@LakieLady
FYi these are the excuses I hear often from defendants, it would not stand up in law. Also just because the defendant had CCTV the owness is not on the driver to prove any thing, I suggest you learn how these things work before quoting me. hmm
If you're actually some sort of legal bod, I suggest you learn how to spell "onus". Spelling it "owness" makes you look a bit - well, twattish, frankly.
Not to mention that the “owness” is (almost) invariably on the prosecution/plaintiff/claimant, so the legal advice is as bad as the spelling.
And that, for the OP to end up in court then either:
- The police/CPS would have to decide it were in the public interest. The police normally have finely tuned noses for twats who have self-punished, so I can’t see that happening.
- CF would have to bring a private prosecution. Also unlikely.
- CF would have to bring a civil case alleging damages, either directly to the car or loss because it was impounded. Since the OP hasn’t damaged the car, and has actively offered a time to release it to which he didn’t turn up, this also seems something of a reach.
OP is fine. CF and his year-wagon are so clearly in the wrong.