Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

PR disasters thread 24

1000 replies

BigWillyLittleTodger · 15/07/2026 16:04

What more summer shenanigans await us from the Montecito duo?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
33
Puzzledandpissedoff · 20/07/2026 11:13

Over on X there is speculation regarding Where's Meghan?? She's not been seen since the roundabout speech
Not quite at the level of Where's Kate yet, but give it time

Dear god, @ShamedBySiri, not this again!!

Fortunately I don't use Twitter, but wouldn't you think they'd have learned from the last time? Hmm

Ferrycrossingmakingwaves9 · 20/07/2026 11:15

Cardemomle · 20/07/2026 11:10

I'm shocked I tell you! William said that about his own father! 😱
He'll be talking about todgers next.

Well you can make light of it and no one is exactly surprised, but it’s not exactly great PR or particularly clever or intelligent to say that the King hates our national sport, one of our biggest industries and exports, especially during a major international tournament.

One might almost think that William doesn’t get on with his dad … .

Thedom · 20/07/2026 11:16

Interesting to see Harry cosying up to the Murdoch media empire, appearing for a fee on Cordens Fox sports channel. Wonder what Harry’s fans think of that, the fans who for years blamed all H&M’s bad press on Murdoch.

How many times is Harry going to have to eat humble pie!

BasiliskStare · 20/07/2026 11:16

This from Tom Sykes for those interested

New Week, New Harry: The Cheeky Chappie Rebrand Nobody Ordered
Get a neck brace: Beers on the table on Fox, the man who complained about being falsely portrayed as a joker is now back doing crowd work.
TOM SYKES
JUL 20

PREVIEW

It’s a new week, and it’s a new Prince Harry. The latest exhausting polish on the rebrand rolled off the production line last night on Fox’s World Cup after-show, and this season’s model is: Cheeky Chappie Harry. Beers on the table. Banter with James Corden. Swearing on American television. A right laugh!
If memory serves — and I have the memoir, the Netflix series, the Oprah sit-down and roughly nine hours of promotional interviews to consult — the cheeky chappie was the one thing Harry told us he never was.

That was the Palace’s invention, remember? Spare is, at its core, 400 pages of a man complaining that the institution cast him as the thick one, the naughty one, the party prince, the lovable ginger idiot — a role assigned to him so William could be the serious one.

A word to our sponsors (you): Harry has Netflix money, Spotify money, memoir money and a palace on standby. I have you lot. Unlike the Duke of Sussex, I cannot rebrand — this is it, I'm afraid, snark and royal-watching until one of us dies — but I cankeep turning up in your inbox every time a Sussex does something hilarious, which, as you may have noticed, is a growth industry these days. Seriously, The Royalist turns one on August 4, at which point your subscription may cease if you have a legacy deal from The Daily Beast. Renew now, no money will be taken until your comp expires.
Upgrade to paid
He was misrepresented, and, actually, he kept insisting, he was a thinker. A sensitive soul. A seeker. A man of depth and wounds.
Six years of that, and now here he is on Fox, doing the cartoon stuff again, voluntarily, one assumes, with an unconvincing look and an even more unconvincing glass of lager!
Being packaged as a cheeky chappie was an unforgivable institutional cruelty when the Palace did it, now it seems to be a savvy relaunch strategy. Glad we’ve cleared that up!...

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to The Royalist to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.
Start trial
A subscription gets you:

Full access to all emails and archive

Post comments and join the community

Tom Sykes | Substack

I am an expert on the British Royal Family. I have led The Daily Beast's coverage of the world's most famous family for over 15 years and now, for those of you who want even more royal gossip and scandal, welcome to my Substack!

https://substack.com/@theroyalist

BigWillyLittleTodger · 20/07/2026 11:17

Ferrycrossingmakingwaves9 · 20/07/2026 11:09

Absolutely this! Great post!

And this is the 24th PR disasters thread about Meghan and Harry which is pretty good going for a pair who are no longer relevant… .

They are irrelevant in the grand scheme of things, they won’t be King and Queen, they are not working members of the royal family, they don’t represent the government of the United Kingdom, but their own words actions and behaviour provide endless juicy gossip so prepare yourself for thread 25, 26 and beyond, whilst they provide the content we will still be here discussing it 🍿 🍿🍿

OP posts:
AnAutumnCrow · 20/07/2026 11:18

One thing that occurs to me: remember the Charlotte Griffith revelation about how it was Sussex PR that leaked the balcony 'thaw' meeting between the King's and Sussexes' spokespeople? And they then blamed the leak on the Palace? And Charlotte Griffiths sat on all this till after the court case that Harry pursued and Meghan reportedly wasn't keen on?

Well, was that episode and example of HaM leaking and blaming together, having both agreed that strategy? Or, is the Charlotte Griffiths revelation actual news to one of them?

Imagine being Harry and reading that 'G-String' article in the Mail, and realising that Meghan did that behind your back and has been blowing up what your thought were your careful plans for a future reconciliation. (Or, of course, vice versa.) And the house is now supposedly in M's name ...where she and the children will live, without Mr RentAGob if necessary. He knows where to send the cheques.

Aprilfountain · 20/07/2026 11:22

MyDogClive · 20/07/2026 11:13

For those at the back.

Hating football isn’t criticism of the national team.

Harry has demonstrated, by his behaviour, that he truly, madly, deeply wants the status of being a member of the royal family. He fails to understand that he cannot be a commentator for hire and a member of the WRF. And yes, people can comment on his hypocrisy.

Yes, before Megxit, when he was a working member of the RF, with all of the lovely perks and privileges, he did nothing but complain bitterly about how hard his life was. Now however, he just seems to epitomize the phrase 'you don't know what you've got till it's gone'!

bluegreygreen · 20/07/2026 11:26

The issue is that he is still trying to cosplay being royal. Yet the Royal family don’t criticise sports teams representing the UK, they praise their efforts.

Exactly.

There is, of course, a previous very popular clip of William doing football commentary on Rio Ferdinand's own TV show; but there is no way he will be seen commentating on a loss by the English team.

Instead, he has praised them and commiserated with them.

Cardemomle · 20/07/2026 11:33

Ferrycrossingmakingwaves9 · 20/07/2026 11:15

Well you can make light of it and no one is exactly surprised, but it’s not exactly great PR or particularly clever or intelligent to say that the King hates our national sport, one of our biggest industries and exports, especially during a major international tournament.

One might almost think that William doesn’t get on with his dad … .

Oh fgs. Has it shaken the nation that KC isn't a soccer fan? We'll get over it.
You're dredging the barrel if you think that's been a bad move.
We don't know that he "doesn't get on with his dad". Unlike Harry, they don't give interviews, write books or have Netflix series slagging each other off for money.

StartupRepair · 20/07/2026 11:48

MasterChef Australia is whipping up excitement for Meghan's episode on Sunday.

PR disasters thread 24
Rhaidimiddim · 20/07/2026 11:48

Not2identifying · 20/07/2026 06:48

Harry's been emphasising his connection to the UK recently so I find it very interesting he wasn't at any England WC matches. He might have looked a little like he was representing the country if he'd been seen there, which must have appealed given that he's pretending to be a royal. My guess is that the FA (with PW as patron) didn't invite him to the main box where the important people sit and he couldn't bear to get a ticket sitting with ordinary people in the crowd (shades of M at Wimbledon).

I agree that M pushes the security thing to have an excuse for not visiting but, also, I think H feels guilty because I think he promised her they'd always have security (silly muppet, we could have given her more accurate information about that than he did).

The Beckhams attended the England matches. They would have used their influence to keep him from getting an invitation.

Justdancevance · 20/07/2026 11:55

That box would have been fun, Victoria looking stony faced while getting quietly hammered, Meghan doing her best seal clapping and offering to be the face of her brand.

Harry would have been trying to twerk David’s nipples and ask where he got his rug

The Beckhams and the Sussex’s both love a self important statement so the Beckhams would declare they would bring both sides together and Harry and Meghan could offer to bring Brooklyn back in the fold

KnickerlessParsons · 20/07/2026 12:13

Mylovelygreendress · 20/07/2026 10:46

There’s a rumour going around X that Harry signed over the house to Meghan in case he had a huge legal bill .
Obviously i don’t know if that’s true and I also have no knowledge of the American legal system but I thought it was interesting given how Meghan has distanced herself from Harry and his woes.

I think intentional voluntary deprivation of assets like that would be illegal. You can’t get out of paying a debt because you’ve given your money to someone else.

TheHatTrick · 20/07/2026 12:15

Cardemomle · 20/07/2026 11:33

Oh fgs. Has it shaken the nation that KC isn't a soccer fan? We'll get over it.
You're dredging the barrel if you think that's been a bad move.
We don't know that he "doesn't get on with his dad". Unlike Harry, they don't give interviews, write books or have Netflix series slagging each other off for money.

