Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

"Lesbians being anti-trans is a lesbophobic trope"

516 replies

MerlinsLostMarbles · 01/05/2023 13:36

https://www.gaytimes.co.uk/originals/lesbians-are-not-anti-trans/

I think this helps give another viewpoint to the "gay people are anti-trans" trope that is often used by the LGB-Alliance and Julie Bindel etc.

Lesbians often have to put up with harmful stereotypes that may deter them from coming out, and in recent years the "lesbians are anti-trans" is another stereotype on top of the existing ones.

'Lesbians being anti-trans is a lesbophobic trope'

Amy Ashenden, Interim CEO of Just Like Us, is dispelling the harmful trope that lesbians are against the trans community. 

https://www.gaytimes.co.uk/originals/lesbians-are-not-anti-trans

OP posts:
Thread gallery
14
MargotBamborough · 13/06/2023 10:46

TeaKlaxon · 13/06/2023 10:37

This lesbian disagrees.

I only saw this thread for the first time today. Which was interesting because I watched the Westminster Hall debate yesterday, and was struck by how the most powerful speeches and interventions came from lesbians.

So I did some research - there are 15 women in the House of Commons listed as being lesbian, bi or (in the case of Layla Moran) pansexual.

Six of them spoke yesterday - five of them opposed changing the Equality Act. Joanna Cherry was the only lesbian or bi woman to support changing the Act.

I got to wondering whether she was speaking for a silent majority of lesbian and bi MPs. Turns out no, she wasn't. Of the 9 gay and bi women MPs who didn't speak, all of them are on the record as supporting the rights of trans people to access healthcare, access spaces in line with their gender identity. This ranges from those who have been powerfully vocal, like Mhairi Black, through to others who have contributed through twitter etc (like Dehenna Davison's support for self-ID and banning conversion therapy).

The myth that is peddled on here - that lesbians are crying out to limit trans women's rights to access women's spaces, groups etc is just nonsense. I know this anecdotally from my own circle - a pretty big group of lesbians and (a smaller number of) bi women - most of us in our thirties and forties. But it is interesting to have a cohort of women whose views are on the record, and discover that 93% of gay, bi and pan women MPs share very similar views to me and my friends about trans rights.

What "rights" of trans people?

The things you are talking about either already exist or aren't rights.

Trans people already can access healthcare.

And there is no such thing as spaces which align with their gender identity. There are male and female spaces, and accessing spaces intended for members of the opposite sex is not a right, it is an infringement of the rights of the opposite sex.

TeaKlaxon · 13/06/2023 10:58

MargotBamborough · 13/06/2023 10:46

What "rights" of trans people?

The things you are talking about either already exist or aren't rights.

Trans people already can access healthcare.

And there is no such thing as spaces which align with their gender identity. There are male and female spaces, and accessing spaces intended for members of the opposite sex is not a right, it is an infringement of the rights of the opposite sex.

The rights that folk on this board are so passionately against.

The ability of a trans woman to use the women's bathrooms.

The ability of trans kids to not be subjected to conversion therapy.

The ability of a trans person to access timely gender related healthcare (and no, right now, unless they can go private they cannot access that).

So rail all you like, but I thought it was interesting - but unsurprising given my own experience - that 14 out of 15 gay or bi women MPs support these things, versus only one who opposes them.

ArabeIIaScott · 13/06/2023 11:01

Sometimes the wishes of the majority don't get to over-ride the wishes of a minority.

Hepwo · 13/06/2023 11:04

Any MP that supports men who want to be in women's prisons, sports, places where they are undressing and having intimate care, is highly suspect.

Women MPs that do this and don't want women to ever be able to excercise their own boundaries are subservient fools with questionable morals.

There's lots of them.

TeaKlaxon · 13/06/2023 11:11

ArabeIIaScott · 13/06/2023 11:01

Sometimes the wishes of the majority don't get to over-ride the wishes of a minority.

But it should perhaps make people stop using lesbians to further their case.

TeaKlaxon · 13/06/2023 11:12

Hepwo · 13/06/2023 11:04

Any MP that supports men who want to be in women's prisons, sports, places where they are undressing and having intimate care, is highly suspect.

Women MPs that do this and don't want women to ever be able to excercise their own boundaries are subservient fools with questionable morals.

There's lots of them.

Dismissing 93% of gay and bi women MPs as 'subservient fools' for disagreeing with you.

Sure, keep telling us how much feminist this movement is.

BaronMunchausen · 13/06/2023 11:21

TeaKlaxon · 13/06/2023 10:58

The rights that folk on this board are so passionately against.

The ability of a trans woman to use the women's bathrooms.

The ability of trans kids to not be subjected to conversion therapy.

The ability of a trans person to access timely gender related healthcare (and no, right now, unless they can go private they cannot access that).

So rail all you like, but I thought it was interesting - but unsurprising given my own experience - that 14 out of 15 gay or bi women MPs support these things, versus only one who opposes them.

Can you not see how accepting that any biological male can, purely on trust of any given male, access women’s safe spaces represents the abolition of sex-based safeguarding of women and girls? And that asserting this as an inalienable right will make many women and girls feel at the very least unsafe?

Nor should removal of body parts for psychological reasons be a “right”. Advocating it for children while framing it as ‘healthcare’ (and talking therapy as 'conversion') is particularly irresponsible.

TeaKlaxon · 13/06/2023 11:24

BaronMunchausen · 13/06/2023 11:21

Can you not see how accepting that any biological male can, purely on trust of any given male, access women’s safe spaces represents the abolition of sex-based safeguarding of women and girls? And that asserting this as an inalienable right will make many women and girls feel at the very least unsafe?

Nor should removal of body parts for psychological reasons be a “right”. Advocating it for children while framing it as ‘healthcare’ (and talking therapy as 'conversion') is particularly irresponsible.

All of which has been discussed ad nauseum.

My point is merely that contrary to what a lot of people on here say, there is no evidence that lesbians and bi women agree with you.

So perhaps the 'GC movement' could stop using us to further their agenda?

MrsOvertonsWindow · 13/06/2023 11:32

So I did some research 😂😂

Hepwo · 13/06/2023 11:33

My point is merely that contrary to what a lot of people on here say, there is no evidence that lesbians and bi women agree with you.

I have lot's of actual experience of agreement!

Do you remember Get the L out at Pride. Are we pretending that didn't happen. Are we pretending LGBA don't exist?

Honestly, if it's superior feminism to pretend that there are no people that have different perspectives on this then keep it.

And yes, I can call women MPs subservient fools when that's my considered evaluation. After all the Deputy Labour leader doesn't hesitate to call MPs she dislikes "scum".

BaronMunchausen · 13/06/2023 11:39

TeaKlaxon · 13/06/2023 11:24

All of which has been discussed ad nauseum.

My point is merely that contrary to what a lot of people on here say, there is no evidence that lesbians and bi women agree with you.

So perhaps the 'GC movement' could stop using us to further their agenda?

You have to exclude women like Julie Bindel, Kate Harris, Kathleen Stock etc from "us" for your last sentence to work. Even if your tiny sample of middle-class politics people were representative and most lesbians in the UK welcome males into lesbian-only spaces, why would that majority cancel the right of lesbians who don't welcome males in said spaces to say so?

TheBiologyStupid · 13/06/2023 11:43

And to that list we can add Jo Phoenix, Allison Bailey, Martina Navratilova...

ArabeIIaScott · 13/06/2023 11:48

MrsOvertonsWindow · 13/06/2023 11:32

So I did some research 😂😂

I liked that. Especially the 93% figure. Sounds very impressive. That's LOTS!

TeaKlaxon · 13/06/2023 11:50

BaronMunchausen · 13/06/2023 11:39

You have to exclude women like Julie Bindel, Kate Harris, Kathleen Stock etc from "us" for your last sentence to work. Even if your tiny sample of middle-class politics people were representative and most lesbians in the UK welcome males into lesbian-only spaces, why would that majority cancel the right of lesbians who don't welcome males in said spaces to say so?

I never said it cancels any rights.

Just asking people to stop pretending that they are representing some sort of lesbian viewpoint.

I never claimed no lesbian is anti trans. I explicitly included Joanna Cherry. If you guys want to campaign on the basis that a very small minority of lesbians agree with you, then go right ahead. Just stop pretending it is a common view among lesbians.

TeaKlaxon · 13/06/2023 11:52

MrsOvertonsWindow · 13/06/2023 11:32

So I did some research 😂😂

Yes. What do you call it when you want to find something out and then look up the relevant sources to find out that information?

Or is that something you don't have to trouble yourself with so much?

Hepwo · 13/06/2023 11:52

Why do you get to determine the "common view" ?

Hepwo · 13/06/2023 11:53

Just asking people to stop pretending that they are representing some sort of lesbian viewpoint.

We are representing some sort of lesbian viewpoint, as are you.

ArabeIIaScott · 13/06/2023 11:54

TeaKlaxon · 13/06/2023 11:24

All of which has been discussed ad nauseum.

My point is merely that contrary to what a lot of people on here say, there is no evidence that lesbians and bi women agree with you.

So perhaps the 'GC movement' could stop using us to further their agenda?

'there is no evidence that lesbians and bi women agree with you'

What about all the lesbians and bi women who do, though? What actual evidence are you looking for, here?

Hepwo · 13/06/2023 11:56

My point is merely that contrary to what a lot of people on here say, there is no evidence that lesbians and bi women agree with you.

Ten minutes later

I never claimed no lesbian is anti trans.

Hepwo · 13/06/2023 11:58

My point is merely that contrary to what a lot of people on here say
Many of whom are lesbians and bi women.

, there is no evidence that lesbians and bi women agree with you.

So the lesbians and bi women that agree with each other here are not evidence of lesbian and bo women agreeing?

IcakethereforeIam · 13/06/2023 12:08

I don't agree that wanting men, including transwomen, to stay out of women's spaces is the same as anti-trans. So, even gay and bi women who supported the Equality Act debate on the 'GC' side would not necessarily be anti-trans. In fact, of the bits I saw, it was noticeable how the GC side took time to assert how they though trans people should be supported and not discriminated against. I don't recall much reciprocation for the rights of women and girls from the other side.

Transmen who be free to use women's spaces, if they so choose. I believe many lesbians or bi people are open to or are in relationships with transmen.

I've nrtft so sorry if I'm repeating a pp.

ArabeIIaScott · 13/06/2023 12:08

I did a survey of myself and 100% of the women in this room agreed with me. I asked the dog, but she didn't understand the question.

TeaKlaxon · 13/06/2023 12:10

Hepwo · 13/06/2023 11:53

Just asking people to stop pretending that they are representing some sort of lesbian viewpoint.

We are representing some sort of lesbian viewpoint, as are you.

A small minority one, sure.

If you were making that clear, I wouldn't have an issue.

MargotBamborough · 13/06/2023 12:11

TeaKlaxon · 13/06/2023 10:58

The rights that folk on this board are so passionately against.

The ability of a trans woman to use the women's bathrooms.

The ability of trans kids to not be subjected to conversion therapy.

The ability of a trans person to access timely gender related healthcare (and no, right now, unless they can go private they cannot access that).

So rail all you like, but I thought it was interesting - but unsurprising given my own experience - that 14 out of 15 gay or bi women MPs support these things, versus only one who opposes them.

No, these things aren't rights.

Trans women using women's bathrooms is not a right, it is an infringement of the rights of actual women to have their own single sex spaces that they don't have to share with male people.

Children seeking puberty blockers, cross sex hormones and surgery absolutely should be undergoing comprehensive psychiatric treatment before they are given access to that. This is not "conversion therapy", it is basic safeguarding.

It is very telling that you can't make your point without twisting and distorting the truth in this way.

Hepwo · 13/06/2023 12:12

So you are shifting about a bit there Tea?

First it's no evidence, then you have decided that you have evidence.

And now you know it's a small minority?

How do you know?