[quote Quartz2208]@NannyAndJohn I have asked you many questions you haven’t answered and I think you will find I have answered it that yes in my opinion in order to have an effective lockdown you would need a strict one but the social economic/political/geographical/cultural landscape we live in means that’s impossible. Anything else just artificially suppresses to buy you time
@Thewiseoneincognito and @PrincessNutNuts yes we need to develop a coherent strategy in order to manage are way through but not at the expense of industries that won’t come back
Interestingly though I think this thread really does show that no one agrees there are a few posters I share no opinions with and others who I strongly agree with on some points and disagree with on others. I think it’s reflective of wider society[/quote]
Since we opened up on July 19th covid numbers have risen sharply, dropped back down and started rising again.
This tells us that what we do affects whether covid numbers rise or fall.
And that's good news.
We are not powerless.
Our fate is in our own hands.
We can choose to do what is necessary to reduce the chaos and death - or not.
I would prefer a proactive covid strategy designed to keep numbers low.... (8 covid deaths a day May 2021 kind of low.)
....To this boom or bust "Open up, let numbers build to unsustainable levels, close everything down again for months" havoc.
Not least because a lot fewer lives and livelihoods are lost in my plan.
Maybe theatres etc would prefer only being fully open for four or five months a year to being open all year but with HEPA filters, masks, and social distancing etc?
I dunno.
But personally, I'd take full years of April-May 2021 life over years of constant covid chaos.