Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Will, George & Charlotte - Taylor Swift concert (photos)

1000 replies

PrettyFlyforaMaiTai · 22/06/2024 14:32

Looks like William took George and Charlotte to see Taylor Swift for his birthday. Looks like Taylor was just as happy to meet them as they were to meet her.

Will, George & Charlotte - Taylor Swift concert (photos)
Will, George & Charlotte - Taylor Swift concert (photos)
OP posts:
Thread gallery
26
toastofthetown · 22/06/2024 16:58

DelectableMe · 22/06/2024 16:56

People having a different opinion is not policing.

No, but telling you to take your opinions onto another thread is.

HadMeABlast · 22/06/2024 16:58

I didn’t get tickets to TS. Or a selfie.

I’m hoping some jam will take take the bitter taste out of my mouth.

Has anyone got any spare?

coolmum123 · 22/06/2024 16:59

pleasehelpwi3 · 22/06/2024 16:33

Disagreeing with someone's politics in a respectful way isn't disgusting!
If I were to post a pic of Kim Jong Un and his daughter at a concert and captioned it with 'cute pics of the great leader' or something, I can't then turn round and complain about people who would (rightly) post negative comments.
A) I think we should become a republic. B) On a personal level I hope Charles and Kate recover from their illnesses and aren't in pain. I'm sure they will due to having the best private care that most people can't afford. It's not disgusting to think A) because of B.)

Edited

Would you not criticize them for taking up an NHS space if they can afford Private care tho?

DelectableMe · 22/06/2024 17:00

toastofthetown · 22/06/2024 16:58

No, but telling you to take your opinions onto another thread is.

No. I never said that.
I said if you want to start a thread on republicanism you should, rather than derail this thread.
Only a suggestion. I'm not policing this thread.
It's a free country, unlike North Korea.

Runnerinthenight · 22/06/2024 17:00

pleasehelpwi3 · 22/06/2024 15:50

Good to see what us plebs are paying for. At least they chucked us a photo.
My sister went to the concert- she sat miles away from the stage, and it cost her a reasonable dent in her weekly salary. She had a great time.
Unlike William and his no doubt incredibly spoilt children, she deserved it, as she works incredibly hard. And she paid for it herself.

I'm sure my sister enjoyed her experience more than William did. For him it's another freebie paid for by the taxpayer, one of hundreds he gets in a year because his ancestor William the Conqueror was luckier at the Battle of Hastings than Harold in 1066. For my sister it was a lovely treat.

I also wonder if Taylor Swift really wants to spend time with freeloaders like him. Probably feels like she has to.

Edited

That's so bitter and twisted! How nasty about these children, whose mother is suffering from cancer? Do you actually begrudge a 10 year old and a 9 year old a treat? I'm sure TS wouldn't have spent time with the Prince of Wales if she didn't want to. The family look like they're enjoying themselves every bit as much as your poorly paid sister.

Pedallleur · 22/06/2024 17:00

Royal Box would prob be empty anyway. Not going to let us sit there. Wimbledon is the same.

smilesy · 22/06/2024 17:00

SummaLuvin · 22/06/2024 16:55

This is a thread on a public forum about public figures and a photo they posted publicly. The level of policing on this thread is ridiculous, the only valid opinions are not yours. Most posters with a negative opinion have said nothing about the kids (beyond they being used for a photo op). Our future head of state should not be beyond reproach just because things are tough. His dad is sick? Well being first in line to throne is sort of defined by needing to setup when your parent dies, falls ill, or is incapacitated. My first comment has 17 thumbs up now, which shows that even if people aren’t saying it, they share the sentiment that William is workshy, a reputation he has been earning for years and doesn’t seem to be moving to change any time soon - whether that reputation is fair or not and that is a problem for the royals.

You have repeatedly stated thatthe children are spoilt. Which implies that they are over indulged and pampered. That is not a pleasant thing to say. There is no evidence that Williams children are spoilt brats. Having wealth doesn’t mean they are spoilt, if they are not given an endless supply of “stuff” or always allowed to get their own way. Where is your evidence that their parents treat them like this? I repeat just having wealth doesn’t make you “spoilt”

PrettyFlyforaMaiTai · 22/06/2024 17:01
Michael Caine Christmas GIF by Sky

Honestly this thread! Some of you are a right bunch of mizers 🤣🧐

OP posts:
Listress · 22/06/2024 17:01

Gutted that little Louis wasn’t there. His mischief always makes me laugh. What a lovely photo and the children look so happy. I saw a video of William dancing earlier which is worth a watch.

