Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

PR disasters thread 24

1000 replies

BigWillyLittleTodger · 15/07/2026 16:04

What more summer shenanigans await us from the Montecito duo?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
33
canklesmctacotits · 18/07/2026 13:52

ShamedBySiri · 18/07/2026 08:46

Collecting all these spurious bought awards is such a strange way to live, although I accept it’s the way in Hollywood/America.
I don’t know how they can turn up and collect the awards and act as if they were well earned.

When DD1 was about three I entered her in a village fete competition to create a vegetable monster. The creation was a dragon made of a cucumber with a crocosmia flower breathing flames and shards of pineapple leaves running down its back. Under my direction she halfheartedly stuck a few of the pineapple bits in. I can tell you I was delighted with my her first prize. She couldn’t have been less interested because of course it hadn’t been the fruit of her own imagination and efforts. It was a useful parenting lesson and I never did such a thing again. DD now has many achievements to be justly proud of, all her own hard work.

Collecting all these fake awards is such an inauthentic way to live. The Pat Tillman was the absolute nadir, I don’t know how he had the face to turn up and collect it. Closely followed by the Living Legend of Aviation where he couldn’t even graciously accept the award but insulted John Travolta whilst doing so.

Have any other Royal family members been given and accepted any such award? I can’t think of any except when Diana was awarded Humanitarian of the Year in 1995 which I thought at the time was well deserved. Plus I don’t think the whole fake award scene was so ubiquitous back then.

Anyway here is this year’s winner of the Pat Tillman award giving a truly humble acceptance speech. Exactly the sort of person who the awards were meant for.

https://x.com/espn/status/2077577276233838876?s=46

These awards appearances aren’t about the accolade. They’re really about social media clips, professional photography, clothes, and basically visibility in a flattering environment where access is controlled and words are rehearsed or not spoken. And where everything is paid for by someone else.

Given they don’t have anything to sell, don’t have reason to appear in public (no shows, nothing to be interviewed about, no books written, irrelevant in current affairs etc) how else can they get onto Instagram and TikTok and facebook than by turning up to places where publicity is free and they don’t have to put in any work to organize interviewers/ videographers/ photographers?

That’s also what these faux royal tours are about. Visibility and a SM presence that someone else is paying for.

Meghan’s Instagram only has 4m followers (I think - and assume a quarter at least are bots). Her Insta and As Ever’s are just her and a ring light. Every now and then she’ll do a mates rates photo shoot with that friend Jake Whatever, and she’ll release those photos over a year or two. It’s all done on a shoestring to a small audience.

The disconnect between their media presence and their productivity is MASSIVE. The media presence is 90% print media, and of that 90% 60% will be not paid-for-by-them which we all know they hate.

It’s all a circus of attention seeking but the right attention only. Awards ceremonies are perfect - someone else is paying to have you seen in a favourable and flattering right.

BasiliskStare · 18/07/2026 14:14

@canklesmctacotits I think you have a point there. I think H thought M would open Gringott's Bank for them in Hollywood. . And to begin with it did. The trouble is thus far what has earned them the real money is telling , not always credible, tales about the RF. Their other NF ( non Docuseries ) productions went down the water spout like Itsy Bitsy spider. If they have something else to climb up on like The Afghanistan military novel turned movie or Cookie girls or the Polo drama or anything , then if it's any good I'm sure we will see it. Some of the awards they have been given I do think are a wee bit ludicrous - Living legends of aviation , anyone? Alongside Chelsey Sullenberger , Buzz Aldrin. But then Tom Cruise got one so I suppose a few slip in under the net. 😂

I remember an anecdote which I probably won't remember correctly. Tom Cruise wanted to fly a fighter jet in Top Gun II. Apparently he was told , this is $30m of taxpayers money . No. 😊Not sure why TC is up there with legends of aviation either.

LipglossAndLies · 18/07/2026 14:16

Starryfifty · 18/07/2026 13:18

So they are leaking about meeting and he's commenting about his father's health at the Times Awards ?

The he is in great health comment lol anyone can say from any of the pictures or videos we have seen of him lately. Hardly a leak saying someone is in great health 😆

Cardemomle · 18/07/2026 14:20

LipglossAndLies · 18/07/2026 14:16

The he is in great health comment lol anyone can say from any of the pictures or videos we have seen of him lately. Hardly a leak saying someone is in great health 😆

No you can't. Saying someone you've just met "is in great health" suggests more than superficial knowledge. Harry is implying that he knows about KC's health.

Strawberriesandcaviar · 18/07/2026 14:35

DaisyDooley · 17/07/2026 22:40

I’ve just realised why I don’t think they FaceTime.
Its the same reason why they wouldn’t let Meghan join the Sandringham summit when she was in Canada -the King/MiGs/Family/Security wouldn’t know who else was in the room when the FaceTime was happening, they could be recording.
They met at Highgrove becuse it’s very private, no recording devices, and I thoroughly expect H&M would have been checked for any hidden devices. No chance of being overheard.
HAM have shown repeatedly how they cannot be trusted. Wasn’t it the jubilee where family members were told not to talk to them on their own?
They have shown how they will sell and leak anything they can for money and to try and stay relevant.
There is no way the King will be FaceTiming those kids. It’s too risky.

I agree - although if recordings come out we’ll know for sure

TheNinkyNonkyIsATardis · 18/07/2026 14:42

BasiliskStare · 18/07/2026 14:14

@canklesmctacotits I think you have a point there. I think H thought M would open Gringott's Bank for them in Hollywood. . And to begin with it did. The trouble is thus far what has earned them the real money is telling , not always credible, tales about the RF. Their other NF ( non Docuseries ) productions went down the water spout like Itsy Bitsy spider. If they have something else to climb up on like The Afghanistan military novel turned movie or Cookie girls or the Polo drama or anything , then if it's any good I'm sure we will see it. Some of the awards they have been given I do think are a wee bit ludicrous - Living legends of aviation , anyone? Alongside Chelsey Sullenberger , Buzz Aldrin. But then Tom Cruise got one so I suppose a few slip in under the net. 😂

I remember an anecdote which I probably won't remember correctly. Tom Cruise wanted to fly a fighter jet in Top Gun II. Apparently he was told , this is $30m of taxpayers money . No. 😊Not sure why TC is up there with legends of aviation either.

To be fair, I'm pretty sure TC is a licensed pilot who owns and files his own planes.

Mylovelygreendress · 18/07/2026 14:52

LipglossAndLies · 18/07/2026 14:16

The he is in great health comment lol anyone can say from any of the pictures or videos we have seen of him lately. Hardly a leak saying someone is in great health 😆

He clearly isn’t in great health .

Mylovelygreendress · 18/07/2026 14:53

AnAutumnCrow · 18/07/2026 11:17

And yet, funnily enough, it would make them look better if they were to visit him and actually make sure he had what he needed, left him some gifts, and said ‘no photos’.

No-one thinks they’ve done this because it’s widely believed that they would have blabbed about it. And there’s their problem. The perception, learned from actual experience, that they are low-class blabbers.

Edited

I dread to think what M will say about her father when he dies .

Lunde · 18/07/2026 14:59

BasiliskStare · 18/07/2026 13:00

In my view the one disadvantage of the grey rock approach is that the other side can spout all sorts of nonsense knowing they won't be contradicted. The advantage of it is a little like Napoleon saying " never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake ". I think the problem is H&M have shown their true colours by their own behaviour. Their implacable fans will believe them. Of those who take a broader interest , I think many won't. I doubt many who take an interest will believe it was H&M's idea to insist on no photographs with KC. (But see my first sentence ) .

Re the Emmy thing. I don't really care whether M paid to enter WLM. I am more inclined to believe NF did as previous posters have said to reignite some interest for ROI. Now whether that gives M the chance to refer to it as Emmy nominated , Emmy award winning , I don't think it really matters. Those who know about these things will know she is not in the realms of Slow Horses etc. So she can say what she likes, but it doesn't turn Archewell productions into Shondaland. It sounds good, but won't fool Hollywood producers, important streaming companies etc. And to be fair some of the photography on the show I thought was really good.

Anyway that's my view from the bridge FWIW.

I don't think Netflix entered WLM - a show they cancelled. Netflix have also been totally silent about the nomination - no social media congratulations. I think Netflix want to forget WLM ever happened and are just ignoring this to hope it goes away.

I think Meghan is hoping that a Daytime Emmy will reignite interest in As Ever or perhaps a new show.

I don't know how many submissions there were for WLM but she didn't get a nomination in any of the culinary categories or as a presenter - just the vague "Daytime Lifestyle" of daytime reality shows about renovations, parenting and and dog shows.

BasiliskStare · 18/07/2026 15:07

TheNinkyNonkyIsATardis · 18/07/2026 14:42

To be fair, I'm pretty sure TC is a licensed pilot who owns and files his own planes.

Oh I am too - not saying against that but is he a "Legend of Aviation" ? Clearly for others to decide.

heatdome · 18/07/2026 15:16

Maybe more in the “promoting/publicising aviation through cinema” angle? Top Gun 2 brought in £1.5 billion at the box office. That’s a lot of eyeballs. There’s not going to be a hero pilot every year to nominate.

Starryfifty · 18/07/2026 15:24

Mylovelygreendress · 18/07/2026 14:53

I dread to think what M will say about her father when he dies .

His family are prepared for a slew of horrible allegations

Lunde · 18/07/2026 15:27

ShamedBySiri · 18/07/2026 08:46

Collecting all these spurious bought awards is such a strange way to live, although I accept it’s the way in Hollywood/America.
I don’t know how they can turn up and collect the awards and act as if they were well earned.

When DD1 was about three I entered her in a village fete competition to create a vegetable monster. The creation was a dragon made of a cucumber with a crocosmia flower breathing flames and shards of pineapple leaves running down its back. Under my direction she halfheartedly stuck a few of the pineapple bits in. I can tell you I was delighted with my her first prize. She couldn’t have been less interested because of course it hadn’t been the fruit of her own imagination and efforts. It was a useful parenting lesson and I never did such a thing again. DD now has many achievements to be justly proud of, all her own hard work.

Collecting all these fake awards is such an inauthentic way to live. The Pat Tillman was the absolute nadir, I don’t know how he had the face to turn up and collect it. Closely followed by the Living Legend of Aviation where he couldn’t even graciously accept the award but insulted John Travolta whilst doing so.

Have any other Royal family members been given and accepted any such award? I can’t think of any except when Diana was awarded Humanitarian of the Year in 1995 which I thought at the time was well deserved. Plus I don’t think the whole fake award scene was so ubiquitous back then.

Anyway here is this year’s winner of the Pat Tillman award giving a truly humble acceptance speech. Exactly the sort of person who the awards were meant for.

https://x.com/espn/status/2077577276233838876?s=46

I really don't think Harry really understood how some of these "Pay to Play" awards work in the US. The Living Legends of Aviation didn't give Harry an award because they thought he was a living legend! They are a small charity that promote aviation careers to children.

They give awards to some celebrity "Legends" each year for their fundraising potential - so Prince Harry - who hasn't flown since his army days was chosen. At minimum the celebrity is supposed to put down $25,000 to $30,000 to buy a table and brings some friends as a donation to the charity (and they hope there will be ongoing donations/appearances at events).

But Harry didn't understand this, didn't buy a table but turned up (without even Meghan) expecting to be treated as the guest of honour and mingle with celebs. So he ended up at the back on a (half empty) table of those who had bought single tickets - and looking really out of place (like Meghan at the cinema in a ball gown). He had a brief moment onstage and then ended up wandering around taking selfies with the fake Prince Mario-Max! 😂

He seems to have dumped the charity now - he wasn't at the 2026 gala.

heatdome · 18/07/2026 15:32

Lunde · 18/07/2026 15:27

I really don't think Harry really understood how some of these "Pay to Play" awards work in the US. The Living Legends of Aviation didn't give Harry an award because they thought he was a living legend! They are a small charity that promote aviation careers to children.

They give awards to some celebrity "Legends" each year for their fundraising potential - so Prince Harry - who hasn't flown since his army days was chosen. At minimum the celebrity is supposed to put down $25,000 to $30,000 to buy a table and brings some friends as a donation to the charity (and they hope there will be ongoing donations/appearances at events).

But Harry didn't understand this, didn't buy a table but turned up (without even Meghan) expecting to be treated as the guest of honour and mingle with celebs. So he ended up at the back on a (half empty) table of those who had bought single tickets - and looking really out of place (like Meghan at the cinema in a ball gown). He had a brief moment onstage and then ended up wandering around taking selfies with the fake Prince Mario-Max! 😂

He seems to have dumped the charity now - he wasn't at the 2026 gala.

Was that the one where he complained in his speech that he was having to shell out thousands for a table?

Starryfifty · 18/07/2026 15:33

heatdome · 18/07/2026 15:32

Was that the one where he complained in his speech that he was having to shell out thousands for a table?

That's the one. He's an idiot

Ferrycrossingmakingwaves9 · 18/07/2026 15:39

Mylovelygreendress · 18/07/2026 14:53

I dread to think what M will say about her father when he dies .

As TM was prepared to sell set up pap shots in order to make money off the back of his daughter’s wedding and was prepared in a televised documentary to tell the world that “it is my turn now” (he meant this in terms of finances so God knows what he was actually saying to her in private) then I think whatever MM says to him is no one else’s business.

He may be in poor health and he may he frail and elderly, but I don’t buy this poor old abandoned Thomas Markle narrative, as promoted by Piers Morgan in various televised frothing rants!

Nor do I buy the argument “he put her through private Catholic school” because it’s the responsibility of every parent to facilitate their child’s education.

BasiliskStare · 18/07/2026 15:40

@Lunde - re the H of Av awards - my mistake . He really should have bought a table. I think I vaguely remember that now , or some other award when he did and let everyone know he'd spent $10k and pointed it out. Anyway , no matter. 👏 I see more what LoA is now.

Ferrycrossingmakingwaves9 · 18/07/2026 15:41

MrsLeonFarrell · 18/07/2026 12:50

I find here the most balanced. X is particularly awful, from fans of any royal.

I doubt many Republicans would summarise this RF board as balanced tbh!

Starryfifty · 18/07/2026 15:51

Ferrycrossingmakingwaves9 · 18/07/2026 15:39

As TM was prepared to sell set up pap shots in order to make money off the back of his daughter’s wedding and was prepared in a televised documentary to tell the world that “it is my turn now” (he meant this in terms of finances so God knows what he was actually saying to her in private) then I think whatever MM says to him is no one else’s business.

He may be in poor health and he may he frail and elderly, but I don’t buy this poor old abandoned Thomas Markle narrative, as promoted by Piers Morgan in various televised frothing rants!

Nor do I buy the argument “he put her through private Catholic school” because it’s the responsibility of every parent to facilitate their child’s education.

like father like daughter. The entire markle family are despicable

bluegreygreen · 18/07/2026 15:52

Ferrycrossingmakingwaves9 · 18/07/2026 15:41

I doubt many Republicans would summarise this RF board as balanced tbh!

There's quite a range of views on the monarchy on the RF board - and indeed on this thread, among regular posters.

Just because people criticise poor public behaviour of the Sussexes does not mean they are monarchists.

Ferrycrossingmakingwaves9 · 18/07/2026 15:58

ShamedBySiri · 18/07/2026 08:46

Collecting all these spurious bought awards is such a strange way to live, although I accept it’s the way in Hollywood/America.
I don’t know how they can turn up and collect the awards and act as if they were well earned.

When DD1 was about three I entered her in a village fete competition to create a vegetable monster. The creation was a dragon made of a cucumber with a crocosmia flower breathing flames and shards of pineapple leaves running down its back. Under my direction she halfheartedly stuck a few of the pineapple bits in. I can tell you I was delighted with my her first prize. She couldn’t have been less interested because of course it hadn’t been the fruit of her own imagination and efforts. It was a useful parenting lesson and I never did such a thing again. DD now has many achievements to be justly proud of, all her own hard work.

Collecting all these fake awards is such an inauthentic way to live. The Pat Tillman was the absolute nadir, I don’t know how he had the face to turn up and collect it. Closely followed by the Living Legend of Aviation where he couldn’t even graciously accept the award but insulted John Travolta whilst doing so.

Have any other Royal family members been given and accepted any such award? I can’t think of any except when Diana was awarded Humanitarian of the Year in 1995 which I thought at the time was well deserved. Plus I don’t think the whole fake award scene was so ubiquitous back then.

Anyway here is this year’s winner of the Pat Tillman award giving a truly humble acceptance speech. Exactly the sort of person who the awards were meant for.

https://x.com/espn/status/2077577276233838876?s=46

I agree about spurious awards but it’s rather unbalanced to mention this without mentioning all of the spurious awards that the RF give one another!

Not to mention the honorary medals some of them receive having served not a single day!

QE2, for example, used awards, knighthoods, and military promotions to "protect" and publicly validate Prince Andrew, when he faced intense public scrutiny for his scandals eg the late Queen knighted Prince Andrew as a Knight Grand Cross on his 51st birthday which was the very day after the Jeffrey Epstein scandal broke. Lownie asserts that this was a deliberate strategy on behalf of the palace after the press started asking tough questions.

Lownie also writes about the late Queen making Prince Andrew a vice admiral shortly after new revelations were made public about his relationship with Epstein.

Almost laughable behaviour if it wasn’t so despicable.

At least an Emmy is a legitimate award for work done, whether you like the work or not. And btw it is usual practice for every agent worth their salt to submit the work of their client writer, artist, producer and director for appropriate industry awards. It’s standard practice, so I don’t know why posters are trying to invalidate it for that reason!

Recklessismymiddlename · 18/07/2026 16:02

Ferrycrossingmakingwaves9 · 18/07/2026 15:41

I doubt many Republicans would summarise this RF board as balanced tbh!

I’m not a royalist not a republican tbh. Sort of in betweener, who thinks in 20/30 years, there will no longer be a monarchy and as long as it’s properly thought out, unlike the shitshow that was Brexit, I’m ok with that.

Recklessismymiddlename · 18/07/2026 16:04

Starryfifty · 18/07/2026 15:51

like father like daughter. The entire markle family are despicable

The Apple didn’t fall far from the tree, where the younger generation is concerned. The lot are not particularly pleasant to put it mildly.

Cardemomle · 18/07/2026 16:04

bluegreygreen · 18/07/2026 15:52

There's quite a range of views on the monarchy on the RF board - and indeed on this thread, among regular posters.

Just because people criticise poor public behaviour of the Sussexes does not mean they are monarchists.

I think that the Sussex supporters are the hardline monarchists.
The rest of us take a more balanced approach to the whole situation.

Fromhere1 · 18/07/2026 16:11

Meghan Markle wrote an amazing tribute to her Dad on Father's Day - not sure if it was 2015 or 2016... She painted him as an incredibly thoughtful Dad who always made time for her. So whatever she might say or imply after he dies would have to line up with her thoughts on him just before (or maybe just after?) she had met Harry.

I've always thought it was very odd that Harry had not met his future Father in Law before the wedding. Surely that would be a huge priority.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.