Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Concerns about racism

1000 replies

PandoraSocks · 05/08/2025 08:33

Hi there Mumsnet HQ

Many of us are concerned about the uptick of hatred, xenophobia and racism on the site over the past couple of weeks. Most of the bigotry is focused on asylum seekers. MNHQ will of course delete racism etc. if reported, but this has gone way beyond a few hateful posts.

Links below to three examples of threads which have descended into real nastiness.

Cheers.

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/in_the_news/5385273-civil-unrest-whats-really-going-on?utm_campaign=thread&utm_medium=share

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/am_i_being_unreasonable/5385914-do-you-believe-there-will-be-a-civil-war?utm_campaign=thread&utm_medium=share

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/am_i_being_unreasonable/5386073-to-be-so-fed-up-amd-disheartened-with-all-the-xenophobia?utm_campaign=thread&utm_medium=share

OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
Zonder · 06/08/2025 10:16

@anyolddinosaur if you read back on this thread you will see that it's not a question of left or right but of racism or not racism. Making sweeping judgements about "the left" is basically using similar characteristics to racism, lumping all people who look, speak, or vote in one way together and condemning them.

FreezeDriedStrawberries · 06/08/2025 10:16

C8H10N4O2 · 06/08/2025 10:10

It is all very subjective though.

If we challenge on thread and identify a PP is telling straight porkies or suggest they are posting in bad faith because of eg a series of posts all skirting around the border of the issue without blatant *isms but often with disinformation we can be deleted for troll hunting.

If we report we are told “challenge on thread”.

I get that human mods will always be subjective without very prescriptive rules but it often feels very inconsistent. Subjectivity back in ye olden days when most mods were clearly regulars on the forums was probably easier to accept than now when the site is huge and moderation often feels remote and less attached to the forum. Even in Site Stuff we need to report threads to ensure HQ see them.

It would be interesting to understand what proportion of the mods are current regulars on MN (in a private capacity) and what sort of diversity exists on the current mod team. (Not just racial diversity, I’m thinking across all the protected characteristics).

It would be interesting to understand what proportion of the mods are current regulars on MN (in a private capacity) and what sort of diversity exists on the current mod team. (Not just racial diversity, I’m thinking across all the protected characteristics)

I posted near enough the same on another thread last night that was complaining a job advert was "racist" because they were asking for applicants who are either black /Asian - that I think it's a good thing as it shows representation, and that I hope MN mods have a range too, across protected characteristics) as it would mean they've got more experience of picking up things say me as a white straight woman would as it's not my lived experience.

SquishedMallow · 06/08/2025 10:16

Herberty · 05/08/2025 21:12

I work in immigration so have a good knowledge of the statistics and issues. There are good and bad people, regardless of immigration status. You cannot blame people for wanting to improve their immigration circumstances and nor can you blame others who live with the impact of the lack of cultural cohesion in the UK and the pressure on health and housing services with an expanding population and a growing UK debt burden.

I have not commented on the immigration type threads as I do not think the posters would accept they either had the law wrong or the statistics.

The whole topic of net migration and the benefits to the uk of migration are really too complex for bite size posts and, in my opinion, MNHQ are in a difficult spot. If they ban posts on immigration etc there are then calls to ban posts on benefits and disability as those are also two topics where people also get very upset by people expressing different opinions to their views.

I think, on balance, all threads and posts should be allowed unless they breach guidelines - as otherwise there is no free speech and we end up (where we almost are in the uk ) with the thought police and threads limited to complaints about MILs until they rise up as a group to complain about discrimination.

I will therefore continue to wince at some of the disability posts (as I am disabled ) but I have to accept that people have a right to say what they think even if they are wrong and to use language that although is not illegal is personally upsetting.

This is a very balanced and knowledgeable post and essentially wraps up the answer to the initial post.

JamesMacGill · 06/08/2025 10:17

Zonder · 06/08/2025 10:16

@anyolddinosaur if you read back on this thread you will see that it's not a question of left or right but of racism or not racism. Making sweeping judgements about "the left" is basically using similar characteristics to racism, lumping all people who look, speak, or vote in one way together and condemning them.

I agree. Gender critical women are often labelled ‘far right’ in the same nonsensical manner. Most of us aren’t.

FreezeDriedStrawberries · 06/08/2025 10:20

@anyolddinosaur Being against or challenging racism isn't a left v right thing.
For one, it implies that everyone who may be right leaning is racist. Which is ridiculous.

OP posts:
JamesMacGill · 06/08/2025 10:23

FreezeDriedStrawberries · 06/08/2025 10:20

@anyolddinosaur Being against or challenging racism isn't a left v right thing.
For one, it implies that everyone who may be right leaning is racist. Which is ridiculous.

Well, quite. Look at the investigation into Corbyn’s Labour.

pointythings · 06/08/2025 10:25

JamesMacGill · 06/08/2025 09:45

Can generalisations be made there is evidence to suggest it is correct? Eg, ‘Brits in Spain act in X/Y way’.

No, because you still have to clarify and qualify. Otherwise you're doing the classic 'tarring everyone with the same brush'.

JamesMacGill · 06/08/2025 10:26

pointythings · 06/08/2025 10:25

No, because you still have to clarify and qualify. Otherwise you're doing the classic 'tarring everyone with the same brush'.

‘Some British men’ would be fine then? (No poor female behaviour springs to mind).

C8H10N4O2 · 06/08/2025 10:29

FreezeDriedStrawberries · 06/08/2025 10:16

It would be interesting to understand what proportion of the mods are current regulars on MN (in a private capacity) and what sort of diversity exists on the current mod team. (Not just racial diversity, I’m thinking across all the protected characteristics)

I posted near enough the same on another thread last night that was complaining a job advert was "racist" because they were asking for applicants who are either black /Asian - that I think it's a good thing as it shows representation, and that I hope MN mods have a range too, across protected characteristics) as it would mean they've got more experience of picking up things say me as a white straight woman would as it's not my lived experience.

The key is in “variety”. I was born with the “big” tripos - minority, female, WC. My life experience will be “typical” in some respects but not in others. My DC grew up in relative affluence, their economic life experience is very different from mine but common in some aspects of race (not all because you can’t entirely separate race, class and sex).

What really matters is the mix. Recruiting to ensure you have a wide variety of backgrounds and categories in the mix does make for better performing teams overall in most industries. A board which defines diversity as photos of different races where all members are still male,, public school and Oxbridge will not be much more diverse than the same board where all the faces are white.
At an individual level no one person is the spokesperson for all of their $CATEGORY and shouldn’t be but if you have enough overall variation and not just a couple of representatives for ticking boxes you end up with better and more imaginative teams.

pointythings · 06/08/2025 10:31

JamesMacGill · 06/08/2025 10:26

‘Some British men’ would be fine then? (No poor female behaviour springs to mind).

I wouldn't even go that far, but that's because my DD went to Spain last year with friends and was appalled at the behaviour of multiple all female British hen groups. So 'some Brits' without qualifying by sex works for me.

JamesMacGill · 06/08/2025 10:31

I agree that affirmative action is not racist.

JamesMacGill · 06/08/2025 10:31

pointythings · 06/08/2025 10:31

I wouldn't even go that far, but that's because my DD went to Spain last year with friends and was appalled at the behaviour of multiple all female British hen groups. So 'some Brits' without qualifying by sex works for me.

‘Some British people’?

pointythings · 06/08/2025 10:33

JamesMacGill · 06/08/2025 10:31

‘Some British people’?

Fair. Also some German people (have seen some awful behaviour there) and some Dutch people (ditto). Tourists can be incredibly rude and entitled.

FreezeDriedStrawberries · 06/08/2025 10:34

PandoraSocks · 06/08/2025 10:21

I thought this article was interesting and touches on some of the issues raised in this thread. I might turn my phone off fir thecrestvof the day!

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/aug/06/digital-democracy-crisis-politics-technological-change

Interesting, just had a read myself now.
It's true the amount of misinformation out there is worrying, and not sure what can really be done about it.
As for turning off phones and getting out and about more in the "real world" so to speak, I've been making a conscious effort to do more of this lately.
It's so lovely and calming when you do - for me either a walk round a nature reserve, or a sit in a cafe just staring off into space people watching 🙂

BIWI · 06/08/2025 10:34

@anyolddinosaur

It's possible some of the posts you object to are actually created by people like the OP who want to shut down debate. As I said in the first paragraph the left has lost credibility.

Where, anywhere, on this thread is the OP looking to shut down debate?

And what does politics have to do with it? As has been said many times, racism exists across all political spectra.

Inchworms · 06/08/2025 10:37

ilovesooty · 06/08/2025 07:58

Any chance of getting back to the point of the thread? I don't think we can expect MNHQ to wade through the ill mannered derailing or the attempts to counter it.

Fair comment! Apologies all

C8H10N4O2 · 06/08/2025 10:38

FreezeDriedStrawberries · 06/08/2025 10:20

@anyolddinosaur Being against or challenging racism isn't a left v right thing.
For one, it implies that everyone who may be right leaning is racist. Which is ridiculous.

