Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions
OP posts:
Thread gallery
33
TheJoyOfWriting · 11/09/2025 18:17

DBSFstupid · 11/09/2025 17:59

We are already lost IMO

No we are not. The US is a different country. Conflating the US and the UK is partly what made stuff like BLM get out of hand.

Genevieva · 11/09/2025 18:17

nomas · 11/09/2025 18:06

There were 59 gun related deaths in the UK in 1996, and 24 last year. So tightening gun laws does reduce deaths.

Policies can work in one country and not another.

We have the strictest gun controls in the world. So strict that our medal-winning olympic pistol team can only practice with air pistols in the UK and have to go overseas to practice with the real thing. Americans look at us and think it is overly draconian. They don't seem to realise that people do own shotguns here and that there are still rifle clubs and cadets rifle training.

I think that our gun controls have been a success, but I can also see that they probably wouldn't work in a country as vast as the United States, with their history and antipathy towards government restrictions. The sadness is that the United States seem unable to have a constructive conversation that reaches a middle ground in which the gun lobby feel they retain the freedoms they need, while mentally ill school shooters find it harder to get hold of assault rifles designed to kill people. My view is that Charlie Kirk was all about facilitating a culture in which debates like that could happen.

As it happen, given the professionalism of this assassination, it is possible that gun controls would have protected him yesterday. They tend to protect against the mentally ill, but unsophisticated potential murderer.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 11/09/2025 18:18

wordler · 11/09/2025 18:15

Well then you are projecting because nothing I said could be construed as that.

I don't believe in capital punishment no matter who you are.

But the rise in political violence at the current moment in time is being pushed and encouraged by Trump and his supporters and it doesn't look as though they will be doing anything to reverse that trend any time soon.

It takes two to tango, doesn’t it? It isn’t just “Trump and his supporters” it’s both sides who are promoting violence.

EsmaCannonball · 11/09/2025 18:19

The left are so frustratingly out-of-touch and self-defeating. If you are concerned about the far-right then this act, and the gloating and equivocation in its aftermath, is just going to swell its numbers, entrench the view that the left is toxic, and produce tit-for-tat sectarian violence where the next assassination will probably be an outspoken person on the left. It's beyond disturbing.

Not surprised by the trantifa allegations. I wonder if there is any connection to that cult which has murdered people recently?

Genevieva · 11/09/2025 18:19

Genevieva · 11/09/2025 18:17

Policies can work in one country and not another.

We have the strictest gun controls in the world. So strict that our medal-winning olympic pistol team can only practice with air pistols in the UK and have to go overseas to practice with the real thing. Americans look at us and think it is overly draconian. They don't seem to realise that people do own shotguns here and that there are still rifle clubs and cadets rifle training.

I think that our gun controls have been a success, but I can also see that they probably wouldn't work in a country as vast as the United States, with their history and antipathy towards government restrictions. The sadness is that the United States seem unable to have a constructive conversation that reaches a middle ground in which the gun lobby feel they retain the freedoms they need, while mentally ill school shooters find it harder to get hold of assault rifles designed to kill people. My view is that Charlie Kirk was all about facilitating a culture in which debates like that could happen.

As it happen, given the professionalism of this assassination, it is possible that gun controls would have protected him yesterday. They tend to protect against the mentally ill, but unsophisticated potential murderer.

Typo:
...would not have protected him yesterday. They tend to protect against the mentally ill, not

Ereshkigalangcleg · 11/09/2025 18:20

EsmaCannonball · 11/09/2025 18:19

The left are so frustratingly out-of-touch and self-defeating. If you are concerned about the far-right then this act, and the gloating and equivocation in its aftermath, is just going to swell its numbers, entrench the view that the left is toxic, and produce tit-for-tat sectarian violence where the next assassination will probably be an outspoken person on the left. It's beyond disturbing.

Not surprised by the trantifa allegations. I wonder if there is any connection to that cult which has murdered people recently?

Zizians?

Lunalara · 11/09/2025 18:20

TheJoyOfWriting · 11/09/2025 18:17

No we are not. The US is a different country. Conflating the US and the UK is partly what made stuff like BLM get out of hand.

It’s not the same as in the US, but polarisation is a pretty big issue here too. On the one hand, there are people from my old uni that would have been happy to remove degrees from Christians. On the other hand, some Catholics I knew were mocking LGBT openly in public. I completely get that this is their faith, but people could have the decency not to laugh about it.

Merrymouse · 11/09/2025 18:21

Dannydevitoiloveyourart · 11/09/2025 18:15

The fact that you are unaware of his influence - and significantly underestimate it - suggests you may not know enough to comment on his views and impact.

He had a social media reach and live attendance at college campuses and rallies that most political candidates could only dream of. Aside from Joe Rogan, I can’t think of a more influential Trump supporter who helped the campaign through the sheer popularity and the impact of their voice.

Re deaths, his support of Trump's policies on abortion, gun control and immigration (to name a few) have indirectly led to deaths of innocent citizens - surely that's obvious?

Edited

Abortion and guns were wedge issues in America long before Trump came down his golden escalator.

nomas · 11/09/2025 18:22

FBI have released an image of a person of interest.

https://x.com/FBISaltLakeCity/status/1966169520403525760

Rosscameasdoody · 11/09/2025 18:22

Dannydevitoiloveyourart · 11/09/2025 18:15

The fact that you are unaware of his influence - and significantly underestimate it - suggests you may not know enough to comment on his views and impact.

He had a social media reach and live attendance at college campuses and rallies that most political candidates could only dream of. Aside from Joe Rogan, I can’t think of a more influential Trump supporter who helped the campaign through the sheer popularity and the impact of their voice.

Re deaths, his support of Trump's policies on abortion, gun control and immigration (to name a few) have indirectly led to deaths of innocent citizens - surely that's obvious?

Edited

There’s a website giving the most disturbing details of women who have died in the USA in 2024/25 as a result of not being able to access abortion or even decent medical care for miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy, stillbirth etc, because medics are afraid they will be imprisoned. Thirteen states now have a total ban on abortion for any reason.

TheJoyOfWriting · 11/09/2025 18:23

Genevieva · 11/09/2025 17:20

I think a lot of people have forgotten that Charlie Kirk's primary mission was to model polite and civil debate and give young people an opportunity to participate in it. He used the socratic method to teach teenagers how to think critically, but also how to behave when confronted with opinions they disagree with. That has never been more important. I don't think anyone needs to caveat their sadness at his murder by telling us whether they agreed or disagreed with his opinions. Agreement or not wasn't the point. Courteous engagement was.

I don't think it's very polite to say that women on birth control are automatically 'crazy and bitter' and that women over 30 are understandably not attractive to 30something men (despite the fact he married a 32yo)

SingleSexSpacesInSchools · 11/09/2025 18:24

Apparently all the kids at my daughter’s Brighton secondary school were talking about the shooting. He’s well known with the youth apparently, lots of his stuff cut up into chunks on tick tok and all that.

mentioned it to me not the other way round.

wordler · 11/09/2025 18:25

Ereshkigalangcleg · 11/09/2025 18:18

It takes two to tango, doesn’t it? It isn’t just “Trump and his supporters” it’s both sides who are promoting violence.

No - it’s not - there are no main stream politicians on the Democrat side - particularly no presidents calling for violence in the way that Trump does.

TheJoyOfWriting · 11/09/2025 18:25

SingleSexSpacesInSchools · 11/09/2025 18:24

Apparently all the kids at my daughter’s Brighton secondary school were talking about the shooting. He’s well known with the youth apparently, lots of his stuff cut up into chunks on tick tok and all that.

mentioned it to me not the other way round.

Edited

What you mean 'cut up into chicks'?

TheUnusuallyQuerulentMxLauraBrown · 11/09/2025 18:25

Dannydevitoiloveyourart · 11/09/2025 18:15

The fact that you are unaware of his influence - and significantly underestimate it - suggests you may not know enough to comment on his views and impact.

He had a social media reach and live attendance at college campuses and rallies that most political candidates could only dream of. Aside from Joe Rogan, I can’t think of a more influential Trump supporter who helped the campaign through the sheer popularity and the impact of their voice.

Re deaths, his support of Trump's policies on abortion, gun control and immigration (to name a few) have indirectly led to deaths of innocent citizens - surely that's obvious?

Edited

And would those policies on abortion, gun crime and immigration have been enacted even if Charlie Kirk had never existed at all? You are massively overestimating how much sway a single media personality has over country/court system/government administration. As if Trump would change his mind on something because CK disagreed with him! Even Elon couldn’t influence Trump much (and Elon has the sort of wealth that makes Trump cream his poorly fitting suit),

And Joe Rogan isn’t really a ‘Trump supporter’, is he? He’s a podcast host who has guests from all over the political spectrum and he officially endorsed Bernie Sanders.

BeanQuisine · 11/09/2025 18:25

Ereshkigalangcleg · 11/09/2025 18:14

Not to his family. And it may end up being quite major in the “scheme of things”. Is it really necessary to downplay it? Do you think that’s the morally correct way?

