Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

LangCleg

1000 replies

dragongirlx · 21/01/2020 16:37

I am a long time lurker but infrequent poster here but I needed to bring this to everyone's attention.
I have found out that Mumsnet HQ have banned the fabulous LangCleg simply for repeatedly pointing out the repeated times coercive control has been used by the moderators to stop women talking.
I understand it started with a conversation when a post was deleted because she allegedly used a sweeping generalisation but they couldn't or wouldn't confirm the generalisation and when she challenged them they decided to ban her on the basis of previous comments.

So it now seems pointing out coercive control is now grounds for being banned, thus proving that coercive control is being used.

I for one would like @MumsnetHQ to provide an explanation here as this is really not on

(also taking bets on how long before the thread is deleted)

OP posts:
Thread gallery
16
Justhadathought · 21/01/2020 16:41

No! She was great poster. One of the best.

TheRattleBag · 21/01/2020 16:42

Ffs. Ridiculous decision.

SarahTancredi · 21/01/2020 16:44

You are kidding Shock

Shes a voice of reason. Intelligent articulate and observant. She was not one for insults etc

This is extremely worrying

Floisme · 21/01/2020 16:44

Very sorry to hear this. Do we know if it's a permanent ban or a temporary suspension?

Imstinkyeddie · 21/01/2020 16:45

Wtf????

RedToothBrush · 21/01/2020 16:46

Lang cut through the bullshit.

That's why she's banned.

Cocolapew · 21/01/2020 16:47

Very sorry to hear this, I always enjoyed her posts.

Redshoeblueshoe · 21/01/2020 16:48

What ?
Fucking hell

RubyViolet · 21/01/2020 16:49

Bring her back Mumsnet ! This is unfair.

NorthernNic · 21/01/2020 16:49

I am very saddened to read this. I felt confident to delurk and try contribute in a meaningful way because of her. I always felt she 'got it' and was able to write things in a very clear cut way.

ahumanfemale · 21/01/2020 16:50

It's going to become a badge of honour to be banned from MN feminism boards given that it seems to only be the good ones who get the ban...

ApplesinmyPocket · 21/01/2020 16:50

No no no, not Lang! she is one of my all-time favourite posters Sad

Her intelligence and clarity will be a huge loss to MN. Shame on whoever made that decision - MN WILL be the poorer without her.

Melioration · 21/01/2020 16:50

Lang is one of the clearest posters on here and indefatigable in the cause of proper understanding of safeguarding.

MNHQ are shooting themselves in the foot if this is the route they want to go down.

BovaryX · 21/01/2020 16:50

No! Is it true? She is one of this forum's most fluent, passionate posters

AlunWynsKnee · 21/01/2020 16:53

That's not good.

Cascade220 · 21/01/2020 16:53

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

GrumpyMiddleAgedWoman · 21/01/2020 16:53

Bloody hell.

Permaban or suspension?

Was this to do with the Jess Philips web chat thread?

GrinitchSpinach · 21/01/2020 16:53

SadSadSad

ScarlettBlaize · 21/01/2020 16:54

Awful decision

MrsSteveMcDonald · 21/01/2020 16:55

That's a really poor decision by MNHQ

BovaryX · 21/01/2020 16:55

I can't believe it. She is such an articulate, informed advocate. Is it true? Lang, if you are here please say

3timeslucky · 21/01/2020 16:55

That's a terrible loss to the forum and to the quality of discussion here. She was - is - interesting, articulate, incisive, clear-thinking and I would have said very measured.

Hopefully after a sit-down and a think they'll reconsider and reinstate her.

RedToothBrush · 21/01/2020 16:55

It's going to become a badge of honour to be banned from MN feminism boards given that it seems to only be the good ones who get the ban...

You mean the clearest and most straight talking have been targeted. It's only a matter of time before you end up getting the chop for none compliance.

Tinsel is bound to be one of the next on the hit list.

PenguindreamsofDraco · 21/01/2020 16:56

FFS

poorbuthappy · 21/01/2020 16:57

Christ they don't like it up 'em

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.