Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Diane Abbott

894 replies

Flowerly · 23/04/2023 12:02

To say that Diane Abbott is doing her best to help the Labour Party to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory?

Hideous antisemitism seemingly not gone away at all and add that to the horrendous misogyny in the Labour Party I wonder at this point why ANYONE would vote for them.

AIBU?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
33
AdamRyan · 23/04/2023 20:19

Socialdistancechampion · 23/04/2023 20:15

Racism is about racial difference. Under British law being Jewish or a Traveller is a protected characteristic in relation to race.

By one definition, but not by all.

And this is what I mean about language. That definition is fine but then it can be used to stop black people talking about their specific experience as they don't have a term for it.

It almost like it's forbidden to talk about colour as a driver of prejudice. Which of course is racism in itself.

Ortiguilla · 23/04/2023 20:19

AdamRyan · 23/04/2023 20:15

I know nothing about her views generally so of course, she could be antisemitic. But I think this letter seems to be clumsy (quoting the original article) rather than deliberate?

Saying that Jewish people have been not suffered from racism any more than people with red hair isn't innocent, clumsy or accidental.

It is a horrendous thing to say.

TwoLeftSocksWithHoles · 23/04/2023 20:18

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Plbrookes · 23/04/2023 20:17

AdamRyan · 23/04/2023 20:01

The original article doesn't talk about the Jewish people's experience of racism. It basically says "white people experience racism too" with no commentary about what that means. The author lumped racist against jews/antisemitism with racism including verbal abuse against other non-black groups, to score points about "white people are victims too".

Using that measure red heads do experience racism as they get verbal abuse for it, based on the melanin in their skin.

You are basically arguing the same point as her. She made the mistake of using the same language as the title of the article. But she was arguing about the content.

I am not a Diane Abbott fan but she has suffered awful racist abuse. And to me this seems the same. She must be "antisemitic" for pointing out the flaws in someone else's article.

I think the other article is terrible. The author has made huge statistical flaws in his analysis to try to prove a point which is at best unhelpful.

I'm not saying that the original article talks about Jewish people's experience of racism. I'm saying that Abbott wrote an response denying that Jewish people experienced racism but that they experienced prejudice of a nature akin to that experienced by red-headed people. It's awful that Abbott, and anyone else, has experienced racist abuse. But that doesn't give her a pass to be antisemitic.

Socialdistancechampion · 23/04/2023 20:15

Racism is about racial difference. Under British law being Jewish or a Traveller is a protected characteristic in relation to race.

AdamRyan · 23/04/2023 20:15

rootsandfruits1 · 23/04/2023 20:09

I am not a Diane Abbott fan but she has suffered awful racist abuse. And to me this seems the same. She must be "antisemitic" for pointing out the flaws in someone else's article.

She's made herself very comfortable with some truly awful antisemites over the last 40 years, so yes, her comments today are consistent with that and I'm personally quite convinced she holds deeply prejudiced views about Jews. And yes, she has suffered awful racist abuse (and misogyny) during that time. Doesn't make her bigotry OK.

I know nothing about her views generally so of course, she could be antisemitic. But I think this letter seems to be clumsy (quoting the original article) rather than deliberate?

Florenz · 23/04/2023 20:15

The point is that people have the idea that there are factions within Labour with some very extreme, nasty views. If Abbott is prepared to go public with these views, what kind of views are being expressed behind closed doors?

AdamRyan · 23/04/2023 20:14

Prejudice against who?
I feel like I'm missing something. Is it offensive or antisemitic to talk about black people's experience without mentioning the holocaust?

Is it offensive to consider antisemitism as separate to racism? Why?

I would define racism as being about colour so a visual marker. Antisemitism seems different as likely to affect Jewish people regardless of their visual appearance? Is that an antisemitic thing to say?

onirgellep · 23/04/2023 20:12

Thepeopleversuswork · 23/04/2023 20:06

@onirgellep

Sorry don't agree with your capture hypothesis

"Capture" was probably the wrong word. But the point holds that large parts of the left are suspicious of Jewish people and conflate Jewishness with the state of Israel. Corbyn and his Momentum henchmen certainly were steeped in this.

Large parts of the extreme left wing of the Labour Party like DA and Corbyn have held these views forever - the election of Corbyn supported by Momentum was a disaster allowing some of these ideas to become more mainstream

It's why I left

rootsandfruits1 · 23/04/2023 20:09

I am not a Diane Abbott fan but she has suffered awful racist abuse. And to me this seems the same. She must be "antisemitic" for pointing out the flaws in someone else's article.

