Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Is Meghan a narcissist?

888 replies

Clbs · 28/09/2025 08:20

I keep seeing these reels and social media smears on Meghan being a narcissist and abusive partner to Harry. She certainly doesn't seem overly popular with the royal family or understood the expectations of her as a royal when she married him.

I'm by no means a royalist or a fan of Megan's. But I'm the same age as Harry so always felt I could relate a little to him. I haven't read his book or watched the netflix docs.

The main thing that doesn't sit quite right for me is they wanted a 'private life' and then done anything but. Did Megan use Harry's desire for privacy to isolate him from his family and friends?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
20
Indianrollerbird · 15/10/2025 17:23

Teeteringpiles555 · 15/10/2025 16:10

Well I don’t mean this to come out in an impolite way, but I don’t know which websites you are looking at, because genuinely I have only see one or two photos where the backs of the heads of H&Ms dc are featured. I couldn’t recognise them in a crowd, or at all really, whereas I could recognise the royal children of C & W for example.

Edited to say that I am not really aware of the global derision related to the dc that you describe either. It all sounds a bit hyperbolic if you ask me.

Edited

It’s not about what you see. It’s about what these kids will think in later life about how their parents used their images and the noise surrounding that use (which is global, whether you are aware of it or not, because that’s the entire point of the internet and social media).

Indianrollerbird · 15/10/2025 17:26

It’s pretty clear H&M’s mental health messaging is not getting through to their supporters. It’s about the feelings of the children being used, not your feelings or what you think you can see.

ozarina · 15/10/2025 17:37

jumpingthehighjump · 15/10/2025 16:41

People in the local area will know what these children look like. They take them to events

Maybe they should lock them in the house and never let them experience a normal childhood? Of course they go to events!

And you have agreed with my post that there will be people who recognise them.

ozarina · 15/10/2025 17:39

SynysterGates · 15/10/2025 16:28

so W&K show their children and thats ok because they are royal....and paid by the tax payer(or who ever) but H&M do it thats bad because they are not paid for by the tax payer (or whoever)

I do wish people would stop using children as a way to bash H&M.

Meghan started all the mystery with the birth of Archie - lying about when she gave birth, keeping him hidden etc only revealing him with Desmond Tutu. It's all a game to Meghan.

jumpingthehighjump · 15/10/2025 18:06

ozarina · 15/10/2025 17:37

And you have agreed with my post that there will be people who recognise them.

Yes, because they can't keep them locked up. No school. No outings. No leaving the house.
That's ridiculous and how pathetic to intimate that M&H are doing them a disservice by allowing them to have a life!

Mylovelygreendress · 15/10/2025 19:11

ozarina · 15/10/2025 17:39

Meghan started all the mystery with the birth of Archie - lying about when she gave birth, keeping him hidden etc only revealing him with Desmond Tutu. It's all a game to Meghan.

Of course it’s a game . First glimpse of Archie at Windsor Castle in time for maximum TV coverage in the US .
Why at the Castle ? Why not in their garden ? Of course US viewers will be more impressed to see “ their “ Princess in a Castle .

ozarina · 15/10/2025 19:21

jumpingthehighjump · 15/10/2025 18:06

Yes, because they can't keep them locked up. No school. No outings. No leaving the house.
That's ridiculous and how pathetic to intimate that M&H are doing them a disservice by allowing them to have a life!

I never said that.

Spectre8 · 15/10/2025 19:47

You still dont frt it, their parents nefwork thst they champion about how social media is harmful for children is about kids who have social media accounts and information they are exposed to thay is harmful....as explained here:

One panelist, Katie, spoke about how when she was just 12 years old, TikTok would fill her For You page with videos about dieting and losing weight; Katie ultimately developed an eating disorder.

Its this type of sfuff they are talking about.

Yes of course as parents you sgoumd be deciding what images and videos of your children to want to share and how and what your boundaries on privacy are and what that means. For one person it wi mean never sharing anything online, to another it will be okay ill share but my acount is set to private and only those people i know, for others it might ne sharing backs of kids heads.

We all know the parent who letd their kid play first shooter ganes, or has all manner of social media accounts and exposed to content they shouldnt be. Parental controls only go so far.

KnickerlessParsons · 15/10/2025 20:14

SynysterGates · 15/10/2025 17:20

I have only seen a baby picture and the back of their heads. So at the moment they don’t seem to be doing much

The kids must get out and about though. Do they go to pre school? Do they have days out? Go to other kids’ houses for play dates? To the supermarket with their parents? Beach? play park? Doctor? Doria’s house? Cinema?

It’s amazing there haven’t been any photos of them anywhere. How do they stop people taking photos ( normal people, not paps necessarily) Surely the kids leave the house from time to time?

BoudiccaRuled · 15/10/2025 23:51

KnickerlessParsons · 15/10/2025 20:14

The kids must get out and about though. Do they go to pre school? Do they have days out? Go to other kids’ houses for play dates? To the supermarket with their parents? Beach? play park? Doctor? Doria’s house? Cinema?

It’s amazing there haven’t been any photos of them anywhere. How do they stop people taking photos ( normal people, not paps necessarily) Surely the kids leave the house from time to time?

People give kids privacy. We never see photos of any celebrity/royal offspring doing normal things. Only photos with official photographers at set up photo shoots such as film premiers or badminton horse trials (or wherever it is we see Zara Phillips' kids with their cousins).

ozarina · 16/10/2025 00:22

Spectre8 · 15/10/2025 19:47

You still dont frt it, their parents nefwork thst they champion about how social media is harmful for children is about kids who have social media accounts and information they are exposed to thay is harmful....as explained here:

One panelist, Katie, spoke about how when she was just 12 years old, TikTok would fill her For You page with videos about dieting and losing weight; Katie ultimately developed an eating disorder.

Its this type of sfuff they are talking about.

Yes of course as parents you sgoumd be deciding what images and videos of your children to want to share and how and what your boundaries on privacy are and what that means. For one person it wi mean never sharing anything online, to another it will be okay ill share but my acount is set to private and only those people i know, for others it might ne sharing backs of kids heads.

We all know the parent who letd their kid play first shooter ganes, or has all manner of social media accounts and exposed to content they shouldnt be. Parental controls only go so far.

You are right in these comments but there is the other side of this and this is what some are commenting on - letting your child be on sm in any shape or form. Many parents do not allow their children to be seen on sm at all in case of misuse of the images. You would think that Meghan would do this - instead she is opening her children up to masses of crazies on sm saying things like Archie has a problem, why are the children always in pjs, they are not the same children in subsequent photos etc etc. I have no idea why she would do this unless it is to keep the interest going .
One day these children will see all of this. It also encourages the crazies that are out there to try to get photos for big bucks or worse.
It goes against all that they preach and against Harry's constant barraging of the uk courts for security .

Spectre8 · 16/10/2025 00:37

ozarina · 16/10/2025 00:22

You are right in these comments but there is the other side of this and this is what some are commenting on - letting your child be on sm in any shape or form. Many parents do not allow their children to be seen on sm at all in case of misuse of the images. You would think that Meghan would do this - instead she is opening her children up to masses of crazies on sm saying things like Archie has a problem, why are the children always in pjs, they are not the same children in subsequent photos etc etc. I have no idea why she would do this unless it is to keep the interest going .
One day these children will see all of this. It also encourages the crazies that are out there to try to get photos for big bucks or worse.
It goes against all that they preach and against Harry's constant barraging of the uk courts for security .

And before she shared these pics on her instagram...there are plenty here who still made comments about her kids, how they are never seen so they must never go anywhere how awful they dont get out an about and on and on, endless speculation on what they look like and why there have been no pics and must be because she doesnt take them anywhere because someone must of take pictures if they had been in public.

So you see when she wasnt her kids were still attracting the crazies. So well makes no difference if a few things are now shared except now those same people bash her doing so...cant do anything right....bashed either way

ozarina · 16/10/2025 01:00

I disagree. Harry said he made himself a target by talking about Taliban kills. It is his number one thing - safety. Her and him allowing this is sheer stupidity.

ozarina · 16/10/2025 01:02

Spectre8 · 16/10/2025 00:37

And before she shared these pics on her instagram...there are plenty here who still made comments about her kids, how they are never seen so they must never go anywhere how awful they dont get out an about and on and on, endless speculation on what they look like and why there have been no pics and must be because she doesnt take them anywhere because someone must of take pictures if they had been in public.

So you see when she wasnt her kids were still attracting the crazies. So well makes no difference if a few things are now shared except now those same people bash her doing so...cant do anything right....bashed either way

The other thing is it doesn't really matter what people on mn or other places SAY - it's the target she makes them by the teasing.

ThePoshUns · 16/10/2025 05:19

I’m just waiting for the big reveal of the children at an opportune ( desperate) moment. It will happen.

Teeteringpiles555 · 16/10/2025 06:00

Spectre8 · 16/10/2025 00:37

And before she shared these pics on her instagram...there are plenty here who still made comments about her kids, how they are never seen so they must never go anywhere how awful they dont get out an about and on and on, endless speculation on what they look like and why there have been no pics and must be because she doesnt take them anywhere because someone must of take pictures if they had been in public.

So you see when she wasnt her kids were still attracting the crazies. So well makes no difference if a few things are now shared except now those same people bash her doing so...cant do anything right....bashed either way

Absolutely this!

Whatever she does people are going to comment negatively so she may as well try and control the narrative a little. Most people would reach this conclusion in her shoes I think.

Besides, neither Harry or Meghan at any point said they wanted to leave the Royal family to go and live under a rock and never come out.

Spectre8 · 16/10/2025 06:20

ozarina · 16/10/2025 01:02

The other thing is it doesn't really matter what people on mn or other places SAY - it's the target she makes them by the teasing.

As I said the moment they were born the crazies were there, we have all seen the ridiculous commenrs about her pregnancy, her bump, are the kids even real etc ..... so basically she shouldnt of had kids then cos by having them she made them a target...

Listen to yourself, seriously...would you tell a woman who was groped that she made herself a target cos she wore a short skirt or a low cut top or whatever?

Teeteringpiles555 · 16/10/2025 06:25

Spectre8 · 16/10/2025 06:20

As I said the moment they were born the crazies were there, we have all seen the ridiculous commenrs about her pregnancy, her bump, are the kids even real etc ..... so basically she shouldnt of had kids then cos by having them she made them a target...

Listen to yourself, seriously...would you tell a woman who was groped that she made herself a target cos she wore a short skirt or a low cut top or whatever?

Yes and the couple themselves were facing threats as early as 2016:

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-63804711

Meghan in June 2022

Duchess of Sussex: Meghan faced very real threats, says Met chief

The Duchess of Sussex faced disgusting threats while a serving royal, an outgoing Met Police boss says.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-63804711

NormaMajors1992coat · 16/10/2025 06:38

Teeteringpiles555 · 16/10/2025 06:00

Absolutely this!

Whatever she does people are going to comment negatively so she may as well try and control the narrative a little. Most people would reach this conclusion in her shoes I think.

Besides, neither Harry or Meghan at any point said they wanted to leave the Royal family to go and live under a rock and never come out.

She’s not really controlling the narrative though, is she. Unless the plan was actually not to be IPPs and global humanitarians living a life of service while collaborating with the Queen, but instead to be derided as a fucking grifter / a grief tourist / outed as a bully / mocked by South Park / compared to Zoolander / forced to apologise for lying to the court / seen fucking up the business so publicly and with popularity tanking. She is nothing really, except a figure of ridicule and joke fodder for the talk show hosts. If that’s really what Meghan wanted then hats off to her but I doubt it very much.

Letmeoutodhere · 16/10/2025 07:40

NormaMajors1992coat · 16/10/2025 06:38

She’s not really controlling the narrative though, is she. Unless the plan was actually not to be IPPs and global humanitarians living a life of service while collaborating with the Queen, but instead to be derided as a fucking grifter / a grief tourist / outed as a bully / mocked by South Park / compared to Zoolander / forced to apologise for lying to the court / seen fucking up the business so publicly and with popularity tanking. She is nothing really, except a figure of ridicule and joke fodder for the talk show hosts. If that’s really what Meghan wanted then hats off to her but I doubt it very much.

Do you think she actually has the perception to see this herself? I don’t. I think she genuinely thinks she’s absolutely alamazingly successful and marvellous. She seems to have completely limitless self belief. Someone who is completely deluded about herself and her husband, who refuses to accept reality. She’s a figure of fascination for this alone.

SynysterGates · 16/10/2025 08:09

KnickerlessParsons · 15/10/2025 20:14

The kids must get out and about though. Do they go to pre school? Do they have days out? Go to other kids’ houses for play dates? To the supermarket with their parents? Beach? play park? Doctor? Doria’s house? Cinema?

It’s amazing there haven’t been any photos of them anywhere. How do they stop people taking photos ( normal people, not paps necessarily) Surely the kids leave the house from time to time?

well I have never seen a photo of the wales kids when they are doing that suff either. so don't really get your point.

PinkPanther57 · 16/10/2025 08:18

Letmeoutodhere · 16/10/2025 07:40

Do you think she actually has the perception to see this herself? I don’t. I think she genuinely thinks she’s absolutely alamazingly successful and marvellous. She seems to have completely limitless self belief. Someone who is completely deluded about herself and her husband, who refuses to accept reality. She’s a figure of fascination for this alone.

Those with that limitless self belief, especially when that’s coupled with status money & looks, can fool most people especially in person & go a long way to achieving heart’s desire.

Many miss I think quite how hard that role in Suits will have been to come by. The early signs were there.

NormaMajors1992coat · 16/10/2025 08:42

Letmeoutodhere · 16/10/2025 07:40

Do you think she actually has the perception to see this herself? I don’t. I think she genuinely thinks she’s absolutely alamazingly successful and marvellous. She seems to have completely limitless self belief. Someone who is completely deluded about herself and her husband, who refuses to accept reality. She’s a figure of fascination for this alone.

I completely agree, she seems detached from the reality of who she is, how she comes across, what she can and can’t do, what other people value, what it takes to be successful and how success is generally measured. That awful podcast that tanked and lasted one season - imagine accepting an award for “shows devoted to or hosted by notable business leaders and entrepreneurs who have had an unique and outsized impact on culture through their podcast”. After the series of fuck ups that is her business. It’s simultaneously fascinating and uncomfortable to watch.

I’m sure she thinks any negativity towards her comes from jealousy and/or racism and/or stuffy old forelock-tugging Brits who love the RF and can’t forgive them for leaving. It couldn’t possibly be because of her behaviour, because she never does anything wrong, never makes a mistake, nothing is ever her or Harry’s fault. It’s so extreme that either they don’t realise how transparent they are, or how unattractive, or they can’t fake even a tiny bit of humility and self-deprecation. And don’t even get me started on the hypocrisy. She seems so desperate for attention and validation, yet doesn’t seem to have that inner voice that says - well I can’t do that - I can’t use my children on social media and lecture others about online safety for children - I can’t bully staff to the point where they need professional mental health support and do panel discussions about bullying - people will think I’m an idiot and a hypocrite if I do. (Of course even better would be not to do these things because she gives a shit about other people but hey ho.)

Mylovelygreendress · 16/10/2025 08:51

Great post @NormaMajors1992coat

chunkybear · 16/10/2025 09:48

Spot on @NormaMajors1992coat