Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Surely H&M will have to dis-own these friends who have spoken out?

180 replies

Romanceisntdead · 28/11/2023 17:20

The info in the OS book is only what your closest friends or family would know.

If they have spilled the info surely they would have asked H&M first?

Some of it is so extremely personal.

OP posts:
Startingagainandagain · 29/11/2023 09:28

I am so bored with these two whining, privileged, entitled people who are trying to fuel controversy so they can make more money out of their grubby books...

They wanted to live their own life abroad away from the royal family and they achieve that.

They have youth, good health, lovely kids and money and yet here they are endlessly complaining about everything...

I really don't understand why they don't just count their blessings and get on with enjoying their life.

It just looks like they are desperate for revenge and want to drag the whole family down to stay relevant. So much for claiming the wanted a quiet life out of the spotlights.

NoNotMyHair · 29/11/2023 09:32

@Startingagainandagain you are right - what a sodding awful way to live life. There is so much wasted potential there.

Catsfrontbum · 29/11/2023 09:36

What did the book say!??

tuttifuckinfruity · 29/11/2023 09:38

Romanceisntdead · 28/11/2023 17:20

The info in the OS book is only what your closest friends or family would know.

If they have spilled the info surely they would have asked H&M first?

Some of it is so extremely personal.

Who is OS, please?

NoNotMyHair · 29/11/2023 09:39

@tuttifuckinfruity you are on the wrong thread I think.

Romanceisntdead · 29/11/2023 09:41

There are 2 people - one named on this page but not the other....yet! I wonder if H & M will make a statement....The Palace wont at all Im sure

OP posts:
caringcarer · 29/11/2023 09:44

SkyFullofStars1975 · 28/11/2023 17:26

That's a whole new level of naive if you thought "friends" were the source of the book.

This. M announced she didn't brief Scobie about first book Finding Freedom and Scobie announced the same, but under oath in court she had to admit she asked her former private secretary to brief Scobie. She only admitted it after the private secretary came forward as a witness. So she was shown to be a liar in court claiming she had forgotten.

caringcarer · 29/11/2023 09:46

Mylovelygreendress · 28/11/2023 19:01

Released today and full of spite against the RF especially Catherine . Really nasty .

Yep. I doubt William will ever speak to H or M again now.

EdithWeston · 29/11/2023 09:47

Samcro · 28/11/2023 18:23

Isn’t there already a long running thread about the book that someone else wrote.
full of hate and made up stuff

I think that's going a bit far. The book isn't full of hate - though I can see full well how there could be an interpretation that it does all indeed stem from grudges that have turned into a kind of hate over time.

The made up stuff has however been a theme of many newspaper articles about this one. This author's levels of accuracy are no better than those shown by the people he writes about in interviews and Harry's book.

Most of the other thread is repeating the lukewarm or negative reviews, though the scope for mistranslation and the naming of the royal "racists" is the main theme this morning

(I put "racists" in inverted comments, because I know the accusation was oblique, but "unconscious biasists" is too clunky a term!)

watcherintherye · 29/11/2023 09:47

There’s a couple I’m friends with - one white, one black. When all this was first in the news, they both said how ridiculous it was, if the only problem was speculating about the potential skin colour of a baby. They said that within both of their families when she was pregnant (x4), there was always discussion about what skin colour (light/dark) the baby might be. Not with any preference expressed, but just as you might discuss the possibility of brown, red or blond hair/blue or brown eyes/freckles etc. She talks freely about how all of her kids are different shades of brown. Is discussion of how genetics might play out considered racist? It’s normal to be interested in what characteristics your children or grandchildren might have, isn’t it?
I think there’s probably still a huge cultural divide between the US and Britain (the aristocracy especially) which could lead to misunderstanding and a perception of rudeness/hostility on both sides concerning the impact of comments which may be made with no ill intent at all.

caringcarer · 29/11/2023 09:56

I don't think King Charles is racist. He welcomed Meghan in his family, agreed to a huge wedding, bought Meghan expensive jewelry and also walked Meghan down the aisle. I think it's normal to wonder about characteristics of an unborn baby especially when parents have different options. I remember wondering what colour eyes my own babies would have. Skin colour is no different to this.

DragonFly98 · 29/11/2023 10:20

funbags3 · 28/11/2023 17:22

I thought this was about the shop then noticed the thread. I couldn't work out what you were on about.

Me too

crowsfeet57 · 29/11/2023 10:36

Everyone is assuming that the comments were racist. But it's natural to speculate on what the children will look like and even if Meghan had been blonde and blue-eyed, there would still have been speculation because he is a redhead, which in my experience always gets people wondering who the children will take after.

The RF could have been hoping they would be more like Meghan!

SkylinePigeon · 29/11/2023 10:53

TenaciousTortoise · 28/11/2023 18:29

I hate this. “They’d consider an invitation”. Just utterly abominable behaviour. Desperate to look like the poor victims again who haven’t received an invitation.

I think Harry sounds like he’s reaching the point of no return. He can’t let this shitshow go on any longer. He either needs to cut out his family and move on or he needs to cut out the drama in whatever form that might take. Either way I’d love to be a fly on the wall in their house tonight.