She's made herself very comfortable with some truly awful antisemites over the last 40 years, so yes, her comments today are consistent with that and I'm personally quite convinced she holds deeply prejudiced views about Jews. And yes, she has suffered awful racist abuse (and misogyny) during that time. Doesn't make her bigotry OK.

Thepeopleversuswork · 23/04/2023 20:06

@onirgellep

Sorry don't agree with your capture hypothesis

"Capture" was probably the wrong word. But the point holds that large parts of the left are suspicious of Jewish people and conflate Jewishness with the state of Israel. Corbyn and his Momentum henchmen certainly were steeped in this.

User98866 · 23/04/2023 20:05

I’m really sad to see Diane Abbot has had to go this way after years of enduring the worst racist and misogynistic abuse. Really Starmer had no choice. She shouldn’t have worded it in the way she did but most people can understand what she meant. That Jews, Irish travelers and Romani can generally pass as white members of the population, where as black people and brown people simply can’t. Of course they shouldn’t have to ‘pass’ (ie. Not wear traditional dress etc) but they are not generally black and brown skinned so don’t experience the specific prejudice that comes with that. She should not have worded it as not being racism though. I’m sure if she was Boris no one would give a shite though.

rootsandfruits1 · 23/04/2023 20:02

So I go back to my original question.
How do black people talk about their unique oppression if they can't use the word racism?
Historically racism has been understood to mean oppression of black people by white people. Expanding that definition takes away black peoples ability to talk about that oppression.

@AdamRyan Quite easily - by not comparing it to the racism experienced by other minorities!! It's really that simple. No one has suggested they can't use the word racism. Your so-called hierarchy of racism is actually responsible for continued (and worsening prejudice and hate) against other minority groups.

Here's the Merriam definition of racism for you - which part of this do you think doesn't apply to how Nazis of the so-called 'master race' viewed Jews and their inferior non-Aryan traits (thereby justifying their extermination)? You know, that 'unique' as you keep putting it, oppression of one group over another...

a belief that race is a fundamental determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race

Your persistence is now just coming across as deep prejudice.

Wiccan · 23/04/2023 20:02

onirgellep · 23/04/2023 19:40

Well you're lovely aren't you - ''fuckwit comment'' ''cretin''

And previously ''racist old gits''

She is exactly how I describe her .I found everything she said extremely offensive.
No idea what you mean by
"racist old gits "?

AdamRyan · 23/04/2023 20:01

Plbrookes · 23/04/2023 19:46

Erm ... if someone writes a response to the article comparing Jewish people's experience of racism to the prejudice experienced by red-headed people they deserve a roasting. And, no, being a Black woman is not the trump card that absolves someone from criticism that you want it to be.

The original article doesn't talk about the Jewish people's experience of racism. It basically says "white people experience racism too" with no commentary about what that means. The author lumped racist against jews/antisemitism with racism including verbal abuse against other non-black groups, to score points about "white people are victims too".

Using that measure red heads do experience racism as they get verbal abuse for it, based on the melanin in their skin.

You are basically arguing the same point as her. She made the mistake of using the same language as the title of the article. But she was arguing about the content.

I am not a Diane Abbott fan but she has suffered awful racist abuse. And to me this seems the same. She must be "antisemitic" for pointing out the flaws in someone else's article.

I think the other article is terrible. The author has made huge statistical flaws in his analysis to try to prove a point which is at best unhelpful.

onirgellep · 23/04/2023 19:59

Thepeopleversuswork · 23/04/2023 19:39

@onirgellep

Diane Abbott if far from stupid. She, like large swathes of the left, has just been captured by a particular ideology that dictates that Jewish people are not subject to the normal rules which dictate the way the left treats oppressed groups. It’s been pretty endemic in Labour for a long time.

Sorry don't agree with your capture hypothesis

She's always held these views ever since she joined the Young Socialists back in the 70s which was riddled with 'Trots' with similiar views on Israel

MissyB1 · 23/04/2023 19:54

HeadNorth · 23/04/2023 19:41

Do you think the ‘wierd gap’ between Abbott’s education & intelligence and how she presents herself could be in any way linked to right wing media and what they choose to present to us and the story they tell about it? I don’t think she has made more gaffes than other politicians referenced up thread, yet somehow she is presented as thick and stupid.

We know institutional racism exists. There is a thread going at the moment that young black girls are 3 times more likely to be strip searched. Abbott has always been presented through the prism of a racist society - we recently had an openly racist Prime Minister, remember.

Totally agree, it’s ok for some politicians to be opening racist - right wing politicians that is. The media (and plenty of mumsnetters) will give them an easy ride.

Wonnle · 23/04/2023 19:53

I'm deeply offended just by her name being mentioned !

The woman is so unhinged it's unreal , how the hell she keeps getting re-elected as an MP is just beyond me

woodhill · 23/04/2023 19:53

The Arabs also enslaved the people in Africa but apparently it was the right kind of slavery

onirgellep · 23/04/2023 19:52

HeadNorth · 23/04/2023 19:41

Do you think the ‘wierd gap’ between Abbott’s education & intelligence and how she presents herself could be in any way linked to right wing media and what they choose to present to us and the story they tell about it? I don’t think she has made more gaffes than other politicians referenced up thread, yet somehow she is presented as thick and stupid.

We know institutional racism exists. There is a thread going at the moment that young black girls are 3 times more likely to be strip searched. Abbott has always been presented through the prism of a racist society - we recently had an openly racist Prime Minister, remember.

No it's my personal view from seeing her speak and be interviewed

Sure there's perhaps excessive reporting of her gaffes and the tirade of misogynistic racist abuse on SM but I'm talking about something different

EsmaCannonball · 23/04/2023 19:50

1dayatatime · 23/04/2023 19:29

I found the comment "And at the height of slavery, there were no white-seeming people manacled on the slave ships." to be both factually incorrect and deeply offensive.

Try telling this to "white seeming people" (including some of my relatives) that were forcibly abducted by African slave traders from their homes in places such as Cornwall, Devon and Ireland and then manacled on slave ships to be taken to Africa.

This of course is in addition to her offensive anti semitism, anti Irish and anti travellers comments.

Her history degree mustn't have covered the Ottomans, who were quite the fans of shackling white-seeming people from the Mediterranean, Central and Eastern Europe, as well as plenty of black people from East Africa. The latter well into the twentieth century.

TreadLight · 23/04/2023 19:50

AdamRyan · 23/04/2023 19:31

So I go back to my original question.
How do black people talk about their unique oppression if they can't use the word racism?
Historically racism has been understood to mean oppression of black people by white people. Expanding that definition takes away black peoples ability to talk about that oppression.

Historically and linguistically, only in America has racism been limited to white on black. In this country we have plenty of history of racism against Afro Caribbeans, Eastern Europeans, Chinese, Indians, Sub Saharan Africans, Pakistanis, Bangladeshis, Nepalese, Jews etc. Etc.

It is quite offensive that one group would monopolise the term and diminish the experiences of all the other victims.

And it isn't based on skin colour. Because the view derives from Critical Race Theory and the American legal system, some people will say some black people can't experience racism because their ancestors hundreds of years ago weren't slaves or experienced segregation in America.

woodhill · 23/04/2023 19:47

Her remarks were so insensitive

Especially the bus comment.

Plbrookes · 23/04/2023 19:46

AdamRyan · 23/04/2023 19:02

I see. So now its not what people say but the agenda other people think they have that's the problem.

I read the article she was replying to and could see her issue with it. It was minimising racism, particularly racism against black people.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/apr/15/racism-in-britain-is-not-a-black-and-white-issue-it-is-far-more-complicated

Because the corollary of one third of ethnic minority people reporting that they have experienced racist assault is that two thirds of ethnic minority people have not.
But the Evidence for Equality National Survey report complicates some of the underlying assumptions that many ostensibly progressive people espouse on racial inequality in Britain. One is a narrow idea of what constitutes racism.Anyone who is white is privileged, we are told, and racism only affects people of colour. The problem with this view is that there are certain minorities who are seen as white and yet experience prejudice. In fact, the two groups most likely to say they have experienced racist abuse, according to the survey, are Gypsy, Traveller and Roma communities and Jewish people. [actually incorrect as the graph shows "other black" as second highest behind travellers]
But the problem with this point of view is that the report has already been used to advance the claim that Britain is still plagued by racism – and the very same people who make this claim also emphasise only one kind of racial inequality, one that puts black and Asian people at the very bottom of society, and “white” people at the top.

I think we are in a bad state when a black woman can't write a response to an article like this without a public roasting

Erm ... if someone writes a response to the article comparing Jewish people's experience of racism to the prejudice experienced by red-headed people they deserve a roasting. And, no, being a Black woman is not the trump card that absolves someone from criticism that you want it to be.

1dayatatime · 23/04/2023 19:45

LeHamelRenard · 23/04/2023 19:37

She’s not being anti-Semitic. She makes a valid point.

No the comment :

"And at the height of slavery, there were no white-seeming people manacled on the slave ships."

Is both factually incorrect and deeply offensive. At the height of slavery there were plenty of white people being manacled on slave ships being sent to Africa.