Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions
OP posts:
Thread gallery
33
wordler · 11/09/2025 18:06

For those of you not in America right now it might be hard to understand just how bad the right wing cult around Trump is making life for many people. Charlie Kirk was a propagandist for a president who has consistently from before his first campaign called for and celebrated violence and revenge against his political enemies. The rise is politically motivated violence is terrifying but it is being stoked by the president himself and all his resources.

He is the politician calling for people he disagrees with to be shot.

www.usnews.com/news/national-news/articles/2024-11-04/the-people-and-groups-trump-has-threatened-with-violence

nomas · 11/09/2025 18:07

RedToothBrush · 11/09/2025 18:05

Have you been living under a rock or did you miss the screenshots of 'who next' up thread?

Farage seems to be doing just fine in the polls.

Farage was doing fine in the polls before as well.

Lunalara · 11/09/2025 18:07

True, that’s why I think guns should be banned. However, in an increasingly hostile society, people may want to find ways to kill people they dislike.

TheUnusuallyQuerulentMxLauraBrown · 11/09/2025 18:07

Dannydevitoiloveyourart · 11/09/2025 17:59

I would agree if the policies stemming from his political extremism were harmless. But the hate, polarisation, and division fuelled by his influence have caused real harm, indirectly costing lives and freedoms, a consequence he played a significant role in.

No, he did not deserve to die in that way. But he lived by the political sword, recklessly ignoring the real world consequences of his views and rhetoric.

Genuine question - whose deaths were ‘indirectly’ caused by Charlie Kirk?

As I personally was not under the impression that he was influential enough to have caused anything much, let alone loss of life - he was a talking head for the younger wing of the American conservative right (I vaguely knew him as a younger Matt Walsh type, but admittedly I’m not the right audience for either of them) half the people on this thread didn’t even know his name until yesterday.

I expect he will become far more influential in death than he ever was in life, which is presumably the opposite of what his critics wanted?

OonaStubbs · 11/09/2025 18:08

nomas · 11/09/2025 18:06

There were 59 gun related deaths in the UK in 1996, and 24 last year. So tightening gun laws does reduce deaths.

Yes but the US already has over a billion guns. And you aren't starting from the same starting point, hardly anyone in the UK in 1996 owned a gun or had any interest in owning one.

RedToothBrush · 11/09/2025 18:08

Rosscameasdoody · 11/09/2025 18:02

How so ? This is all a matter of record. He was asked a question at a meeting about what he would do if his ten year old daughter became pregnant via rape. His answer was that the baby would be born. He went further and as well as condemning abortion and advocating for a complete ban under any circumstances, he said women should have to prioritise motherhood over careers, and that women are suffering because they are encouraged to focus on jobs over families. He criticized birth control, saying it make women angry and bitter, and that females over 30 aren’t attractive in the dating pool.

He was an evangelical Christian fundamentalist, pushing for Christian Nationalism and a strong Christian presence in American politics. He was anti trans, anti gay, a misogynist and a racist. In 2023 at a political conference hosted by his Turning Points USA group, he called Martin Luther King Jr an awful person and of the Civil Rights Act of 1965 that outlawed discrimination on the basis of race, colour, religion, sex and national origin, and prohibited segregation he said ‘We made a huge mistake when we passed the Civil Rights Act in the 1960s’. How much more evidence do you need.

The fact that he was murdered for his views is no less a tragedy than any others who have been assassinated for similar reason. It’s yet another nail in the coffin of free speech. But that doesn’t make him a saint.

And again.

You said the only reason anyone here was sympathetic was because of his trans views.

I've been banging on about the dangers of political polarisation and violence for about a decade but still...

MyHeartyCoralSnail · 11/09/2025 18:09

Lunalara · 11/09/2025 18:05

It feels isolating in real life because my friends think it’s amazing that a “fascist” dies to an assassination attempt. I am centrist in my political views, but I despise anyone who condones violence.

If my friends though my it was amazing that a father of two young. Children was gunned down but his beliefs they would no longer be my friends. I would be questioning everything about their character. What reaction would they have if you called them out. If you ever expressed opinions contrary to theirs. They are not worthy of you friendship

BeanQuisine · 11/09/2025 18:09

RedToothBrush · 11/09/2025 17:56

No one asked you to.

There might be other completely innocent people who get caught in the fallout though, because of the way this is being so polarised and saying Kirk 'deserved it' because of his horrible political views doesn't really help the mood right now.

The fear is escalation that goes way beyond either individual man involved in this shooting.

I didn't say that "he deserved it". I described it as "a minor tragedy in the scheme of things."

MyHeartyCoralSnail · 11/09/2025 18:10

RedToothBrush · 11/09/2025 18:08

And again.