Of course it’s not going to be important to you personally, he’s not your loved one, but you are not the arbiter of how “minor” a man’s death was. People would say that about most people’s deaths, wouldn’t they? Oh wait, they probably would have more human decency than that.

I'm not a member of his family. I'm a rational member of the public, being told by hysterics like you that I "lack human decency" because I'm not responding as though he was my close relative or my hero.

The "morally correct way" would be to put this in the context of contemporary US political extremism, to which Kirk was a contributor. And in this context, it's not at all surprising.

And for those of us who are not American and not responsible for their culture and politics, and not able to influence such matters, it's of little consequence.

SingleSexSpacesInSchools · 11/09/2025 18:26

TheJoyOfWriting · 11/09/2025 18:25

What you mean 'cut up into chicks'?

Sorry chunks. As in short 60 second extracts on social media etc

Robin67 · 11/09/2025 18:26

Butchyrestingface · 11/09/2025 17:55

Meh. When Nancy Pelosi's 82 year old husband Paul was attacked and gravely injured in his home home, Charlie Kirk encouraged 'patriots' to become 'mid-term heroes' by bailing the suspect out of jail.

This is really not the guy whose hill I would die on in terms of revulsion at distasteful reactions to his death. He'd probably be there leading the charge had the victim been someone whose views HE disagreed with.

Seriously! If this is true I am no longer indifferent. That is shocking.

TheUnusuallyQuerulentMxLauraBrown · 11/09/2025 18:27

TheJoyOfWriting · 11/09/2025 18:25

What you mean 'cut up into chicks'?

Presumably typo/autocorrect for ‘Stitch’

www.wikihow.com/What-Does-Stitch-Incoming-Mean

Rosscameasdoody · 11/09/2025 18:28

TheJoyOfWriting · 11/09/2025 18:25

What you mean 'cut up into chicks'?

Chunks, not chicks. In other words bits shown out of context I would imagine.

TheJoyOfWriting · 11/09/2025 18:28

inamarina · 11/09/2025 17:33

Fully agree with you, and also with this statement by Glinner on X:

’You don't have to say "I disagreed with him on some things". No-one agrees with everyone on everything. It's a pointless statement that just distances you from your own humanity.’

I can see that it could be difficult for liberal politicians, say, who criticised Kirk a lot for his more extreme views, and shared little of his views. But they shouldn't need to acknowledge their differences when he was alive, people will believe they are truly upset of they just give a respectful statement about thr horror of the murder.

TheJoyOfWriting · 11/09/2025 18:29

Robin67 · 11/09/2025 18:26

Seriously! If this is true I am no longer indifferent. That is shocking.

That's vile.

EsmaCannonball · 11/09/2025 18:29

The far-right being the only promoters of political violence in western democracies is such a stuck-in-the-20th-century way of thinking. Have people not noticed the changes in the last two decades or so? The 'Anti' in 'Antifa' performs the same function as the 'Democratic' in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

TheJoyOfWriting · 11/09/2025 18:30

TheUnusuallyQuerulentMxLauraBrown · 11/09/2025 18:25

And would those policies on abortion, gun crime and immigration have been enacted even if Charlie Kirk had never existed at all? You are massively overestimating how much sway a single media personality has over country/court system/government administration. As if Trump would change his mind on something because CK disagreed with him! Even Elon couldn’t influence Trump much (and Elon has the sort of wealth that makes Trump cream his poorly fitting suit),

And Joe Rogan isn’t really a ‘Trump supporter’, is he? He’s a podcast host who has guests from all over the political spectrum and he officially endorsed Bernie Sanders.

Rogan has been huge in marshaling young men to vote Trump, so has Charlie Kirk.

Rosscameasdoody · 11/09/2025 18:31

TheUnusuallyQuerulentMxLauraBrown · 11/09/2025 18:25

And would those policies on abortion, gun crime and immigration have been enacted even if Charlie Kirk had never existed at all? You are massively overestimating how much sway a single media personality has over country/court system/government administration. As if Trump would change his mind on something because CK disagreed with him! Even Elon couldn’t influence Trump much (and Elon has the sort of wealth that makes Trump cream his poorly fitting suit),

And Joe Rogan isn’t really a ‘Trump supporter’, is he? He’s a podcast host who has guests from all over the political spectrum and he officially endorsed Bernie Sanders.

Wow, this is naive. The testament to how much influence Kirk had is how widespread and detailed the reporting of his death is.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread