Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

FWR

1000 replies

MarsScarlet · 27/01/2025 06:05

FYI: I've name changed for this to avoid a pile-on.

This post is about the overwhelming negativity and hostility with the FWR board that new posters and posters with a differing viewpoint face if they attempt to use the board.

There is a persistent group within the board that are, to put it simply, hateful towards others. Despite posting there on and off for more than 4 years, I have never felt welcome, despite not holding any particular extreme views or being abusive to others. Without exception, I am accused of being another poster, or a man, a TRA, or some kind of paid activist. This occurs again and again until I leave a thread in frustration.

I’ve seen this happen to many other new posters. Few return. Why would they? Such an acidic atmosphere doesn’t encourage healthy discussion. I’d just like to discuss women’s rights, but this board makes discussion impossible.

I’m not exactly sure what the answer is, except for @MNHQ to request the board to tone down the rhetoric a bit and back off on any new names they may see on the board. Let people engage with you rather than actively drive them away.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
16
Runor · 28/01/2025 10:23

I haven’t read the full thread (always a mistake to post before reading….!)

I’ve been on the FWR board for a few years under different names (so nobody really knows who’s a newbie just from their name). I find it robust and challenging, but I haven’t generally come across the name-calling you describe. I think most of us have honed our arguments well enough to have pretty firm views, but lots of us welcome genuine challenge, supported by logical arguments and verified data. If someone is offering a different point of view, but based simply on an emotional response, or eg some random post from Twix, then yes, that’s going to get run down pretty quickly.

It’s a great place to test out whether a particular position logically holds together

NotAPartyPerson · 28/01/2025 10:23

@PepeParapluie Yes I agree with everything you've said in reply to me. I think I am just not always feeling robust enough to take on all the extremely well formed arguments!

ArabellaScott · 28/01/2025 10:23

NotAPartyPerson · 28/01/2025 09:53

To me, this thread proves the OP's point pretty succinctly. I generally avoid trans threads because my views don't align with the majority of the posters on the threads.

Sometimes I plop on them. Why? Because it makes me pleased when I do read them to see that not everyone agrees with the prevailing view on the thread. So if I disagree but can't be bothered with a massive argument I sometimes leave a little plop. And yes, I do get thanked for it.

The one thing that really annoys me is when you post a dissenting view and then get a response along the lines of 'are you saying women can't have opinions?' Such a ridiculous way to shut posters down, especially when (like me) they often are women!

You're proud of 'plopping'. Dear me.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 28/01/2025 10:24

Of course! I'm saying (I think, I'm sort of formulating thoughts as I go) that my views fall between "TRA" and "TERF" (please note the extreme quotation marks, I am not using either term in a derogative manner) and it is hard to find a space to voice this. But I also understand it's not FWR posters' place to provide me with this space.

That's fair. But what I would say is if you really want to see abuse, try coming out with any defence of women's sex based rights, even the most half arsed, milquetoast one that grudgingly concedes that TWAW but some women and girls might need to be treated with kindness because of past trauma from men, on other parts of social media. Reddit, Twitter etc.

ArabellaScott · 28/01/2025 10:25

MarsScarlet · 28/01/2025 10:04

@AwaitingFreedom

EDIT - I'm still wanting clarity on your feminine/masculine tones btw.

That isn't what the thread is about, and I have no interest in it being derailed further on that arc. Perhaps give it some thought on your own or make your own thread in FWR in you actually are interested.

Asking questions about posts you've made, on a thread you started is not derailing.

Bannedontherun · 28/01/2025 10:26

ArabellaScott · 28/01/2025 10:25

Asking questions about posts you've made, on a thread you started is not derailing.

Quite

NotAPartyPerson · 28/01/2025 10:27

That's fair. But what I would say is if you really want to see abuse, try coming out with any defence of women's sex based rights, even the most half arsed, milquetoast one that grudgingly concedes that TWAW but some women and girls might need to be treated with kindness because of past trauma from men, on other parts of social media. Reddit, Twitter etc.

Oh absolutely. I totally agree that FWR is far more 'civil' (I know that's a loaded word too!) than many places where the issue is debated. I haven't seen much/any really actual abuse left to stand on the threads.

PepeParapluie · 28/01/2025 10:27

NotAPartyPerson · 28/01/2025 10:23

@PepeParapluie Yes I agree with everything you've said in reply to me. I think I am just not always feeling robust enough to take on all the extremely well formed arguments!

Totally understandable, I’m not always in the mood either and have to take breaks from FWR sometimes as it can be quite mentally tiring.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 28/01/2025 10:30

That's fair. But what I would say is if you really want to see abuse, try coming out with any defence of women's sex based rights, even the most half arsed, milquetoast one that grudgingly concedes that TWAW but some women and girls might need to be treated with kindness because of past trauma from men, on other parts of social media. Reddit, Twitter etc.

I would add to this- many of us who've run that gauntlet of abuse from TRAs might have a tendency to not treat others with kid gloves. But I think we're generally fairly reasonable if someone is genuinely coming to a thread with questions or asking us to explain our position. There is a lot of trolling on FWR and Mumsnet in general (and all of social media) and I think some posters are a little naive about the extent of it.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 28/01/2025 10:30

Doh meant to quote my own post there! Blush

Wemaybebetterstrangers · 28/01/2025 10:32

WinterBones · 28/01/2025 09:59

and this is why we don't bother, because out of my entire post, that is the bit you chose to quote. it makes discussion a pointless exercise with you.

No. Sorry you don’t get to silence a person by saying what they’ve said is ‘pointless’. And certainly not on a wholly incorrect assertion.

I quoted that section of your post

‘the stance that they're all perverts with genital obsession that some vocal posters have’

because, and only because, it highlights everything that’s inaccurate and exaggerated (maybe even hyperbolic a favourite MN word that’s over used), about the gender woo movement.

I’d say no ‘GC’ women (people) think that. But it’s said and again as a basis, as a foundation, from which to attack the GC view (I also dislike the term ‘Gender Critical’ but it’s a short cut at least).

So yes, it is absolutely on point. Perhaps the whole point.

And I understand your ‘cognitive dissonance’ to an extent. I think most of us seem to have friends who are trans, or know trans women IRL. The difference for some is that they understand women’s fears and perspectives about predatory men. So they respect that. Those trans women, like other men who understand women’s fears and concerns, do not attempt to enter, nor think they should be welcome, in women’s spaces.

2 coffees down, work started. Tea (milk no sugar) to come.

NotAPartyPerson · 28/01/2025 10:34

I would add to this- many of us who've run that gauntlet of abuse from TRAs might have a tendency to not treat others with kid gloves. But I think we're generally fairly reasonable if someone is genuinely coming to a thread with questions or asking us to explain our position. There is a lot of trolling on FWR and Mumsnet in general (and all of social media) and I think some posters are a little naive about the extent of it.

I can understand that. I suppose one of the big problems with online debates is that it can be hard to interpret tone, and it becomes hard to know when people are being genuine or just trolling, which leads everyone to take a defensive stand sometimes - I mean, see the tone of my first post on this thread 🫣 I understand that people's fingers have been burned. I may one day get brave and start my own thread in FWR!

Helleofabore · 28/01/2025 10:34

NotAPartyPerson · 28/01/2025 10:11

OP perceived, I think, the volume of posters disagreeing with her as unpleasant. She named an individual not even on the thread at that point as someone who was an example of what she meant. She said posters on FWR were more male in their posting style. She described the many responses as a pile on and unpleasant. She said she felt she had to leave the thread.

I have been following the thread from the start. I can understand why OP felt overwhelmed at the volume and strength of feeling but I don’t think anyone has been unpleasant to OP. I think some of OP’s comments have been unnecessary, e.g the ‘so unpleasant’ comment.

So if OP feels this thread is an example of what she meant by her original post, I.e feeling ganged up on if you disagree with the prevailing view, then my view, having seen her reaction on this thread is that actually, it’s because she is a bit overwhelmed by or over sensitive to being asked lots of questions or for more evidence/ detail etc.

