Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

NHS Fife tries to silence nurse - Sandie Peggie vs NHS Fife Health Board and Dr Beth Upton - thread #40

1000 replies

nauticant · 23/07/2025 21:35

Sandie Peggie, a nurse at Victoria Hospital in Kirkcaldy (VH), has brought claims in the employment tribunal against her employer; Fife Health Board (the Board) and another employee, Dr B Upton. Ms Peggie’s claims are of sexual harassment, harassment related to a protected belief, indirect discrimination and victimisation. Dr Upton claims to be a transwoman, that is observed as male at birth but asserting a female gender identity.

The Employment Tribunal hearing started on Monday 3 February 2025 and was expected to last 2 weeks. However, after 2 weeks it was not complete and it adjourned part-heard. It resumed on 16 July and the last day of evidence will be 28 July and then there will be 2 days of submissions from counsel meaning that the hearing will end on 30 July.

The hearing commenced with Sandie Peggie giving evidence. Dr Beth Upton gave evidence from Thursday 6 February to Wednesday 12 February.

Access to view the hearing remotely was obtainable by sending an email request to [email protected] by 5pm on Wednesday 9 July. Detailed instructions were provided here:

drive.google.com/file/d/16-9POEZ7yHWUr6EmbfquJZO18Gv78bSm/view

The hearing is being live tweeted by x.com/tribunaltweets and there's additional information here: tribunaltweets.substack.com/p/peggie-vs-fife-health-board-and-dr-005 and tribunaltweets.substack.com/p/peggie-vs-fife-health-board-and-dr-bd6. This also has threadreaderapp archives of live-tweeting of the sessions of the hearing for those who can't follow on Twitter, for example: archive.ph/WSSjg.

An alternative to Twitter is to use Nitter: nitter.net/tribunaltweets or nitter.poast.org/tribunaltweets

Links to previous threads #1 to #29 can be found in the header of thread #30.

Thread 30: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5375337-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-30
Thread 31: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5375819-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-31
Thread 32: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5376072-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-32
Thread 33: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5376608-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-33
Thread 34: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5377387-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-34
Thread 35: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5377598-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-35
Thread 36 mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5378031-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-36
Thread 37: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5378200-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-37
Thread 38: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5378463-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-38
Thread 39: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5378747-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-39

OP posts:
Thread gallery
26
NebulousSupportPostcard · 24/07/2025 11:16

rebmacesrevda · 24/07/2025 10:41

So it was KS, not DrU, that asked if she could sit in on his interview, was it?

Given that AG was responsible for the interviews surely she had authority to say a flat no to a key witness supporting a complainant by sitting in on the complainant's interview? She had responsibility to do more than say it was not ideal?

HagsterWheel · 24/07/2025 11:17

rebmacesrevda · 24/07/2025 10:42

Less emotional support animal, more control the narrative...

In every folie à deux there’s a primary individual.

And there is usually a mutual obsession, which is felt much more strongly by one of the parties than the other.

The FBI has done some groundbreaking research on this very dangerous dynamic. It often is initiated by the chance meeting of individuals both of whom harbour an immature and hidden desire for revenge on others.

Their meeting precipitates a sequence of events whereby they cause damage to others, partly as a way of controlling and managing intrusive (sometimes subconscious) feelings of inadequacy and/or shame.

The parties in these relationships are often intelligent people, though harbouring those immaturities and insecurities, and can present well before it all starts fracturing.

TimeForATerf · 24/07/2025 11:18

This is mad, I've now got 4 browsers open

Mumsnet
Live TT on X
TT on Thread Reader
The Scotsman live updates

Canijustsayonething · 24/07/2025 11:18

SionnachRuadh · 24/07/2025 11:02

I've actually heard it said seriously - this is in public sector settings following Stonewall law - that if you enter the ladies, see a TW and immediately leave, that could be an act of discrimination. So the only way to be safe is to comply with what the TW wants.

It will take a long time to shift the public sector.

so women are to be forced to stay in a situation that they feel uncomfortable in?

screams into a pillow

KnottyAuty · 24/07/2025 11:18

maltravers · 24/07/2025 11:12

She went to her manager though didn’t she? And got no help.

Worse - her manager ED - told her she’d find out and didn’t tell her the proper process to make a higher complaint… while simultaneously telling other colleagues that SP was a racist, anti-trans Trump lover IB her briefing for the “official” IX…

I’m confused.
i thought we had ED start an IX even tho she was a witness (and clearly didn’t do a good IX anyway).
Then LM got involved with an IX from February after the solicitor’s letter - IX2
So what the hell is AG doing getting more interviews after SP’s suspension was lifted - IX3??

NeatOchreShark · 24/07/2025 11:19

ForumHag101 · 24/07/2025 11:13

Dusting off name change

I've just about caught up in these very fast moving pages- thanks all
I've been pondering as to why DrU is so emotional now he's identifying as a transwoman? Presumably oestrogen though I've no idea about his medical history.
Seems to require a lot of support

PS love Dame Katy and glad she's back 😁
PPS On a more serious note, attended quite a few births- never saw a baby needing their sex 'assigning' 🙂
PPPS Sandie looks so well compared with Feb sessions- and has a fab handbag collection!

it's absolutely the E. E can take a man who has never cried in his life to crying every five minutes over anything. Detrans males actually report missing being able to cry so freely once they come off E, which I found interesting as I always thought 'boys don't cry' was more about societal emotional repression, rather than women actually being more inclined to cry due to our naturally occurring hormones.

Lins77 · 24/07/2025 11:19

TwoLoonsAndASprout · 24/07/2025 11:16

I shall leave this here for people to draw their own conclusions:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Al5wW8I8In0

(give it a second to be approved…)

There's nothing unsafe about someone leaving a room (or a lift) that you're in!

If they stay in it and beat you up, that's another matter.

maltravers · 24/07/2025 11:19

Canijustsayonething · 24/07/2025 11:18

so women are to be forced to stay in a situation that they feel uncomfortable in?

screams into a pillow

We won’t though.

SionnachRuadh · 24/07/2025 11:20

Lins77 · 24/07/2025 11:14

And how do you know the person who came in and immediately left did it because of you? Maybe they forgot something.

Well exactly, I might go to the loo and think "oh flip sake, I've broken a nail, I should get my wee manicure kit out of my bag", and leave for that reason.

Another person assuming I left because of them is obviously suffering from main character syndrome. Which is common in a certain demographic.

anyolddinosaur · 24/07/2025 11:20

The class issue is also relevant to Searle's behaviour. Upton is a well connected (upper) middle class doctor, Sandie is a working class nurse, clearly not with money behind her. Sandie, she would have thought, could not afford decent representation at an ET, Upton could. His union would back him, hers would not.

This was probably subconscious but still affecting hr rection. I would bet Searle still thinks she was right but she also thinks she needs to reflect, not on what she did wrong but on how it will affect her.

BeKindWisely · 24/07/2025 11:20

MarieDeGournay · 24/07/2025 11:10

AG - don't think it's OK confronting colleagues, you go to your manager, don't think it's something we should say

Im not clear if this is AG quoting, or AG's own words - if the latter, it's a disappointment, she's been OK so far, but isn't 'confronting the colleague' what you're supposed to do, in the first place, then escalate it?
Not 'confront' as in aggressively, but talk to them about the incident in q.

Am I misremembering something from part 1 of the tribunal- I thought Sandie was told by someone that there was nothing they would do about CRoom issue and she would have say something herself?
Is that completely in my imagination?

oldwomanwhoruns · 24/07/2025 11:20

So disappointing to see yet another Fife employee who was clearly incapable of engaging her brain. Did she notice that Upton was a bloke? If so, did she think that this had any relevance, just perhaps?
How can a grown adult be so indoctrinated/cowed/just plain stupid *

  • strike out which do not apply
GwenPost · 24/07/2025 11:22

KnottyAuty · 24/07/2025 11:18

Worse - her manager ED - told her she’d find out and didn’t tell her the proper process to make a higher complaint… while simultaneously telling other colleagues that SP was a racist, anti-trans Trump lover IB her briefing for the “official” IX…

I’m confused.
i thought we had ED start an IX even tho she was a witness (and clearly didn’t do a good IX anyway).
Then LM got involved with an IX from February after the solicitor’s letter - IX2
So what the hell is AG doing getting more interviews after SP’s suspension was lifted - IX3??

<delurks>

I think LM was just 'reviewing the suspension' not doing the ix

maltravers · 24/07/2025 11:22

BeKindWisely · 24/07/2025 11:20

Am I misremembering something from part 1 of the tribunal- I thought Sandie was told by someone that there was nothing they would do about CRoom issue and she would have say something herself?
Is that completely in my imagination?

That’s my recollection. She went to her line manager who first said I’ll look into it and then said nothing I can do. So SP said she’d say something herself then.

wantmorenow · 24/07/2025 11:22

On twitter now https://x.com/Sorelle_Arduino/status/1948302577654767920

SCOTLAND: FIFE Labour councillor David Graham, 43, has been found guilty of sexually abusing a 15YO girl over 6+ months. Abuse happened in his home, office & car. He groomed her with gifts & left DNA on a towel. He now faces jail. Labour are 'excluding' him from

David Graham isn’t just a Labour Councillor, he was on the board at NHS Fife where women are being monstered for refusing to undress in front of men Have you joined the dots yet?

https://x.com/Sorelle_Arduino/status/1948302577654767920

Rightsraptor · 24/07/2025 11:23

Lins77 · 24/07/2025 11:14

And how do you know the person who came in and immediately left did it because of you? Maybe they forgot something.

If you're a narcissist everything is because of you.

UpDo · 24/07/2025 11:24

DrBlackbird · 24/07/2025 11:15

AG - don't think it's OK confronting colleagues, you go to your manager, don't think it's something we should say.

So another staff member who thinks Sandie should be quiet and suck it up knowing that if Sandie had gone to her manager all she’d be told is that DrU has the right to change in F CR and if she didn’t like it, she could go use the broom closet at the other end of the hospital. It’s despairing how much we’ve indoctrinated our DDs into thinking that being kind is the penultimate goal and include myself in that.

edited: but also this seems to point to AG, who headed the investigation (don’t know their job title/role) had already decided that SP was in the wrong right from the get go…

Edited

AG is a clinical nurse manager. Not Sandies direct manager though, as far as I can tell.

Merrymouse · 24/07/2025 11:24

anyolddinosaur · 24/07/2025 11:20

The class issue is also relevant to Searle's behaviour. Upton is a well connected (upper) middle class doctor, Sandie is a working class nurse, clearly not with money behind her. Sandie, she would have thought, could not afford decent representation at an ET, Upton could. His union would back him, hers would not.

This was probably subconscious but still affecting hr rection. I would bet Searle still thinks she was right but she also thinks she needs to reflect, not on what she did wrong but on how it will affect her.

Agree, and also think KS semi-admitted it when she said that she and Upton could be trusted because they are doctors, as though nurses don't have to comply with professional standards.

Lemonz · 24/07/2025 11:25

Lins77 · 24/07/2025 11:14

And how do you know the person who came in and immediately left did it because of you? Maybe they forgot something.

IIRC, I think she waited outside for DU to leave, so it was probably obvious that she had left because of him. And indeed that is the reason that she left.

Completely rational behaviour from a woman who doesn't consent to share a changing space with a man. A space the man shouldn't have been in in the first place!

BeKindWisely · 24/07/2025 11:26

maltravers · 24/07/2025 11:22

That’s my recollection. She went to her line manager who first said I’ll look into it and then said nothing I can do. So SP said she’d say something herself then.

Thank you. I hope this comes up again. There's alot of leaning on (especially in the final line of KS testimony) and inferred in disciplinary, that the issue was Sandie didn't follow proper channels- should have gone to management first.
This was confusing me because I had a recollection of that.
Perhaps we can track down that part from part 1?

prh47bridge · 24/07/2025 11:26

BeKindWisely · 24/07/2025 11:20

Am I misremembering something from part 1 of the tribunal- I thought Sandie was told by someone that there was nothing they would do about CRoom issue and she would have say something herself?
Is that completely in my imagination?

Not quite. She was told by ED there was nothing they could do, Whilst some on here have said that ED told her she would have to say something to Upton herself, the evidence appears to be that she said that to ED, not the other way around.

SirChenjins · 24/07/2025 11:27

Upton appears more and more to be the limpest of limp lettuces, despite his posturing - or, what was previously referred to in Scots as a 'big jessie'.

Lemonz · 24/07/2025 11:27

maltravers · 24/07/2025 11:22

That’s my recollection. She went to her line manager who first said I’ll look into it and then said nothing I can do. So SP said she’d say something herself then.

Yeah she'd asked twice and just got a big shrug it seems. The manager did not tell her to take matters into her own hands, but didn't respond when she said she'd have to say something and didn't offer any alternative course of action.

ArabellaScott · 24/07/2025 11:28

TimeForATerf · 24/07/2025 11:18

This is mad, I've now got 4 browsers open

Mumsnet
Live TT on X
TT on Thread Reader
The Scotsman live updates

You want one of those banks of clocks, showing the time in Fife, Holyrood, Glasgow, Dubai, and Nairn. To cover all bases.

GreenFriedTomato · 24/07/2025 11:28

Discussing Uptons contemporaneous phone notes..And why didn't she write in her meeting notes that he had recorded these on his phone ? Floundering and stuttering a bit now

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread