Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Is Meghan a narcissist?

888 replies

Clbs · 28/09/2025 08:20

I keep seeing these reels and social media smears on Meghan being a narcissist and abusive partner to Harry. She certainly doesn't seem overly popular with the royal family or understood the expectations of her as a royal when she married him.

I'm by no means a royalist or a fan of Megan's. But I'm the same age as Harry so always felt I could relate a little to him. I haven't read his book or watched the netflix docs.

The main thing that doesn't sit quite right for me is they wanted a 'private life' and then done anything but. Did Megan use Harry's desire for privacy to isolate him from his family and friends?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
20
Letmeoutodhere · 13/10/2025 13:07

Serenster · 13/10/2025 13:06

Prenuptial agreements are not valid under UK law.

It would be drawn up in the US

PinkPanther57 · 13/10/2025 13:10

Mylovelygreendress · 13/10/2025 12:24

I keep reading about M bagging a billionaire. Really ? She is an attractive middle aged woman with 2 children , a ton of baggage plus a reputation for lying and bullying .
I really cannot see billionaires queuing up.

Possibly not literal billionaire but ultra high net worth, but that said, am told there’s a real art & less competition in finding one less picky on the edge of old age ;) She’s a beautiful, canny, stylish woman after all. Time will tell.

NormaMajors1992coat · 13/10/2025 13:10

I don’t think she’ll be doing much billionaire hunting in the UK

Serenster · 13/10/2025 13:14

Letmeoutodhere · 13/10/2025 13:07

It would be drawn up in the US

Sorry, I thought you meant any existing pre-nuptial, not a hypothetical future one!

The Royal family wouldn’t need a pre-nuptial in any event as Harry does not himself own any substantial assets.

NormaMajors1992coat · 13/10/2025 13:17

Yes I meant if Meghan ditches Harry and goes off looking for husband no.3 aka “bagging a billionaire” 🤪🫠

Trinner · 13/10/2025 13:37

crinkletits · 12/10/2025 18:00

Nobody knows who or what she is because there isn’t a person on this forum who’s most likely met her never mind spent sufficient time with her to know her.

Except for the huge volume of media interviews, documentaries and SM content that MM
herself has developed and discharged onto global media platforms - direct from the horses mouth - for the public to digest.

Whether any of that persona presented is ‘real’ needs to be assessed alongside her actions, and the words of many ex staff, friends, colleagues, family who have chosen to speak out, to get a more rounded picture of the ‘real’ person. My point being that there are a significant number of primary source material touch points to generate a picture of a consistent pattern of behaviour and predictable character traits.

I think this is what is so entertaining about them both - their total lack of self awareness whilst the general public can predict the latest nonsense behaviour and have fun ridiculing the relentless grandiose and delusional behaviour of the grifting buffoons.

It’s just hilarious - the ‘content’ they inadvertently create on an almost daily basis which keeps everyone laughing (at them).

elessar · 13/10/2025 13:50

Outig · 13/10/2025 10:54

I hadn’t read Meghan’s statement after the Balenciaga PR, but I just read her spokesperson said this

“They have worked closely together collaborating on design for key moments on the world stage.

How absolutely crazy narcissistic does that come across?

the full article………

“After Meghan Markle attended Pierpaolo Piccioli’s Balenciaga show in Paris last weekend, she issued a grand statement declaring that she and Piccioli had “worked closely together, collaborating on design for key moments on the world stage.”

She added that her attendance reflected “the culmination of many years of…friendship.”

Piccioli’s recollection, captured in a new interview just released on The Cut, is somewhat at variance with Meghan’s; it’s fair to say.

Asked how Meghan’s appearance happened, he replied: “Meghan and I met some years ago, and we’ve been texting ever since. She reached out and said she’d love to come to the show.”

Of course, Meghan, it has been observed before, has unusual ideas about what constitutes a “friend.”

In her Netflix cooking show, she was shown buying several hundred dollars’ worth of books in a bookstore for the child of a mystery “new” friend who turned out to be Queer Eye’s Tan France.

She then prepared an elaborate fruit platter to greet him, but the gestures played, not as generous, but as staged, when, upon arrival, the “friends” greeted each other with a mutual, slightly shamefaced mumbling of, “So nice to meet you.”

The credibility of the show’s central premise—that Meghan is a cool person with loads of friends whom she loves entertaining—collapsed, for me, under the weight of that ridiculous moment: two people who had never met playing lifelong confidants for the sake of 40 minutes of television.

I have long felt that Meghan’s tendency to massively exaggerate the depth of her relationship with various “dear friends” was a liability that was going to trip her up one day—and now, here it is.

I suspect that Piccioli’s cool-to-cold account of his and Meghan’s “friendship” was triggered by that other line in Meghan’s absurd statement implying that they were somehow “design” partners or “collaborating” together.

