I don't normally post in this section, I read most threads, though.
I have never understood why when a judge will say that " it is normal for a man to seek sex, elsewhere whilst his wife is pregnant", as was said in defence of a father having sex with his 8 year old daughter, for example. It was mainly women protesting this. If a similar excuse was given for a woman comitting a crime, I as a woman would defend that it isn't normal to abuse children, or allow children to be abused, it is a cre that should be severely punished.
I wouldn't attack a pregnant woman, or an elderly, more vulnerable/weaker person than myself, unless my life was at risk. If it was said in court that there was a good reason for women to do this, I would take to the streets in protest.
Men aren't though, even though it has been said countless times that they cannot control their urges.
I have always wondered why they don't protest against it being claimed that they have no control over their actions, because of their gender.
If men are, as some believe and it is quite scary that many in power and who have control of the media believe that they cannot help but abuse those weaker than them, they should be kept locked in institutions.
As another example for a positive change, it is thankfully no longer acceptable for a man to walk away from his children, not as unacceptable as a woman, but it is changing.
Hopefully so can attitudes to abusive behaviour towards women and children, in general.
When reasons are given for the crimes committed by women, it is usually their childhood and previous abuse/neglect that is sited, not that their behaviour is to be expected because they are female and the opportunity presented itself.
As is the case in rape etc cases. Yet the protests, by other men, who don't behave in that manner, simply don't happen.