more for saying ‘what’.

WhatWouldJeevesDo · 29/10/2023 14:28

NewFriendlyLadybird · 29/10/2023 10:59

@WinterDeWinter totally agree with you. I think given names have always been class signifiers; food too. Where you go on holiday and what you do on holiday is a massive new signifier — and, as with many things, does not always correlate with how ‘expensive’ it is. And interior design. Almost certainly because making decisions about such things used only to be available to the upper classes. Now they are generally available, there have to be ways to differentiate in order to retain that entrenched social power.

I think names as class identifiers got more pronounced throughout the twentieth century. Authors of fiction would use stereotypes such as ‘Mabel’ for a 1920s housemaid. However, I look back at my family who were domestic servants and manual labourers in the 1920s and they all seem to have either timeless Christian names like John and Jane and Mary, or sometimes (for the men) family surnames given as names.
I think names as class identifiers is a more pronounced trend now even than it was in the eighties when Viz had Sharon and Tracy, but maybe I’ve taken my eye off the ball.

I’m hoping this thread will keep me amused until all the class-based Christmas arguments take over.

Thepeopleversuswork · 29/10/2023 14:12

Barbadossunset · 29/10/2023 12:29

Thepeople thank you for answering my question.
I thinking sneering at people for whatever background is horrible. Sneering at people for being ‘posh’ is just as bad as for being ‘common’.
If you don’t like the person then find a reason to dislike them as a person, not because of their background.

I agree completely with this... sneering at people for being "posh" is indeed obnoxious. Any kind of sneering based on an arbitrary perception of where people sit in society in unpleasant.

But the bare fact of the matter is that the more cultural capital you have, the more power and authority you are likely to have in society. And that has all sorts of benefits: you're far more likely to have (and be able to make) money, you're likely to be better connected and to find it easier to find good jobs. You're much more likely to find life easier in all sorts of ways.

So sneering "down" is likely to be proportionately more damaging to the person you're sneering at that sneering up.

That doesn't mean it's OK to discriminate against anyone because of their background. But the implications of sneering at people for having less money/cultural capital are different from sneering at them for having more.

Pineapplesnowbells · 29/10/2023 13:14

Thanks very much for the explanation @WinterDeWinter.

WinterDeWinter · 29/10/2023 12:40

Barbadossunset · 29/10/2023 12:29

Thepeople thank you for answering my question.
I thinking sneering at people for whatever background is horrible. Sneering at people for being ‘posh’ is just as bad as for being ‘common’.
If you don’t like the person then find a reason to dislike them as a person, not because of their background.

I think sneering at others sneering at others is ok and that's the worst that @Thepeopleversuswork could be accused of Grin

Barbadossunset · 29/10/2023 12:29

Thepeople thank you for answering my question.
I thinking sneering at people for whatever background is horrible. Sneering at people for being ‘posh’ is just as bad as for being ‘common’.
If you don’t like the person then find a reason to dislike them as a person, not because of their background.

Thepeopleversuswork · 29/10/2023 12:22

@Barbadossunset

How did the reasons your mother thought it vulgar to say common differ from your reasons?
Do you think it’s vulgar to sneer at people for being middle - or upper - class?

I think describing anyone as "common" is incredibly insulting. It's basically trash-talking them as being "average", "uninteresting" and without intelligence or polish.

My mother would have disliked it because she considered it LMC (though she would happily have thought it of people but just using a different name).

NewFriendlyLadybird · 29/10/2023 11:23

CurlewKate · 27/10/2023 16:26

Generally speaking, basic English/Anglo Saxon words are posher than French origin ones. So pardon, lounge, toilet are less posh than what, sitting room and lavatory. Utterly ridiculous but true!

Although of course lavatory is Latin-origin. Perhaps a public school sort of thing?

TheBeef · 29/10/2023 11:13

I assume you are shouting from another room because you want them to come to you rather than trying to have a conversation.

I am hard of hearing, I ignore all attempts from people calling from another part of the house. I am unlikely to hear my own name.

I think it is rude to yell names, we go to the person concerned, adult or child.

DPIL shout names loudly from the kitchen when dinner is ready. When they are here, we go to wherever they are with a 10 min warning, then go back to say dinner is ready.

NewFriendlyLadybird · 29/10/2023 11:05

Barbadossunset · 29/10/2023 10:40

Even in tech, a new-ish power profession or industry or whatever, properly posh people are over-represented.

WinterDeWinter do you think anyone who was privately educated is automatically ‘posh’?

When I was at school (private, decades ago), fees were within reach of more ‘normal’ families, and there was a wide range of meaningful scholarships, bursaries, and local authority places. We were a much more socially diverse cohort than would be possible now, when you need serious money to afford the fees. And although money doesn’t equal class, put everyone together and socialise them together, you will churn out people who all belong to the same club.

NewFriendlyLadybird · 29/10/2023 10:59

@WinterDeWinter totally agree with you. I think given names have always been class signifiers; food too. Where you go on holiday and what you do on holiday is a massive new signifier — and, as with many things, does not always correlate with how ‘expensive’ it is. And interior design. Almost certainly because making decisions about such things used only to be available to the upper classes. Now they are generally available, there have to be ways to differentiate in order to retain that entrenched social power.

WinterDeWinter · 29/10/2023 10:58

No, but lots are.

Barbadossunset · 29/10/2023 10:40

Even in tech, a new-ish power profession or industry or whatever, properly posh people are over-represented.

WinterDeWinter do you think anyone who was privately educated is automatically ‘posh’?

WinterDeWinter · 29/10/2023 10:32

Maybe 'wildly naive'? Apologies, I have quite an exaggerated style because i often can't 'find' the correct word I'm looking for (processing disorder) so I have to find workarounds and they can be a bit, erm, 'literary', which I'm sure can be very annoying.

WinterDeWinter · 29/10/2023 10:26

Why do you think I'm obnoxious @Chickenkeev . That's a really strong word and I'm looking back at what I wrote and wondering what I did.

What I was trying to say is that through discussions about distinctions between what and pardon, which now seem ridiculous and archaic, we are perhaps kidding ourselves that class is a thing of the past.

And that my own experience had been that the same privately and/or Oxbridge educated people are still in the key positions of power as they always have been.

This was the case in television, broadsheet journalism, politics, the charity sector and the art world which are the things I've had experience of - but I expext it's also the case in banking, law, medicine etc. Even in tech, a new-ish power profession or industry or whatever, properly posh people are over-represented.

That's all. You can agree or disagree, but I honestly don't see what's obnoxious about it.

When I said 'willfully taking our eye off the ball' I was clumsily trying to say that maybe we like to pretend that we no longer live n a society in which inherited privilege is still a very real thing.

@Pineapplesnowbells and @WhatWouldJeevesDo re the new markers of class, I was definitely thinking of names! But there are others aren't there - I think it's all become a bit more fractured and hyperlocalised now, but in my quite 'bohemian' [vom] part of London it's indicated by parenting styles, types of cooking/food, the kind of fitness/ 'wellness' you do (yoga/cycling/running), being ok with swearing and drinking in front of children, not being 'uptight'. In West London amongst the lawyers and bankers there are probably quite different ones, but they all do the same thing, which is to create them and us.

Chickenkeev · 29/10/2023 09:34

ThanksItHasPockets · 29/10/2023 09:19

Calling someone ‘obnoxious’ is always rude.

Not when they're actually being obnoxious. It's descriptive. You may disagree with my evaluation of OP which is fine. But i feel they are obnoxious. As is my right. You are equally well within your rights to think i'm wrong.

Barbadossunset · 29/10/2023 09:29

It was late, I expressed myself badly.

Fair enough - so what does ‘Wilfully taking our eye off the ball’ mean?

ThanksItHasPockets · 29/10/2023 09:19

Calling someone ‘obnoxious’ is always rude.

Chickenkeev · 29/10/2023 09:15

WinterDeWinter · 29/10/2023 09:10

Why are you being so rude? It was late, I expressed myself badly.

I didn't intend to be rude. And if this thread tells us anything, it's that rudeness is subjective.

WinterDeWinter · 29/10/2023 09:10

Chickenkeev · 29/10/2023 08:35

I think it's an obnoxious way of saying ignoring something. But i can't sure like 🤣

Why are you being so rude? It was late, I expressed myself badly.

CampsieGlamper · 29/10/2023 09:01

If you reach for the sickbag Alice when you hear "toilet" ," lounge"and "serviette" then dont work in gynae with UWC and LMC patients. "Lady garden" - augh

Chickenkeev · 29/10/2023 08:35

Barbadossunset · 29/10/2023 08:31

Wilfully taking our eye off the ball” needs some explanation.

I don’t understand this sentence either

I think it's an obnoxious way of saying ignoring something. But i can't sure like 🤣

Barbadossunset · 29/10/2023 08:31

Wilfully taking our eye off the ball” needs some explanation.

I don’t understand this sentence either