Antipodean fruit grower statement

[nothingcomestonothing]

The antipodean fruit growers site is down. A statement from the owner reads in part:

What I fear more than losing my site, being sued, or dealing with police is living in a world where [redacted by me as would be against MN talk guidelines] while normal people are not allowed to even discuss it.

The mob has already planned subsequent targets. Should we stay down, they will then attack 'gender critical' communities - especially those ran by and for women. No place can exist online which criticizes [redacted], and nothing would excite them more than this power and domination struggle being inflicted on a female space instead.

Posted for info.

Looks like Cloudfare are morally and ethically superior to Facebook.

www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/six-months-after-christchurch-shootings-videos-attack-are-still-facebook-n1056691

Wasn't it set up to document this man's atrocious behaviour?

Not to support it.

Wrong end of the stick as usual.

Wow. That's quite a statement. I don't like a lot of the stuff on there. But they are absolutely vital to exposing some of the most disgusting and dodgy people on the internet.

And the people behind this attack demonstrate just that. Even if you don't like the way they say it, we need people who are defending our children from the insidious dark tendrils of those who seek to ensnare them.

You really know nothing about this, do you?

Go back and research CWCki and Encyclopedia Dramatica, The Gamer From Mars documentaries on Chris Chan and KF would be an eye opener for you.

Huh? Is it me? I don't see the connection?

A site that documents all kinds of things, documented a man raping his mother and again somehow MN is at fault? Did we make the man rape his mother?

If I am wrong use your own words to explain it.

I'm quite sure it can be summarised in a couple of sentences, if relevant to why Mumsnetters posted a thread about Chris Chan raping their mother.

How is 🥝 responsible for him raping his mother?

I do hope when KF is back up, we will see people posting there about some of the horrific things Mumsnetters talk about, urging them to... well, whatever it is we're being urged to do. I'm not quite sure. Wave a "down with this sort of thing" sign, I guess.

Would seem only fair.

I not really interested in walking you through 15 years of Chris Chan lore, watch the documentaries at least as they're fascinating.

Long story short - (likely) autistic kid was trolled and bullied for 15 years leading to him raping his mum.

Do you actually believe that?
Are you ok hun

The trouble is, once an internet site is down people are free to make up any stories they like about it and nobody can go and see for themselves if they are true.

So the forum being formed was or wasn't anything to do with C Chan? It''s a pretty simple question.

To be fair I placed an Ocado order and bought gratuitous sweet potato wedges and overpriced smoked hummous because MN made me do it. It was 5+ years ago and I haven’t offended since.

Ditch the loo brush, leave abusive bastards (inclusive of whatever sex or gender the bastard may be) and seek help, and make a chicken last for infinity while properly lemon drizzling and not wearing the wrong boots on the school run.

While we mutter about the fierce modding, they saw this coming a long time ago. There is nothing here except females not doing what they are told and saying the difficult things out loud.

However this is not about who said what and the morality of it; don't get sucked into it. This is purely and simply about 'if we kick off hard enough and make a big enough noisy fuss will the people platforming this group do what we want in desperation to shut us up'. It's the same tactic as repeatedly ringing the desk of a refuge to block calls and drive the staff mad until in stressed out overwhelm they break and do what the political group wants.

It is no different to your toddler howling at you for sweets. Or to be allowed to drink from their brother's welly or to be taken to nursery by the dog.

Long story short - (likely) autistic kid was trolled and bullied for 15 years leading to him raping his mum.

You what? Where are the rules of misogyny when you need them? Newsflash: the only person responsible for Chris Chan’s crime is Chris Chan.

Kiwi Farms was formed after CWCki for the sole intention of trolling Chris Chan.

This was Kiwi Farms twitter header before they got banned.

You got a link to that? Not just a screenshot which can be altered

I thought this recent article was quite fair:
thedailyscroll.substack.com/p/reaping-the-strange-fruits-of-kiwi

A - were they banned? By who?
B - why did you take a screen shot just before they were taken down?

Long story short - (likely) autistic kid was trolled and bullied for 15 years leading to him raping his mum

That is pretty much one of the most offensive things I've ever read on here and the bar is really low.

Isn't it just, It's unbelievable that anyone would be defending KF.

Best get to cancelling
Instagram
Business insider
IMDb
Tumbler
Discogs
Sportskeeder
Everybodywiki
Urban dictionary
Newsweek
Daily mail
And on and on and on
All have a page or more on cwc in my first ever Google

Set to my dear