It sounded remarkably like Meghan, having failed to nail Gwyneth’s schtick, was positioning herself for a crack at Victoria Beckham’s.

Reread Meghan’s statement, and it’s pretty clear that Meghan wants us to understand that her friendship with this great designer has been beneficial to him, because it meant he got her input!

In Piccioli’s telling, a casual meeting resulted in a bunch of texts and a request for a ticket to his show.

It’s an interesting divergence to say the least.

Wow, thanks for sharing that Outig, I’d missed that she’d made that claim.

it is unbelievably brass necked, to make that claim at all, let alone to make it given the truth of the situation that she’d asked for an invite from a casual acquaintance. Her positioning really makes it seem like she was a key contributor as part of the design process!

Once again a very Meghan turn of phrase where she’s making a very bold claim that is designed to strongly imply one thing but with enough plausible deniability to get her out of trouble of challenged - I’m sure she’d either drop her spokesperson in it and deny all knowledge, or say that the “collaborating on key design moments on the world stage” just meant her appearance at the show wearing the Balenciaga designs.

Trinner · 13/10/2025 13:54

MrsFinkelstein · 13/10/2025 12:44

Meghan is beautiful, but she's at least a decade too old for a billionaire IMO.

Saying that, Jerry Hall did get Rupert Murdoch, though that was very short lived and I imagine any pre-nup would only be favourable to the billionaire.

Main issue being that if Meghan ever does remarry she loses her only distinguishing feature. The Title of Duchess.

Main issue being that if Meghan ever does remarry she loses her only distinguishing feature. The Title of Duchess.

Everything is transactional - I am sure MM has already done the ‘math’.

With regards age - she would be hitting her 50’s on marriage No3 if she were to start divorce proceedings with PH today - so going by Jackie O and Jerry H as a bench mark she’d be looking at a fugly 75 year old. I suspect fugly won’t bother her given her current fugly ‘fox’ - it will be the cash and the status. I suspect she has burnt her bridges and credibility in Hollywood - so probs a politician would be right up her alley - I can see her getting a kick out of being a politicians wife - being feted and talking shit on the campaign trail.

PinkPanther57 · 13/10/2025 14:03

Trinner · 13/10/2025 13:54

Main issue being that if Meghan ever does remarry she loses her only distinguishing feature. The Title of Duchess.

Everything is transactional - I am sure MM has already done the ‘math’.

With regards age - she would be hitting her 50’s on marriage No3 if she were to start divorce proceedings with PH today - so going by Jackie O and Jerry H as a bench mark she’d be looking at a fugly 75 year old. I suspect fugly won’t bother her given her current fugly ‘fox’ - it will be the cash and the status. I suspect she has burnt her bridges and credibility in Hollywood - so probs a politician would be right up her alley - I can see her getting a kick out of being a politicians wife - being feted and talking shit on the campaign trail.

Edited

Someone like Ed Mapelli Mozzi has 800 mil
odd - more readies than H?

Some Italian aristo in wings somewhere? Can she tap up Fergie who thought she had serious chance with John F Kennedy Jr & Tiger Woods acc to Lownie!

ozarina · 13/10/2025 14:13

elessar · 13/10/2025 13:50

Wow, thanks for sharing that Outig, I’d missed that she’d made that claim.

it is unbelievably brass necked, to make that claim at all, let alone to make it given the truth of the situation that she’d asked for an invite from a casual acquaintance. Her positioning really makes it seem like she was a key contributor as part of the design process!

Once again a very Meghan turn of phrase where she’s making a very bold claim that is designed to strongly imply one thing but with enough plausible deniability to get her out of trouble of challenged - I’m sure she’d either drop her spokesperson in it and deny all knowledge, or say that the “collaborating on key design moments on the world stage” just meant her appearance at the show wearing the Balenciaga designs.

Oprah Winfrey Yes GIF

This is typical MM style though isn't it ? It's insinuation and suggestion and hoping that people will make a link which doesn't exist. We saw this on the Oprah show with the suggestion about Archie and his colour - Meghan fed and Oprah lapped it up like the big fool she was. She's done this for years .

ozarina · 13/10/2025 14:15

PinkPanther57 · 13/10/2025 13:10

Possibly not literal billionaire but ultra high net worth, but that said, am told there’s a real art & less competition in finding one less picky on the edge of old age ;) She’s a beautiful, canny, stylish woman after all. Time will tell.

They need someone though who can keep confidentiality and she doesn't meet that criteria. She's a liability.

PersistentRain · 13/10/2025 14:20

I’d read a comment before that she didn’t have the personality to marry a billionaire. She wants to be in charge and it’s probably not what they are after, they want someone who is totally focused on them and their needs.
I think Diana definitely could have bagged on, she was seen as a prize like Jackie.

