I would go further and say the evidence is there over and over again that even one man outweighs all women; all those women in a space, all those impacted, all those who ever might enter that space or service, there is no need anywhere in that entire half of the population that outweighs the apparently appalling risk of that man being distressed by a limit to his freedom in access to and use of those women.
It is related to the entrenched belief that you see so easily in men and in women, you can find it there in AIBU threads and relationship threads often: the belief that Men Have Needs, and women have no right to refuse their body to a man's use. It's why marital rape was not outlawed until the 90s. It's why incelism has such a foothold. It's there in the rhetoric from the GI lobby, women 'gatekeeping their vaginas' ffs.
When 'respecting a man' involves enforcing his right of access to a non consenting woman's exposed vagina while she suffers surgery - when he is a man who has already breached her boundaries in not only requiring to be present while she undresses but repeatedly asking her to start getting her clothes off - it has passed through batshit and just gone to plain abuse. If 'loving trans people' means abusing women, any person involved with a shred of sense should start to ask themselves some very, very serious questions.
And we should wonder, yet again, where are the shocked voices of the GI lobby and all those who 'just want to live in peace' going wtaf are you doing to that woman, that is wrong, wholly unacceptable, that is NOT in our name?