A PP wrote "The Labour Party has a new agenda, a quasi religious belief which amalgamates queer theory, gender identity, critical race theory. This new agenda will suffuse everything they do, it has replaced socialism."
Pick-your-own-identity politics is an extreme neoliberal position that is actually incompatible with socialism. Creating your own bespoke identity and then claiming oppression on the basis of it is in diametric opposition to class analysis, because it destroys the notion of class as being something that is imposed on you by circumstances beyond your control.
Without socialism, the Labour Party aren't going to fix the issues that you mention, because without class analysis, those issues won't be deemed important. Instead, endless money will be wasted on EDI trainers and the like, who would be flipping burgers with their numpty degrees otherwise.
Pick-your-own-identity politics is in fact a means of getting unearned power in an environment that has embraced queer theory as gospel. A white man, who would otherwise be classed as an oppressor regardless of wealth, can become classified as oppressed and therefore gain power in a structure that gives privilege to those who are labelled as being oppressed in wider society. Sarah Summers (who is taking Brighton Rape Crisis to court) profiled an EDI trainer who would be a photographer languishing in obscurity if not for a Brave And Stunning decision to transition. This trainer now talks about wearing h** sister's knickers in front of rooms full of workers, some of whom may be the victims of this kind of paraphilic clothing theft. If this trainer was born female, talking about wearing someone else's knickers would get the training session immediately halted. Labour aren't stopping this misogynistic nonsense: it is the Tories who are pulling govt departments out of Stonewall and other EDI Industrial Complex accreditation schemes.