You said the only reason anyone here was sympathetic was because of his trans views.

I've been banging on about the dangers of political polarisation and violence for about a decade but still...

Yep.

TheJoyOfWriting · 11/09/2025 18:10

RayonSunrise · 11/09/2025 14:16

I’ve been watching the American online rx to this horrible event and unfortunately I think the US is fucked. A huge number of them have jumped straight past “My God, this is horrible that culture war provocation and tribalism have got so bad people think free speech absolutism is completely answerable with gun violence” to “I have just spent the morning seeking out all the worst takes I can find so I can accuse the Other Side of terrible things and carry on point scoring.”

It’s like the Jan 6th attack, when people were so keen to paint their side as righteous they almost completely ignored what actually happened and why it was a big fucking problem.

In discussions of him today, I have questioned people who downplayed his views (eg. 10yo rape victims should not be allowed abortion & the Leviticus mandate to stone men for gay sex was 'God's perfect law for sexual matters'. )

But you are totally right about the insane US left attitudes. There is a terrifying attitude from far too many that the murder isn't a big deal bc he had unpleasant views. Completely ignoring the sacred right to free speech and the evilness of punishing that w death.

I wonder what the motive was. An older man, clearly a skilled shooter. There are conspiracies swirling that Kirk was pressuring Trump about his Epstein links, and about Epstein's relationship w Mossad. Some speculate Mossad killed him, they are famously good snipers. Otoh there are so many crazy groups out there. This was cleat someone who knew a lot about shooting, that's all we can say rn.

Talkinpeace · 11/09/2025 18:10

He had not been hoisted on his own petard. He was likely assassinated by a professional with (sounds like illegally owned untraceable gun).

No.
The gun is a Mauser 3.0 bolt action rifle
standard deer hunting weapon
and a standard static deer hunting shot
within the capabilities of a significant proportion of adults in Utah

Lunalara · 11/09/2025 18:10

MyHeartyCoralSnail · 11/09/2025 18:09

If my friends though my it was amazing that a father of two young. Children was gunned down but his beliefs they would no longer be my friends. I would be questioning everything about their character. What reaction would they have if you called them out. If you ever expressed opinions contrary to theirs. They are not worthy of you friendship

It’s not just them. I know so many people like this in real life.

MorningLarkEchoes · 11/09/2025 18:11

wordler · 11/09/2025 18:06

For those of you not in America right now it might be hard to understand just how bad the right wing cult around Trump is making life for many people. Charlie Kirk was a propagandist for a president who has consistently from before his first campaign called for and celebrated violence and revenge against his political enemies. The rise is politically motivated violence is terrifying but it is being stoked by the president himself and all his resources.

He is the politician calling for people he disagrees with to be shot.

www.usnews.com/news/national-news/articles/2024-11-04/the-people-and-groups-trump-has-threatened-with-violence

Well from your post it sounds like you are trying to justify what happened to CK, which makes you just as bad as the people you are criticising.

MyHeartyCoralSnail · 11/09/2025 18:13

Talkinpeace · 11/09/2025 18:10

He had not been hoisted on his own petard. He was likely assassinated by a professional with (sounds like illegally owned untraceable gun).

No.
The gun is a Mauser 3.0 bolt action rifle
standard deer hunting weapon
and a standard static deer hunting shot
within the capabilities of a significant proportion of adults in Utah

And presumably not registered to the shooter otherwise they would know who he was 🤦‍♀️

TheUnusuallyQuerulentMxLauraBrown · 11/09/2025 18:13

wordler · 11/09/2025 18:06

For those of you not in America right now it might be hard to understand just how bad the right wing cult around Trump is making life for many people. Charlie Kirk was a propagandist for a president who has consistently from before his first campaign called for and celebrated violence and revenge against his political enemies. The rise is politically motivated violence is terrifying but it is being stoked by the president himself and all his resources.

He is the politician calling for people he disagrees with to be shot.

www.usnews.com/news/national-news/articles/2024-11-04/the-people-and-groups-trump-has-threatened-with-violence

Those who ARE in the US are perhaps finding it hard to understand that many people outside of the US believe that NO ONE should be SHOT TO DEATH for saying things, even if the things they said were objectively terrible things.

… but then, we in the UK have gun control and did away with the death penalty in the 1960s, while the US has those arsebackwards.

nomas · 11/09/2025 18:14

OonaStubbs · 11/09/2025 18:08

Yes but the US already has over a billion guns. And you aren't starting from the same starting point, hardly anyone in the UK in 1996 owned a gun or had any interest in owning one.

After the UK introduced handgun ban in 1997, gun related deaths have halved.

It is still statistically significant.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 11/09/2025 18:14

BeanQuisine · 11/09/2025 18:09

I didn't say that "he deserved it". I described it as "a minor tragedy in the scheme of things."

Not to his family. And it may end up being quite major in the “scheme of things”. Is it really necessary to downplay it? Do you think that’s the morally correct way?

Of course it’s not going to be important to you personally, he’s not your loved one, but you are not the arbiter of how “minor” a man’s death was. People would say that about most people’s deaths, wouldn’t they? Oh wait, they probably would have more human decency than that.

MyHeartyCoralSnail · 11/09/2025 18:14

Lunalara · 11/09/2025 18:10

It’s not just them. I know so many people like this in real life.

None of whom deserve the time of day

Merrymouse · 11/09/2025 18:14

wordler · 11/09/2025 18:06

For those of you not in America right now it might be hard to understand just how bad the right wing cult around Trump is making life for many people. Charlie Kirk was a propagandist for a president who has consistently from before his first campaign called for and celebrated violence and revenge against his political enemies. The rise is politically motivated violence is terrifying but it is being stoked by the president himself and all his resources.

He is the politician calling for people he disagrees with to be shot.

www.usnews.com/news/national-news/articles/2024-11-04/the-people-and-groups-trump-has-threatened-with-violence

I take your point about Trump not being the free speech advocate he claims to be, and I wouldn't vote for him, but from this side of the pond, he definitely seems to have been democratically elected.

Both Democrats and Republicans seem happy to say that black is white, particularly when it comes to women's rights, so can you explain how we recognise the Americans who aren't in a cult?

RegimentalSturgeon · 11/09/2025 18:15

cui bono?
My belief is that this was a false flag operation.

IwantToRetire · 11/09/2025 18:15

Kara Dansky
@KDansky

I disagreed with Charlie Kirk on just about everything. But, we shared an opposition to "gender identity" and the abolition of sex.

He once had me on his show to discuss it. He was polite, outgoing, and funny.

During the interview, I said something about the "TQIA." He exclaimed, "I don't know what any of that means!" I said, "Don't worry, nobody does." He and his entire audience laughed.

I am not a Republican, and I am certainly not MAGA. But I am grieving his death in part because he was a human being, in part because he leaves behind a wife and two children, and in part because of what this says about American society.

I will not take any part in any political violence, and I will stand with anyone, wherever they stand on the political spectrum, who will denounce it.

I hope America can recover from this.

#RIP

EDIT: I will block anyone who comes on here to glorify violence.

https://x.com/KDansky/status/1965887040010203358

Dannydevitoiloveyourart · 11/09/2025 18:15

TheUnusuallyQuerulentMxLauraBrown · 11/09/2025 18:07

Genuine question - whose deaths were ‘indirectly’ caused by Charlie Kirk?

As I personally was not under the impression that he was influential enough to have caused anything much, let alone loss of life - he was a talking head for the younger wing of the American conservative right (I vaguely knew him as a younger Matt Walsh type, but admittedly I’m not the right audience for either of them) half the people on this thread didn’t even know his name until yesterday.

I expect he will become far more influential in death than he ever was in life, which is presumably the opposite of what his critics wanted?

The fact that you are unaware of his influence - and significantly underestimate it - suggests you may not know enough to comment on his views and impact.

He had a social media reach and live attendance at college campuses and rallies that most political candidates could only dream of. Aside from Joe Rogan, I can’t think of a more influential Trump supporter who helped the campaign through the sheer popularity and the impact of their voice.

Re deaths, his support of Trump's policies on abortion, gun control and immigration (to name a few) have indirectly led to deaths of innocent citizens - surely that's obvious?

Butchyrestingface · 11/09/2025 18:15

GoldThumb · 11/09/2025 18:01

‘He’d probably be’

You can’t just vilify someone and attack their character by saying what you think they’d do, without any evidence they’ve ever done this?

Charlie Kirk once tweeted ‘You can tell a lot about a person by how they react when someone dies’ and it’s very very true

I just provided evidence of him making bad taste jokes (at least I hope they were jokes!) and mocking an old man gravely injured in the very post you quoted. Not unreasonable to conjecture that had PP died, CK would have kept up the distasteful commentary he indulged in whilst the man was lying in intensive care.

wordler · 11/09/2025 18:15

MorningLarkEchoes · 11/09/2025 18:11

Well from your post it sounds like you are trying to justify what happened to CK, which makes you just as bad as the people you are criticising.

Well then you are projecting because nothing I said could be construed as that.

I don't believe in capital punishment no matter who you are.

But the rise in political violence at the current moment in time is being pushed and encouraged by Trump and his supporters and it doesn't look as though they will be doing anything to reverse that trend any time soon.

TheJoyOfWriting · 11/09/2025 18:16

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.