Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Is Meghan a narcissist?

888 replies

Clbs · 28/09/2025 08:20

I keep seeing these reels and social media smears on Meghan being a narcissist and abusive partner to Harry. She certainly doesn't seem overly popular with the royal family or understood the expectations of her as a royal when she married him.

I'm by no means a royalist or a fan of Megan's. But I'm the same age as Harry so always felt I could relate a little to him. I haven't read his book or watched the netflix docs.

The main thing that doesn't sit quite right for me is they wanted a 'private life' and then done anything but. Did Megan use Harry's desire for privacy to isolate him from his family and friends?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
20
KnickerlessParsons · 16/10/2025 10:09

well I have never seen a photo of the wales kids when they are doing that suff either. so don't really get your point.

we see lots of candid photos of the royal children at horse shows etc. Zara’s too.

TemuRoyal · 16/10/2025 12:04

SynysterGates · 16/10/2025 08:09

well I have never seen a photo of the wales kids when they are doing that suff either. so don't really get your point.

There are stories about them, though eg one time Catherine took G and C to Poundland for Crimbo Decs and G told C off for making a mess on the floor.

CatchingtheCat · 16/10/2025 12:25

SynysterGates · 16/10/2025 08:09

well I have never seen a photo of the wales kids when they are doing that suff either. so don't really get your point.

You’ve never seen photos of William and George at Aston Villa matches?

crinkletits · 16/10/2025 13:14

Trinner · 13/10/2025 13:37

Except for the huge volume of media interviews, documentaries and SM content that MM
herself has developed and discharged onto global media platforms - direct from the horses mouth - for the public to digest.

Whether any of that persona presented is ‘real’ needs to be assessed alongside her actions, and the words of many ex staff, friends, colleagues, family who have chosen to speak out, to get a more rounded picture of the ‘real’ person. My point being that there are a significant number of primary source material touch points to generate a picture of a consistent pattern of behaviour and predictable character traits.

I think this is what is so entertaining about them both - their total lack of self awareness whilst the general public can predict the latest nonsense behaviour and have fun ridiculing the relentless grandiose and delusional behaviour of the grifting buffoons.

It’s just hilarious - the ‘content’ they inadvertently create on an almost daily basis which keeps everyone laughing (at them).

Media interviews? The selfless and unbiased opinions in print from the like of Rupert Murdoch? It’s almost like they are in the business to make money. Unfortunately hate sells and people such as yourself gobble it up in greedy handfuls desperate to believe the very worst about someone you’ve never met. Weird eh? You might want to think about why?

ozarina · 16/10/2025 13:20

Spectre8 · 16/10/2025 06:20

As I said the moment they were born the crazies were there, we have all seen the ridiculous commenrs about her pregnancy, her bump, are the kids even real etc ..... so basically she shouldnt of had kids then cos by having them she made them a target...

Listen to yourself, seriously...would you tell a woman who was groped that she made herself a target cos she wore a short skirt or a low cut top or whatever?

As usual you go off on a tangent about something else as opposed to addressing the point raised.

ozarina · 16/10/2025 13:21

crinkletits · 16/10/2025 13:14

Media interviews? The selfless and unbiased opinions in print from the like of Rupert Murdoch? It’s almost like they are in the business to make money. Unfortunately hate sells and people such as yourself gobble it up in greedy handfuls desperate to believe the very worst about someone you’ve never met. Weird eh? You might want to think about why?

Are you saying there is no content out there made by the Sussexes themselves?

ozarina · 16/10/2025 13:27

Letmeoutodhere · 16/10/2025 07:40

Do you think she actually has the perception to see this herself? I don’t. I think she genuinely thinks she’s absolutely alamazingly successful and marvellous. She seems to have completely limitless self belief. Someone who is completely deluded about herself and her husband, who refuses to accept reality. She’s a figure of fascination for this alone.

Meghan's ideal is shown in that latest spiel on insta. Her walking along with her crew in attendance on her way to spew her words of wisdom out to a waiting audience. She can talk about herself and how far she has come ( but let's ignore the bit between Suits and getting to Montecito). She is miked up and can let it all go about how brilliant she is . She's over the baby stuff now with her kids - as they grow they are of less use to her. It's all about her.

NormaMajors1992coat · 16/10/2025 13:57

ozarina · 16/10/2025 13:21

Are you saying there is no content out there made by the Sussexes themselves?

And presumably that Rupert Murdoch owns ITV, The Cut, Vanity Fair, Harpo Productions (better let Oprah know!), CBS, Netflix, the podcasts of Jamie Kern Lima and Emma Grede etc.

It’s a lovely narrative, this idea that Meghan actually is a super smart trad wife entrepreneur author content producer cook female founder tv presenter campaigner humanitarian fashionista (delete as appropriate) and all the negativity is down to Rupert Murdoch and not her own behaviour, but of course it’s a load of old shite.

Soupandaroll · 16/10/2025 14:51

the social media thing is more than just whether she posts her kids faces or not. I think there is a real danger of kids living their childhoods through a camera lens, experiences only being real if they’re performed, filtered and filmed. It’s where a lot of the self-conscious, anxious teenage behaviour comes from, not just living life but being filmed, documented and shared doing it, for likes and views.

it is very difficult to say SM is harmful and my child is never having a smartphone, while asking the kids to stir the jam or pick a rose while filming them with your smart phone for Instagram.

PinkPanther57 · 16/10/2025 15:04

Soupandaroll · 16/10/2025 14:51

the social media thing is more than just whether she posts her kids faces or not. I think there is a real danger of kids living their childhoods through a camera lens, experiences only being real if they’re performed, filtered and filmed. It’s where a lot of the self-conscious, anxious teenage behaviour comes from, not just living life but being filmed, documented and shared doing it, for likes and views.

it is very difficult to say SM is harmful and my child is never having a smartphone, while asking the kids to stir the jam or pick a rose while filming them with your smart phone for Instagram.

God help kids if fat or plain or go through an awkward stage etc as image & beauty are power & opportunity to M. To be plain or awkward is to fail. Who’s drumming the sensible love & common sense into the kids? To say a la Mrs Doubtfire ‘handsome is as handsome does’ etc, if Lilly preens too much?

Might I suggest ‘handsome is as handsome does’ for a kitchen sign instead of ‘Don’t try and win the part, win the room’ etc.

I sometimes wonder if York girls are so normal as they had down-to-earth, ‘good egg’ nannies doing all the parenting!

Trinner · 16/10/2025 17:47

crinkletits · 16/10/2025 13:14

Media interviews? The selfless and unbiased opinions in print from the like of Rupert Murdoch? It’s almost like they are in the business to make money. Unfortunately hate sells and people such as yourself gobble it up in greedy handfuls desperate to believe the very worst about someone you’ve never met. Weird eh? You might want to think about why?

“Except for the huge volume of media interviews, documentaries and SM content that MM
herself has developed and discharged onto global media platforms - direct from the horses mouth - for the public to digest.”

Again for those at the back struggling with reading and comprehension - as anyone can see I am explicitly talking about the media interviews MM herself gives directly (from the horses mouth) to HER chosen media outlets.

crinkletits · 16/10/2025 18:00

Trinner · 16/10/2025 17:47

“Except for the huge volume of media interviews, documentaries and SM content that MM
herself has developed and discharged onto global media platforms - direct from the horses mouth - for the public to digest.”

Again for those at the back struggling with reading and comprehension - as anyone can see I am explicitly talking about the media interviews MM herself gives directly (from the horses mouth) to HER chosen media outlets.

Edited

Oh we know you can read, it’s almost copy and paste straight from the Daily Mail.

crinkletits · 16/10/2025 18:01

ozarina · 16/10/2025 13:21

Are you saying there is no content out there made by the Sussexes themselves?

I’ll check again .. but I don’t believe I did.

Trinner · 16/10/2025 18:06

crinkletits · 16/10/2025 18:00

Oh we know you can read, it’s almost copy and paste straight from the Daily Mail.

Seems you are really struggling today. My post is explicit that H&M have provided mountains of content directly from themselves over the years across multiple media formats for anyone to make their own opinion….no need for the DM when you have authentic primary source evidence directly from the horses mouth to form an opinion.

ozarina · 16/10/2025 18:14

crinkletits · 16/10/2025 18:01

I’ll check again .. but I don’t believe I did.

Oh good then you agree that we know a great deal about the Sussexes from their own mouths.

chunkybear · 16/10/2025 18:19

ozarina · 16/10/2025 18:14

Oh good then you agree that we know a great deal about the Sussexes from their own mouths.

They’re trying to memorialise their ‘love story’ 🤢🤮, except everyone knows it’s all bollocks, made up stories, purchased crappy self congratulatory awards …. So at least it’s also being memorialised what arseholes they are!

Falseknock · 16/10/2025 21:33

ozarina · 16/10/2025 13:20

As usual you go off on a tangent about something else as opposed to addressing the point raised.

People even commented on how she rubbed her bump it was nuts. Men were after Katie Prices daughter online saying she's of age now. When people are in the public eye people do go crazy.

Serenster · 17/10/2025 07:21

Listen to yourself, seriously...would you tell a woman who was groped that she made herself a target cos she wore a short skirt or a low cut top or whatever?

No. But I would tell someone who for example chose to lie to the court that they have only themself to blame when they get called a liar. And then when everything they say get scrutinised, and further stretchings of the truth are revealed.

upinaballoon · 17/10/2025 08:50

she shouldnt of had kids

She shouldn't HAVE had kids?
She shouldn't have had children?
I think it's fine that she had children.
I wish she would teach them to use adverbs. I'm not sure if she or Harry would know what I'm talking about.

TheRealHousewife · 17/10/2025 11:36

ozarina · 06/10/2025 14:14

You really do have to wonder how these things work...
Meghan gets invite from Balenciaga...
Soneone says " oh dear weren't they involved in some furore about child pornography a while back? "
Meghan thinks - a. Oh yes that's not really good is it ? Or B. Oh yes but it was in the past so that's ok now ...
someone says " but how does that square with the protecting young people theme?"
Meghan says " just because I'm staying courtesy of them and getting free shoes doesn't mean I'm endorsing them" How does it all work in her head and her PR's minds? They KNOW she gets picked up on in the press but they think .. oh well let's just do it. Your jam is shit, your wine is faltering so fall back on the title 🤷‍♀️

@ozarina I’ve scan read the thread but can’t see that anyone’s commented on the fact Meghan Markle ACTUALLY INVITED HERSELF! The Daily Mail published an article stating that she texted Pierpaolo Piccioli and asked if she could attend. He agreed and also agreed as per her request to keep it secret. There is also a podcast but I cannot find the link where PP stated the same.

I think the fact she invited herself to a Balenciagas fashion show is even worse than merely accepting an invite from a company with a stained reputation due to inappropriate sexual content that featured very young children.

It’s as if she is aiding them in raising their profile and being ‘rehabilitated’ and in doing so, her own previous conduct can be forgiven.

Outig · 17/10/2025 12:57

Yes, and he totally blew her inflated pretentious statement out of the water, and so publicly.

The statement Meghan issued to the media

They have worked closely together collaborating on design for key moments on the world stage.

This evening reflects the culmination of many years of artistry and friendship, reflected in her support for his new creative chapter at Balenciaga."’

Pierpaulo’s comments in The Cut interview

“Meghan and I met some years ago, and we’ve been texting ever since.

She reached out and said she’d love to come to the show.

😂

What a chasm between both statements, and people ask why Meghan is so disliked and why so many believe she is a narcissist!!!

Indianrollerbird · 17/10/2025 13:14

@TheRealHousewife It has been mentioned. @Spectre8 claimed that Meghan had gone to support her "friend," Pierpaolo Piccioli, and there was nothing remotely hypocritical in her supporting a brand accused of using child SA imagery. I asked her what about Meghan supporting her actual friend, Missan Harriman, who had not only condemned Balenciaga back in 2022, but complained just last year about his friends staying silent on the matter. She didn't respond.

Well now we know that Meghan was not supporting her "friend", Pierpaolo- she was helping herself. And it appears that Pierpaolo barely knows her and didn't invite her, in stark contrast to her friend Missan, who has been one of her most vocal supporters for years. So far, no comment on this development from @Spectre8 .

prelovedusername · 17/10/2025 13:26

Indianrollerbird · 17/10/2025 13:14

@TheRealHousewife It has been mentioned. @Spectre8 claimed that Meghan had gone to support her "friend," Pierpaolo Piccioli, and there was nothing remotely hypocritical in her supporting a brand accused of using child SA imagery. I asked her what about Meghan supporting her actual friend, Missan Harriman, who had not only condemned Balenciaga back in 2022, but complained just last year about his friends staying silent on the matter. She didn't respond.

Well now we know that Meghan was not supporting her "friend", Pierpaolo- she was helping herself. And it appears that Pierpaolo barely knows her and didn't invite her, in stark contrast to her friend Missan, who has been one of her most vocal supporters for years. So far, no comment on this development from @Spectre8 .

We can probably safely assume that’s the end of the monochrome photographs.

Mylovelygreendress · 17/10/2025 14:32

TheRealHousewife · 17/10/2025 11:36

@ozarina I’ve scan read the thread but can’t see that anyone’s commented on the fact Meghan Markle ACTUALLY INVITED HERSELF! The Daily Mail published an article stating that she texted Pierpaolo Piccioli and asked if she could attend. He agreed and also agreed as per her request to keep it secret. There is also a podcast but I cannot find the link where PP stated the same.

I think the fact she invited herself to a Balenciagas fashion show is even worse than merely accepting an invite from a company with a stained reputation due to inappropriate sexual content that featured very young children.

It’s as if she is aiding them in raising their profile and being ‘rehabilitated’ and in doing so, her own previous conduct can be forgiven.

Maybe she couldn’t wangle an invitation to any other show ?
She was at a vegan dinner for “ women who own their power” in LA yesterday .
No, me neither …..

Trinner · 17/10/2025 14:46

prelovedusername · 17/10/2025 13:26

We can probably safely assume that’s the end of the monochrome photographs.

Maybe she’s having another clear out episode of friends and family in her usual scorched earth approach when she believes she has moved on to bigger and better things - Missan and Daniel? Also where’s Doria?