Runnerinthenight · 22/06/2024 17:03

pleasehelpwi3 · 22/06/2024 15:57

He's not a regular person though is he? He doesn't work and he and his whole family are parasites, paid for by the British taxpayer.
I don't wish him or his family harm, but I wish they'd piss off and get a job and actually do something real with their lives. And stop stealing from us, the taxpayer.

I wish you and your mates would do exactly what you wish William and his family would do!

RedYellowPinkGreenPurpleOrangeBlue · 22/06/2024 17:04

Awwww, that is so cute. What adorable pictures! 😍 Thank you @@PrettyFlyforaMaiTai Smile

RedYellowPinkGreenPurpleOrangeBlue · 22/06/2024 17:07

Runnerinthenight · 22/06/2024 17:03

I wish you and your mates would do exactly what you wish William and his family would do!

Ditto!

I do wonder why posters come on to this board if they LOATHE the Royal Family so much! 🙄

I also find the people moaning the most and the loudest about 'living at the taxpayers expense' don't pay tax. If they do, it's very little. I do loathe Royal-Family haters so much. Such tedious whiny people. Hmm

pearlfritillary · 22/06/2024 17:07

What lovely pictures - I'm delighted that all had a fabulous time!

Runnerinthenight · 22/06/2024 17:08

pleasehelpwi3 · 22/06/2024 16:18

You're clearly happy to pay for a bunch of freeloaders out of your taxes. Next time you drive over a pot hole, or worry why your or a relative's child is in a class with 33 kids with just a teacher and no TA, or if you get ill and can't get a hospital appointment for 6 months, think then if paying for their castles and servants and Edward and Sophie's ski-ing trips are worth it......

Well if you can't afford £1.50 a year or whatever it is, it's a pity of you.

Your couple of quid isn't going to fix any potholes, improve the NHS or recruit more teachers. It's actually also a pity of you if you think it would. Take it up with the government. The monarchy doesn't fill potholes, just so you know.

toastofthetown · 22/06/2024 17:09

DelectableMe · 22/06/2024 16:57

Could you please look at the posts where young children are being routinely criticised on the grounds of "republicanism". That's what I was referring to. In a general sense.

You quoted a post of mine (indicating the reply was to me) saying "having a go at young children. Just because you're republican doesn't mean your[sic] have to be unpleasant.". That calls me out specifically on making unpleasant comments I haven't made.

I can't control if other posters have criticised the children (and a few posts have crossed the line for me). One of the issues I have with a monarchy is the demands it places on its children. I actually disagree totally with celebrity children being public figures as the children lose privacy in childhood and people have weird parasocial relationships and expectations of them. I've replied five times on this thread, and all my responses are below. Not one has mentioned the children outside of referencing how other people are talking about them.

I'm inclined to agree. If this was coming from a background of decades of hard work in the line of his duty then I might be more sympathetic, but he's been workshy his entire time as a working royal. His elderly relatives do more than he does, and he's second in line to be our (unelected) head of state.

I haven't seen anyone on this thread being unpleasant about the children. Criticism of their father's work ethic (or lack thereof) isn't criticising the children.

I'm not the one you're replying to, but I feel like that's not really the point. The Queen said the monarchy has to be seen to be believed and she was right. Saying years after the fact "oh we did loads of hard work honestly. It's just that there's no evidence of it" doesn't really cut it, especially when people have concerns around your work ethic anyway.

Please can you quote where I've had a go at young children? The only person I've criticised on this thread is 42 years old, which is hardly a young child.

No, but telling you to take your opinions onto another thread is.

HadMeABlast · 22/06/2024 17:09

pearlfritillary · 22/06/2024 17:07

What lovely pictures - I'm delighted that all had a fabulous time!

Just googled your name as it was unfamiliar to me. How beautiful 😍

GenericWoman · 22/06/2024 17:10

I repeat just having wealth doesn’t make you “spoilt”

It depends what you mean by spoilt doesn't it?

Spoilt can mean 'ruined by pampering' or it can mean "given almost all of what they want because of excessive opportunities not open to others'.

The former does not equate with wealth necessarily but it is probably more likely.
Unless the parent is Scrooge, all children of the wealthy and all children of royalty will be spoilt in the latter sense.

They want to see Taylor Swift, so they get to see Taylor Swift.
They want to meet a famous hero footballer. They get to meet their hero.
They want to ice skate/learn to ride/learn to play polo/learn to play the piano, trombone, cello.
They want to wear nice clothes. They get to wear nice clothes.

This is fairly 'spoilt' in the latter sense as most children will have lots of things they want lke that but can never do because their parents can't afford it or don't have the opportunity to provide it (Taylor Swift meeting eg)

Royal children are therefore necessarily spoilt in the latter sense by the fact of excess wealth and excess opportunity open to them.

SeatonCarew · 22/06/2024 17:11

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Runnerinthenight · 22/06/2024 17:11

RedYellowPinkGreenPurpleOrangeBlue · 22/06/2024 17:07

Ditto!

I do wonder why posters come on to this board if they LOATHE the Royal Family so much! 🙄

I also find the people moaning the most and the loudest about 'living at the taxpayers expense' don't pay tax. If they do, it's very little. I do loathe Royal-Family haters so much. Such tedious whiny people. Hmm

Couldn't agree more! The sound of barrels being scraped is overwhelming on this thread!

What actually goes through these people's minds? Some of the posts here are utterly disgusting, and mostly factually incorrect as well! The level of hatred frankly baffles me.

RocketsMagnificent7 · 22/06/2024 17:12

Saying years after the fact "oh we did loads of hard work honestly. It's just that there's no evidence of it" doesn't really cut it,

He didn't say there was no evidence of it, simply that it wasn't publicised. Can you not see the difference?

Runnerinthenight · 22/06/2024 17:13

GenericWoman · 22/06/2024 17:10

I repeat just having wealth doesn’t make you “spoilt”

It depends what you mean by spoilt doesn't it?

Spoilt can mean 'ruined by pampering' or it can mean "given almost all of what they want because of excessive opportunities not open to others'.

The former does not equate with wealth necessarily but it is probably more likely.
Unless the parent is Scrooge, all children of the wealthy and all children of royalty will be spoilt in the latter sense.

They want to see Taylor Swift, so they get to see Taylor Swift.
They want to meet a famous hero footballer. They get to meet their hero.
They want to ice skate/learn to ride/learn to play polo/learn to play the piano, trombone, cello.
They want to wear nice clothes. They get to wear nice clothes.

This is fairly 'spoilt' in the latter sense as most children will have lots of things they want lke that but can never do because their parents can't afford it or don't have the opportunity to provide it (Taylor Swift meeting eg)

Royal children are therefore necessarily spoilt in the latter sense by the fact of excess wealth and excess opportunity open to them.

Doesn't that apply to all the children born to well-off parents? "Spoilt" usually refers to a type of behaviour born of simply being privileged. I've seen no signs that the royal children are "spoilt". They are polite and well-mannered when they have to appear in public which is no mean feat for such young children!!!

eggplant16 · 22/06/2024 17:15

Lovely full smile from George. Poor lad, often looks care worn

Runnerinthenight · 22/06/2024 17:16

pleasehelpwi3 · 22/06/2024 16:20

I think the evidence is in the photo.....and every photo of them having amazing opportunities not open to other children whose parents work for a living doing real jobs.

Bullshit. Two of my kids are going - twice in fact. They met TS briefly at a concert in 2011.

DelectableMe · 22/06/2024 17:17

toastofthetown · 22/06/2024 17:09

You quoted a post of mine (indicating the reply was to me) saying "having a go at young children. Just because you're republican doesn't mean your[sic] have to be unpleasant.". That calls me out specifically on making unpleasant comments I haven't made.

I can't control if other posters have criticised the children (and a few posts have crossed the line for me). One of the issues I have with a monarchy is the demands it places on its children. I actually disagree totally with celebrity children being public figures as the children lose privacy in childhood and people have weird parasocial relationships and expectations of them. I've replied five times on this thread, and all my responses are below. Not one has mentioned the children outside of referencing how other people are talking about them.

I'm inclined to agree. If this was coming from a background of decades of hard work in the line of his duty then I might be more sympathetic, but he's been workshy his entire time as a working royal. His elderly relatives do more than he does, and he's second in line to be our (unelected) head of state.

I haven't seen anyone on this thread being unpleasant about the children. Criticism of their father's work ethic (or lack thereof) isn't criticising the children.

I'm not the one you're replying to, but I feel like that's not really the point. The Queen said the monarchy has to be seen to be believed and she was right. Saying years after the fact "oh we did loads of hard work honestly. It's just that there's no evidence of it" doesn't really cut it, especially when people have concerns around your work ethic anyway.

Please can you quote where I've had a go at young children? The only person I've criticised on this thread is 42 years old, which is hardly a young child.

No, but telling you to take your opinions onto another thread is.

So you don't think the Wales children are spoilt, just children having a nice time?
Good. Then we agree 👍

Twotimesrhymes · 22/06/2024 17:18

This photo is gorgeous and reminds me of Lady Di and Thorpe Park .. just letting the kids enjoy themselves

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread