Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

KJK Live streams being sacked from her GPs surgery - trans staff member

1000 replies

HootyMcBooby · 19/07/2024 17:15

Forward to 19.15 for the actual phone call.

KJK confrontation with trans staff member at her GPs surgery.

This ideology has no place in the NHS.
As someone whose Mother, aged 72, had a stroke and waited in an NHS corridor on a trolley for 16 hours only to be asked as the doctors FIRST question....... "how do you identify?", I feel the NHS is captured beyond hope,

I've had to leave my GP surgery due to an activist working there. #LWS #LetWomenSpeak #LWSLocals

This is the original #AdultHumanFemale channel and home of Kellie-Jay Keen aka Posie Parker.If you would like to donate to help support us, click here ⇨ http...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UfiFJ4nbHUk

OP posts:
Thread gallery
14
GermaineBloodyGreer · 21/07/2024 07:31

FrippEnos · 21/07/2024 05:08

But this is similar behaviour of many TRAs.
Those that go into shops, banks and eateries across the country and provoke confrontation once they have been "mis-gendered".

As I posted up thread, this is just KJK dropping to their level.

I'm not quite sure whether you're agreeing with me or not, but I'll answer on both fronts.

"But this is similar behaviour of many TRAs" is most definitely not an excuse if an individual wants to be taken seriously as an adult and sway people to their line of thinking. If you want to paint (Group) as irrational, abusive bullies, you don't stoop to their level and then try present yourself as some sort of paragon of sensibility that others are meant to rally behind despite indulging in the same obnoxious, bully-like tactics.

KJK cannot bully trans-identified people out of existence. It does not work like that.

Pourquoise · 21/07/2024 07:48

FrippEnos · 21/07/2024 05:08

But this is similar behaviour of many TRAs.
Those that go into shops, banks and eateries across the country and provoke confrontation once they have been "mis-gendered".

As I posted up thread, this is just KJK dropping to their level.

This is, as many here like to call it, whataboutery.

OldCrone · 21/07/2024 08:06

Ineverlose · 21/07/2024 01:54

But why hasn’t she shed the same sunlight on her husband’s company? One rule for me and another rule for thee

Why should she? What has her husband got to do with this? He runs his own company, she does her activism. They're two different people and women (thankfully) are no longer considered to be their husbands' possessions.

Why aren't you also asking about what her parents do, or siblings? What about her children? There are four of them, and given how popular trans identities are at the moment amongst children and young people, it's possible, even likely, that some of their friends might identify as trans. I'm sure you could find some juicy gossip there to satisfy your witch-burning urges.

Go on, cast your net wider, and see how many people's lives and livelihoods you can destroy with guilt by association in your purity spiral.

Or you could just get a life and stop being so obsessed with someone you hate.

HPFA · 21/07/2024 08:17

GermaineBloodyGreer · 21/07/2024 04:35

Coming out of years of lurking to comment on this.

This is truly unhinged behaviour by KJK, and regardless of whatever agreements I may have with her on some of the issues, there's really no excusing her increasingly antagonistic behaviour towards others. This is embarrassing to watch and an embarrassment to the whole GC movement.

Imagine getting triggered by a fucking pronoun badge of all things at a GP and harassing a receptionist at her own bloody workplace. She sought unnecessary confrontation and subsequently whinged about it after the fact, successfully victimising herself (to her followers) in a situation where SHE was the perpetrator.

If she felt the pronoun badges (which I agree are silly, but so so trivial) so egregiously offensive to her sensibilities, she could have simply turned and walked out the bloody door.

And honestly I struggle to wrap my head around her defenders for always going to bat for her and twisting themselves into knots to justify her abhorrent and divisive behaviour. This does absolutely NOTHING for the cause. If anything, it diminishes us.

100% agree.

As far as I'm concerned the people who have contributed the most to the movement are people like Stephanie Davis-Arai, Emma Hilton, Jo Phoenix, Janice Turner etc - those who have put in the hard graft of presenting the data, convincing opinion formers, turning the political tide.

Whenever I hear about KJK's great contributions, all I hear is variations of "she gets us publicity" - well, what does that achieve if it makes us look like the transphobic bigots the other side tries to claim we are? It would be perfectly possible for her to give women a platform - which is supposed to be her raison d'etre - without trying to hound trans people out of their jobs.

GermaineBloodyGreer · 21/07/2024 08:20

AlisonDonut · 21/07/2024 05:14

There is no 'us'. We are all individuals and do things our own ways.

Until you put yourself on the line, and get out there and put your name to your face, you cannot hold someone else to your exacting standards.

I'm not defending her. I'm saying she has her own way of doing things and you have yours. She walks into violence and so I am not going to slag her off even if I personally disagree with what she does on other days when she isn't in the middle of a baying mob.

And she has every good reason to fear the safety of personal medical information, bearing in mind what else has happened to her.

So, KJK is above criticism because she puts herself out there, and her detractors obviously have not. OK.

I really don't want to engage in this sort of argumentation, because it's defensive and silly. KJK puts herself out there as a political and ideological activist and therefore is subject to scrutiny from members of the public. Full stop. Calling into question the credentials of her critics is a low-effort attempt to prevent people from voicing negative opinions about her methods.

And you are absolutely defending her. You are attempting to rationalise and justify her absurd public outburst in this very post. You are all across this thread defending her. And that's fine - it's your right to support her; I've no qualms with it. But let's drop the pretense that you're coming from a place of impartial indifference, when all your posts in this thread thus far have been putting together excuses for her and making condescending remarks to those critical of her behaviour.

BackToLurk · 21/07/2024 08:29

OldCrone · 21/07/2024 08:06

Why should she? What has her husband got to do with this? He runs his own company, she does her activism. They're two different people and women (thankfully) are no longer considered to be their husbands' possessions.

Why aren't you also asking about what her parents do, or siblings? What about her children? There are four of them, and given how popular trans identities are at the moment amongst children and young people, it's possible, even likely, that some of their friends might identify as trans. I'm sure you could find some juicy gossip there to satisfy your witch-burning urges.

Go on, cast your net wider, and see how many people's lives and livelihoods you can destroy with guilt by association in your purity spiral.

Or you could just get a life and stop being so obsessed with someone you hate.

Presumably people think she should because, as has been said, she paints herself as uncompromising (and indeed is very critical of the slightest compromise from others), and living off the earnings of a man whose company appears very active in supporting all things LGBTQIA+ (the company's term) looks very compromising indeed.

OldCrone · 21/07/2024 08:40

BackToLurk · 21/07/2024 08:29

Presumably people think she should because, as has been said, she paints herself as uncompromising (and indeed is very critical of the slightest compromise from others), and living off the earnings of a man whose company appears very active in supporting all things LGBTQIA+ (the company's term) looks very compromising indeed.

I think trying to destroy someone's livelihood because you disagree with his wife's activism is a pretty nasty thing to do.

Or are you trying to destroy her marriage? That's nasty, too.

You could just stop with the purity spiral.

Myalternate · 21/07/2024 08:44

I don’t agree with how KJK has behaved nor some of her extreme views but I will be forever grateful to her campaigning for women’s rights.
It was reading articles about KJK and her LWS events that first drew my attention to the issue’s affecting women’s rights. Until then I was unaware that men pretending to be women were demanding access and acceptance in women’s sports and spaces.

Cleary, she’s the target for TRA’s to go after as they believe it’s all her fault the rights of transgender people are being stripped away from them.

BackToLurk · 21/07/2024 08:46

OldCrone · 21/07/2024 08:40

I think trying to destroy someone's livelihood because you disagree with his wife's activism is a pretty nasty thing to do.

Or are you trying to destroy her marriage? That's nasty, too.

You could just stop with the purity spiral.

No one is trying to destroy anyone's livelihood or marriage. Grow up.

These are questions about a person who has set themselves up as 'uncompromising', 'holding the line', etc. And who is quite keen on jumping on anyone else who falls short in her eyes. She's a hypocrite. Lots of people are and if those people are high profile then attention is often drawn to it. I appreciate it must be quite disappointing for anyone heavily invested in her 'brand', but hey ho.

Myalternate · 21/07/2024 08:47

BackToLurk · 21/07/2024 08:29

Presumably people think she should because, as has been said, she paints herself as uncompromising (and indeed is very critical of the slightest compromise from others), and living off the earnings of a man whose company appears very active in supporting all things LGBTQIA+ (the company's term) looks very compromising indeed.

Doesn’t she make her own money? Why assume she’s ‘living off his earnings’ ?

BackToLurk · 21/07/2024 08:48

Myalternate · 21/07/2024 08:47

Doesn’t she make her own money? Why assume she’s ‘living off his earnings’ ?

Through the t-shirts?

Alwaystired94 · 21/07/2024 08:56

Pourquoise · 21/07/2024 07:48

This is, as many here like to call it, whataboutery.

no only TRA do that of course!!!

Alwaystired94 · 21/07/2024 08:57

BackToLurk · 21/07/2024 08:48

Through the t-shirts?

don’t forget the stickers

Myalternate · 21/07/2024 08:58

So if her husband finances her, what business is it of anyone else’s ?
Maybe he agrees with her campaign.

Alwaystired94 · 21/07/2024 09:03

Myalternate · 21/07/2024 08:58

So if her husband finances her, what business is it of anyone else’s ?
Maybe he agrees with her campaign.

i think some have an issue with that as they are profiting off of it while denouncing it on the other hand.

or people wonder if she actually believes any of what she is saying.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 21/07/2024 09:19

Or you could just get a life and stop being so obsessed with someone you hate.

It'll never catch on!

OldCrone · 21/07/2024 09:22

BackToLurk · 21/07/2024 08:46

No one is trying to destroy anyone's livelihood or marriage. Grow up.

These are questions about a person who has set themselves up as 'uncompromising', 'holding the line', etc. And who is quite keen on jumping on anyone else who falls short in her eyes. She's a hypocrite. Lots of people are and if those people are high profile then attention is often drawn to it. I appreciate it must be quite disappointing for anyone heavily invested in her 'brand', but hey ho.

Lots of people's lives and livelihoods have been destroyed by 'guilt by association' purity spirals.

No idea what the 'grow up' comment is meant to mean. It's precisely because I'm not a child (and not all that young anymore, sadly) that I understand that complete purity really isn't possible. It's something that many of us felt in our youth (myself included), that we shouldn't ever compromise on our principles.

Most of us soon realise, in early adulthood, that this sort of purity really isn't possible unless we become hermits living in caves with no contact with the rest of society. Real adult life is all about compromises. I'm sure you know this if you're an adult.

If you think KJK hasn't yet learned this lesson, take it up with her. Tell her to grow up. But stop trying to drag her family into this. They're not responsible for her actions. Purity spirals help no one.

EverybodyLovesString · 21/07/2024 09:48

I mean, KJK spends a great deal of time attacking other women for not being pure enough. There's hours and hours of YouTube videos of her shouting about it. She raises funds and sells merchandise off the back of those videos, literally monetising her attacks on feminists and campaigners. Purity spirals are part of her stock in trade.

I think she's big enough and tough enough to sustain some criticism on Mumsnet. Especially since she's more than happy to dish it out.

As I said before, I have supported her and defended her. I've attended her events, I've bought t-shirts (which never arrived but hey ho). I think she's extraordinarily gifted as a campaigner and public speaker. I just think she could spend less time bullying people and egging on her followers to attack other women.

AlisonDonut · 21/07/2024 09:52

GermaineBloodyGreer · 21/07/2024 08:20

So, KJK is above criticism because she puts herself out there, and her detractors obviously have not. OK.

I really don't want to engage in this sort of argumentation, because it's defensive and silly. KJK puts herself out there as a political and ideological activist and therefore is subject to scrutiny from members of the public. Full stop. Calling into question the credentials of her critics is a low-effort attempt to prevent people from voicing negative opinions about her methods.

And you are absolutely defending her. You are attempting to rationalise and justify her absurd public outburst in this very post. You are all across this thread defending her. And that's fine - it's your right to support her; I've no qualms with it. But let's drop the pretense that you're coming from a place of impartial indifference, when all your posts in this thread thus far have been putting together excuses for her and making condescending remarks to those critical of her behaviour.

Calling into question the credentials of her critics is a low-effort attempt to prevent people from voicing negative opinions about her methods.

You can have as many negative opinions about her methods as you want. As far as I am concerned if she has broken the law then report her. If you have issues with her methods, call her up on her talk show and tell her. That is your right. Crack on.

This is a discussion forum and so a discussion is held. I've chipped in when I happened to come back on here and pressed 'Threads I'm on' and see a response I wanted to respond to.

You can put yourself out there, you can not put yourself out there, that's your choice. I'm not giving her excuses, but I think if I'd been through what she had, I'd be hyper sensitive to a He/Him badge wearing woman in a binder pretending to be a man who has access to my medical records. I think this because I've known her to go from obnoxious mumsnet poster on here who was boisterous and gobby to a known international voice on the matter. What she has actually done to get her message out is pretty phenomenal, and you can see this from the sheer volume of threads about her.

People that do what she has done don't get there by shutting up when they see things they don't agree with. Personally, as I've said in my posts 'all over this thread' I wouldn't have given the envelope to anyone and I'd have just changed doctors. And I wouldn't have posted the surgery name. But in this world of immediate media is is always going to be likely that a known activist would live stream the call and post the surgery. That was a huge error on their part if they wanted to stay anonymous. They could have called her and arranged a meeting and discussed her concerns with her. That's what I would have done.

We used to have this thing which was 'I don't agree with what you say but I defend your right to say it'. We need to remember if we silence the people who will speak up, then we will all end up having to shut up.

AccidentallyWesAnderson · 21/07/2024 10:02

Well said @AlisonDonut

illinivich · 21/07/2024 10:04

This isnt about KJK, if it was, everyone would be speaking directly to her on youtube not here. Its about how many women support her stance and how much that goes against a more respectable opinions of women in the media and in politics.

We all know how much we have to compromise in real life with family and work, and we all know how supposedly insignificant things can tip us over the edge.

KJK, like many of us, doesnt have any real power, but can speak about how ridiculous and dangerous it all is. And thats what the more respectable and political voices don't want exposing - their inability to say (or maybe see) the reality of trans ideology they are trying to compromise with. And how little they have achieved for women on this issue.

Wumblewimble · 21/07/2024 10:12

KJK got kicked out of a doctors list because she wouldn't lie.
That is serious and affects us all.
we have people in here trying to blame her for it. But it is is the strand movement that did it

Ineverlose · 21/07/2024 10:15

Kjk could speak about how stupid and dangerous it is that her husband’s company promotes lgbtqia+ ideology. Why doesn’t she?

Alwaystired94 · 21/07/2024 10:17

Wumblewimble · 21/07/2024 10:12

KJK got kicked out of a doctors list because she wouldn't lie.
That is serious and affects us all.
we have people in here trying to blame her for it. But it is is the strand movement that did it

she was kicked off the doctors because she decided to abuse a member of their staff. there was no reason for her to mention the pronouns whatsoever.

AlisonDonut · 21/07/2024 10:23

Alwaystired94 · 21/07/2024 10:17

she was kicked off the doctors because she decided to abuse a member of their staff. there was no reason for her to mention the pronouns whatsoever.

She had already said she wanted to be taken off their register before they 'kicked her off'.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.