You keep avoiding my question.
You plopped yourself here on the OPs thread.
The OPs child is being subjected to Bullying and subjected to Coercive Control
Why is this something which warms your heart?
You advocate to force the OPs girl to accept males in
▪︎ her shower area
▪︎ her changing room and
▪︎ her toilet block
You dismiss the fact that the OPs child is the vulnerable party.
You dismiss the fact that she has a right to be safeguarded by the school.
You dismiss the fact that she has a lawful right to female only single sex provision in
▪︎ her shower area
▪︎ her changing room and
▪︎ her toilet block
However
Let me reframe it in a way you may be able to understand
How should the school safeguard the male student who wants to access the female only single sex space in the context of his wanting access to
▪︎ the girls showers when the girls showers are being used by girls
▪︎ the girls changing room when the girls changing rooms are being used by girls
▪︎ the girls toilet block when the girls toilet block is being used by girls
such that the school ensure he is not subjecting any girl to non-contact child sex abuse or contact child sex abuse and ends up with a criminal record for sex offending?
This ^ is the theory the OPs childs school is trying to upsell to the OP and the OPs child (and society as a whole).
The management claim they will risk assess each male before enforcing the decision of forcing the OPs child to participate in their qualifying males wants.
Therefore:
How exactly can you claim you are able to spot the sex offender 100% of the time?
And if it is not 100% of the time and 100% correct whats your number?
How may girls can be subjected to avoidable sexual offending to warm your heart?
Or to reframe
How many male students can be put at risk of engaging in avoidable sex offending on the school grounds?