Actually, I think for the most part this does sum up my issue with FWR (I'm not the OP)! So I suppose I'm saying that a lot of people feel the same way. I find it frustrating that FWR posters may assume everyone agrees with them because lots of people feel unable to engage in the debate. But maybe you don't mind that? Genuinely pondering this, not being passive aggressive.

There are posters who do post to help clarify their thoughts though. And if those posters are up front, they often get loaded with information and opinions from all sides of the discussion (because there are plenty of people who do have different perspectives) and then they are left to make their own decisions.

Unfortunately, what can happen in the thread is that someone comes through and makes a derisive and inflammatory comment about the board and then derails the thread. Or the OP turns around and makes a derisive and inflammatory comment about the board or the posters.

I am not saying that this is what you would do, by the way NotAPartyPerson but I have seen good threads . They were started with clear and good intentions and the OP didn't turn out to be just someone trolling, looking for screenshots or luring in posters to then demonise them, which unfortunately happens more often than not.

Take a thread for instance that was posted to discuss Trump but in that OP the OP took the opportunity to make the point (or imply the point) that FWR or feminists were 'aligned with the far right'. That is never going to be a positive outcome.

But it happens like this all the time. I think you will find that posters on this thread have done threads in that style very recently and that is why this thread has turned out how it has.

ShireMaiden · 28/01/2025 10:36

NotAPartyPerson · 28/01/2025 09:59

Yes, I probably am a bit sad. And reasonably kind, I think.

I think for me it's not that I 'can't back up my arguments', more that I would ideally like to have a more nuanced discussion (I'm not totally opposed to everything I read on FWR) and that feels almost impossible when you have 20+ people battering you with arguments.

Exactly

WinterBones · 28/01/2025 10:36

Helleofabore · 28/01/2025 10:22

I understand that if you have a group of friends that you don't see acting in the way that people describe that you will find it discordant to read about what others who have gender identities do.

I think that maybe it is important to think about the discussions as being about the collective group and the impact on women and girl's rights. And to also understand that just because you don't mind your friends being in female single sex spaces that other people are harmed by it and unfortunately your nice friends being in a public single sex space (and only if they entered and by the sounds of it, they don't) may unintentionally harm others by their decision.

I don't believe though that feminists have argued that all spaces are 'female only'. They have argued that any space that is advertised as female only or 'women only' when there is an expectation that women means female only, that it remains that way. And if a mixed sex space is provided as an alternative.

"I know in my heart i support my trans friends in living their life, except that one, that one i don't, and can't, and what does that say about me?"

It says, Winter, that you have boundaries. And that you should have boundaries. And that maybe what women have been discussing does take a huge amount of time and emotional effort to work through. Only you can do it for yourself. I find myself reevaluating my stance frequently as I get new information. I assume that is what most people do, unless they really are ideologically driven.

I read all the views because I hope that someone can present an argument that does change my thinking and they often do. Reading extreme views that are evidenced and coherent in that person's mind does make people think even if it is jarring and full of true hate and something I disagree with.

So much of the discussion on this thread and on FWR ends up being about whether someone's interpretation accurately represents the event or the statement under discussion. Because, in my opinion, it is only when an accurate interpretation is presented that people can really fully evaluate whether they agree or not and why.

And it is that full discussion to establish an accurate base that interests me. Hence why I, and others, ask to see the information that helped form an opinion.

thank you for this reply, i think you hit a nail on the head... i love learning, and i love conversations that make me think, and i'm always open to changing my viewpoint on stuff if people with more experience/knowledge are willing to share.

It isn't often that something this jarring as this person happens, and it is quite a profound event in how its making me realise where my boundaries are with all this, and i'm still working through how i feel about that, as ultimately, that boundary feels like a challenge to what i believe about tolerance/acceptance of the people around me, and such an epiphany needs time to contemplate, probe and allow to settle... i'm not there yet!

NotAPartyPerson · 28/01/2025 10:38

I understand that @Helleofabore. And I understand why posters in FWR are protective of the space. I hope that if I were to start a thread it would indeed go as respectfully as I might now hope. This discussion has actually given me a bit of hope!

Ereshkigalangcleg · 28/01/2025 10:40

can understand that. I suppose one of the big problems with online debates is that it can be hard to interpret tone, and it becomes hard to know when people are being genuine or just trolling, which leads everyone to take a defensive stand sometimes - I mean, see the tone of my first post on this thread 🫣 I understand that people's fingers have been burned. I may one day get brave and start my own thread in FWR!

I hope you do! Thank you for being so open minded and honest, it's a breath of fresh air.

MarsScarlet · 28/01/2025 10:41

@PepeParapluie

I understand the cumulative effect of many posters challenging you (or any poster) is a bit overwhelming. But I guess what I’m saying is, it’s not because there’s an acceptable viewpoint on FWR and posters are intolerant of dissent. It’s because there is a prevailing viewpoint and posters want to understand or interrogate (in an academic/ debating sense, not a personal sense!) new or dissenting ideas.

What about the tactic they use when they want to put off a discussion where they start swapping cake ideas? It's happened on this very thread, too. That doesn't seem very tolerant nor academic.

OP posts:
Ereshkigalangcleg · 28/01/2025 10:41

Where are the cake recipes?

ArabellaScott · 28/01/2025 10:44

What's with all the 'they' posts, OP? Who is it you mean? Either it's some.posters who are here on this thread, in which case it's a bit rude to 'they' us, or it's too vague for anyone to respond to.

Bannedontherun · 28/01/2025 10:44

<hangs head in shame>? It was eating a Jaffa cake, this is an example of reinterpreting into a cake recipe

Ereshkigalangcleg · 28/01/2025 10:46

Is that it? Grin

NotAPartyPerson · 28/01/2025 10:46

I hope you do! Thank you for being so open minded and honest, it's a breath of fresh air.

Thank you too. It's been great to have the discussion. Not often I leave a thread like this feeling better about things! I'm glad I didn't plop today 😉

MarsScarlet · 28/01/2025 10:47

@Helleofabore

I am not saying that this is what you would do, by the way NotAPartyPerson but I have seen good threads . They were started with clear and good intentions and the OP didn't turn out to be just someone trolling, looking for screenshots or luring in posters to then demonise them, which unfortunately happens more often than not.

Take a thread for instance that was posted to discuss Trump but in that OP the OP took the opportunity to make the point (or imply the point) that FWR or feminists were 'aligned with the far right'. That is never going to be a positive outcome.

But it happens like this all the time. I think you will find that posters on this thread have done threads in that style very recently and that is why this thread has turned out how it has.

Can't posters make threads on whatever they like? (Obviously, FWR-related of course.) I'm not sure what you're saying here.

OP posts:
Helleofabore · 28/01/2025 10:48

WinterBones · 28/01/2025 10:36

thank you for this reply, i think you hit a nail on the head... i love learning, and i love conversations that make me think, and i'm always open to changing my viewpoint on stuff if people with more experience/knowledge are willing to share.

It isn't often that something this jarring as this person happens, and it is quite a profound event in how its making me realise where my boundaries are with all this, and i'm still working through how i feel about that, as ultimately, that boundary feels like a challenge to what i believe about tolerance/acceptance of the people around me, and such an epiphany needs time to contemplate, probe and allow to settle... i'm not there yet!

I have found winterbones that until I came to MN, I had no articulate idea about boundaries. It was robust discussions that I watched and now take part in that allowed me to work out my boundaries.

In being pushed to articulate my thoughts, I realised how I needed accurate information to work it out. This issue became one that was impacting my home life so I started trying to establish what was happening. I started researching it from many different angles. And I realised just how disappointing it is that often our national broadcasters and media don’t give a balanced view. I now look at original source content to then work out if the opinions in the mainstream media are accurate.

It is exhausting. But sometimes this robust discussion about the veracity of information on FWR actually helps enormously because it forces all sorts of links that can be read.

You are not there yet? Of course it takes time. I don’t think there is any personal shortcuts, do you?

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.