Oh come on, that's so obviously fake.

I really don't understand why Meghan bashers believe everything that's printed in the tabloids is the gospel truth.

As for Scobie's book, I have no intention of reading it but it's just gossip and tittle tattle, just like all the royal books. I know the Meghan hate brigade are very wedded to this conspiracy theory that he and Meghan are best friends just because they're both biracial and he's the only one not sticking to the anti-Meghan party line, but he's always said he doesn't know her and barely met her, I don't see any evidence to support this theory that everyone who criticises the royals are all part of some conspiracy by non-white people to lie and try to bring down the crown. Gossip mongerers get their gossip from all sorts of places or they make it up.

SkylinePigeon · 29/11/2023 11:01

caringcarer · 29/11/2023 09:44

This. M announced she didn't brief Scobie about first book Finding Freedom and Scobie announced the same, but under oath in court she had to admit she asked her former private secretary to brief Scobie. She only admitted it after the private secretary came forward as a witness. So she was shown to be a liar in court claiming she had forgotten.

That was Jason Knauf, the person William planted in Meghan's home to spy on her, who invented all kinds of nasty lies and leaked horrible things about her to the press the entire time he was supposedly working for her. He sent private info about the royals to the press, broke his NDA, leaked like crazy. He was the one who filed a complaint about Meghan for bullying without the permission of those she allegedly bullied (those she allegedly bullied asked him to rescind the complaints, and they were clearly baseless and made up) then emailed the press to tip them off about the complaint he'd just invented. He was also Thomas Markle's press handler and look how badly he fucked that up. He hired his best friend for a prestigious job when she'd only worked as a nanny before, and then when she was fired for gross misconduct she immediately landed a job as live-in nanny to a millionaire Tory whose sister is a Daily Mail journalist.

Then William showered him with rewards and accolades, even making him CEO of the Cambridge Foundation despite him having no experience.

It's obvious that everything Knauf did to undermine and leak nasty shit to try to destroy Meghan was on William's orders. Vile men, both of them.

watcherintherye · 29/11/2023 11:15

SkylinePigeon · 29/11/2023 11:01

That was Jason Knauf, the person William planted in Meghan's home to spy on her, who invented all kinds of nasty lies and leaked horrible things about her to the press the entire time he was supposedly working for her. He sent private info about the royals to the press, broke his NDA, leaked like crazy. He was the one who filed a complaint about Meghan for bullying without the permission of those she allegedly bullied (those she allegedly bullied asked him to rescind the complaints, and they were clearly baseless and made up) then emailed the press to tip them off about the complaint he'd just invented. He was also Thomas Markle's press handler and look how badly he fucked that up. He hired his best friend for a prestigious job when she'd only worked as a nanny before, and then when she was fired for gross misconduct she immediately landed a job as live-in nanny to a millionaire Tory whose sister is a Daily Mail journalist.

Then William showered him with rewards and accolades, even making him CEO of the Cambridge Foundation despite him having no experience.

It's obvious that everything Knauf did to undermine and leak nasty shit to try to destroy Meghan was on William's orders. Vile men, both of them.

How do you know so much about the inner machinations of the Royal Family and its staff?

MaturingCheeseball · 29/11/2023 11:39

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

iamwhatiam23 · 29/11/2023 11:43

Romanceisntdead · 29/11/2023 09:41

There are 2 people - one named on this page but not the other....yet! I wonder if H & M will make a statement....The Palace wont at all Im sure

The other is catherine

GoonieGang · 29/11/2023 11:56

Neriah · 28/11/2023 19:01

Amusing how invested people are in whining about a couple making their own money, but are "grifters". While the grifter monarch steals dead peoples money under ancient laws that should have been repealed centuries ago , lies about giving it to charity, then users it to bolster his personal pocket. If Harry has mental health problems, they couldn't possibly be the result of growing up with inbred thieves?

Some of us really like the RF and want to be invested in them. Whilst it is evident you hate them, the work the RF do for charity are not lies.

Ticklemeharder · 29/11/2023 11:59

These are the translations of the extracts floating around Twitter

Surely H&M will have to dis-own these friends who have spoken out?
Surely H&M will have to dis-own these friends who have spoken out?
watcherintherye · 29/11/2023 12:01

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

SkylinePigeon · 29/11/2023 12:08

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

labmum567 · 29/11/2023 12:11

Surely this "racist" comment is all about context. For examples "I wonder if the baby will be a red head like you or dark like Megan". Compared to "I hope the baby's red like you and not dark like Megan". Similar words but mean very different things. Obviously I'm completely making up the comments. Just an example of how things can be said

SkylinePigeon · 29/11/2023 12:13

watcherintherye · 29/11/2023 11:15

How do you know so much about the inner machinations of the Royal Family and its staff?

I worked in a newsroom for eight years before changing careers.

Frasers · 29/11/2023 12:24

It’s all just more of the same isn’t it, harry and Megan briefing against the royal family, now doing it through a mouth piece to avoid blow back. There is nothing new or shocking here. I guess it keeps them in the headlines, which is their aim, as they were falling into obscurity.