PinkPanther57 · 13/10/2025 14:30

ozarina · 13/10/2025 14:15

They need someone though who can keep confidentiality and she doesn't meet that criteria. She's a liability.

True, but some billionaire/UHNW WAGs are far from quiet on their socials & lean into patronages, philanthropy, fashion, TED talks, opportunities for their families etc. Enjoy making a splash, being revered…al the associated, power, glam, gravitas…

However, trustworthiness towards nearest & dearest chap or lack thereof, considered carefully I’d think.

PinkPanther57 · 13/10/2025 14:33

PersistentRain · 13/10/2025 14:20

I’d read a comment before that she didn’t have the personality to marry a billionaire. She wants to be in charge and it’s probably not what they are after, they want someone who is totally focused on them and their needs.
I think Diana definitely could have bagged on, she was seen as a prize like Jackie.

Not universally & the UHNW a much bigger pool.

Trinner · 13/10/2025 14:36

PinkPanther57 · 13/10/2025 14:03

Someone like Ed Mapelli Mozzi has 800 mil
odd - more readies than H?

Some Italian aristo in wings somewhere? Can she tap up Fergie who thought she had serious chance with John F Kennedy Jr & Tiger Woods acc to Lownie!

Well she’s already gone down the wealthy sportsman route - wasn’t she targeting Ashley Cole and Rory McIlroy? Can’t see her as a WAG though.

PinkPanther57 · 13/10/2025 15:36

Trinner · 13/10/2025 14:36

Well she’s already gone down the wealthy sportsman route - wasn’t she targeting Ashley Cole and Rory McIlroy? Can’t see her as a WAG though.

True, meant in context as significant other. It would have to be a touch more prestigious now re: any next prospect.

prelovedusername · 13/10/2025 15:47

Meghan and Harry are not going to divorce any time soon. Their lives may diverge but they both have far too much to lose.

I don’t think the RF want that either. Nobody would benefit from them divorcing, perhaps if there were no children then a clean break might have been possible but there are, so they will always be in each other’s lives.

ERthree · 13/10/2025 15:50

prelovedusername · 13/10/2025 15:47

Meghan and Harry are not going to divorce any time soon. Their lives may diverge but they both have far too much to lose.

I don’t think the RF want that either. Nobody would benefit from them divorcing, perhaps if there were no children then a clean break might have been possible but there are, so they will always be in each other’s lives.

Not so sure but Meghan will only leave when she has some other bloke lined up. Any divorce announcement would come just after Christmas on Catherine's birthday,

BigAnne · 13/10/2025 15:58

I don't think they'll divorce. Partly because they'd struggle to find anyone who'd want them. They remind me of a couple I know who are well off but heavy drinkers, they enable each other because their lifestyle goes uncritical.

BigAnne · 13/10/2025 16:00

BigAnne · 13/10/2025 15:58

I don't think they'll divorce. Partly because they'd struggle to find anyone who'd want them. They remind me of a couple I know who are well off but heavy drinkers, they enable each other because their lifestyle goes uncritical.

*uncriticised

TheMeasure · 13/10/2025 17:22

I agree that they won’t divorce any time soon and to be honest, it’s probably better all round that they don’t. Much as I dislike Harry, I don’t wish that on him as I think it would destroy him. And, as I also think Meghan has a very damaging book inside her, the RF have nothing to gain from a split either.

NormaMajors1992coat · 13/10/2025 17:56

Any divorce announcement would come just after Christmas on Catherine's birthday

😂😂

Mylovelygreendress · 13/10/2025 17:56

TheMeasure · 13/10/2025 17:22

I agree that they won’t divorce any time soon and to be honest, it’s probably better all round that they don’t. Much as I dislike Harry, I don’t wish that on him as I think it would destroy him. And, as I also think Meghan has a very damaging book inside her, the RF have nothing to gain from a split either.

She probably does have enough for a damaging book ( would it be truthful ??) but I reckon if they do split up , the Royal lawyers will negotiate a watertight settlement which will limit what she can say and do. The last thing Meghan wants is her title to be removed so she may have to toe the line.

JSMill · 13/10/2025 19:35

BigAnne · 13/10/2025 15:58

I don't think they'll divorce. Partly because they'd struggle to find anyone who'd want them. They remind me of a couple I know who are well off but heavy drinkers, they enable each other because their lifestyle goes uncritical.

I can think of people like that. I think you might very well be right.

Trinner · 13/10/2025 20:27

JSMill · 13/10/2025 19:35

I can think of people like that. I think you might very well be right.

Sounds about right for PH at least - as per PP who said that no one in the upper classes would have him. But I am sure MM could be persuasive enough to attract another husband. But I don’t think she is done squeezing the pip’s from this current ‘opportunity’ just yet. I would imagine he is hell to be married to - maybe she should be given an OBE for service to the country for tolerating the ginger whinger.