Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Confessions of a Female Founder fails to chart this week

1000 replies

foreverblowingbubbless · 26/04/2025 08:09

It's not good news for Meghan. The podcast by Meghan is out of the Spotify 100 in the US and the UK. With Apple it's not even in the top 200 chart.

https://podcastcharts.byspotify.com/

Podcast Charts

The most popular podcasts, updated daily.

https://podcastcharts.byspotify.com/

OP posts:
Thread gallery
53
jeffgoldblum · 08/05/2025 08:56

Weepixie · 08/05/2025 08:01

oh dear!! Well someone here did warn about this!!

I have to say my thoughts are very much along the same lines as Meghans lawyers and were from the start of reading the article.

Although I do agree! , and most people would not follow the advice from a tv show hosted by someone who isn’t an expert the issue here is that several things need to be taken into account.

firstly, Meghans fans tend to be almost cult like in their admiration, it’s no surprise that they would copy things from her show.

secondly , most shows that give out this sort of content normally have disclaimers that the advice should be followed at people’s own risk !
was a disclaimer featured anywhere on the show or at the end?

thirdly , Meghan and Netflix are American, the USA is a very sue happy place ! , everyone knows this , they have warnings on everything because people have sued ! , coffee is hot … ! Is just one example, this then cannot come as a surprise surely!

Rhaidimiddim · 08/05/2025 09:08

Speaking of "stalwarts who keep the flame burning" @CoffeeCantata - they seemed to have disappeared from here lately (again).

Weepixie · 08/05/2025 09:31

@jeffgoldblum im in agreement with you but was too tired and too stuffed full of the cold to write anymore than I did and I knew someone else would do it 😊

HonoriaBulstrode · 08/05/2025 10:26

im assuming it’s to plant the seed in peoples minds of them as the new shiny , young royals !

But M is older than both W & C!

jeffgoldblum · 08/05/2025 10:42

Weepixie · 08/05/2025 09:31

@jeffgoldblum im in agreement with you but was too tired and too stuffed full of the cold to write anymore than I did and I knew someone else would do it 😊

🤣🤣🤣 that’s normally my posting style!! , why write a large post when one sentence will do! ❤️

jeffgoldblum · 08/05/2025 10:43

HonoriaBulstrode · 08/05/2025 10:26

im assuming it’s to plant the seed in peoples minds of them as the new shiny , young royals !

But M is older than both W & C!

I know!! That’s why they need to push the “young couple “ rubbish!

BigWillyLittleTodger · 08/05/2025 13:15

Rhaidimiddim · 08/05/2025 09:08

Speaking of "stalwarts who keep the flame burning" @CoffeeCantata - they seemed to have disappeared from here lately (again).

They come out of the shadows when the latest embarrassing debacle has slid out of the headlines, they all go underground when the shit really hits the fan like Harry’s latest own goal interview, then when the initial furore has died down they slink back, not to engage but just to use their usual tired MO, you’re bullies, you don’t know them, but but Andrew, as has happened on another thread I’m on.

HawthornLantern · 08/05/2025 13:16

It’s hard to disagree with any of the comments on this thread unless wilfully determined to defend Meghan in the teeth of all evidence (just to clarify where I stand on the general topic).

But I would like to mention that the hot coffee case against McDonalds found against McDonalds. The coffee had caused third degree burns and required a skin graft when it had spilled on the purchaser’s lap. The court found that 80% of the responsibility lay with McDonalds. They disputed the level of punitive damages ($2.7mn) and the eventual amount was settled out of court - but if they had accepted the original request simply to cover the medical bills and loss of earnings for the daughter who looked after her mother ($20k in total) it would have been way cheaper for them.

This is not to say that I support the $8mn case against Netflix, as goodness knows why the claimant used the Epsom salts, just that the coffee case wasn’t trivial.

foreverblowingbubbless · 08/05/2025 14:12

HonoriaBulstrode · 08/05/2025 10:26

im assuming it’s to plant the seed in peoples minds of them as the new shiny , young royals !

But M is older than both W & C!

Now when you put it like that 😳

OP posts:
CoffeeCantata · 08/05/2025 15:16

Rhaidimiddim · 08/05/2025 09:08

Speaking of "stalwarts who keep the flame burning" @CoffeeCantata - they seemed to have disappeared from here lately (again).

Yes - in fact, to maintain their faith in Harry and Meghan's essential goodness, innocence and authenticity, they are having to believe increasingly unbelievable things.

