I read that story and I'm hoping that it's all a wretched misunderstanding or piece highlighting blowhard threats.
Otherwise, are some would-be litigants genuinely looking to expand outwards from compelled speech to compelled use as a crash test dummy in the name of inclusive sports?
I'm failing to insert a cigarette paper between MRA, incel rhetoric, and legal recourse to resolve aggrieved feelings about being unable to compel women and girls to behave in line with male preferences.