KJK Live streams being sacked from her GPs surgery - trans staff member

[HootyMcBooby]

Forward to 19.15 for the actual phone call.

KJK confrontation with trans staff member at her GPs surgery.

This ideology has no place in the NHS.
As someone whose Mother, aged 72, had a stroke and waited in an NHS corridor on a trolley for 16 hours only to be asked as the doctors FIRST question....... "how do you identify?", I feel the NHS is captured beyond hope,

Why does KJK have such a hold over people? It's weird.

I beg to differ.
I don't think she saw red. I think she saw an opportunity. Something she could capitalise on.
And she did.

Content.

@Omlettes

The article which you keep gleefully re-posting is a hit piece from The Daily Mail Australia published before KJK's trip Down Under.

It includes the names of her children, including her daughter, who is still a minor.

Doxxing her family in this way is contemptible. I hope you are banned for it.

And no, I don't condone KJK's behaviour at the surgery.

Correction: the article was published during her tour of Australia.

You don’t seem to understand that doxing means publishing private information@BoreOfWhabylon , it doesn’t mean publishing information that the person doesn’t like. This information has been publicly available for 15 months. It’s not doxing 🙄

@Hepwo Regardless of your view on her streaming this incident, there is no need to resort to personal attacks on others who are more critical.

Posting published online newspaper articles isn't doxxing

@Ineverlose
Naming her children is ok with you, then?
Let's see what MNHQ think of that, shall we?

I'm leaving the thread now.

I would also add that the assumption that people in this thread who do not view her action in a positive light are part of the "loony left" per Hepwo's comment (if Hepwo simply meant to point out certain potentially excessive comments, there was no need to use such terms) actually serves as an example of the type of the knee-jerk presumption that is often denounced on this board because there is a certain type of transgender activism that engages in such division.

Disagreeing with her action does not automatically translate to being on the left.

Posting a link to a published article is not "doxxing" someone.

Very tempted to call into her next show and ask about her TRA husband.

I guess being part of the loony left makes a change from being a far right evangelist Christian.

I am actually really disappointed in this thread.

In what sense?

afaik KJK was the woman who started and spearheaded the 'let women speak' movement that has poured sunlight on how women are being silenced right now,

She has feet of clay, what a shame. The movement she has started is bigger than her now, well done KJK for giving a platform to womens' voices.

Well before she was involved in this debate she put her children’s names in the public domain by participating in a story for The Times about gendered expectations for children. At that time she was planning to start her own fashion-based business. I won’t link it but it’s still on The Times site.

It’s not doxxing when journalists repeat information KJK put out there herself.

So the problem is KJK shed sunlight in a phone call she had from a doctors surgery. And true to form it's got many posters foaming. It's not the fault of the person who did the banning it's KJKs fault for making it public and telling the world what happened.

But why hasn’t she shed the same sunlight on her husband’s company? One rule for me and another rule for thee

KJKs husband's company whataboutery is the new ' she's a nazi'

@MaidOfAle @Alwaystired94

When I'm making a risk assessment, I assume that one of the criminal minority might be present. It's part of the security mindset.

I was the PP that made that comment. I stand by it. I don't see someone of a particular minority - in this case, a gender minority - and assume criminality. I don't tend to do that with any groups of people I encounter, except perhaps groups of men walking around streets in the wee hours with torches. (This has occurred to me, before anyone asks.)

This is because I don't automatically judge others based on their appearance, but their behaviour. This doesn't mean I'm overly trusting of others. I look anyone I encounter quite carefully for cues that they might be a threat - not their appearance, but their actions, their words, and body language. So, I assume first they are not a threat, and keep a look out for any signs that they are.

Wanting her kids fed, clothed and with a roof over their heads? What a witch.

Coming out of years of lurking to comment on this.

This is truly unhinged behaviour by KJK, and regardless of whatever agreements I may have with her on some of the issues, there's really no excusing her increasingly antagonistic behaviour towards others. This is embarrassing to watch and an embarrassment to the whole GC movement.

Imagine getting triggered by a fucking pronoun badge of all things at a GP and harassing a receptionist at her own bloody workplace. She sought unnecessary confrontation and subsequently whinged about it after the fact, successfully victimising herself (to her followers) in a situation where SHE was the perpetrator.

If she felt the pronoun badges (which I agree are silly, but so so trivial) so egregiously offensive to her sensibilities, she could have simply turned and walked out the bloody door.

And honestly I struggle to wrap my head around her defenders for always going to bat for her and twisting themselves into knots to justify her abhorrent and divisive behaviour. This does absolutely NOTHING for the cause. If anything, it diminishes us.

But this is similar behaviour of many TRAs.
Those that go into shops, banks and eateries across the country and provoke confrontation once they have been "mis-gendered".

As I posted up thread, this is just KJK dropping to their level.

There is no 'us'. We are all individuals and do things our own ways.

Until you put yourself on the line, and get out there and put your name to your face, you cannot hold someone else to your exacting standards.

I'm not defending her. I'm saying she has her own way of doing things and you have yours. She walks into violence and so I am not going to slag her off even if I personally disagree with what she does on other days when she isn't in the middle of a baying mob.

And she has every good reason to fear the safety of personal medical information, bearing in mind what else has happened to her.

She seeks out violence and aggression. Watch how her face lights up when she is in the car in NZ and she first sees the baying mob. She’s not the first or last to be thrilled by drama. This isn’t bravery, it’s a dangerous instinct that moves towards trouble and demands to be in the centre of it