At first they needed to believe that the RF, motivated by racism, denied the usual privileges to them and their children, and that some members of the RF are openly racist. Now they need to believe in a Palace and press conspiracy, a campaign by employees on both sides of the Atlantic to work together to slander Meghan and that Catherine spends all her time trying to imitate Meghan. Oh - and some of the crazier ones think that KC only sells jam because he's copying Meghan.

It's funny, I suppose, but also really annoying to witness the logical and moral contortions they now need to do to maintain belief in their idols!

Serenster · 08/05/2025 15:19

At first they needed to believe that the RF, motivated by racism, denied the usual privileges to them and their children, and that some members of the RF are openly racist. Now they need to believe in a Palace and press conspiracy, a campaign by employees on both sides of the Atlantic to work together to slander Meghan and that Catherine spends all her time trying to imitate Meghan. Oh - and some of the crazier ones think that KC only sells jam because he's copying Meghan.

Don’t forget that following Harry’s interview they now believe that some of Harry’s family want “history to repeat itself”… 🙄

Weepixie · 08/05/2025 15:50

Don’t forget that following Harry’s interview they now believe that some of Harry’s family want “history to repeat itself”… 🙄

If Meghan ever gets into a speeding car driven by a drunk and drugged up driver and doesn’t put her seatbelt on it probably will happen again. The SS are right to be scared.

foreverblowingbubbless · 08/05/2025 16:13

Weepixie · 08/05/2025 15:50

Don’t forget that following Harry’s interview they now believe that some of Harry’s family want “history to repeat itself”… 🙄

If Meghan ever gets into a speeding car driven by a drunk and drugged up driver and doesn’t put her seatbelt on it probably will happen again. The SS are right to be scared.

Especially when running with a family who thought their status and wealth made them immune to the laws of ordinary mortals.

OP posts:
foreverblowingbubbless · 10/05/2025 17:25

Who is the next bore?

OP posts:
Profhilodisaster · 10/05/2025 17:30

@RandyRedHumpback I watched that earlier (don't know if Scott is covering it on his own because Chase can't stomach her ), just about all of it was fake , interesting about the shoulder shrug when asked if she would be married to H forever.

User14March · 10/05/2025 17:36

Profhilodisaster · 10/05/2025 17:30

@RandyRedHumpback I watched that earlier (don't know if Scott is covering it on his own because Chase can't stomach her ), just about all of it was fake , interesting about the shoulder shrug when asked if she would be married to H forever.

It feels like JKL genuinely likes her? How can they vouch for each others sincerity & integrity when they don’t know each other well (?) at all (?). Is M really mindblowingly charismatic? Is that it? Some are.

JKL is surely, clever (?) savvy (?) so why all the sycophantic simpering (?). It feels sickeningly contrived down to the mirror image way they are sitting (?)

Profhilodisaster · 10/05/2025 17:55

I was left with the feeling that JKL doesn't care much for Meghan , the smiley look on her face seemed to be forced , almost showing contempt at times.

RandyRedHumpback · 10/05/2025 18:33

I really think it was a transactional thing. JKL is a billionaire in cosmetics, but her roots are in broadcasting. If she wants to become big in podcasting, her podcast isn't that well followed. Having MM on would have been a massive boost to her viewing figures. For MM, Jamie as a potential future investor would be enough to want to keep her on side. Also she's clearly struggling to find interesting guests for CFF, so a "you go on mine, I'll go on yours" deal might have been struck. They both count Oprah Winfrey as mentors, so there's a chance Oprah may have suggested they hook up. And finally, I think Jamie is a Christian and probably quite open to hearing MM out. She's a poor interviewer though, and her facial expression quite frightening at times. Also her voice is just awful, she used to speak normally - you can find footage of her as a young news anchor - so I don't understand the ickle girl vocal fry at all.

Scott's analysis was very interesting, and I don't think he found a shred of credibility in anything she says. @Profhilodisaster yes! I think Chase can't bear watching the Sussexes, so Scott's taking one for the team!

I really hope he looks at the whole interview and that video was just a taster. I've been thinking about what MM said about the notes to the children and what she wants them to feel about her parenting. That she loved them more than anyone else ever will, and that these notes will inform them of that. I find that really off.

For a start, they have two parents. And surely she should hope they feel loved to bits by all the figures around them, their dad and their grandmother too, not just her. And that one day they will find love as good as if not exceeding her own love for them. She sounds so competitive, like it's more important that she wins with them than just being a loving mum to them.

Second, having grown up in a love free environment, I've always been of the view that having to question whether your parents loved you is a sign that they failed to make you feel safe/secure/loved. I don't want my children growing up questioning whether I loved them. I want them to take it for granted, iyswim. It's just a fact, like the colour of their eyes. It almost feels like she needs to provide them with proof, rather than just being a loving mum in the moment.

Everything she does is so performative. She really feels the need to narrate what a good friend/ wife/mum she is. Mind you, the people around her all seem to be similar. Is it a fake Hollywood thing or an influencer thing? It's pretty depressing to think people are taken in by this type of performance.

User14March · 10/05/2025 19:23

RandyRedHumpback · 10/05/2025 18:33

I really think it was a transactional thing. JKL is a billionaire in cosmetics, but her roots are in broadcasting. If she wants to become big in podcasting, her podcast isn't that well followed. Having MM on would have been a massive boost to her viewing figures. For MM, Jamie as a potential future investor would be enough to want to keep her on side. Also she's clearly struggling to find interesting guests for CFF, so a "you go on mine, I'll go on yours" deal might have been struck. They both count Oprah Winfrey as mentors, so there's a chance Oprah may have suggested they hook up. And finally, I think Jamie is a Christian and probably quite open to hearing MM out. She's a poor interviewer though, and her facial expression quite frightening at times. Also her voice is just awful, she used to speak normally - you can find footage of her as a young news anchor - so I don't understand the ickle girl vocal fry at all.

Scott's analysis was very interesting, and I don't think he found a shred of credibility in anything she says. @Profhilodisaster yes! I think Chase can't bear watching the Sussexes, so Scott's taking one for the team!

I really hope he looks at the whole interview and that video was just a taster. I've been thinking about what MM said about the notes to the children and what she wants them to feel about her parenting. That she loved them more than anyone else ever will, and that these notes will inform them of that. I find that really off.

For a start, they have two parents. And surely she should hope they feel loved to bits by all the figures around them, their dad and their grandmother too, not just her. And that one day they will find love as good as if not exceeding her own love for them. She sounds so competitive, like it's more important that she wins with them than just being a loving mum to them.

Second, having grown up in a love free environment, I've always been of the view that having to question whether your parents loved you is a sign that they failed to make you feel safe/secure/loved. I don't want my children growing up questioning whether I loved them. I want them to take it for granted, iyswim. It's just a fact, like the colour of their eyes. It almost feels like she needs to provide them with proof, rather than just being a loving mum in the moment.

Everything she does is so performative. She really feels the need to narrate what a good friend/ wife/mum she is. Mind you, the people around her all seem to be similar. Is it a fake Hollywood thing or an influencer thing? It's pretty depressing to think people are taken in by this type of performance.

It’s almost like she’s planning for an H free future. ‘HE loves me so much’ ‘I want them to know how much they were loved’.

RandyRedHumpback · 10/05/2025 19:36

Oh yes, @User14March not once does she say she loves him. The most he gets is that he's a fox. And even that's self congratulatory.

Profhilodisaster · 10/05/2025 20:05

This is a short clip of the JKL podcast, where JKL's facial expression screams ' I'm struggling to tolerate you'
x.com/candidcoverage/status/1921205051508326721?s=46&t=zeqvo7Iw1m8V4kXAX7nn1A

elessar · 11/05/2025 23:39

Did anyone spot her Mother’s Day post?

someone (I can’t remember if it was on this thread or somewhere else) posted wondering how she would manage to post wishing herself a happy Mother’s Day - but of course she’s managed it, including an extremely fake sounding quote supposedly from the kids about how much they love her.

no mention of her own mother, interestingly.

foreverblowingbubbless · 12/05/2025 01:23
nicksplat doug GIF

Yeah nothing about Doria - just how she is so important to her children !

OP posts:
Thedom · 12/05/2025 06:16

Profhilodisaster · 10/05/2025 20:05

This is a short clip of the JKL podcast, where JKL's facial expression screams ' I'm struggling to tolerate you'
x.com/candidcoverage/status/1921205051508326721?s=46&t=zeqvo7Iw1m8V4kXAX7nn1A

Jeez, JKL is botoxed to within an inch of her life, her forehead looks plastic and she can barely open her eyes. The only expression is around her mouth which is the only movable part in her whole face.😁

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.