You quoted a post of mine (indicating the reply was to me) saying "having a go at young children. Just because you're republican doesn't mean your[sic] have to be unpleasant.". That calls me out specifically on making unpleasant comments I haven't made.
I can't control if other posters have criticised the children (and a few posts have crossed the line for me). One of the issues I have with a monarchy is the demands it places on its children. I actually disagree totally with celebrity children being public figures as the children lose privacy in childhood and people have weird parasocial relationships and expectations of them. I've replied five times on this thread, and all my responses are below. Not one has mentioned the children outside of referencing how other people are talking about them.
I'm inclined to agree. If this was coming from a background of decades of hard work in the line of his duty then I might be more sympathetic, but he's been workshy his entire time as a working royal. His elderly relatives do more than he does, and he's second in line to be our (unelected) head of state.
I haven't seen anyone on this thread being unpleasant about the children. Criticism of their father's work ethic (or lack thereof) isn't criticising the children.
I'm not the one you're replying to, but I feel like that's not really the point. The Queen said the monarchy has to be seen to be believed and she was right. Saying years after the fact "oh we did loads of hard work honestly. It's just that there's no evidence of it" doesn't really cut it, especially when people have concerns around your work ethic anyway.
Please can you quote where I've had a go at young children? The only person I've criticised on this thread is 42 years old, which is hardly a young child.
No, but telling you to take your opinions onto another thread is.