Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

KJK Live streams being sacked from her GPs surgery - trans staff member

1000 replies

HootyMcBooby · 19/07/2024 17:15

Forward to 19.15 for the actual phone call.

KJK confrontation with trans staff member at her GPs surgery.

This ideology has no place in the NHS.
As someone whose Mother, aged 72, had a stroke and waited in an NHS corridor on a trolley for 16 hours only to be asked as the doctors FIRST question....... "how do you identify?", I feel the NHS is captured beyond hope,

I've had to leave my GP surgery due to an activist working there. #LWS #LetWomenSpeak #LWSLocals

This is the original #AdultHumanFemale channel and home of Kellie-Jay Keen aka Posie Parker.If you would like to donate to help support us, click here ⇨ http...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UfiFJ4nbHUk

OP posts:
Thread gallery
14
AGoingConcern · 19/07/2024 23:25

It's a shame I'm normally quite open minded.

Thanks, I needed a good laugh tonight.

Pronoun pins serve the same purpose as a name bage - to let others know what to call them. Throwing tantrums about them or trying to turn them into an attack on your beliefs is nothing but a distraction from conversations about actual issues facing women.

NoSnowdrop · 19/07/2024 23:26

Why not drop the straw man and answer the question? Why wear pronoun badges?

MaidOfAle · 19/07/2024 23:26

AGoingConcern · 19/07/2024 22:28

To which the man replies that it is his sincere belief that all women are bitches, sinful, weak and vicious by nature. Just like you believe that a trans woman is a man and calling them anything else is forcing you to participate in someone else's delusion, this man believes that forcing him to call a woman anything but bitch is forcing him to participate in your delusion that women can be anything but bitches.

Your beliefs are not the same as objective facts. They're your beliefs and protected only as your beliefs. What you call someone doesn't have the power to change them, so they're not under threat.

That man's beliefs wouldn't pass the Grainger test. HTH.

WinkyMcFlapFace · 19/07/2024 23:29

So are we all pretending KJK didn’t just publicly celebrate swearing at and harassing not one but two NHS workers, and call for protests at their place of work?

Like if no one mentions it then it didn’t happen?

The contortions required are impressive.

I’m not convinced KJK is safe to be out and about, being this fragile about seeing a badge.

Especially given she sells stickers, badges, t-shirts etc that are actually activist, then raises hell at anyone critiquing those or taking them down.

saraclara · 19/07/2024 23:29

NoSnowdrop · 19/07/2024 23:26

Why not drop the straw man and answer the question? Why wear pronoun badges?

How about 'why verbally abuse someone for wearing one'?

Impossiblenurse · 19/07/2024 23:30

AGoingConcern · 19/07/2024 23:25

It's a shame I'm normally quite open minded.

Thanks, I needed a good laugh tonight.

Pronoun pins serve the same purpose as a name bage - to let others know what to call them. Throwing tantrums about them or trying to turn them into an attack on your beliefs is nothing but a distraction from conversations about actual issues facing women.

It's really not though is it.

I refer to Bert by name when I am speaking to Bert.

I refer to Bert as him when I am speaking about him to another person....so no pronouns and name badges are not the same thing at all. Why would you wish to suggest they are?

SugarandSpiceandAllThingsNaice · 19/07/2024 23:31

HootyMcBooby · 19/07/2024 23:20

Ah, so says the person who says pronouns are really never used anyway and there is no need to refer to someone using their pronouns, but is simultaneously defending the person wearing the pronoun badge being worn for apparently no reason......
And it IS absolutely compelled speech. The inference is obviously because KJK refused to refer to this person as a man, used biological reality, and called this person "she" (and was corrected several times on the phone), that she would be sacked from the practice because she would not use the chosen language.
How is that not compelled speech? Use our approved language, or lose your rights / privileges. Do this, or there will be consequences.

Yeah, I didn’t say any of that. Nice try.
I said there is no need to use the third person pronouns when interacting with a GP receptionist. You’d be a right nutter to go to a receptionist and use third person pronouns or woman/man

I approach a woman receptionist and

”Good morning woman, the touch screen is not working. I have an appointment at 9:30 could she mark me as arrived”
”Sorry what? Who?”
”She logs me in as arrived. she tells woman GP I am here.”
”Thats me, I do that “
”Thank you woman she”

KJK’s phone call to complain was harrassment. She wasn’t compelled to use any form of speech in the GP’s office to access GP services.

WinkyMcFlapFace · 19/07/2024 23:32

Toseland · 19/07/2024 23:23

Was KJ tricked by the practice into saying the words 'irretrievable breakdown'?

This is from the bma www.bma.org.uk/advice-and-support/gp-practices/managing-your-practice-list/removing-patients-from-your-practice-list

"The removal of a patient from a GP practice list should be a rare event. Reasons include:

  • disagreement between the practice and patient, and an irretrievable breakdown of the relationship"

Did you miss the part where she swore at their staff, then told them she and her family were leaving the practice, before swearing at them some more, all whilst broadcasting live without their knowledge?

I don’t think anyone would have a problem demonstrating irretrievable breakdown of relationship.

HootyMcBooby · 19/07/2024 23:32

WinkyMcFlapFace · 19/07/2024 23:29

So are we all pretending KJK didn’t just publicly celebrate swearing at and harassing not one but two NHS workers, and call for protests at their place of work?

Like if no one mentions it then it didn’t happen?

The contortions required are impressive.

I’m not convinced KJK is safe to be out and about, being this fragile about seeing a badge.

Especially given she sells stickers, badges, t-shirts etc that are actually activist, then raises hell at anyone critiquing those or taking them down.

How is a biological definition (factual reality) printed on a sticker or a jumper, comparable to the kind of activism used by TRAs?

Her thing is "Woman = Adult Human Female".

It's hardly a contentious statement for most sane people.

OP posts:
HootyMcBooby · 19/07/2024 23:34

SugarandSpiceandAllThingsNaice · 19/07/2024 23:31

Yeah, I didn’t say any of that. Nice try.
I said there is no need to use the third person pronouns when interacting with a GP receptionist. You’d be a right nutter to go to a receptionist and use third person pronouns or woman/man

I approach a woman receptionist and

”Good morning woman, the touch screen is not working. I have an appointment at 9:30 could she mark me as arrived”
”Sorry what? Who?”
”She logs me in as arrived. she tells woman GP I am here.”
”Thats me, I do that “
”Thank you woman she”

KJK’s phone call to complain was harrassment. She wasn’t compelled to use any form of speech in the GP’s office to access GP services.

AGAIN.
Why wear the badge?

OP posts:
SugarandSpiceandAllThingsNaice · 19/07/2024 23:34

NoSnowdrop · 19/07/2024 23:26

Why not drop the straw man and answer the question? Why wear pronoun badges?

Who cares why? Not your body not your choice.

If wearing crucifixes are not a convert to Christianity or burn as a heretic right now attack on the anyone in public around them, then why the phobia over a little old pink, blue and white striped badge?

AGoingConcern · 19/07/2024 23:34

MaidOfAle · 19/07/2024 23:26

That man's beliefs wouldn't pass the Grainger test. HTH.

I'm not sure you're correct on that.

But regardless we're discussing manifestations of belief, not the beliefs themselves.

SugarandSpiceandAllThingsNaice · 19/07/2024 23:35

HootyMcBooby · 19/07/2024 23:34

AGAIN.
Why wear the badge?

Given up on the compelled speech fallacy? Good. Progress.

MaidOfAle · 19/07/2024 23:36

AGoingConcern · 19/07/2024 23:03

You seem confused about the analogy. This hypothetical man is insisting only on his right to call women what he believes they are, not insisting anyone else do anything. That's his sincerely held belief just like you believe trans women are men, and he's angry anyone is trying to force him to pretend anything else. "Compelled speech!" he shouts. These bitches and their puppets are trying to force me to participate in their delusion that women aren't bitches by forcing me to call them something else.

The man can believe all women are bitches. He can refer to them aloud as she/her/a woman while privately thinking "bitch" to himself all day long. But it doesn't mean people can't insist that in public spaces he treat others with the basic respect of calling them what they wish to be called.

Edited

Show that believing that women are "bitches" passes the Grainger Test or GTFO.

HootyMcBooby · 19/07/2024 23:37

SugarandSpiceandAllThingsNaice · 19/07/2024 23:35

Given up on the compelled speech fallacy? Good. Progress.

No it's not a fallacy.

You are almost as bad as the person KJK spoke to on the phone "I'm not listening, I'm not listening, I'm not listening".
You can keep saying it doesn't exist.
It doesn't make it so.

OP posts:
SugarandSpiceandAllThingsNaice · 19/07/2024 23:38

HootyMcBooby · 19/07/2024 23:32

How is a biological definition (factual reality) printed on a sticker or a jumper, comparable to the kind of activism used by TRAs?

Her thing is "Woman = Adult Human Female".

It's hardly a contentious statement for most sane people.

KJK got the definition from a dictionary, not a biology text book.
Dictionaries are regularly updated as language and meaning shift over time.

AGoingConcern · 19/07/2024 23:40

Impossiblenurse · 19/07/2024 23:30

It's really not though is it.

I refer to Bert by name when I am speaking to Bert.

I refer to Bert as him when I am speaking about him to another person....so no pronouns and name badges are not the same thing at all. Why would you wish to suggest they are?

You have just articulated why pronoun badges aren't compelling any sort of belief or speech. Brava! KJK could absolutely have simply used the person's name and avoided referencing their gender and ignored the pin entirely.

Pronouns are often used in spoken and written language to reduce repetition and improve rhythm and flow. If you choose to use them in place of a name or title, you should use the indvidual's preferred ones just as you (hopefully) would use the name or title someone gave you to call them.

Christinapple · 19/07/2024 23:40

Battytwatty · 19/07/2024 20:02

@@@PlanetJanette
She wasn’t harassed in the slightest. And she didn’t swear at her. She said “fucking pronouns “ as she was leaving the surgery. As per other posters, activists should absolutely not be wearing badges and insisting on pronouns in the workplace. Completely unprofessional. The NHS need to read the fucking room WE ARE ALL DONE WITH THIS SHIT!

I often think this when I read about the gender critical/trans debate- if the worst thing about one's life is seeing pronoun badges then that's probably quite the level of privilege they have there.

Do you think people who are worried about how they're going to afford their next power bill/rent payment/food shop are going to have a meltdown if they see someone wear a pronoun badge somewhere?

HootyMcBooby · 19/07/2024 23:40

SugarandSpiceandAllThingsNaice · 19/07/2024 23:38

KJK got the definition from a dictionary, not a biology text book.
Dictionaries are regularly updated as language and meaning shift over time.

Ah, I'd be really interested to hear the new definition of woman?

OP posts:
EverybodyLovesString · 19/07/2024 23:40

The Forstater judgement doesn't give anyone the right to harrass trans people in their workplace and it doesn’t allow for misgendering that discriminates against trans people. She’s posted on Twitter that she regrets her anger so even she - who almost never admits being wrong about anything - realises she crossed a line.

I've defended KJK in the past but I dislike her drift to more extreme positions and the cult-like behaviour of some of her followers.

OldCrone · 19/07/2024 23:42

SugarandSpiceandAllThingsNaice · 19/07/2024 23:09

She decided to call her “woman” when it was completely unnecessary to the purpose of accessing the GP surgery. Compelled speech is only compelled when you are forced to say something either under duress or out of necessity.

There is no part of an interaction with a receptionist to access the surgery that requires the use of the words, woman/man, he/her, she/him.

So what's the point in her wearing a pronoun badge?

SugarandSpiceandAllThingsNaice · 19/07/2024 23:42

HootyMcBooby · 19/07/2024 23:37

No it's not a fallacy.

You are almost as bad as the person KJK spoke to on the phone "I'm not listening, I'm not listening, I'm not listening".
You can keep saying it doesn't exist.
It doesn't make it so.

If you say so. You can’t even imagine how that conversation of compelled speech would go when faced with a Trans GP receptionist. You just sit there and insist that it would happen.

PurpleBugz · 19/07/2024 23:44

Only thing wrong with what I just watched was that she didn't inform the caller they were on air till the end. She was blunt and emotional during the call but not abusive. Her argument is sound ideology has no place in the gp practice and forcing people to use pronouns is not ok. We have had rulings on this recently? It's not legal to force compliance?

Swearing or shouting at staff is not ok. We don't have a recording of her interaction at the dr surgery to know if she behaved appropriately there.

I really do agree with her but she should not have taken that call on air. It named the surgery and the staff member said her name. That should have been edited out before playing to the public in my opinion

MaidOfAle · 19/07/2024 23:45

AGoingConcern · 19/07/2024 23:34

I'm not sure you're correct on that.

But regardless we're discussing manifestations of belief, not the beliefs themselves.

Are you seriously suggesting that thinking that all women are "bitches" would be found to be worthy of protection in a democratic society?

If you can't manifest a belief, you can't hold it in practice. The whole reason why Forstater went to tribunal was because she manifested her gender critical beliefs outside of work and was fired for it.

Impossiblenurse · 19/07/2024 23:48

SugarandSpiceandAllThingsNaice · 19/07/2024 23:38

KJK got the definition from a dictionary, not a biology text book.
Dictionaries are regularly updated as language and meaning shift over time.

language changes and evolves through shared understanding and consensus. Otherwise we would be talking gibberish and no one would understand what we are on about.

I'm not quite ready to give up language that refers clearly to men and women, female and males, shes and hes. I don't think I am alone. I can't approve of changing the meaning of words with biological implications, particularly in healthcare, where accuracy could be critical

You could expend your energies creating something new and exciting. New words get added to the lexicon everyday..

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.