Edited

I thought it was an interesting comment! But genuine and relatable. Not a crime.

jeffgoldblum · 20/07/2026 12:17

AnAutumnCrow · 20/07/2026 11:18

One thing that occurs to me: remember the Charlotte Griffith revelation about how it was Sussex PR that leaked the balcony 'thaw' meeting between the King's and Sussexes' spokespeople? And they then blamed the leak on the Palace? And Charlotte Griffiths sat on all this till after the court case that Harry pursued and Meghan reportedly wasn't keen on?

Well, was that episode and example of HaM leaking and blaming together, having both agreed that strategy? Or, is the Charlotte Griffiths revelation actual news to one of them?

Imagine being Harry and reading that 'G-String' article in the Mail, and realising that Meghan did that behind your back and has been blowing up what your thought were your careful plans for a future reconciliation. (Or, of course, vice versa.) And the house is now supposedly in M's name ...where she and the children will live, without Mr RentAGob if necessary. He knows where to send the cheques.

Yes! , and still the defenders have yet to comment on “pill gate” ! , where are the comments about that!! 🤔

Ferrycrossingmakingwaves9 · 20/07/2026 12:40

TheHatTrick · 20/07/2026 12:15

I thought it was an interesting comment! But genuine and relatable. Not a crime.

Yes but imagine the uproar and criticism that would have ensued had Harry said it! That’s the point!

Cardemomle · 20/07/2026 12:43

Ferrycrossingmakingwaves9 · 20/07/2026 12:40

Yes but imagine the uproar and criticism that would have ensued had Harry said it! That’s the point!

I think if Harry had said that, most of us would have thought; there's something else Harry is claiming to stay in the news.
William doesn't. He has no need to constantly say desperate things for attention.
It came up in a podcast he was invited to join. Not like Harry's habitual loose lipped approach, but contextual.

TheHatTrick · 20/07/2026 12:45

Ferrycrossingmakingwaves9 · 20/07/2026 12:40

Yes but imagine the uproar and criticism that would have ensued had Harry said it! That’s the point!

Harry has indicated he hardly has a relationship with his father.

People who feel Harry has been unkind and unfair to his family are absolutely going to scrutinize every word he says about them until he makes some kind of public amends commiserate with his public criticisms.

Starryfifty · 20/07/2026 12:46

<a class="break-all" href="https://archive.is/20260720044640/www.dailymail.com/debate/article-15988975/harry-meghan-reverse-megxit-maureen-callahan.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://archive.is/20260720044640/www.dailymail.com/debate/article-15988975/harry-meghan-reverse-megxit-maureen-callahan.html

Bredaa · 20/07/2026 12:47

Ferrycrossingmakingwaves9 · 20/07/2026 12:40

Yes but imagine the uproar and criticism that would have ensued had Harry said it! That’s the point!

But we don’t need any imaginary situations as H&M provide more than enough material for ‘uproar and criticism’ more or less daily - but I prefer to characterise it as ridicule - most of their delusional and grandiose shenanigans is just pure entertainment - don’t think any is worried that they have any clout or impact.

Starryfifty · 20/07/2026 12:47

Not sure if you can access my link. Maureen Callahan article. Would certainly explain why Meg is quiet lately

EmpressSisi · 20/07/2026 12:48

I mean it’s kind of obvious that Charles doesn’t like football. Is anyone genuinely surprised by the revelation? 🤣

Hence why it’s not a big deal! 🫣

Lunde · 20/07/2026 12:51

BemusedAmerican · 20/07/2026 00:39

It was announced in January that Meghan would release a cookbook in 2026. Maybe she is home working on it. 😁

Wasn't it supposed to be based on her WLM series and the recipes she used?

Starryfifty · 20/07/2026 12:53

Lunde · 20/07/2026 12:51

Wasn't it supposed to be based on her WLM series and the recipes she used?

I believe so but can't see it happening now

Bredaa · 20/07/2026 12:55

Justdancevance · 20/07/2026 11:55

That box would have been fun, Victoria looking stony faced while getting quietly hammered, Meghan doing her best seal clapping and offering to be the face of her brand.

Harry would have been trying to twerk David’s nipples and ask where he got his rug

The Beckhams and the Sussex’s both love a self important statement so the Beckhams would declare they would bring both sides together and Harry and Meghan could offer to bring Brooklyn back in the fold

I think this also shows that PH can’t even get England adjacency never mind royal adjacency - he’s totally persona non grata culturally and socially when he can’t even get an invite to WC game on his home turf.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread