I am reality inclusive - male and female are exclusive categories and you can’t wander from one to another. You can’t “identify” into a category from which you are excluded by material reality.
I am safeguarding inclusive. Single sex spaces are often necessary for safeguarding - specifically places where women are vulnerable - changing rooms and lavatories - anywhere where they are sick and/or unconscious such as a hostel dorm, sleeper train, hospital ward, refuge. Additionally I believe single sex spaces are valuable for mental well-being and there should be a distinction between, for example “mens sheds” and “bottled up blokes” support and social groups and a woman only walking groups as well as sex specific single sex spaces such as prostate cancer support, breastfeeding support and single sex spaces designed for power. I think there is a distinction between acknowledging that sometimes mixed sex doesn’t meet the objectives of supporting the group so it’s fine to be single sex and the single sex spaces that exist to exclude one sex (female) from power eg men only dinking and golf clubs used for networking (house of commons bar famously when MT was an MP).
Additionally children are a vulnerable group and need particular protection from sexualisation and sexual harm. Children have the right to grow into adults without psychological and chemical interference in their developmental pathway. Removal of safeguards for children in the name of “inclusivity” is just academic noncing. I am not paedophillia inclusive and am not in favour of producing a sub-set of consent age adults with pre-pubescent bodies. I think “glitter families” and “rainbow families” are grooming. I think telling a child their body is “wrong” or “god made a mistake” and encouraging chemical and surgical correction is a monstrous form of child abuse. I think the “yeet the teet” woman and professionals of that ilk should be in prison - not on insta.
I don’t believe in inherent, internal, gender identity, or “brain sex”. I believe gender is a social hierarchy that has placed men at the top and women at the bottom. Sissy porn is responsible for a lot of older male gender fanatics - not wrong body theory, gods mistakes etc. I believe a woman is a person with a female body and any personality - not a person with a feminine personality and any body (and vice versa).
I am aesthetic inclusive - dress how you please. Be as masc of femme as you like - but don’t tell me it’s literally changed your sex because that’s rude. A sex class is not a costume or a performance. I do have limits on my inclusivity - don’t wear sex or fetish clothes in public and expect me to think you are a person worth treating with respect. Wearing the clothes you masterbate in full time is perverted - not “brave” and you deserve ridicule.
I believe it is wrong to discriminate against anyone who claims a “trans” identity or a diagnosis of gender dysphoria in terms of services, housing, employment etc - but again - limits. If you turn up to a job interview and act like a dick and dress like a stripper you can’t expect to be treated the same as someone who dresses appropriately and behaves normally. “Bring your whole self to work” is stupid - bring your professional self only to work please. Expecting people to access services for their sex class such as changing areas, sex specific jobs, sex segregated sports etc is not discrimination. Men don’t need to compete in women’s cycling races or park run categories or change in the ladies or be female support workers.
I am healthcare inclusive but, again, I have limits. The same access as everyone else but no prostate exams for women who claim to be men - no smear tests for male people - no state funded cosmetic surgery or trans based hormone treatment and no medical intervention for children. People with gender dysphoria should have access to good mental health services (as should others with mental health problems).
That was a very long was of saying “not really”.