I touched on this yesterday upthread - excessive focus on individual identity pretty alien to the left and I’d say probably alien to the centre right. It's often anti-materialist and distraction from economic class politics.

If individual identity fits on an axis it fits on libertarian/authoritarian rather than left right. Its not an accident that the authoritarian left and right both have equally unhelpful approaches to race and sex (and I’ve experienced both from authoritarians on both economic wings).

JamesMacGill · 06/08/2025 10:39

pointythings · 06/08/2025 10:33

Fair. Also some German people (have seen some awful behaviour there) and some Dutch people (ditto). Tourists can be incredibly rude and entitled.

In that case I can’t think of any comments that fall foul as I think everyone acknowledges that they are only critiquing a minority of a certain group and that not everyone within that group behaves badly.

I think if people have trouble understanding they should just think of the siege women are under for being gender critical. Accusations of bigotry, relentless demands for evidence, asserting that they are hysterical/dramatic.

FreezeDriedStrawberries · 06/08/2025 10:51

Can we not try and turn it into yet another trans thread, this is about RACISM. I hope no-one engages

GrammarTeacher · 06/08/2025 10:52

JamesMacGill · 06/08/2025 10:39

In that case I can’t think of any comments that fall foul as I think everyone acknowledges that they are only critiquing a minority of a certain group and that not everyone within that group behaves badly.

I think if people have trouble understanding they should just think of the siege women are under for being gender critical. Accusations of bigotry, relentless demands for evidence, asserting that they are hysterical/dramatic.

There were definitely comments on the threads linked to above that were generalising entire countries and religions and inciting hate. Most have been deleted.
Being subjected to such generalisations is genuinely lack a slap in the face (at least). I can never forget the shock I experienced a decade ago when a colleague genuinely said in the staff room ‘not all Catholics are terrorists, but all terrorists are Catholic’ (yes, I know the 70s and 80s were calling him asking for his bigotry back).
If you look back through the threads there were genuinely people saying that babies didn’t deserve health care because they were Palestinian and therefore a security threat. Babies.

JamesMacGill · 06/08/2025 10:53

FreezeDriedStrawberries · 06/08/2025 10:51

Can we not try and turn it into yet another trans thread, this is about RACISM. I hope no-one engages

The parallels are too strong for it not to arise now and then when making comparisons. Many women were called bigots when they raised concerns - luckily logic prevailed and now I would say the majority of posters on here see that concerns around gender ideology are not rooted in simple hatred.

FreezeDriedStrawberries · 06/08/2025 10:55

Saucery · 05/08/2025 16:51

I like small batch gins from regional distilleries. Nothing fruity, nothing bland.
Damn, now I want gin, but I’m going walking tomorrow and waking up with a hangover will cramp my enthusiasm (never that strong at 6am anyway). Even the smallest amount of gin gives me a hangover these days, the Curse Of The Middle Aged Woman Sad

See, I've never been a gin fan. It's got a weird taste 😁 I was always more of a vodka girl. Not anymore though as I'm old and can't neck it anymore 😂😭

JamesMacGill · 06/08/2025 10:55

GrammarTeacher · 06/08/2025 10:52

There were definitely comments on the threads linked to above that were generalising entire countries and religions and inciting hate. Most have been deleted.
Being subjected to such generalisations is genuinely lack a slap in the face (at least). I can never forget the shock I experienced a decade ago when a colleague genuinely said in the staff room ‘not all Catholics are terrorists, but all terrorists are Catholic’ (yes, I know the 70s and 80s were calling him asking for his bigotry back).
If you look back through the threads there were genuinely people saying that babies didn’t deserve health care because they were Palestinian and therefore a security threat. Babies.

Well, I’m Catholic, but I don’t think that’s comparable to this. Nobody has said ‘all terrorists are Muslim’ (for example). But some groups are higher risk for certain crimes or activities and it is not racist to worry about that. As PP said, in light of the fact we have 40,000 people under surveillance for terrorism reasons, is it really just bigoted to say you’re concerned about unvetted immigration from Islamic countries?

GrammarTeacher · 06/08/2025 10:56

Actually I disagree with you. I’ve had a truly awful time on the FWR board and no longer go there. This was a shame as there were a significant number of GCs there that I do respect and have had great conversations with. One of them called out a prominent GC for associating with Tommy Robinson and the pile on was awful. There are a number of accounts (hopefully bots) who seem to revel in hatred and bigotry. We see this in posts about racism, SEN, benefits all over. This was a site I joined for support whilst trying to conceive and it is increasingly full of goady hate posting.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread