Is Meghan a narcissist?

[Clbs]

I keep seeing these reels and social media smears on Meghan being a narcissist and abusive partner to Harry. She certainly doesn't seem overly popular with the royal family or understood the expectations of her as a royal when she married him.

I'm by no means a royalist or a fan of Megan's. But I'm the same age as Harry so always felt I could relate a little to him. I haven't read his book or watched the netflix docs.

The main thing that doesn't sit quite right for me is they wanted a 'private life' and then done anything but. Did Megan use Harry's desire for privacy to isolate him from his family and friends?

I have not got a clue what the children look like facially. Backs of heads, them in the distance, a picture of hands etc. No problem

William and Catherine’s tour to Pakistan ( at the request of the U.K. Government) was 5 days.
Their tour to the Caribbean ( on behalf of the Late QE2) was 8 days .
They took George to Australia in 2014 and George and Charlotte on a European tour ( again official)
The Wales DC are now at school so more difficult to include them .
H and M have left their DC on numerous occasions by choice . When the late Queen died they ended up being away for 3 weeks . Why couldn’t Doria or a nanny bring them over to the U.K. ?

Nevertheless she uses them to promote herself and her business. But that’s ok, whereas talking about it is not?

Why are you using quotation marks, I didn’t say that ….
also vitriolic or just telling the truth - sometimes the truth is toxic or some peoples behaviours are vitriolic, doesn’t mean it’s not true, in this case, it’s just her all over

Talk about them all you want. That doesn't mean I agree with all the comments I read as some have pretty awful about how she weaponises her children, and how they will need full on therapy when they're older because of their awful parents and stuff like that. I don't like it and that's my prerogative surely...

Sure, it just seems so strange not to mind someone using her children for commercial purposes (especially when that involves putting them on social media which she thinks is dangerous), but to complain about people discussing that behaviour? Surely putting children on social media when you say yourself that it’s harmful is infinitely worse than commenting on someone doing that?

We are going round in circles here. I have no idea what her children look like. I think they both have protected them well. A hand stirring something in a bowl, the back of a head in the distance, a pink jumper, whatever. I really don't care.

Let’s also not forget Harry stating his children can’t come to the UK unless he gets the security he wants … that’s the epitome of using them as weapons!

I agree that you’re going round in circles, but you’re not alone, it often happens when people try to excuse Meghan’s behaviour. Hypocrisy is very difficult to defend, isn’t it? You just look a bit silly criticising posters for making points about the children while arguing that it’s fine for Meghan to put them in harm’s way in order to promote herself and make money. The UK is too dangerous for them, children should be protected from social media blah blah. Oh, and look at me and my social media post identifying where you can find my 6 year old playing football.

So if H&M go for a work related visit or even if they dont they are leaving their kids ina secure home they pay for security with a nanny too...whats the issue?

As for W&K yes they harp on abijt what odneeful parent they are every single time they bang on about how they are wanting to spend time with their kids as a reason why they are doing less engagements, everything.

🙄

Doesnt account for all the times she doesnt tell you.

I would want fewer engagements and much more time with my children if I had cancer or my DH / DW had cancer.

Call me silly if you like, don't care.

I will say yet again, I have no idea what their children look like and I think they have protected them well. Saying they have put them in harms way? Seriously?!!

p.s. Opinions may vary lol

Except they aren't plastering them all over sm is she just her instagram. 🙄 she isnt posting something everyday either.

You do realise safety of kids and small isnt about posting a photo. Its about what kids have access to when they have access to the Internet and exposed ro what is online. How are your kids using social media what are they looking st, why do they have an account? Should they? Is tiktok ok because what they can see on thay platform is safe content. Its about how these platforms can becomes grounds dor breeding bullying online od kids from their peers. The nasty comments the criticising that happens, trolling etc. Surely you talk to hour kids about these things about how to stay safe online.

Having pics of the backs of your heads is not what they are talking about or campaigning about.

Eh????

That post makes zero sense.

Just going by Meghan’s own opinion, voiced many times, most recently just a few days ago, that social media is harmful for children. She said it, not me. Although I happen to agree, and so do many others, including governments around the world.

What about their mental health in the future? When they see how they were used by their parents to sell pancake mix and trips to Disneyland, to the derision of the world's media? Whilst at the same time being told it was too unsafe to go and see their grandfather and get to know their British relatives. Online safety is not just about the here and now, or about physical safety; it's about the mental safety of your children when they can see for themselves what their parents put into the world about them and how that was received. You would have thought Meghan and Harry would know and understand this, given the work that they do with the Parent Network and the like.

And after all these years of whipping up a frenzy about what they look like through hints (and spawning a tonne of deep fakes from Sussex supporters), just what do you think is going to happen when their faces are revealed? No doubt for a tidy sum.

Come on now - you really can't believe what you have just written ?

It's only her Instagram - it's not social media?

pics of her children are not important? - they ARE if like Harry you obsess about security. People in the local area will know what these children look like. They take them to events.

Why does she show her children at all?

There is no need to, she could entirely prtect them from intrusion and they could have a private childhood.

But she chooses to share photos and videos of them, because it's useful content for her.

W&K have to allow their children to be seen in public becuase of their jobs and roles, there's no avoiding it and it has to be managed.
The only way they could have avoided it would be to have left their official roles and moved somewhere quiet and pursued an entirely private life...which M&H have chosen not to do.

Posting your kids on holiday, on their birthdays, playing in the garden etc is still exposing them and their childhoods to the public for consumption, even if you don't show their face it's still them having their own experiences mined without cinsent.

Why would anyone choose to do that?
It doesn't benefit the kids.

Well I don’t mean this to come out in an impolite way, but I don’t know which websites you are looking at, because genuinely I have only see one or two photos where the backs of the heads of H&Ms dc are featured. I couldn’t recognise them in a crowd, or at all really, whereas I could recognise the royal children of C & W for example.

Edited to say that I am not really aware of the global derision related to the dc that you describe either. It all sounds a bit hyperbolic if you ask me.

so W&K show their children and thats ok because they are royal....and paid by the tax payer(or who ever) but H&M do it thats bad because they are not paid for by the tax payer (or whoever)

I do wish people would stop using children as a way to bash H&M.

Harry himself said he worried about the Wales DC.
Meghan said she wouldn’t be able to take Archie to school in the U.K. as there would be 50 photographers waiting for them in the morning!
They then agreed to NF filming Archie in his bath .
It’s only a matter of time - and when the price is right- before A and L’s faces are shown.

People in the local area will know what these children look like. They take them to events

Maybe they should lock them in the house and never let them experience a normal childhood? Of course they go to events!

No - W+C show their children because George certainly and the others probably will have constitutionally significant roles which will require them to have a public profile, and they need to learn how to do that and manage it. So there’s a good reason. You might even say it’s necessary given that the alternative is what - to expose them to public and press attention for the first time as adults having not taught them how to cope with it?
Plus allowing carefully managed photos of the children reduces the value of pap shots and the chances of unwanted attention.

H+M do it and that’s bad, because their children have absolutely no constitutional significance, there is absolutely no need for their private lives to be used in this way, and their parents are only doing it to bolster their own profiles and make money. Which is not a very good reason, for the avoidance of doubt.

I have only seen a baby picture and the back of their heads. So at the moment they don’t seem to be doing much