Sardine, a bit heavy? - read Thomas Sowell (Philosophy Professor Stanford University) - The Vision of The Anointed (Self-Congratulation as a basis of Social Policy).
It is a post graduate read, ie heavy going with a lot of census comparisons because he needs to prove his point, but his basic premise is:
The West is sleepwalking to disaster because it clings to left liberal ideology and is blind to the discordant EMPIRICAL feedback that those good intentions DON'T WORK and in fact make matters worse.
That these people (limp wristed relativists) are not the majority but are highly articulate and dominate the main institutions of society (education, civil service, law, politics, media) and so have influence far above their actual numbers. That they are motivated by Good Intentions and truly believe that they are morally superior to the silent majority. When faced with evidence that their Visions don't work, their response is to either accuse the person raising the point of being uncaring/racist/not as moral as they (the ad hominem attacks of the left) or to reply that the solution is more (welfare, understanding, etc)
Sowell examines Visions beloved of the left - the 'war on poverty', rehabilitative crime, to name 2 examples, and proves absolutely empirically that rewarding bad choices through welfare has in fact made for MORE poor people. Since the liberalisation of the criminal justice system in the 1960s and the accordance of rights to criminals, crime has rocketed, on every level.
Some recent examples are Labour's disgraceful response (accusations of racism in the working class) to concerns about immigration - a policy they did not discuss with the electorate ONCE before implementing it (highly dysfunctional) - and the arch delusionist himself, Gordon Brown, who bankrupted this country in persuit of his Vision of Fairness For All.
Staggeringly, he has got away with it by blaming the bankers. Whereas in a truly fair world, he would be charged or sectioned.