Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

This mum just blocked my toddler from approaching hers

413 replies

Skysky1 · 04/10/2023 14:17

was in town today walking through M&S , with my 3 yr old.
We had just bought toys in the previous shop so he was out of pram and walking with his new toys in his hands and was excited about them.
Walking parallel to us was also a mum with toddler (around two)
My son approached him from the side and started walking directly next to him showing him his toys whilst they were both walking , the child smiled in response and didn't appear to seem at unease, however the mum swiftly stopped and put her arm out in front of my son blocked him between her arm and a Column so that he couldn't go any further and then she said ' excuse me ' as if for him to back away.
He turned to face me and I swooped him up and said ' he's only a toddler'
To which she didn't respond, she carried on walking and I changed direction.
I was left feeling quite sad for my son
I just wanted other mum's opinions on this . Was I in the wrong for letting my child approach hers , I guess everyone is entitled to their personal space. However I never anticipated that reaction it just seemed like a mean thing to do , and I'm always very welcoming to other kids that approach us

OP posts:
Theoriginalmrscillianmurphy · 05/10/2023 21:58

Christ almighty op, some of these responses are batshit.

I have never met a mumsnetter in real life thank fuck.

I smiled to myself reading the bit about your son showing the other child his toys. How sweet 😊

Sheerdetermination · 05/10/2023 21:52

Gosh, so many miseries on this thread. I’m with you, OP. The other mum was anti-social and it’s a shame she was mean to your young child.

ScattyGinger · 05/10/2023 21:12

We've all had days where we've been absolutely up to our tits with life. Maybe she was just having one of those days and didn't need any further distractions or dramas. The amount of times my kids have kicked off over everything, all day, and I just want to get on and home before anything else happens. 😆 x

Energydrink · 05/10/2023 21:08

..

DottyLottieLou · 05/10/2023 20:53

She sounds mean. She didn't handle it well.

Toomuchtrouble4me · 05/10/2023 20:41

Who cares? 🤷‍♀️ It’s nothing - move on.

Rosejasmine · 05/10/2023 20:37

You’re being over sensitive and it doesn’t matter.

Daisywithastory · 05/10/2023 20:25

It’s really hard to picture as we weren’t there. There could definitely be merit to the idea that she thought he was getting away from you and she was trying to help. I don’t think you’d have needed to call out for her to get that impression.
Or - though this may just be because I have to be so vigilant with my twins who are a bit younger - she could have thought that there was a chance that her child would grab the toys from your child and not give them back without a fight and so was trying to prevent that?
Just thoughts and obviously I wasn’t there (and mostly only read op’s responses as this thread is v long)

Ticktockk · 05/10/2023 19:35

I struggle to see any other explanation than she was helpfully stopping your child from escaping from you. You just said you were a couple of meters behind trying to catch up, with your pram.
I think I’d have done the same!

Bayleaf5 · 05/10/2023 19:34

Maybe her child was on chemo or immunocompromised, and she didn’t want another child in close contact for obvious reasons. She shouldn’t have to explain, but maybe there as a very good reason.

PuddlesPityParty · 05/10/2023 18:52

Sugargliderwombat · 04/10/2023 21:49

🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'm not worked up, I work with little kids and think it's a weird thing to do.

So again why do you think an adult needs to explain their life to you? Lmao miss nosey pants.

Lisa46 · 05/10/2023 18:30

Maybe her child was contagious but she didn’t want to say?

CharlotteBog · 05/10/2023 17:41

DeadbeatYoda · 05/10/2023 16:46

When I was younger, this would have looked like a really dickish move, ( if there was a genuine reason why the mother couldn't let her toddler interact, they would just say so). These days, so many people are so unfriendly, precious and unpleasant, lord knows what the other woman was thinking.

I actually don't think they are. MN is not RL (thankfully).

DeadbeatYoda · 05/10/2023 16:46

When I was younger, this would have looked like a really dickish move, ( if there was a genuine reason why the mother couldn't let her toddler interact, they would just say so). These days, so many people are so unfriendly, precious and unpleasant, lord knows what the other woman was thinking.

PeggyPoggleshaw · 05/10/2023 15:03

IHateWasps · 05/10/2023 08:07

<ul><li>"toddler: 1 to 3 years"</li></ul>

The NHS is wrong there because it is indeed 1 to 3 not 1-4 so they become a toddler on their first birthday and stop being one when they turn 3. I studied child development and that's what we were taught and that's generally considered to be the age range for toddlers, not 1-4.

  • toddler: 1 to 3 years
  • child: 4 to 12 years

🤦🏻‍♀️

fliptopbin · 05/10/2023 14:50

I often think that the kindest thing that you can do on this overcrowded island is to minimize your interactions with other people as much as possible
So avoid unnecessary eye contact, don't make unnecessary puerile small talk and avoid impinging on peoples personal space as much as possible

jays · 05/10/2023 13:40

SerafinasGoose · 05/10/2023 13:19

One person's idea of manners and positive interaction is not the same as another's. By the same token there is not one absolute morality that is independent of time or circumstance.

I acknowledge this. I'm aware people's view of the same thing will differ.

You are convinced that you are absolutely, unmitigatingly correct and that no nuance or differences in contributing circumstances can negate that view.

That says everything it needs to say about the difference between your position and my position.

The encounter is not important in any event. The other party has probably long forgotten it by now. We choose what we want to make into an issue that's worth getting het up about, and something that we quickly let go, because it isn't.

For me, the OP's encounter (and this particular exchange, interesting though it's been) fall strictly into the latter category.

It doesn’t really matter where it falls for you though, it’s rude! It just is. Like I say, it’s absolutely fine to be rude. I can’t reimagine the parameters of rude so that it falls outside the box of rudeness 😂 it just is! I mean I almost want to agree at the moment just out of politeness!

Katypp · 05/10/2023 13:37

SerafinasGoose · 05/10/2023 13:14

Not at all.

People have pressures in their lives. They're carrying all manner of things around with them that others have no clue over.

I wouldn't describe myself as a misanthrope. I'm the butt of a joke amongst those who know me for making friends everywhere I go when in leisure venues, travelling for leisure or even conferencing. But if I'm rushing around a supermarket, particularly if I'm aware there's an imminent miniature Vesuvius about to erupt in the shape of my kid, or if they've followed through and it's currently behind their knee and I'm rushing out before it reaches their shoes, or I'm on the way to a nerve-wracking medical appointment, or I want a quiet meal in a restaurant without someone else's kid undoing my shoelaces or jolting my elbows, or kicking my plane seat etc., then no. I do not want to interact with your precious children. They are making me stressed and it's giving me a headache.

There's a time and a place for positive social interaction, a time for solitude, and a time for getting to where you need to go as quickly and painlessly as possible. And part of decent manners, civility and making your own and others' day go by quickly and more pleasantly, is recognising what is and is not an appropriate time and place.

I agree. But it is the rudeness I take issue with.
I have no desire to chat to someone else's toddler. But I would never to so rude, if what we are being told is accurate.

Toastiesforever · 05/10/2023 13:34

Hufflepods · 04/10/2023 15:47

@Toastiesforever If another toddler stopped to talk to my toddler id be chuffed to bits, and really how rushed can you be in that situation because let me tell you with a toddler your getting nowhere fast.

Do you really think once you have a child you can't have anywhere to be or any timings to keep to?? Not everyone with a toddler is mooching around a shop trying to fill their day.

Have had 3 toddlers, and a full time job so believe me im never just meandering about the place but i have common decency enough to accept the innocence of 1 toddler talking to another.

SerafinasGoose · 05/10/2023 13:19

jays · 05/10/2023 13:11

Yes, but it was rude. There’s no law that says you must not be rude, she completely entitled to be. And she was. Unless you want to re-write the entire history of manners in order to make you right, she was rude.

One person's idea of manners and positive interaction is not the same as another's. By the same token there is not one absolute morality that is independent of time or circumstance.

I acknowledge this. I'm aware people's view of the same thing will differ.

You are convinced that you are absolutely, unmitigatingly correct and that no nuance or differences in contributing circumstances can negate that view.

That says everything it needs to say about the difference between your position and my position.

The encounter is not important in any event. The other party has probably long forgotten it by now. We choose what we want to make into an issue that's worth getting het up about, and something that we quickly let go, because it isn't.

For me, the OP's encounter (and this particular exchange, interesting though it's been) fall strictly into the latter category.

SerafinasGoose · 05/10/2023 13:14

Katypp · 05/10/2023 12:17

Maybe so, it is is genuinely alarming to see how much rude behaviour is regarded as perfectly normal and acceptable on this thread. What on earth is happening to us?
In the past, people welcomed conversation and interaction with others. Nowadays, we don't need it because we come on sites like this and social media to get our interaction so we don't 'need' to speak to real people and the fact that most on here don't seem to have a problem with a woman blocking a THREE-YEAR-OLD from taking to her child speaks volumes.
Ban or control all interaction outside the home, don't answer the door, ban visitors until baby is XX weeks old, go no contact with people over the slightest issues - then go back on social media to whine that you've got no-one to help out/babysit. Does anyone else think we are going mad?

Not at all.

People have pressures in their lives. They're carrying all manner of things around with them that others have no clue over.

I wouldn't describe myself as a misanthrope. I'm the butt of a joke amongst those who know me for making friends everywhere I go when in leisure venues, travelling for leisure or even conferencing. But if I'm rushing around a supermarket, particularly if I'm aware there's an imminent miniature Vesuvius about to erupt in the shape of my kid, or if they've followed through and it's currently behind their knee and I'm rushing out before it reaches their shoes, or I'm on the way to a nerve-wracking medical appointment, or I want a quiet meal in a restaurant without someone else's kid undoing my shoelaces or jolting my elbows, or kicking my plane seat etc., then no. I do not want to interact with your precious children. They are making me stressed and it's giving me a headache.

There's a time and a place for positive social interaction, a time for solitude, and a time for getting to where you need to go as quickly and painlessly as possible. And part of decent manners, civility and making your own and others' day go by quickly and more pleasantly, is recognising what is and is not an appropriate time and place.

WongWifi · 05/10/2023 13:12

So you would block a toddler and be rude to a little child? You are the problem sweetheart.

jays · 05/10/2023 13:11

SerafinasGoose · 05/10/2023 13:04

It was not rude. Parents do not owe explanations of their parenting methods to random strangers in the supermarket when they are on the run and likely have other things on their mind than other people's children. It was a nanosecond encounter between strangers who are unlikely to meet further.

A difference of opinion as to who is and is not rude is not gaslighting. Gaslighting is an insidious, longstanding method of abuse designed to mess with the victim's head to the extent that it makes them doubt their own reality. It's mental torture and a hideous form of abuse. To equate that kind of serious issue with a frivolous Mumsnet thread about a real non-issue denigrates those who really have suffered this form of clever, sophisticated, mind-bending abuse. A disagreement as to whether some fly-by-night stranger was or wasn't rude is just that: a simple disagreement.

And who cares, anyway? Rude strangers, rude drivers, rude passers-by are ten-a-penny. If you expend your energies being pissed at every one of these encounters you are going to live a very angry life.

Don't sweat the small stuff.

Yes, but it was rude. There’s no law that says you must not be rude, she completely entitled to be. And she was. Unless you want to re-write the entire history of manners in order to make you right, she was rude.

SerafinasGoose · 05/10/2023 13:04

jays · 04/10/2023 16:27

It was rude. Don’t listen to all the bollocks on here saying it wasn’t. It was. She could have had a million reasons but all it would have taken was a little eye contact with you and a ‘sorry he’s tantrum prone/not well/about to have a melt down, whatever. I was rude and honestly, don’t let folk on here gaslight you into thinking it wasn’t. So many folk all against gaslighting yet they do it on here to OP’s on a daily basis. It was rude.

It was not rude. Parents do not owe explanations of their parenting methods to random strangers in the supermarket when they are on the run and likely have other things on their mind than other people's children. It was a nanosecond encounter between strangers who are unlikely to meet further.

A difference of opinion as to who is and is not rude is not gaslighting. Gaslighting is an insidious, longstanding method of abuse designed to mess with the victim's head to the extent that it makes them doubt their own reality. It's mental torture and a hideous form of abuse. To equate that kind of serious issue with a frivolous Mumsnet thread about a real non-issue denigrates those who really have suffered this form of clever, sophisticated, mind-bending abuse. A disagreement as to whether some fly-by-night stranger was or wasn't rude is just that: a simple disagreement.

And who cares, anyway? Rude strangers, rude drivers, rude passers-by are ten-a-penny. If you expend your energies being pissed at every one of these encounters you are going to live a very angry life.

Don't sweat the small stuff.

AmIAutumnalNow · 05/10/2023 12:30

MysteryBelle · 04/10/2023 15:22

Only a classless person is mean and aggressively hostile to a little child. Aggressively and immediately blocking a toddler with her arm so that he doesn’t get close to her child, sounds like a racist behavior. If she touched him while blocking him and pinning him between her arm and the column that could be considered assault. How a person reacts in the spur of the moment shows the character, or lack of one.

Brilliant