Active discussions

Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Talk
The royal family
Original poster

Harry has a lot to answer for.

999 replies

Corcory · 10/03/2021 10:14

I think Harry has a lot to answer for in this whole debacle. He's a 35 year old man brought up as a Royal who should know how the whole thing works and how to ensure his wife is fully educated in the rules and regs. of being a Royal. She was his wife, why on earth was she going to HR at the Palace for help with mental health problems? Harry has loads of experience and the knowledge of where to get help, what on earth was he doing? Harry knows full well that there is a rule about not being given a royal title when it comes to Archie. Why didn't he explain this to Megan? It has absolutely nothing to do with Archie's skin colour. Why is Harry moaning about having their security removed given his father paid £4m for their security after the tax payer stopped paying after they moved to California?
It is not the Royal family's decision whither or not someone has The Metropolitan Police fly over to do security duties.
Prince William sorted the press out when they were making disparaging comments about Kate, why didn't he put his foot down as his brother did?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
HeadNorth · 22/03/2021 19:09

@Samcro

There is so much made up stuff on this thread now its like reading a fictional book.
Yeah, but one poster has watched Harry play polo so is obviously privy to the inner workings of his marriage Grin
ImpatiensI · 22/03/2021 19:15

Everyone's privy to the inner workings of his marriage, thanks to his decision to broadcast it to the world.

Roussette · 22/03/2021 19:23

Haha... so he has managed to tell you every single aspect of the way his marriage works, because he did the Oprah chat.... 😂
I missed that bit!

SoWhyNot · 22/03/2021 19:28

@ImpatiensI

Everyone's privy to the inner workings of his marriage, thanks to his decision to broadcast it to the world.
This! They can’t ask or expect privacy after doing a tell all to sell out Harry’s family.
fafadebelem · 22/03/2021 19:29

Yep, it's called airing your dirty laundry.

Did they expect to control public opinion to such an extent that we would all believe them?

DeusEx · 22/03/2021 19:29

@ImpatiensI

I doubt Kate is as sweet as her public persona is but given how fond she was of Harry and how careful she’s been over the years, I can’t imagine what she could have done to deserve M’s clear dislike.

I expect Kate might have been concerned at Meghan stealing some of her limelight as princess perfect. Kate seems as tho she's sacrificed a lot to have that role. Also if she was on good terms with Harry perhaps she did resent a bit losing her place as his confidant.

Meanwhile M's bound to be the possessive type who has to have 100% attention and adoration from her man and anyone who might interfere with that is an enemy.

Why is she ‘bound to be’ like that?
ImpatiensI · 22/03/2021 19:29

It was all in there @Roussette, for anyone with their eyes open.

Roussette · 22/03/2021 19:35

No. If you wanted to put a particular negative slant on it, you could find something.
Funny that there are people out there who don't agree with you isn't it
Perhaps their eyes weren't open like yours lol

DeusEx · 22/03/2021 19:35

@HeadNorth @Samcro well said!

Mummyoflittledragon · 22/03/2021 19:37

In fairness Rousette, we saw a fair bit of how their marriage works, the body language for starters. It’s been discussed on the thread already that Meghan shushes Harry, pats him on the hand to tell him to be quiet, withdraws her hand slightly to show displeasure at William etc.

Lockdownbear · 22/03/2021 19:37

Did they expect to control public opinion to such an extent that we would all believe them?

Something like that. I don't think they (Meghan) possibly thought anyone would question stuff nor did it cross their minds how many photos of Harry were in the public domain.

ImpatiensI · 22/03/2021 19:40

Why is she ‘bound to be’ like that?

Because it's blindingly obvious from everything that's known about her and from her demeanour in that interview that she's an insecure, demanding, needy and controlling personality.

redspecial · 22/03/2021 19:40

Everyone's privy to the inner workings of his marriage, thanks to his decision to broadcast it to the world ImpatiensI you beat me to it Grin.

Did they expect to control public opinion to such an extent yes, apparently their PR is using a small army of linked bot accounts to control or influence SM.

CallmeHendricks · 22/03/2021 19:41

Yes - it was rather foolish of Harry to say that he loved taking Archie on bike rides in the child seat on the back of his bike as it was something he'd never been able to do as a child.
Cue: photos of Harry as a toddler, sitting in a child seat on the back of Charles's bike.

Roussette · 22/03/2021 19:43

Mummy it has gone from reading body language to mean something... to saying he is in an abusive coercive marriage with a narcissist and that their marriage will be ending soon.

I'm pretty sure me and DHs body language would give posters on here a field day. 😂
You cannot tell a marriage just from perceived readings of body language and make your assumptions fact.

AnaofBroceliande · 22/03/2021 19:44

@CallmeHendricks

Yes - it was rather foolish of Harry to say that he loved taking Archie on bike rides in the child seat on the back of his bike as it was something he'd never been able to do as a child. Cue: photos of Harry as a toddler, sitting in a child seat on the back of Charles's bike.
He's a classic re-writer of history who believe his own BS. The fake wedding, for example.
ImpatiensI · 22/03/2021 19:45

@Roussette

No. If you wanted to put a particular negative slant on it, you could find something. Funny that there are people out there who don't agree with you isn't it Perhaps their eyes weren't open like yours lol
No negative slant required - the negativity was all there, coming from their own mouths.
Roussette · 22/03/2021 19:45

Because it's blindingly obvious from everything that's known about her and from her demeanour in that interview that she's an insecure, demanding, needy and controlling personality

FFS. How horrible. You. Do. Not. Know. Her. To judge someone like this and speak like that from 'her demeanour'
Awful judgemental posters on here.

Roussette · 22/03/2021 19:46

According to your set of negativite judgement Impatiens
Not from mine thanks

CallmeHendricks · 22/03/2021 19:47

"I expect Kate might have been concerned at Meghan stealing some of her limelight as princess perfect."

Why on earth would she have been? I've seen similar suggestions on here before and it's not something that would even cross my mind, if I were Kate. I'd be glad to share the spotlight.

foxhat · 22/03/2021 19:49

PR is using a small army of linked bot accounts to control or influence SM.

I can't help but think that some of those are on MN...

fafadebelem · 22/03/2021 19:49

Meghan? Is that you?!

Lauren15 · 22/03/2021 19:51

Wtf was the fake wedding story all about? And that line ‘this spectacle.... is for the world’. What a bloody high opinion they’ve got of themselves. If they were going to have a big wedding the British public would make the best of it, but we weren’t begging for one either. If they’d have gone for a small scale one like Charles and Camilla, people would have been fine with it as well.

AnaofBroceliande · 22/03/2021 19:53

@Lauren15

Wtf was the fake wedding story all about? And that line ‘this spectacle.... is for the world’. What a bloody high opinion they’ve got of themselves. If they were going to have a big wedding the British public would make the best of it, but we weren’t begging for one either. If they’d have gone for a small scale one like Charles and Camilla, people would have been fine with it as well.
Yeah, that was so ridiculous. Bullshit, too. They honestly believe their own made up narrative.
Samcro · 22/03/2021 19:55

@foxhat

PR is using a small army of linked bot accounts to control or influence SM.

I can't help but think that some of those are on MN...

I take it you are talking about the negative posters
Swipe left for the next trending thread